Hostname: page-component-745bb68f8f-lrblm Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-02-06T10:57:53.571Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

CHARACTERISTICS OF HIGH-QUALITY GUIDELINES

Evaluation of 86 Clinical Guidelines Developed in Ten European Countries and Canada

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  22 January 2003

Jako S. Burgers
Affiliation:
University Medical Centre Nijmegen
Françoise A. Cluzeau
Affiliation:
St. George's Hospital Medical School
Steven E. Hanna
Affiliation:
McMaster University
Claire Hunt
Affiliation:
Institute of Psychiatry
Richard Grol
Affiliation:
University Medical Centre Nijmegen and The AGREE Collaboration
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

Objectives: To identify predictors of high-quality clinical practice guidelines.

Methods: A total of 86 guidelines from 11 countries were assessed by four independent appraisers per guideline using the AGREE instrument (23 items). Six aspects of guideline development were considered to explain the variation in quality scores: care level (primary/secondary care), scope (diagnosis/treatment), type of guideline (new/update), year of publication, type of agency (governmental/professional), and whether the guideline was produced within a structured and coordinated program.

Results: Guidelines produced within a guideline program and by governmental agencies had higher scores than their counterparts. Differences in the applicability of the guidelines could not be explained by the variables studied.

Conclusions: To ensure high quality, clinical guidelines should be produced within a structured and coordinated program. Professional organizations or specialist societies that aim to develop guidelines may adopt quality criteria from leading guideline agencies.

Type
GENERAL ESSAYS
Copyright
© 2003 Cambridge University Press