Hostname: page-component-745bb68f8f-b95js Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-02-11T12:09:31.094Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Revised Risk Estimates for MRSA Infection in Patients with Intermittent Versus Persistent MRSA Nares Colonization

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  12 February 2016

Daniel I. Vigil
Affiliation:
Veterans Affairs Eastern Colorado Health Care System, Denver, Colorado
Mary T. Bessesen*
Affiliation:
Veterans Affairs Eastern Colorado Health Care System, Denver, Colorado
Patrick W. Hosokawa
Affiliation:
University of Colorado, Adult and Child Center for Outcomes Research and Delivery Science, Aurora, Colorado.
*
Address correspondence to Mary T. Bessesen, MD, Veterans Affairs Eastern Colorado Health Care System, 1055 Clermont St., Denver, CO 80220 (mary.bessesen@va.gov).
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Type
Letters to the Editor
Copyright
© 2016 by The Society for Healthcare Epidemiology of America. All rights reserved 

We thank Beyersmann and Schrade1 for their comments, and we agree that the use of an estimator that accounts for death without prior infection is appropriate for our data. As they point out, the raw incidence proportions of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) we reported (16.33% for persistently colonized, 11.18% for intermittently colonized, and 0.51% for non-colonized) reflected observed infections, and did not account for infections that may have occurred after administrative censoring at the study end date. Thus, these data represent an underestimation of risk.

For this reason, we reported proportions based on Kaplan-Meier analysis: 21.26% for persistently colonized, 12.83% for intermittently colonized, and 0.55% for non-colonized. Beyersmann and Schrade aptly pointed out that this analysis does not account for death without prior infection and thus overestimates risk. They propose that the Aalen-Johansen method is a better estimator in this case because it accounts for competing causes. We agree, and we conducted an additional analysis. These new calculations produced results that fall between the other 2 estimates: 20.61% for persistently colonized, 12.16% for intermittently colonized, and 0.54% for non-colonized. The use of the Aalen-Johansen estimator increases the precision of the estimates without changing our overall conclusions.

ACKNOWLEDGMENTS

Financial support: MTB is a recipient of VA Merit Review grant I01BX007080.

Potential conflicts of interest: All authors report no conflicts of interest relevant to this article.

References

REFERENCE

1. Beyersmann, J, Schrade, C. Estimating infection incidence in longitudinal studies. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol 2016. doi: 10.1017/ice.2016.19.Google Scholar