Hostname: page-component-745bb68f8f-lrblm Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-02-06T00:42:05.990Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The Impact of International Law on Domestic Judgments: The Influence of the Inter-American Court Of Human Rights in the Rulings of the Argentinean Supreme Court Regarding Crimes Against Humanity

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  28 February 2019

Agostina Allori
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

Good afternoon. I would like to thank the International Association of Law Libraries, the organizing committee and especially Gloria Orrego Hoyos for the invitation. It is a real pleasure and honor for me to be here.

Today I will talk about the influence of the Inter-American Court of Human Rights in the rulings of Argentina's Supreme Court. I will focus particularly on the importance that the Argentinian Supreme Court gave to the Inter-American Court in the most significant decisions during the process of reopening cases of crimes against humanity.

Type
Articles
Information
International Journal of Legal Information , Volume 43 , Issue 1 , Spring 2015 , pp. 9 - 13
Copyright
Copyright © 2015 by the International Association of Law Libraries. 

References

1 Among them, the work of Basch, et al. Google Scholar

2 See, e.g., Acosta, 1998; Boico, 2000; and Felicetti 2000. Google Scholar

3 Literally, it means “Due Obedience.”Google Scholar

4 Meaning “Full Stop.”Google Scholar

5 This case declared the applicability of crimes against humanity.Google Scholar

6 It declared the unconstitutionally of the Acts.Google Scholar

7 It reopened the case Riveros and declared the unconstitutionality of Menem's Executive pardons.Google Scholar

8 Paragraph 41.Google Scholar

9 Point 23.Google Scholar

10 Point 31.Google Scholar

11 Paragraph 124.Google Scholar