Hostname: page-component-745bb68f8f-b6zl4 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-02-06T02:10:12.440Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Application of pulsed electric fields for the elimination of highly drug-resistant Candida grown under modelled microgravity conditions

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  04 September 2018

Eglė Lastauskienė*
Affiliation:
Institute of Biosciences, Center of Life Sciences, Vilnius University, Sauletekio ave 7, 10257, Vilnius, Lithuania
Vitalij Novickij
Affiliation:
Institute of High Magnetic Fields, Vilnius Gediminas Technical University, Naugarduko st. 41, 03227, Vilnius, Lithuania
Auksė Zinkevičienė
Affiliation:
Department of Immunology, State Research Institute Centre for Innovative Medicine, Santariškių st. 5, 08406, Vilnius, Lithuania
Irutė Girkontaitė
Affiliation:
Department of Immunology, State Research Institute Centre for Innovative Medicine, Santariškių st. 5, 08406, Vilnius, Lithuania
Algimantas Paškevičius
Affiliation:
Laboratory of Biodeterioration Research, Nature Research Centre, Akademijos st. 2, 08412, Vilnius, Lithuania Laboratory of Microbiology of the Centre of Laboratory Medicine, Vilnius University Hospital Santaros Clinics, Santariškių st. 2, 08661, Vilnius, Lithuania
Jurgita Švedienė
Affiliation:
Laboratory of Biodeterioration Research, Nature Research Centre, Akademijos st. 2, 08412, Vilnius, Lithuania
Svetlana Markovskaja
Affiliation:
Laboratory of Mycology, Nature Research Centre, Zaliuju ezeru st. 49, 08406, Vilnius, Lithuania
Jurij Novickij
Affiliation:
Institute of High Magnetic Fields, Vilnius Gediminas Technical University, Naugarduko st. 41, 03227, Vilnius, Lithuania
*
Author for correspondence: Eglė Lastauskienė, E-mail: eglelast@gmail.com
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Candida lusitaniae and C. guilliermondii are perfect model organisms for the study of Candida genera behaviour in various conditions. Both of them are rare pathogens capable to cause candidiasis in the patients with weakened immune system and can undergo morphology switches related to the increased antifungal drug resistance. Candida genera yeasts are able to inhabit diverse range of ecological niches including space ships and space stations. During the long-term expeditions, astronauts are affected by various factors that can change the state immune system. In such conditions, the commensal usually non-pathogenic microorganisms can spread through the body of the host and cause infections. Weakened immune system and limited use of drugs in spaceships promote the search of the alternative methods for the biocontrol of microorganisms. Several studies demonstrate that microorganisms are altering their gene expression, physiology, morphology, pathogenicity and evolving resistance to the antifungals under microgravity conditions. Our research indicated that switch to the pseudohyphae morphology leads up 30-fold increased resistance to amphotericin B in C. lusitaniae and C. guilliermondii. Cultivation of yeasts in rotary cell culture system (RCCS) is related to the altered cell growth and resistance to the antifungal treatment. Our results showed that growth in the RCCS led to the extreme increase in cell resistance to amphotericin B as compared with the standard growth conditions. In our research, we applied electroporation for the biocontrol of two Candida species. C. lusitaniae and C. guilliermondii cells grown in RCCS exhibited significantly increased survivability after pulsed electric field (PEF) treatment in comparison with cells grown under routine conditions. We have shown that PEF bursts of 2.5–25 kV cm−1 of 100 µs × 8 duration display a dose-dependent permeabilization of both studied Candida species. Our research indicated that budding cells and pseudohyphae morphology cells, with increased resistance to amphotericin B, can be effectively inactivated after applying PEF higher than 15 kV cm−1.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2018 

Introduction

Candida lusitaniae and C. guilliermondii are rare pathogens that have gained interest since they easily acquire resistance to antifungal treatment (Hawkins and Baddour, Reference Hawkins and Baddour2003). They can undergo morphological switching and form pseudohyphae structures. Phenotypic switching is induced in the yeast population by the external signals such as pH, temperature and mating-associated factors. Pseudohyphae morphology is associated with various processes related to Candida virulence: colonization, rapid dissemination in the host tissues, adhesion to host surfaces, biofilm formation (Thompson et al., Reference Thompson, Carlisle and Kadosh2011). Pseudohyphae phenotype displays an increased antifungal drug resistance up to ten times as well (Miller et al., Reference Miller, Dick and Merz2006). Antifungal treatment of Candida-caused diseases is difficult since the metabolism and cell structure of the pathogen are similar to the host. The side effect of the antifungal treatment as well as growing resistance to the antifungal treatment and reported multidrug resistance cases (Khan et al., Reference Khan, Malik and Ahmad2012; Asner et al., Reference Asner, Giulieri, Diezi, Marchetti and Sanglard2015) promote the new studies of the alternative methods for the biocontrol of Candida yeasts. Particularly the problem has high actuality in space stations where the access to drugs and treatment options are limited.

Environment of the spaceships and international space stations is very specific and colonized by different types of bacteria, viruses and yeast (Castro et al., Reference Castro, Thrasher, Healy, Ott and Pierson2004; Cohrs et al., Reference Cohrs, Mehta, Schmid, Gilden and Pierson2008; Horneck et al., Reference Horneck, Klaus and Mancinelli2010). Microorganism can persist on the surfaces of the devices in the air, water and other biological objects including astronauts (Nickerson et al., Reference Nickerson, Ott, Wilson, Ramamurthy and Pierson2004; Ott et al., Reference Ott, Bruce and Pierson2004). Candida yeasts are commensal microorganisms that can colonize human body. Their growth is limited by the host immune system and competition with other microorganisms occupying the same locations. In the patient suffering skin diseases, when the immune system is reduced or after antibiotic treatment, Candida yeasts can easily spread in the human body. During long spaceflights, organisms of the astronauts are affected by ionizing radiation, UV radiation, stress, closed environment thus can lead to the decreased immunity, allergic diseases and increased risk to suffer microorganism-caused infections (Aviles et al., Reference Aviles, Belay, Vance and Sonnenfeld2005; Sonnenfeld, Reference Sonnenfeld2005; Crucian et al., Reference Crucian, Stowe, Pierson and Sams2008, Reference Crucian, Zwart, Mehta, Stowe, Uchakin, Quiriarte, Pierson, Smith and Sams2013). Disbalance in immune system leads to the increased rate of infections and allergies as well (Montoro et al., Reference Montoro, Mullol, Jáuregui, Dávila, Ferrer, Bartra, Del Cuvillo, Sastre and Valero2009). The pathogenicity of the microorganisms is altered in space and microgravity conditions and non-pathogenic yeast can change the gene expression programmes and cause diseases (Crabbé et al., Reference Crabbé, Pycke, Van Houdt, Monsieurs, Nickerson, Leys and Cornelis2010). The use of the antimicrobial and antifungal drugs during the long spaceflights under the weakened immune system conditions is strictly limited. Therefore, search for the alternative methods for the elimination of the microorganisms as well as analysis of the microorganism physiology under microgravity conditions is one of the main tasks of NASA (Castro et al., Reference Castro, Thrasher, Healy, Ott and Pierson2004; Horneck et al., Reference Horneck, Klaus and Mancinelli2010). For the simulation of the low shear microgravity conditions in earth, rotary cell cultivation system (RCCS) is used. Cell growth in RCCS affects the main cell processes such as DNA replication and repair, response to environmental conditions, mitochondria functions and changes cell viability and resistance to the various stress conditions (Nislow et al., Reference Nislow, Lee, Allen, Giaever, Smith, Gebbia, Stodieck, Hammond, Birdsall and Hammond2015). In this work, we study the effects of modelled microgravity conditions on C. lusitaniae and C. guilliermondii cells and evaluate the feasibility of electroporation for biocontrol of RCCS affected and non-affected Candida species.

Electroporation (electropermeabilization) is the disruption of the cell membrane potential resulting in the hydrophilic pore formation (Teissie et al., Reference Teissie, Golzio and Rols2005; Teissie, Reference Teissie2014), therefore permeability of the cell membrane can be increased when external electric field pulses are applied to the cells. Electroporation is successfully used in vitro and in vivo applications and the most attractive feature is that it is universal for all the cell types (Rems and Miklavčič, Reference Rems and Miklavčič2016). Electropermeabilization can be reversible when pores in the cell membrane are closed after a certain period, and irreversible, that leads to the cell death (Krassowska and Filev, Reference Krassowska and Filev2007). Electroporation is successfully applied in electrochemotherapy (Mir, Reference Mir2001; Sersa et al., Reference Sersa, Miklavcic, Cemazar, Rudolf, Pucihar and Snoj2008; Sersa et al., Reference Sersa, Cemazar and Snoj2009; Miklavčič et al., Reference Miklavčič, Mali, Kos, Heller and Serša2014), electrogenetransfer (Li, Reference Li2004; Andre and Mir, Reference Andre and Mir2010), food industry (Sack et al., Reference Sack, Sigler, Frenzel, Eing, Arnold, Michelberger, Frey, Attmann, Stukenbrock and Müller2010; Saulis, Reference Saulis2010) as well it has potential for wound treatment similarly to electrotherapy (Ferguson et al., Reference Ferguson, Byrnes, Sun, Marti, Bonde, Duncan and Harmon2005; Kambouris et al., Reference Kambouris, Zagoriti, Lagoumintzis and Poulas2014; Novickij et al., Reference Novickij, Grainys, Lastauskienė, Kananavičiūtė, Pamedytytė, Zinkevičienė, Kalėdienė, Novickij, Paškevičius and Švedienė2015).

Material and methods

Yeasts and cultivation conditions

Previously described C. lusitaniae C18 and C. guilliermondii C94 clinical isolates were used in our research (Zinkeviciene et al., Reference Zinkeviciene, Vaiciulioniene, Baranauskiene, Kvedariene, Emuzyte and Citavicius2011; Lastauskiene et al., Reference Lastauskiene, Zinkevičiene, Girkontaite, Kaunietis and Kvedariene2014).

For the electroporation assay, yeast cells were grown in 10 ml YPD medium (2% glucose, 2% peptone, 1% yeast extract) on a rotary shaker at 130 rpm, overnight at 30°C. Then, cells were harvested by centrifugation at 2000 rpm for 5 min, three times washed with 1 M sorbitol and resuspended in 1 ml 1 M sorbitol. The final concentration was 109 CFU ml−1.

Antifungal assay

For the pseudohyphae induction, C. lusitaniae and C. guilliermondii cell suspensions (1 × 103–5 × 103 CFU ml−1) were plated on YPD plates supplemented with 1 mM CuSO4 (Favel et al., Reference Favel, Michel-Nguyen, Peyron, Martin, Thomachot, Datry, Bouchara, Challier, Noël, Chastin and Regli2003; Miller et al., Reference Miller, Dick and Merz2006). Yeasts were incubated for 5 days at 35°C in the dark and the number of colonies exhibiting the original and variant phenotypes were counted. For the reversal studies, colonies showing different phenotypes were separately grown in the liquid YPD medium for 48 h. On the YPD-CuSO4 medium, 100 µl of 1 × 103–5 × 103 CFU ml−1 suspension was plated again and the ability to maintain parental phenotype was evaluated, fulfilling the criteria for phenotype switching and showing that pseudohyphae formation occurred as a morphology switching, but not as a random mutation event.

Determination of the minimal inhibitory concentration (MIC) of amphotericin B was performed by microdilution in 96-well plate and agar diffusion methods. For the microdilution method, 100 µl of 106–107 CFU ml−1 suspension was added to the 100 µl of the YPD medium supplemented with 0.005, 0.01, 0.1, 1 and 2 mg ml−1 of amphotericin B dissolved in dimethyl sulfoxide and incubated at 35°C for 48 h. As the sterility control, YPD medium alone was used. Cell suspension in YPD medium served as a positive control. For the agar diffusion method, 106 CFU ml−1 suspension was mixed with the YPD medium. One hundred microlitres of the tested substance of concentrations listed above was added to the well. MIC was determined as the concentration with the visible inhibition zone around the well. All tests were performed in triplicate.

RCCS conditions

Rotary cell culture system Synthecon RCCS-1(USA) was used. This system ensures bubble-free membrane-based oxygenation, which results in a gentle culturing and the vertical move rotation. C. lusitaniae and C. guilliermondii cell suspensions were grown overnight in the rotary shaker at 130 rpm, 30°C. One microlitre of the suspension was transferred to the 10 ml sterile YPD medium and grown for 16 h in the rotary cell culture system at 30°C, 22.5 rpm.

Electroporation setup and parameters

For pulse generation, the 0–3 kV, 60 A square wave pulse generator (100 ns–1 ms) that has been developed in the Institute of High Magnetic Fields (VGTU, Vilnius, Lithuania) was applied (Novickij et al., Reference Novickij, Grainys, Lastauskienė, Kananavičiūtė, Pamedytytė, Kalėdienė, Novickij and Miklavčič2016). The electric pulses were generated in electroporation cuvette with 1 mm gap between the electrodes (VWR International, Radnor, PA, USA). The square wave 100 µs × 8 pulse bursts of 2.5–25 kV cm−1 have been generated at the repetitive frequency of 1 Hz. The waveform of the pulse is presented in Fig. 1. In order to determine the threshold electric field when electroporation occurs, the amplitude of electric field was increased with a step of 2.5 kV cm−1.

Fig. 1. The waveform of the applied pulses.

For the evaluation of cell permeabilization, 73 µl of 109 cell suspension was mixed with 7 µl, 50 µM propidium iodide (PI) and transferred to electroporation cuvette for further pulsed treatment. After electropermeabilization, yeast cells were incubated for 5 min at room temperature. Evaluation of the membrane permeabilization was carried out by flow cytometry at 550 nm wavelength, using Amnis Flow Sight system (Amnis, Seattle, WA, USA).

For the cell viability analysis, CFU count was performed. Seventy-three microlitres of 109 cell suspension was subjected to the various strength pulsed electric field (PEF). After the treatment, cells were plated onto YPD plates and incubated at 30°C in the dark. After 48 h of growth, appeared colonies were counted.

Results

Analysis of pseudohyphae structures showed that altered phenotypes appeared in the C. lusitaniae and C. guilliermondii populations with the frequency of 10−2. They were reversible and parental phenotypes after the reversal studies were maintained, indicating the morphology switching – not a random mutation event (Fig. 2).

Fig. 2. Pseudohyphae formed by C. lusitaniae. Microscopy analysis showed pseudohyphae formation and cells with the altered phenotype that can undergo further phenotypic switching.

After successful pseudohyphae induction, evaluation of the antifungal drug resistance was performed. In the antifungal drug susceptibility assay, amphotericin B was used for identification of the increased drug resistance phenotypes. The MIC detected by both – microdilution and agar diffusion methods showed 0.01 mg ml−1 MIC of amphotericin B for the cellular phenotype of both Candida strains. After the pseudohyphae induction, the MIC of amphotericin B increased significantly – ten times for C. lusitaniae and 20 times for C. guilliermondii pseudohyphae morphology. Cell cultivation in the RCCS system led to the formation of even more resistant phenotype of both tested Candida species. MIC of amphotericin B grew up to 0.2 mg ml−1 for C. lusitaniae and to 0.32 mg ml−1 for C. guilliermondii cells grown in RCCS conditions (Table 1).

Table 1. Minimal inhibitory concentrations of amphotericin B in three types of C. lusitaniae and C. guilliermondii cells

C. lusitaniae and C. guilliermondii cells were subjected to the 2.5–25 kV cm−1 PEF of 8 × 100 µs duration pulses. Results of the cell permeabilization analysis performed by flow cytometry are presented in Fig. 3. Statistically significant difference (P < 0.05) in fluorescent dye uptake can be observed already after applying 10 kV cm−1 PEF. Further increase of PEF amplitude results in an increased permeabilization rate until it reaches saturation at 20 kV cm−1. The percentage of PI-positive cell in the control samples did not exceed 7%. The gates were positioned in the PEF-untreated control sample according to the results obtained by staining Candida cells with PI and performing fluorescent microscopy analysis (Nicon Eclipse 80i, Japan). The shift of the fluorescence spectra can be observed after treatment or the cells with PEF showing increased number in PI-positive (permeabilized cells) (Fig. 4). All the experiments were repeated in triplicates and reliability of the results was confirmed by fluorescent microscopy as well.

Fig. 3. Flow cytometry analysis results of C. lusitaniae and C. guilliermondii permeabilization rate after applying 2.5–25 kV cm1 PEF.

Fig. 4. Fluorescence spectra and determination of the analysis gates. (A) 0 kV cm1, PEF untreated, control sample; (B) 15 kV cm1 8 × 100 µs PEF; (C) 25 kV cm1 8 × 100 µs PEF.

Since the electric field in the range of 2.5–7.5 kV cm−1 did not induce a statistically significant increase in reversible cell permeabilization, further in the study, the C. lusitaniae and C. guilliermondii cellular and pseudohyphae phenotypes were subjected to 7.525 kV cm−1 PEF.

After applying 10 kV cm−1 PEF, cell viability decreased significantly if compared with the untreated control (Fig. 5). Percentage of the irreversibly permeabilized cells increased in a dose-dependent manner. After applying 20, 22.5 and 25 kV cm−1, 36 ± 5%, 29 ± 4% and 21 ± 4% of CFU were detected, respectively. Permeabilization rate of the pseudohyphae phenotype of C. lusitaniae showed a similar dose-dependent result. At 7.5 and 12.5 kV cm−1, no significant CFU loss was observed when compared with the untreated control. The significant loss in viability in pseudohyphae morphology was observed after applying 15 kV cm−1 PEF and it decreased in the dose-dependent manner. These results showed that applied PEF parameters are suitable for the inactivation of both morphological forms.

Fig. 5. CFU of the PEF-treated C. lusitaniae budding cells grown in standard conditions, pseudohyphae phenotype and under microgravity grown cells showed significantly increased resistance after cultivation under microgravity conditions.

The cellular and pseudohyphae morphology in RCCS grown cells exhibited significantly increased resistance (P < 0.05) to the applied 20, 22.5 and 25 kV cm−1 PEF.

C. guilliermondii showed in generally around 10% higher cell viability in test conditions as compared with C. lusitaniae (Fig. 6).

Fig. 6. Susceptibility to the applied PEF of C. guilliermondii cells grown in standard conditions, pseudohyphae phenotype and under microgravity grown cells.

C. guilliermondii viability displayed dose-dependent inactivation rate. RCCS growth has increased the resistance to the applied PEF (P < 0.05) already after applying 12.5 kV cm−1 PEF indicating the new, highly resistant phenotype.

Discussion

Numerous studies have confirmed that growth, physiology, morphology and virulence are altered in microorganisms during the spaceflights (Nickerson et al., Reference Nickerson, Ott, Wilson, Ramamurthy and Pierson2004). Specific environment in the space ships and space stations is affecting both: the microorganism and the host. Microgravity, UV and ionizing radiation, stress and limited space conditions can weaken organism immunity (Crucian et al., Reference Crucian, Stowe, Pierson and Sams2008). Candida-caused infection are closely related with the weak immune system.

In this study, we applied electroporation for the biocontrol of amphotericin B-resistant phenotypes of Candida yeasts. We showed that phenotype switching due to the pseudohyphae formation and growth under microgravity conditions were associated with changes in amphotericin B MIC profiles. In this study, MICs of at least ten dilutions higher were apparent for pseudohyphae phenotype compared with the cellular morphology. Yeast cell grown under microgravity conditions exhibited 20 and 32 dilutions higher resistance to amphotericin B when compared with the normal cells and two and 1.6 times higher resistance when compared with the pseudohyphae morphology for C. lusitaniae and C. guilliermondii, respectively. The results indicate the new possible phenotypes that are associated with the extreme resistance to amphotericin B. Resistance breakpoints for polyenes have not been determined, but most clinicians use a MIC of 1.0 µg ml−1 to indicate resistance to amphotericin B (Messer et al., Reference Messer, Jones and Fritsche2006; Messer et al., Reference Messer, Moet, Kirby and Jones2009; Pfaller et al., Reference Pfaller, Castanheira, Messer, Moet and Jones2010).

To our knowledge, this research is the first study which uses electroporation for the inactivation of both morphological forms and microgravity-affected Candida yeasts. We have shown that pseudohyphae morphology displayed slightly higher viability rate if compared with the cellular phenotype after applying 7.5–12.5 kV cm−1 PEF (Fig. 4), meanwhile the inactivation rate for the microgravity-affected cells was the same (Fig. 5).

However, the 15–22.5 kV cm−1 treatment resulted in a similar cell inactivation efficacy for both morphological types, however the resistance to PEF increased in the cells grown under microgravity conditions. We believe that the result was influenced by the dependence of the induced transmembrane potential on the morphological structure of the cells. In case of a cellular morphology, the dependence is straight-forward, having a linear proportionality with increase of PEF amplitude (Krassowska and Filev, Reference Krassowska and Filev2007); however, for irregularly shaped cells, the distortion of the spatial distribution of the induced transmembrane potential occurs (Pucihar et al., Reference Pucihar, Kotnik, Valič and Miklavčič2006). As a result, the activation of the increased membrane permeability is completed by both the spatial position of the cells and angular distribution of the irregularly shaped cells in respect to the electric field vector, which both affect the density of induced pores, number of pores and the efficacy of permeabilization in overall (Valič et al., Reference Valič, Pavlin and Miklavčič2004; Pucihar et al., Reference Pucihar, Miklavčič and Kotnik2009; Kotnik et al., Reference Kotnik, Pucihar and Miklavčič2010).

At the same time, microgravity conditions seem to alter the gene expression pattern in C. lusitaniae causing increased resistance to both chemical compounds and physical treatment. Distribution of the nutrients and metabolites is changed around the microorganisms due to the lack of sedimentation and can alter the cell growth (Nickerson et al., Reference Nickerson, Ott, Wilson, Ramamurthy and Pierson2004); this leads to shortened lag phase, increased biomass and increased production of the secondary metabolites (Klaus, Reference Klaus2003). Changed fluid dynamics and extracellular transport efficiency might be the cause of changed cell growth in microgravity conditions (Kacena and Todd, Reference Kacena and Todd1997). The mechanism of the antifungal resistance is remaining unclear. The possible explanation could be related to the microbial growth kinetics and changes in cellular transport causing massive efflux of antifungal compounds from the cell (Tixador et al., Reference Tixador, Richoilley, Gasset, Templier, Bes, Moatti and Lapchine1985). It was shown that transcriptional profiling and gene expression analysis of bacteria show alterations in the metabolic pathways that can be related to the increased resistance to antibiotics in bacteria (Wilson et al., Reference Wilson, Ott, Höner zu Bentrup, Ramamurthy, Quick, Porwollik, Cheng, McClelland, Tsaprailis, Radabaugh, Hunt, Fernandez, Richter, Shah, Kilcoyne, Joshi, Nelman-Gonzalez, Hing, Parra, Dumars, Norwood, Bober, Devich, Ruggles, Goulart, Rupert, Stodieck, Stafford, Catella, Schurr, Buchanan, Morici, McCracken, Allen, Baker-Coleman, Hammond, Vogel, Nelson, Pierson, Stefanyshyn-Piper and Nickerson2007; Crabbé et al., Reference Crabbé, Pycke, Van Houdt, Monsieurs, Nickerson, Leys and Cornelis2010). Microgravity affects the core cellular processes as growth control via RNA and ribosomal biogenesis, metabolism, DNA repair, replication, response to pH, mitochondria function in yeast (Nislow et al., Reference Nislow, Lee, Allen, Giaever, Smith, Gebbia, Stodieck, Hammond, Birdsall and Hammond2015) that can contribute to increased antifungal drug resistance as well as PEF resistance. Microgravity conditions can have possible influence on the cell wall and membrane structure and integrity, as well as reparation of the hydrophilic pores after the PEF treatment. We suggested that increased general cell vitality and cellular damage reparation rate can contribute to the faster and more efficient restoration of the cell membrane integrity increasing survivability of the PEF-treated cells.

The determined PEF-induced inactivation and inability of microorganisms to form complete resistance to PEF are the major advantages, which will be responsible for the interest in the methodology. The technique may be potentially used as an effective wound decontamination method. Pseudohyphae-associated biofilm formations may alter the response of yeast to PEF; however, biofilms can be successfully eradicated by electroporation after adequate parametrical analysis. The dependence of the effect on the applied electrodes and pulse delivery system can be also highlighted as a major limitation; however, the methodology is widely spread in the area of cancer treatment and thus, all the same limitations apply, which are successfully countered. Lastly, electroporation is safe, non-toxic and the acquisition of the bureaucratic base for clinical treatment presumably will be easier.

In conclusion, our results showed that C. lusitaniae and C. guilliermondii cells grown under simulated microgravity conditions gained up to 30-fold higher resistance to amphotericin B. RCCS significantly increased survivability of both Candida species after PEF treatment as well in comparison with cells grown under routine conditions. Highly drug-resistant Candida yeast can be effectively inactivated after applying PEF higher than 15 kV cm−1.

Funding

This work was supported by the Research Council of Lithuania Towards the Future Technologies Program project ELMIGRAV (Grant number – LAT-02/2016).

Conflict of interest

None.

References

Andre, FM and Mir, LM (2010) Nucleic acids electrotransfer in vivo: mechanisms and practical aspects. Current Gene Therapy 10, 267280.10.2174/156652310791823380Google Scholar
Asner, SA, Giulieri, S, Diezi, M, Marchetti, O and Sanglard, D (2015) Acquired multidrug antifungal resistance in Candida lusitaniae during therapy. Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy 59, 77157722.Google Scholar
Aviles, H, Belay, T, Vance, M and Sonnenfeld, G (2005) Effects of space flight conditions on the function of the immune system and catecholamine production simulated in a rodent model of hindlimb unloading. Neuroimmunomodulation 12, 173181.Google Scholar
Castro, VA, Thrasher, AN, Healy, M, Ott, CM and Pierson, DL (2004) Microbial characterization during the early habitation of the international space station. Microbial Ecology 47, 119126.10.1007/s00248-003-1030-yGoogle Scholar
Cohrs, RJ, Mehta, SK, Schmid, DS, Gilden, DH and Pierson, DL (2008) Asymptomatic reactivation and shed of infectious varicella zoster virus in astronauts. Journal of Medical Virology 80, 11161122.10.1002/jmv.21173Google Scholar
Crabbé, A, Pycke, B, Van Houdt, R, Monsieurs, P, Nickerson, C, Leys, N and Cornelis, P (2010) Response of pseudomonas aeruginosa PAO1 to low shear modelled microgravity involves AlgU regulation. Environmental Microbiology 12, 15451564.Google Scholar
Crucian, B, Zwart, S, Mehta, S, Stowe, R, Uchakin, P, Quiriarte, H, Pierson, D, Smith, SM, Sams, C (2013) Immune system dysregulation persists during long-duration spaceflight. Journal of Allergy and Clinical Immunology 131, AB210.Google Scholar
Crucian, BE, Stowe, RP, Pierson, DL and Sams, CF (2008) Immune system dysregulation following short- vs long-duration spaceflight. Aviation, Space, and Environmental Medicine 79, 835843.Google Scholar
Favel, A, Michel-Nguyen, A, Peyron, F, Martin, C, Thomachot, L, Datry, A, Bouchara, JP, Challier, S, Noël, T, Chastin, C and Regli, P (2003) Colony morphology switching of Candida lusitaniae and acquisition of multidrug resistance during treatment of a renal infection in a newborn: case report and review of the literature. Diagnostic Microbiology and Infectious Disease 47, 331339Google Scholar
Ferguson, M, Byrnes, C, Sun, L, Marti, G, Bonde, P, Duncan, M and Harmon, JW (2005) Wound healing enhancement: electroporation to address a classic problem of military medicine. World Journal of Surgery 29(Suppl. 1), S55S59.Google Scholar
Hawkins, JL and Baddour, LM (2003) Candida lusitaniae infections in the era of fluconazole availability. Journal of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology 36, e14e18.Google Scholar
Horneck, G, Klaus, DM and Mancinelli, RL (2010) Space microbiology. Microbiology and Molecular Biology Reviews 74, 121156.Google Scholar
Kacena, M and Todd, P (1997) Growth characteristics of E. coli and B. subtilis cultured on an agar substrate in microgravity. Microgravity Science and Technology 10, 5862.Google Scholar
Kambouris, ME, Zagoriti, Z, Lagoumintzis, G and Poulas, K (2014) From therapeutic electrotherapy to electroceuticals: formats, applications and prospects of electrostimulation. Annual Research & Review in Biology 4, 30543070.10.9734/ARRB/2014/10563Google Scholar
Khan, MSA, Malik, A and Ahmad, I (2012) Anti-candidal activity of essential oils alone and in combination with amphotericin B or fluconazole against multi-drug resistant isolates of Candida albicans. Medical Mycology 50, 3342.Google Scholar
Klaus, DM (2003) Space microbiology: microgravity and microorganisms. Encyclopedia of Environmental Microbiology 1–6, 29963003.Google Scholar
Kotnik, T, Pucihar, G and Miklavčič, D (2010) Induced transmembrane voltage and its correlation with electroporation-mediated molecular transport. Journal of Membrane Biology 236, 313.10.1007/s00232-010-9279-9Google Scholar
Krassowska, W and Filev, PD (2007) Modeling electroporation in a single cell. Biophysical Journal 92, 404417.Google Scholar
Lastauskiene, E, Zinkevičiene, A, Girkontaite, I, Kaunietis, A and Kvedariene, V (2014) Formic acid and acetic acid induce a programmed cell death in pathogenic Candida species. Current Microbiology 69, 303310.Google Scholar
Li, SL (2004) Electroporation gene therapy: new developments in vivo and in vitro. Current Gene Therapy 4, 309316.Google Scholar
Messer, SA, Jones, RN and Fritsche, TR (2006) International surveillance of Candida spp. and Aspergillus spp.: report from the SENTRY Antimicrobial Surveillance Program (2003). Journal of Clinical Microbiology 44, 17821787.Google Scholar
Messer, SA, Moet, GJ, Kirby, JT and Jones, RN (2009) Activity of contemporary antifungal agents, including the novel echinocandin anidulafungin, tested against Candida spp., Cryptococcus spp., and Aspergillus spp.: report from the SENTRY antimicrobial surveillance program (2006 to 2007). Journal of Clinical Microbiology 47, 19421946.Google Scholar
Miklavčič, D, Mali, B, Kos, B, Heller, R and Serša, G (2014) Electrochemotherapy: from the drawing board into medical practice. Biomedical Engineering Online 13, 29.Google Scholar
Miller, NS, Dick, JD and Merz, WG (2006) Phenotypic switching in Candida lusitaniae on copper sulfate indicator agar: association with amphotericin B resistance and filamentation. Journal of Clinical Microbiology 44, 15361539.Google Scholar
Mir, LM (2001) Therapeutic perspectives of in vivo cell electropermeabilization. Bioelectrochemistry 53, 110.Google Scholar
Montoro, J, Mullol, J, Jáuregui, I, Dávila, I, Ferrer, M, Bartra, J, Del Cuvillo, A, Sastre, J and Valero, A (2009) Stress and allergy. Journal of Investigational Allergology & Clinical Immunology 19, 4047.Google Scholar
Nickerson, CA, Ott, CM, Wilson, JW, Ramamurthy, R and Pierson, DL (2004) Microbial responses to microgravity and other low-shear environments. Microbiology and Molecular Biology Reviews 68, 345361.Google Scholar
Nislow, C, Lee, AY, Allen, PL, Giaever, G, Smith, A, Gebbia, M, Stodieck, LS, Hammond, JS, Birdsall, HH and Hammond, TG (2015) Genes required for survival in microgravity revealed by genome-wide yeast deletion collections cultured during spaceflight. Biomed Research International 2015, 976458.Google Scholar
Novickij, V, Grainys, A, Lastauskienė, E, Kananavičiūtė, R, Pamedytytė, D, Zinkevičienė, A, Kalėdienė, L, Novickij, J, Paškevičius, A and Švedienė, J (2015) Growth inhibition and membrane permeabilization of Candida lusitaniae using varied pulse shape electroporation. Biomed Research International 2015, 457896.Google Scholar
Novickij, V, Grainys, A, Lastauskienė, E, Kananavičiūtė, R, Pamedytytė, D, Kalėdienė, L, Novickij, J and Miklavčič, D (2016) Pulsed electromagnetic field assisted in vitro electroporation: a pilot study. Scientific Reports 6, 33537.Google Scholar
Ott, CM, Bruce, RJ and Pierson, DL (2004) Microbial characterization of free floating condensate aboard the mir space station. Microbial Ecology 47, 133136.10.1007/s00248-003-1038-3Google Scholar
Pfaller, MA, Castanheira, M, Messer, SA, Moet, GJ and Jones, RN (2010) Variation in Candida spp. distribution and antifungal resistance rates among bloodstream infection isolates by patient age: report from the SENTRY Antimicrobial Surveillance Program (2008–2009). Diagnostic Microbiology and Infectious Disease 68, 278283.Google Scholar
Pucihar, G, Kotnik, T, Valič, B and Miklavčič, D (2006) Numerical determination of transmembrane voltage induced on irregularly shaped cells. Annals of Biomedical Engineering 34, 642652.Google Scholar
Pucihar, G, Miklavčič, D and Kotnik, T (2009) A time-dependent numerical model of transmembrane voltage inducement and electroporation of irregularly shaped cells. IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering 56, 14911501.Google Scholar
Rems, L and Miklavčič, D (2016) Tutorial: electroporation of cells in complex materials and tissue. Journal of Applied Physics 119, 201101.Google Scholar
Sack, M, Sigler, J, Frenzel, S, Eing, C, Arnold, J, Michelberger, T, Frey, W, Attmann, F, Stukenbrock, L and Müller, G (2010) Research on industrial-scale electroporation devices fostering the extraction of substances from biological tissue. Food Engineering Reviews 2, 147156.Google Scholar
Saulis, G (2010) Electroporation of cell membranes: the fundamental effects of pulsed electric fields in food processing. Food Engineering Reviews 2, 5273.Google Scholar
Sersa, G, Miklavcic, D, Cemazar, M, Rudolf, Z, Pucihar, G and Snoj, M (2008) Electrochemotherapy in treatment of tumours. European Journal of Surgical Oncology 34, 232240.Google Scholar
Sersa, G, Cemazar, M and Snoj, M (2009) Electrochemotherapy of tumours. Current Oncology 16, 3435.Google Scholar
Sonnenfeld, G (2005) The immune system in space, including Earth-based benefits of space-based research. Current Pharmaceutical Biotechnology 6, 343349.Google Scholar
Teissie, J (2014) Electropermeabilization of the cell membrane. Methods in Molecular Biology 1121, 2546.Google Scholar
Teissie, J, Golzio, M and Rols, MP (2005) Mechanisms of cell membrane electropermeabilization: a minireview of our present (lack of?) knowledge. Biochimica et Biophysica Acta 1724, 270280.Google Scholar
Thompson, DS, Carlisle, PL and Kadosh, D (2011) Coevolution of morphology and virulence in Candida species. Eukaryotic Cell 10, 11731182.Google Scholar
Tixador, R, Richoilley, G, Gasset, G, Templier, J, Bes, JC, Moatti, N and Lapchine, L (1985) Study of minimal inhibitory concentration of antibiotics on bacteria cultivated in vitro in space (Cytos 2 experiment). Aviation, Space, and Environmental Medicine 56, 748751.Google Scholar
Valič, B, Pavlin, M and Miklavčič, D (2004) The effect of resting transmembrane voltage on cell electropermeabilization: a numerical analysis. Bioelectrochemistry 63, 311315.Google Scholar
Wilson, JW, Ott, CM, Höner zu Bentrup, K, Ramamurthy, R, Quick, L, Porwollik, S, Cheng, P, McClelland, M, Tsaprailis, G, Radabaugh, T, Hunt, A, Fernandez, D, Richter, E, Shah, M, Kilcoyne, M, Joshi, L, Nelman-Gonzalez, M, Hing, S, Parra, M, Dumars, P, Norwood, K, Bober, R, Devich, J, Ruggles, A, Goulart, C, Rupert, M, Stodieck, L, Stafford, P, Catella, L, Schurr, MJ, Buchanan, K, Morici, L, McCracken, J, Allen, P, Baker-Coleman, C, Hammond, T, Vogel, J, Nelson, R, Pierson, DL, Stefanyshyn-Piper, HM and Nickerson, CA (2007) Space flight alters bacterial gene expression and virulence and reveals a role for global regulator Hfq. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the USA 104, 1629916304.Google Scholar
Zinkeviciene, A, Vaiciulioniene, N, Baranauskiene, I, Kvedariene, V, Emuzyte, R and Citavicius, D (2011) Cutaneous yeast microflora in patients with atopic dermatitis. Open Medicine 6, 713719.Google Scholar
Figure 0

Fig. 1. The waveform of the applied pulses.

Figure 1

Fig. 2. Pseudohyphae formed by C. lusitaniae. Microscopy analysis showed pseudohyphae formation and cells with the altered phenotype that can undergo further phenotypic switching.

Figure 2

Table 1. Minimal inhibitory concentrations of amphotericin B in three types of C. lusitaniae and C. guilliermondii cells

Figure 3

Fig. 3. Flow cytometry analysis results of C. lusitaniae and C. guilliermondii permeabilization rate after applying 2.5–25 kV cm1 PEF.

Figure 4

Fig. 4. Fluorescence spectra and determination of the analysis gates. (A) 0 kV cm1, PEF untreated, control sample; (B) 15 kV cm1 8 × 100 µs PEF; (C) 25 kV cm1 8 × 100 µs PEF.

Figure 5

Fig. 5. CFU of the PEF-treated C. lusitaniae budding cells grown in standard conditions, pseudohyphae phenotype and under microgravity grown cells showed significantly increased resistance after cultivation under microgravity conditions.

Figure 6

Fig. 6. Susceptibility to the applied PEF of C. guilliermondii cells grown in standard conditions, pseudohyphae phenotype and under microgravity grown cells.