Clostridioides difficile-associated diarrhea (CDAD) is the most frequently reported healthcare-associated illness in the United States, with an annual economic burden >$1 billion and up to 9% mortality, and critically ill trauma patients may be uniquely at risk.Reference Lessa, Mu and Bamberg1–Reference Lumpkins, Bochicchio and Joshi4 Military trauma patients have multiple CDAD risk factors, including frequent broad-spectrum antimicrobial exposure, transient immunosuppression, and challenges related to infection control in the deployed environment and along the evacuation chain. We describe the epidemiology of wounded military personnel diagnosed with CDAD.
Methods
Wounded military personnel (June 2009 through February 2014) from the Trauma Infectious Disease Outcomes StudyReference Tribble, Conger and Fraser5 with a diagnosis of confirmed (laboratory supported) or presumptive (diarrhea with treatment for CDAD without lab confirmation) CDAD were examined. Inclusion criteria were active-duty or Department of Defense beneficiaries, aged ≥18 years, injured during deployment, requiring medical evacuation to Germany followed by transfer to participating US military hospitals. Infections were defined as previously described.Reference Tribble, Conger and Fraser5 CDAD diagnosis was based on a combination of clinical and laboratory findings suggesting CDAD and/or directed antimicrobial therapy against CDAD for ≥5 days.Reference Tribble, Conger and Fraser5 CDAD severity was defined according to the 2017 guidelines using highest creatinine and white blood cell values on day of diagnosis.Reference McDonald, Gerding and Johnson6 The study was approved by the Institutional Review Board of the Uniformed Services University.
Results
Among 2,660 wounded military personnel, 23 patients with CDAD were identified (4 presumptive and 19 confirmed), with an incidence of 2.76 per 10,000 occupied bed days (OBD). Overall, 7 cases were confirmed by toxin enzyme immunoassay, 11 by polymerase chain reaction, and 1 by both methods. Patients were primarily young (median age, 24 years) men (96%) who sustained blast injuries (70%), resulting in critical injuries (median injury severity score [ISS], 38) (Table 1). Prior to CDAD diagnosis, patients were hospitalized a median of 12 days, and 17 (74%) had ≥1 infection, most commonly pneumonia (47%) and skin and soft-tissue infections (SSTIs, 47%). Severe CDAD was diagnosed in 8 (35%) and fulminant CDAD was diagnosed in 6 (26%) patients. Furthermore, 19 patients (83%) were admitted to the intensive care unit (ICU) and 74% were intubated prior to or at the time of diagnosis.
Table 1. Characteristics of Wounded Military Personnel with Clostridioides difficile-Associated Diarrhea (CDAD)
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6d2b1/6d2b12c797e32055d524d7564113fdadd9f7a7c2" alt=""
Note. ICU, intensive care unit; IQR, interquartile range; CNS, central nervous system.
Nearly all patients (96%) received antibiotics prior to CDAD diagnosis: 96% received first-generation cephalosporins, 87% received tetracyclines (largely doxycycline for malaria chemoprophylaxis), 70% received carbapenems, 57% received fluoroquinolones, and 22% received clindamycin. Comparatively, among 2,637 patients without CDAD, 91% received antimicrobials during their hospitalizations: 88% received tetracyclines, 86% received first-generation cephalosporins, 70% received carbapenems, 47 received fluoroquinolones, and 16% received clindamycin. Among CDAD patients, 87% and 57% were exposed to ≥3 and ≥5 antibiotic classes, respectively, with a median of 13 days of antibiotic exposure prior to CDAD diagnosis. During the study period, only Brooke Army Medical Center (6 CDAD patients) tracked CDAD rates, with concurrent annual incidences of 1.15 per 10,000 OBD in 2009, 0.78 in 2010, 1.9 in 2011, 2.7 in 2012, 4.7 in 2013, and 7.8 in 2014. Military hospitals in the National Capital Region only tracked incidences of healthcare-onset CDAD in 1 of the 2 admitting hospitals in 2013 and 2014, during which time the rates were 9.43 and 8.34 per 10,000 OBD, respectively.
Treatment included oral metronidazole alone in 15 patients, intravenous metronidazole alone in 2 patients, and combination of oral vancomycin, metronidazole, and intravenous metronidazole in 6 patients. No patients with CDAD died.
Discussion
Prior civilian trauma population studies demonstrated incidences of CDAD similar to nontrauma critically ill patients (1%–3% and 4%–5%, respectively) despite a lack of traditional risk factors.Reference Vanzant, Ozrazgat-Baslanti and Liu3,Reference Lumpkins, Bochicchio and Joshi4 Despite widespread antimicrobial use in our military trauma population, CDAD rates were low (0.86%; 2.76 per 10,000 OBD). A study of cumulative antibiotic exposure in hospitalized patients showed a median of 14 antibiotic days in CDAD patients,Reference Stevens, Dumyati, Fine, Fisher and van Wijngaarden7 similar to the median of 13 antibiotic days identified in our population. The same study identified a median of 3 antibiotic class exposures in the CDAD group, while our CDAD patients received a median of 6 antibiotic class exposures prior to diagnosis. More than half of patients were exposed to ≥5 antibiotic classes prior to CDAD diagnosis, which is consistent with literature suggesting higher CDAD risk with increased number of antibiotic class exposures.Reference Stevens, Dumyati, Fine, Fisher and van Wijngaarden7 We noted extensive tetracycline exposure in our population, largely driven by malaria prophylaxis. Although tetracyclines have demonstrated lower risk for CDAD than other antibiotics, given the high degree of broad antimicrobial class exposure, current data are insufficient to determine whether tetracycline exposure impacted our population.Reference Tariq, Cho and Kapoor8
Similar to civilian trauma cohorts,Reference Vanzant, Ozrazgat-Baslanti and Liu3,Reference Lumpkins, Bochicchio and Joshi4 our CDAD patients were severely injured and were primarily admitted to the ICU, were intubated prior to diagnosis, and were diagnosed >1 week into their hospitalizations. This high injury severity is characteristic of the overall TIDOS population: 64.5% with blast injuries; 38% with ISS ≥25; 52% admitted to the ICU; 33% mechanically ventilated.Reference Campbell, Li and Whitman9 Among our CDAD patients, 74% were diagnosed with ≥1 preceding infection, and 34% of the overall TIDOS population had ≥1 infection, primarily SSTIs.Reference Campbell, Li and Whitman9
Patients were primarily treated with metronidazole due to contemporary literature and guidelines during the study period.Reference Napolitano and Edmiston2 Although CDAD was severe or fulminant in >50% of patients, there were no deaths. This finding differs dramatically from mortality rates in nontrauma patients (30%–80% in severe cases), but it is similar to that in civilian trauma studies and may result from our population being aged in their mid-20s and healthy prior to trauma.Reference Vanzant, Ozrazgat-Baslanti and Liu3,Reference Lumpkins, Bochicchio and Joshi4,Reference Karas, Enoch and Aliyu10 Although our study largely involved penetrating trauma (compared to blunt trauma in civilian studies),Reference Vanzant, Ozrazgat-Baslanti and Liu3,Reference Lumpkins, Bochicchio and Joshi4 we were unable to evaluate certain CDAD risk factors (eg, gastric acid suppression, enteral feeding, and intraabdominal surgery) and complications (eg, toxic megacolon or colonic perforation). Further investigation is needed to determine whether penetrating and blunt trauma populations have distinct risk factors for CDAD.
Acknowledgments
We are indebted to the Infectious Disease Clinical Research Program TIDOS team of clinical coordinators, microbiology technicians, data managers, clinical site managers, and administrative support personnel for their support. We offer special thanks to Teresa Merritt for her assistance with data collection and Leigh Carson for her assistance in manuscript preparation. The view(s) expressed are those of the authors and do not reflect the official views of the Uniformed Services University of the Health Sciences, Henry M. Jackson Foundation for the Advancement of Military Medicine, Inc., the National Institutes of Health or the Department of Health and Human Services, Landstuhl Regional Medical Center, Walter Reed National Military Medical Center, Brooke Army Medical Center, the US Army Medical Department, the US Army Office of the Surgeon General, the Department of Defense, the Departments of the Army, Navy or Air Force, or the US Government. Mention of trade names, commercial products, or organizations does not imply endorsement by the US government.
Financial support
Support for this work was provided by the Infectious Disease Clinical Research Program (IDCRP-024), a Department of Defense (DoD) program executed by the Uniformed Services University of the Health Sciences through a cooperative agreement with The Henry M. Jackson Foundation for the Advancement of Military Medicine (HJF). This project was supported with federal funds from the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases, the National Institutes of Health (interagency agreement no. Y1-AI-5072), the Defense Health Program of the US DoD (award no. HU0001190002), and the Department of the Navy under the Wounded, Ill, and Injured Program (award no. HU0001-10-1-0014).
Conflicts of interest
All authors report no conflicts of interest relevant to this article.