Hostname: page-component-6bf8c574d5-956mj Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-02-23T02:25:15.058Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Organizational Justice Interventions: Practicalities, Concerns, and Potential

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  07 January 2015

Donald M. Truxillo ,
Talya N. Bauer  and
Michael A. Campion
Donald M. Truxillo*
Affiliation:
Portland State University
Talya N. Bauer
Affiliation:
Portland State University
Michael A. Campion
Affiliation:
Purdue University
*
E-mail: truxillod@pdx.edu, Address: Donald M. Truxillo, Department of Psychology, Portland State University, PO Box 751, Portland, OR 97207
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. As you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Commentaries
Information
Industrial and Organizational Psychology , Volume 2 , Issue 2 , June 2009 , pp. 211 - 214
Copyright
Copyright © Society for Industrial and Organizational Psychology 2009 

Footnotes

*

Department of Psychology, Portland State University

**

School of Business Administration, Portland State University

***

Krannert Graduate School of Management, Purdue University

References

Gilliland, S. W. (1993). The perceived fairness of selection systems: An organizational justice perspective. Academy of Management Review, 18, 694–734.Google Scholar
Gilliland, S. W. (1994). Effects of procedural and distributive justice on reactions to a selection system. Journal of Applied Psychology, 79, 691–701.Google Scholar
Greenberg, J. (2009). Everybody talks about organizational justice, but nobody does anything about it. Industrial and Organizational Psychology: Perspectives on Science and Practice, 2, 181–195.Google Scholar
Goldman, B. M. (2001). Toward an understanding of employment discrimination claiming: An integration of organizational justice and social information processing theories. Personnel Psychology, 54, 361–386.Google Scholar
Hausknecht, J. P., Day, D. V., & Thomas, S. C. (2004). Applicant reactions to selection procedures: An updated model and meta-analysis. Personnel Psychology, 57, 639–683.Google Scholar
Ployhart, R. E., Ryan, A. M., & Bennett, M. (1999). Explanations for selection decisions: Applicants’ reactions to informational and sensitivity features of explanations. Journal of Applied Psychology, 84, 87–106.Google Scholar
Shaw, J. C., Wild, E., & Colquitt, J. A. (2003). To justify or excuse?: A meta-analytic review of the effects of explanations. Journal of Applied Psychology, 88, 444–458.Google Scholar
Steiner, D. D., & Gilliland, S. W. (1996). Fairness reactions to personnel selection techniques in France and the United States. Journal of Applied Psychology, 81, 134–141.Google Scholar
Truxillo, D. M., Bauer, T. N., Campion, M. A., & Paronto, M. E. (2002). Selection fairness information and applicant reactions: A longitudinal field study. Journal of Applied Psychology, 87, 1020–1031.Google Scholar