Hostname: page-component-6bf8c574d5-rwnhh Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-02-22T13:16:40.150Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Blood culture utilization at an academic hospital: Addressing a gap in benchmarking – CORRIGENDUM

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  11 December 2018

Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

An abstract is not available for this content. As you have access to this content, full HTML content is provided on this page. A PDF of this content is also available in through the ‘Save PDF’ action button.
Type
Corrigendum
Information
Infection Control & Hospital Epidemiology , Volume 39 , Issue 12 , December 2018 , pp. 1507 - 1509
Copyright
© 2018 by The Society for Healthcare Epidemiology of America. All rights reserved. 

The authors of Chen et alReference Chen, Bilker, Hamilton, O’Donnell and Nachamkin 1 would like to issue the following corrections for tables 1 and 3 in their original published article:

Table 1 Characteristics of Blood Culture Sets

Table 3 Odds of Having Repeat Cultures Drawn the Following Day

Correction for Table 1: Intensive care unit (ICU) is not a sub-category of service. We determined the number of sets drawn from patients in an ICU and those that were not drawn in an ICU.

Correction for Table 3: “In the ICU” is not a sub-category of Previous report. We have Untabbed this line to indicate that “in the ICU” is its own covariate in this model.

The entire corrected tables appear below.

References

1. Chen, AI, Bilker, WB, Hamilton, KW, O’Donnell, JA, Nachamkin, I. Blood culture utilization at an academic hospital: Addressing a gap in benchmarking. Infection Control Hosp Epidemiol 2018;39: 1353–1359.Google Scholar
Figure 0

Table 1 Characteristics of Blood Culture Sets

Figure 1

Table 3 Odds of Having Repeat Cultures Drawn the Following Day