Hostname: page-component-6bf8c574d5-2jptb Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-02-19T11:56:08.701Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Gandhi and the Virtue of Care

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  25 March 2020

Joseph Kupfer
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

The film Gandhi expands our understanding of how the virtue of care can function in the public sphere by portraying Gandhi dealing with Indian independence from Britain, the subjugation of women and Untouchables, and strife between Hindus and Muslims. Gandhi illustrates in his social and political activism how the virtue of care is animated by benevolence and structured by the building blocks of the care perspective: responsibility and need, relationship and mutual dependency, context and narrative.

Type
Research Article
Information
Hypatia , Volume 22 , Issue 3 , Summer 2007 , pp. 1 - 21
Copyright
Copyright © 2007 by Hypatia, Inc.

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Carroll, Noel. 2002. The wheel of virtue: Art, literature, and moral knowledge. Journal of Aesthetics and Art Criticism 60 (1): 3–26.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Card, Claudia. 1995. Gender and moral luck. In Justice and care. ed. Held, Virginia. Boulder, Colo.: Westview Press.Google Scholar
Clement, Grace. 1996. Care, autonomy, and justice. Boulder, Colo.: Westview Press.Google Scholar
Friedman, Marilyn. 1993. What are friends for? Ithaca, N.Y.: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
Gilligan, Carol. 1982. In a different voice: Psychological theory and women's development. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Gilligan, Carol. 1986. Remapping the moral domain: New images of the self in relationship. In Reconstructing individualism: Autonomy, individuality, and the self in Western thought. ed. Heller, Thomas C. Sosna, Morton, and Wellbery, David E. Stanford, Calif.: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
Gilligan, Carol. 1987. Moral orientation and moral development. In Women and moral theory. ed. Kittay, Eva Feder and Meyers, Diana Tietjen. Totowa, N.J.: Rowman & Littlefield.Google Scholar
Held, Virginia. 1993. Feminist morality. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Held, Virginia. ed., 1995. Justice and care. Boulder, Colo.: Westview Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jaggar, Allison. 1995. Caring as a feminist practice of moral reason. In Justice and care. ed. Held, .CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mullett, Sheila. 1988. Shifting perspectives: A new approach to ethics. In Feminist perspectives: Philosophical essays on method and morals. ed. Code, Lorraine Mullett, Sheila, and Overall, Christine. Toronto: University of Toronto Press.Google Scholar
Murdoch, Iris. 1971. The sovereignty of good. New York: Shocken Books.Google Scholar
Nedelsky, Jennifer. 1990. Law, boundaries, and the bounded self. Representations 30: 162–89.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Noddings, Nel. 1984. Caring, a feminine approach to ethics and moral education. Berkeley and Los Angeles: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Noddings, Nel. 2002. Starting at home: Caring and social policy. Berkeley and Los Angeles: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Okin, Susan Moller. 1989. Justice, gender, and the family. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
Peck, M. Scott. 1978. The road less traveled. New York: Simon & Schuster.Google Scholar
Rawls, John. 1969. The justification of civil disobedience. In Civil disobedience: Theory and practice. ed. Bedau, Hugo. New York: Pegasus.Google Scholar
Ruddick, Sara. 1989. Maternal thinking: Toward a politics of peace. Boston: Beacon Press.Google Scholar
Ruddick, Sara. 1995. Injustice in families: Assault and domination. In Justice and care. ed. Held, .CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Slote, Michael. 2001. Morals from motives. New York: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar