Hostname: page-component-745bb68f8f-g4j75 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-02-06T00:33:58.309Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

THE RESTORATION OF ALTARS IN THE 1630s

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  15 February 2002

KENNETH FINCHAM
Affiliation:
University of Kent
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

The nationwide campaign to erect railed altars in the 1630s has always been seen as a central feature of the Laudian reformation of the Church. Recently some scholars have denied its close association with Laud and Arminian sacramentalism, and have proposed that the policy originated with Charles I, to be reluctantly endorsed by his archbishop. As for its enforcement, Julian Davies has identified at least five variants which were implemented in the dioceses. This article argues instead that Archbishops Neile and Laud were centrally involved in the introduction of the railed altar, and that they oversaw the imposition of a single altar policy, with only Williams of Lincoln briefly championing a variation on it. Differences did emerge, however, over where communicants should receive, since this had not been prescribed by authority. Charles I, on this reading, was not the driving force for change, although he clearly came to support it.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
© 2001 Cambridge University Press

Footnotes

I am grateful for the comments of Nicholas Cranfield, Richard Cust, Andrew Foster, Peter Lake, and Nicholas Tyacke on an earlier draft of this article, and for the remarks of the anonymous referees.