Hostname: page-component-6bf8c574d5-h6jzd Total loading time: 0.001 Render date: 2025-02-22T09:37:01.959Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

The Causes and Consequences of a Scientific Literature We Cannot Trust: An Evidence-Based Practice Perspective

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  07 January 2015

Rob B. Briner*
Affiliation:
University of Bath
Neil D. Walshe
Affiliation:
University of San Francisco
*
E-mail: r.b.briner@bath.ac.uk, Address: School of Management, University of Bath, Bath BA2 7AY, UK
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Commentaries
Copyright
Copyright © Society for Industrial and Organizational Psychology 2013

References

Briner, R. B., Denyer, D., & Rousseau, D. M. (2009). Evidence-based management: Concept cleanup time? Academy of Management Perspectives, 23, 1932.Google Scholar
Briner, R. B., & Rousseau, D. M. (2011). Evidence-based I–O psychology: Not there yet. Industrial and Organizational Psychology: Perspectives on Science and Practice, 4, 322.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kepes, S., & McDaniel, M. A. (2013). How trustworthy is the scientific literature in I-O psychology? Industrial and Organizational Psychology: Perspectives on Science and Practice, 6(3), 252268.Google Scholar
Pfeffer, J., & Sutton, R. I. (2006). Hard facts, dangerous half-truths, and total nonsense: Profiting from evidence-based management. Boston, MA: Harvard Business School Press.Google Scholar
Rousseau, D. M. (2006). Is there such a thing as evidence-based management? Academy of Management Review, 31, 256269.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Smith, R. (1991). Where is the wisdom…? British Medical Journal, 303(6806), 798799.Google Scholar