Hostname: page-component-6bf8c574d5-956mj Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-02-23T03:07:28.762Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Psychological Contributions to Competitive Business Process

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  07 January 2015

Bill Curtis*
Affiliation:
CAST Software
*
E-mail: curtis@acm.org, Address: CAST Software, PO Box 126079, Fort Worth, TX 76126-0079
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Commentaries
Copyright
Copyright © Society for Industrial and Organizational Psychology 2012 

References

Curtis, B., Hefley, W. E., & Miller, S. (2001). The people capability maturity model: Guidelines for improving the workforce. Boston, MA: Addison Wesley. Google Scholar
Curtis, B., Hefley, W. E., & Miller, S. (2003). Experiences applying the people capability maturity model. Crosstalk: The Journal of Defense Software Engineering, 16, 913. Google Scholar
Goldman, S. L., Nagel, R. N., & Preiss, K. (1995). Agile competitors and virtual organizations. New York, NY: Van Nostrand Reinhold. Google Scholar
Ployhart, R. E. (2012). The psychology of competitive advantage: An adjacent possibility. Industrial and Organizational Psychology: Perspectives on Science and Practice, 5, 6281. Google Scholar
Porter, M. E. (1985). Competitive advantage: Creating and sustaining competitive performance. New York, NY: Free Press. Google Scholar
Raczynski, R., & Curtis, B. (2008). Software data violate SPC's underlying assumptions. IEEE Software, 25, 4951. Google Scholar
Rummler, G., & Brache, A. P. (1995). Improving performance: Managing the white space on the organization chart. San Francisco, CA: Jossey Bass. Google Scholar
Womack, J. P., Jones, D. T., & Roos, D. (1990). The machine that changed the world. New York, NY: MacMillan. Google Scholar