Hostname: page-component-6bf8c574d5-qdpjg Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-02-23T00:32:38.839Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Intelligence 2.0 in I–O Psychology: Revival or Contextualization?

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  07 January 2015

Symen A. Brouwers*
Affiliation:
Tilburg University Ghent University
Fons J.R. Van de Vijver
Affiliation:
Tilburg University North-West University University of Queensland
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Commentaries
Copyright
Copyright © Society for Industrial and Organizational Psychology 2012 

References

Carroll, J. B. (1993). Human cognitive abilities: A survey of factor analytic studies. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar
Malda, M., Van de Vijver, F. J. R., & Temane, M. Q. (2010). Rugby versus soccer in South Africa: Content familiarity explains most cross-cultural differences in cognitive test scores. Intelligence, 38, 582595.Google Scholar
Oberauer, K., Süß, H.-M., Wilhelm, O., & Wittman, W. W. (2003). The multiple faces of working memory: Storage, processing, supervision, and coordination. Intelligence, 31, 167193.Google Scholar
Oyserman, D., & Lee, S. W. S. (2008). Does culture influence what and how we think? Effects of priming individualism and collectivism. Psychological Bulletin, 134, 311342.Google Scholar
Scherbaum, C. A., Goldstein, H. W., Yusko, K. P., Ryan, R., & Hanges, P. J. (2012). Intelligence 2.0: Reestablishing a research program on g in I–O psychology. Industrial and Organizational Psychology: Perspectives on Science and Practice, 5, 128148.Google Scholar
Scribner, S. (1984). Cognitive studies of work. The Quarterly Newsletter of the Laboratory of Comparative Human Cognition, 6, 150.Google Scholar