Case note. Second Circuit holds that false statements contained in
    customs forms warrant forfeiture of ancient Gold Phiale - hotly
    contested foreign patrimony issue not reached by the court: United
    States v. An Antique Platter of Gold

CJ Shapreau

doi:10.1017/S0940739100770949

Case note. Second Circuit holds that false statements contained incustoms forms warrant forfeiture of ancient Gold Phiale - hotlycontested foreign patrimony issue not reached by the court: UnitedStates v. An Antique Platter of Gold

Published online by Cambridge University Press: 18 February 2005

CJ Shapreau

Show author details

CJ Shapreau: Affiliation:
Giancarlo & Gnazzo, San Francisco, CA, USA

Article contents

Abstract

Rights & Permissions

Abstract

An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. As you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'

Type: Research Article
Information: International Journal of Cultural Property , Volume 9 , Issue 1 , January 2000 , pp. 49 - 137

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/S0940739100770949 [Opens in a new window]

Article contents

Case note. Second Circuit holds that false statements contained incustoms forms warrant forfeiture of ancient Gold Phiale - hotlycontested foreign patrimony issue not reached by the court: UnitedStates v. An Antique Platter of Gold

Abstract

Save article to Kindle

Save article to Dropbox

Save article to Google Drive

Reply to: Submit a response

Your details

You have entered the maximum number of contributors

Conflicting interests