No CrossRef data available.
Article contents
Abstract
An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
![Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'](https://static-cambridge-org.ezproxyberklee.flo.org/content/id/urn%3Acambridge.org%3Aid%3Aarticle%3AS088753670000814X/resource/name/firstPage-S088753670000814Xa.jpg)
- Type
- Comment/Reply
- Information
- Hypatia , Volume 11 , Issue 1: Special Issue: The Family and Feminist Theory , Winter 1996 , pp. 168 - 174
- Copyright
- Copyright © 1996 by Hypatia, Inc.
References
Deveaux, Monique. 1995. Shifting paradigms: Theorizing care and justice in political theory. Hypatia 10(2): 115–19.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Held, Virginia. 1982. The political “testing” of moral theories. Midwest Studies in Philosophy 7: 343–63.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Held, Virginia. 1989. Rights and goods: Justifying social action. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Held, Virginia. 1993. Feminist morality: Transforming culture, society, and politics. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Kittay, Eva Feder. 1984. Womb envy: An explanatory concept. In Mothering: Essays in feminist theory, ed. Trebilcot, Joyce. Totowa NJ: Rowman and Allanheld.Google Scholar
Moody‐Adams, Michele M. 1990. On the alleged methodological infirmity of ethics. American Philisophical Quarterly 27(3): 225–36.Google Scholar
Moody‐Adams, Michele M. 1996. Feminist inquiry and the transformation of the “public” sphere in Virginia Held's Feminist morality. Hypatia 11(1): 155–67.Google Scholar
Whitbeck, Caroline. 1976. Theories of sex difference. In Women and philosophy: Toward a theory of liberation, ed. Gould, Carol C. and Wartofsky, Marx W.New York: Putnam.Google Scholar