No CrossRef data available.
Article contents
Voluntary Standards: On What Exactly?
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 07 January 2015
Abstract
An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
![Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'](https://static-cambridge-org.ezproxyberklee.flo.org/content/id/urn%3Acambridge.org%3Aid%3Aarticle%3AS1754942600005265/resource/name/firstPage-S1754942600005265a.jpg)
- Type
- Commentaries
- Information
- Copyright
- Copyright © Society for Industrial and Organizational Psychology 2013
References
Edelman, L. B., Fuller, S. R., & Mara-Drita, I. (2001). Diversity rhetoric and the managerialization of law. American Journal of Sociology, 106, 1589–1641.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hays-Thomas, R., & Bendick, M. Jr. (2013). Professionalizing diversity and inclusion practice: Should voluntary standards be the chicken or the egg? Industrial and Organizational Psychology: Perspectives on Science and Practice, 6, 193–205.Google Scholar
Jones, J. R., & Harter, J. K. (2005). Race effects on the employee engagement-turnover intention relationship. Journal of Leadership and Organizational Studies, 11(2), 78–88.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lahiri, I. (2008). Creating a competency model for diversity and inclusion practitioners. The Conference Board, Report Number: TCBCP005.Google Scholar