Hostname: page-component-745bb68f8f-s22k5 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-02-06T12:53:08.079Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Nd–Sr–Pb isotopic composition and mantle sources of Triassic rift units in the Serbo-Macedonian and the western Rhodope massifs (Bulgaria–Greece)

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  26 September 2011

NIKOLAY BONEV*
Affiliation:
Department of Geology, Palaeontology and Fossil Fuels, Sofia University St Kliment Ohridski, BG-1504 Sofia, Bulgaria
YILDIRIM DILEK
Affiliation:
Department of Geology, Miami University, Oxford, OH 45056, USA
JOHN M. HANCHAR
Affiliation:
Department of Earth Sciences, Memorial University of Newfoundland, St John's, NL A1B 3X5, Canada
KAMEN BOGDANOV
Affiliation:
Department of Mineralogy, Petrology and Economic Geology, Sofia University St Kliment Ohridski, BG-1504 Sofia, Bulgaria
LASLO KLAIN
Affiliation:
Department of Geology, Palaeontology and Fossil Fuels, Sofia University St Kliment Ohridski, BG-1504 Sofia, Bulgaria
*
Author for correspondence: niki@gea.uni-sofia.bg
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

We report on the field occurrence and isotopic compositions of metamafic rocks exposed in the Serbo-Macedonian (Volvi and Therma bodies) and western Rhodope (Rila Mountains) massifs of Bulgaria and Greece. These metamafic units consist of high- and low-Ti gabbroic and basaltic rocks, whose Nd–Sr–Pb isotopes are compatible with mantle-derived MORB and OIB components with a small amount of crustal material involved in their melt source. These isotopic features combined with the field observations are consistent with an intra-continental rift origin of the metamafic rocks protolith, and are comparable to those of the Triassic rift-related mafic rocks in the northern Aegean region.

Type
Rapid Communication
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2011

1. Introduction

The Serbo-Macedonian and Rhodope metamorphic massifs constitute the crystalline basement of the Alpine orogenic belt in the Balkan Peninsula and display a structural record of a late Mesozoic contractional deformation episode overprinted by an early Cenozoic extensional deformation (e.g. Ricou et al. Reference Ricou, Burg, Godfriaux and Ivanov1998). Both massifs comprise amphibolite-facies metamorphic rocks of continental and oceanic origin (e.g. Liati, Reference Liati2005; Himmerkus, Reischmann & Kostopoulos, Reference Himmerkus, Reischmann and Kostopoulos2009) that are intruded by a series of Late Cretaceous to Miocene granitoids (Zagorchev, Moorbath & Lilov, Reference Zagorchev, Moorbath and Lilov1987; Dinter et al. Reference Dinter, Macfarlane, Hames, Isachsen, Bowring and Royden1995; Christofides et al. Reference Christofides, Koroneos, Soldatos, Eleftheriadis and Kilias2001). The S-vergent, imbricate crustal architecture of the Serbo-Macedonian and Rhodope massifs was assembled during a contractional phase in the hanging wall of a N-dipping Cretaceous–Tertiary subduction zone that was located within the Vardar Ocean farther to the SSW (in the present-day coordinate system) (Ricou et al. Reference Ricou, Burg, Godfriaux and Ivanov1998). This shortening and nappe-stacking event resulted in crustal thickening, amphibolite-facies regional metamorphism and topographic build-up, reminiscent of many other collision zones (Dilek, Reference Dilek, Dilek and Pavlides2006). The subsequent extensional collapse of this young orogenic belt led to metamorphic core complex formation starting in early Cenozoic time (e.g. Bonev & Beccaletto, Reference Bonev, Beccaletto, Taymaz, Yilmaz and Dilek2007 and references therein).

The high-grade metamorphic units of the Serbo-Macedonian and Rhodope massifs are locally intercalated with mafic-ultramafic rocks, which are pervasively deformed and metamorphosed up to amphibolite facies. The same structural and metamorphic fabric elements observed in these mafic-ultramafic rock assemblages and in the surrounding rocks of the two massifs indicate that they all experienced the same deformational events, and that they were already part of the same crustal mosaic in the Balkan Peninsula by latest Cretaceous time. However, how these mafic-ultramafic rocks were incorporated into the protoliths of the Serbo-Macedonian and Rhodope massifs and the nature of their melt source(s) and the tectonic setting of their formation, are not well understood. The existing models consider them either as ophiolitic allochthonous tectonic sheets, representing the remnants of a Tethyan oceanic lithosphere, or as late-orogenic intrusive-extrusive complexes (Dixon & Dimitriadis, Reference Dixon, Dimitriadis, Robertson and Dixon1984; Robertson et al. Reference Robertson, Dixon, Brown, Collins, Morris, Pickett, Sharp, Ustaömer, Morris and Tarling1996; Himmerkus et al. Reference Himmerkus, Zachariadis, Reischmann and Kostopoulos2005; Himmerkus, Reischmann & Kostopoulos, Reference Himmerkus, Reischmann and Kostopoulos2009). These different interpretations have major implications for the crustal evolution of the Balkan Peninsula and need to be validated with field-based structural, geochemical, isotopic and geochronological studies.

In this paper, we report on the field occurrence and Nd–Sr–Pb radiogenic isotope geochemistry of the Volvi and Therma mafic-ultramafic units in the Serbo-Macedonian Massif and a series of other mafic complexes in the western Rhodope Massif exposed in southern Bulgaria and northern Greece (Fig. 1). Our data and field observations suggest that these mafic-ultramafic rock units represent para-rift assemblages emplaced during rifting of the Serbo-Macedonian and Rhodope massifs during Triassic time. This inferred rifting was aborted, however, before the onset of continental break-up and seafloor spreading, and thus no ocean basin was created between these rifted blocks. In the first part of the paper, we present a brief account of the regional geology, geochemistry and isotopic signature of the Triassic mafic-ultramafic rocks, and then discuss their origin and significance for the Mesozoic–Cenozoic tectonic evolution of the region.

Figure 1. Tectonic map of the Serbo-Macedonian Massif and the western-central Rhodope Massif in southern Bulgaria and northern Greece and adjacent units (adapted from Kockel, Mollat & Walther, Reference Kockel, Mollat and Walther1977; Zagorčev, Reference Zagorčev1994; Ricou et al. Reference Ricou, Burg, Godfriaux and Ivanov1998), showing the locations of studied samples listed in Table 1. Inset: Tectonic framework of the Alpine system in the Aegean domain of the eastern Mediterranean region. The main exposures of Jurassic ophiolites are shown in black using data from Papanikolaou (Reference Papanikolaou2009).

2. Regional geology and geochemistry of Triassic mafic-ultramafic rocks

In the northern Aegean region, there are three major continental blocks in the crustal mosaic of the Balkan Peninsula. These include, from west to east, the Pelagonia, Serbo-Macedonian and Rhodope massifs (Fig. 1, inset). Jurassic ophiolites and Triassic mafic rift-related rocks occur on both sides of Pelagonia, whereas the same oceanic crust elements were emplaced from the south or occur within the Serbo-Macedonian and Rhodope massifs.

The Serbo-Macedonian Massif is separated from the Pelagonia microcontinent to the SW by the Vardar suture zone, which is part of the innermost Hellenides. To the north, the Serbo-Macedonian Massif continues laterally into the Rhodope Massif, which delimits the Alpine Balkan thrust–fold belt in the north (Fig. 1). The crustal basement units of the Serbo-Macedonian and the Rhodope massifs are structurally related to the Mesozoic development of the Neotethyan Vardar oceanic realm at the southern continental margin of Eurasia (Koukouvelas & Doutsos, Reference Koukouvelas and Doutsos1990; Burg et al. Reference Burg, Ricou, Ivanov, Godfriaux, Dimov and Klain1996; Robertson et al. Reference Robertson, Dixon, Brown, Collins, Morris, Pickett, Sharp, Ustaömer, Morris and Tarling1996; Dinter, Reference Dinter1998; Ricou et al. Reference Ricou, Burg, Godfriaux and Ivanov1998; Bonev & Beccaletto, Reference Bonev, Beccaletto, Taymaz, Yilmaz and Dilek2007). The Serbo-Macedonian and Rhodope massifs comprise mainly amphibolite-facies metamorphic basement rocks consisting of pre-Alpine (Neoproterozoic–Permian) and Alpine (e.g. Lips, White & Wijbrans, Reference Lips, White and Wijbrans2000; Liati, Reference Liati2005; Himmerkus, Reischmann & Kostopoulos, Reference Himmerkus, Reischmann and Kostopoulos2009) units of continental and oceanic affinities. All these metamorphic units are intruded by granitoid plutons that range in age from Late Cretaceous to Miocene (Zagorchev, Moorbath & Lilov, Reference Zagorchev, Moorbath and Lilov1987; Dinter et al. Reference Dinter, Macfarlane, Hames, Isachsen, Bowring and Royden1995; Christofides et al. Reference Christofides, Koroneos, Soldatos, Eleftheriadis and Kilias2001).

The high-grade crystalline rocks of the western-central Rhodope Massif are best exposed in the Verila, Rila and Pirin mountains in Bulgaria, and extend into the Central Rhodope Mountains in Bulgaria and Greece (Fig. 1). Almost all of these basement units in the western-central Rhodope Massif contain bodies and lenses of mafic-ultramafic rocks, showing mid-ocean ridge (MORB)-like geochemical affinities (Kolcheva & Eskenazy, Reference Kolcheva and Eskenazy1988; Liati & Mposkos, Reference Liati and Mposkos1990). Both high-grade metamorphic units and mafic-ultramafic intercalations with c. 245–250 Ma old protoliths structurally overlie along the WSW-vergent Nestos thrust fault the Upper Palaeozoic–Triassic (Kronberg, Meyer & Pilger, Reference Kronberg, Meyer and Pilger1970; Liati, Gebauer & Fanning, Reference Liati, Gebauer, Fanning, Dobrzhinetskaya, Faryad, Wallis and Cuthbert2011) platform carbonates represented by the Pirin-Pangeon unit (Papanikolaou & Panagopoulos, Reference Papanikolaou and Panagopoulos1981; Zagorčev, Reference Zagorčev1994). The metamorphic basement of the Rila Mountains in the western Rhodope Massif is regarded as the northeastward extension of the Ograzden unit in the Serbo-Macedonian Massif (Zagorčev, Reference Zagorčev1994; Zagorchev, Reference Zagorchev2001). In the Rila Mountains, the metagabbro-metadiorite bodies within the high-grade metamorphic units show island arc tholeiitic (IAT) and calc-alkaline (CA) affinities (Machev, Reference Machev2002). These mafic rocks are locally associated with sheared boudins of lherzolite?–clinopyroxenite cumulates (Bazylev et al. Reference Bazylev, Zakariadze, Zeljazkova-Panayotova, Kolcheva, Obërhansli and Solovieva1999). A complex Alpine ultra-high, high- and medium pressure tectonometamorphic history of the western-central Rhodope units is bracketed between 149 and 40 Ma (Liati, Reference Liati2005 and references therein). Zircon U–Pb geochronology in the Rhodope units has revealed ubiquitous Permo-Carboniferous (310–253 Ma) and Late Jurassic–Early Cretaceous (160–134 Ma) granitoid protolith ages in the high-grade basement (e.g. Peytcheva et al. Reference Peytcheva, Von Quadt, Ovtcharova, Handler, Neubauer, Salnikova, Kostitsin, Sarov and Kolcheva2004; Liati, Reference Liati2005; Turpaud & Reischmann, Reference Turpaud and Reischmann2010) (Fig. 1).

The Serbo-Macedonian Massif (Mercier, Reference Mercier1966; Dimitriević, Reference Dimitrijevic1974) extends northwards into Serbia, F.Y.R. Macedonia, Greece and Bulgaria, and has been considered as either a separate crustal unit within the Internal Hellenides (Papanikolaou, Reference Papanikolaou2009) that was thrust onto the Rhodope Massif (Kockel & Walther, Reference Kockel and Walther1965), or is part of a single continental block sharing together with the Rhodope Massif the same Alpine nappe-stacking kinematics (Ricou et al. Reference Ricou, Burg, Godfriaux and Ivanov1998). In the Chalkidiki Peninsula of northern Greece, it has been subdivided into two separate series. The Lower Kerdilion series is separated by a SW-dipping fault (Kockel, Mollat & Walther, Reference Kockel, Mollat and Walther1971, Reference Kockel, Mollat and Walther1977) or ductile shear zone (Burg, Godfriaux & Ricou, Reference Burg, Godfriaux and Ricou1995) from the Upper Vertiskos series. The Vertiskos series hosts mafic-ultramafic bodies, which are known as the Therma-Volvi-Gomati (TVG) complex (Dixon & Dimitriadis, Reference Dixon, Dimitriadis, Robertson and Dixon1984) (Fig. 1). Recent zircon U–Pb geochronology has shown the presence of Neoproterozoic (586 Ma) and Silurian (433–428 Ma) igneous basement rocks in the Vertiskos series gneisses, which are intruded by the Triassic (mean age 228 Ma), A-type Arnea granite (Himmerkus, Reischmann & Kostopoulos, Reference Himmerkus, Reischmann and Kostopoulos2009 and references therein) (Fig. 1). The Permian–Lower Triassic Examili clastic and volcanic successions overlying the Vertiskos series have been interpreted as the products of Triassic rifting (Dimitriadis & Asvesta, Reference Dimitriadis and Asvesta1993).

Dixon & Dimitriadis (Reference Dixon, Dimitriadis, Robertson and Dixon1984) identified the Volvi mafic rocks as ‘transitional basalts’ of mixed ‘alkalic’ and ‘above-subduction-zone’ geochemical affinities generated in an ‘in situ’ Mesozoic intra-continental rift. Sr–Nd isotope chemistry of the TVG complex revealed MORB and IAT affinities interpreted in terms of formation in a supra-subduction zone environment (Himmerkus et al. Reference Himmerkus, Zachariadis, Reischmann and Kostopoulos2005). The Volvi body mainly consists of isotropic coarse-grained massive and pegmatoid metagabbros and rare basaltic dykes, whereas the Therma body consists of basalts, rare altered peridotites and gabbros. All these mafic-ultramafic rocks of both the Therma and Volvi bodies are metamorphosed into massive or layered amphibolites, which largely preserve primary igneous textures and mineral phases. Liati, Gebauer & Fanning (Reference Liati, Gebauer, Fanning, Dobrzhinetskaya, Faryad, Wallis and Cuthbert2011) have reported a zircon U–Pb SHRIMP protolith age of 252 ± 13 Ma for the Volvi body metagabbros, implying Late Permian–Early Triassic magmatic crystallization.

In the western foothills of the Rila Mountains, along the Bistrica river valley, the amphibolite-facies gneiss and schist successions of the Rhodope Massif host thick metadiorite-metagabbro layers. These gabbro-diorite bodies commonly form massive or banded amphibolites, and locally show in weakly metamorphosed and deformed domains massive or pegmatoid textures similar to these observed in the Volvi mafic body. In the northern part of the Rila Mountains, massive amphibolites are intercalated with schists and overlain by migmatitic gneisses that texturally strongly resemble those of the Ograzden unit of the Serbo-Macedonian Massif. Between the Greek Serbo-Macedonian Massif and the Rila Mountains in the western-northern Rhodope Massif, other occurrences of metamafic rocks that are texturally similar to the Volvi body metagabbros are observed in the foothills of the Pirin Mountains (Fig. 1).

We have identified high- and low-Ti groups in the Volvi and Therma bodies (Serbo-Macedonian Massif) and in the Rila Mountains of the western Rhodope Massif based on the trace elements and rare earth element (REE) characteristics of the mafic-ultramafic rocks (SiO2 = 45–56 wt%) (Bonev & Dilek, Reference Bonev and Dilek2010). The high-Ti group rocks with high high-field-strength element (HFSE) and REE contents show E-MORB and mild within-plate oceanic floor signatures (OIB). The low-Ti group rocks exhibit, on the other hand, both partly N-MORB/E-MORB depleted and fractionated HFSE and REE characteristics and similar enriched characteristics comparable to the high-Ti group, and also an arc-like signature. Both high- and low-Ti groups display low- to medium-K tholeiitic and mostly calc-alkaline affinities of the gabbroic-basaltic protoliths. These geochemical signatures, trace element and REE characteristics of the mafic-ultramafic rocks are consistent with a continental rift setting for their tectonic environment of formation (Bonev & Dilek, Reference Bonev and Dilek2010). We interpret the arc-like geochemical signature of the low-Ti group to have been inherited from previous subduction events (Palaeotethyan) in the region.

3. Nd–Sr–Pb isotope results and comparison with other Triassic rift units

We analysed three samples from the Volvi body (V1, V2, V3; low-Ti group), one sample from the Therma body (TH1; low-Ti group), together with two samples from the western Rhodope Massif metamafic rocks (WRB-1; high-Ti group, WRB-3; low-Ti group) for whole-rock Sr, Nd and Pb isotopic compositions. We compared the Nd and Pb isotopes of our rock samples to the published Nd and Pb isotopic compositions of the Triassic rift-related mafic rocks in the adjacent Pelagonian zone of the western Hellenides. We also compared the Nd and Sr isotopes obtained in this study with the Nd and Sr isotopic compositions of mafic rocks from the Athos-Volvi zone (equivalent of the TVG complex) (Himmerkus et al. Reference Himmerkus, Zachariadis, Reischmann and Kostopoulos2005).

Chemical separation of the samples and whole-rock isotopic analyses were done in the TERRA Facility in the Department of Earth Sciences at Memorial University of Newfoundland (Canada) and calibrated against both international and internal standards. Sr–Nd–Pb isotopes were measured on a multicollector Finningan MAT 262V thermal ionization mass spectrometer, and 87Sr/86Sr, 143Nd/144Nd, 208Pb/204Pb, 207Pb/204Pb and 206Pb/204Pb ratios were corrected for mass fractionation and normalized to international standards. The whole-rock Nd, Sr and Pb isotopic compositions are given in Table 1.

Table 1. Nd, Sr and Pb isotopic compositions of metamafic rocks from the Serbo-Macedonian and western Rhodope massifs

Location of samples shown in Figure 1.

The 143Nd/144Nd ratios of the mafic rock samples fall in the range of 0.5127–0.5131, with positive εNd values that are characteristic of mantle melts. When time corrected for the crystallization age of the Arnea granite (228 Ma) adjacent to the Volvi body, the εNd(t) values vary from +2.4 to +9.8 (Table 1). The 87Sr/86Sr ratios of the Volvi (V1 = 0.7039), Therma (TH1 = 0.7051) and the western Rhodope samples (WRB-1 = 0.7061) display values characteristic of the oceanic crust. However, sample (WRB-3) from the western Rhodope massif has a higher 87Sr/86Sr ratio of 0.7098. These data indicate that the analysed mafic rocks except sample WRB-3 originated from magmas that were derived from a similar mantle source with a high time-integrated Sm/Nd ratio and with a moderate range of Rb/Sr ratios. In a correlative 143Nd/144Nd v. 87Sr/86Sr diagram (Fig. 2a), almost all of the samples (except sample WRB-3) show consistent values of obtained isotopic ratios to those of the TVG complex MORB-like, arc-like and cumulate mafic rock groups reported by Himmerkus et al. (Reference Himmerkus, Zachariadis, Reischmann and Kostopoulos2005).

Figure 2. Correlation diagrams for Nd–Sr–Pb isotopes of the metamafic rocks. (a)143Nd/144Nd v. 87Sr/86Sr diagram. DMM and EMI mantle reservoirs from Hart (Reference Hart1984); (b) 207Pb/204Pb v. 206Pb/204Pb correlation diagram. The NHRL and the fields of reference mantle reservoirs are after Zindler & Hart (Reference Zindler and Hart1986), and the fields of OIB and MORB from Rollinson (Reference Rollinson1993); (c) εNdt v. 206Pb/204Pb diagram. Mantle reservoirs are after Zindler & Hart (Reference Zindler and Hart1986).

The 206Pb/204Pb ratios of the analysed rocks show a relatively narrow range (18.64–19.28), reaching a higher 206Pb/204Pb value of 21.72 for sample WRB-3, which has the most radiogenic Pb (Table 1). These samples display a narrow range of 207Pb/204Pb ratios (15.58–15.77), and similarly uniform 208Pb/204Pb ratios (38.24–39.31), reaching a higher value in sample WRB-3. The Volvi–Therma mafic rocks exhibit a short linear trend straddling a progressive enrichment along the MORB–OIB line in the 207Pb/204Pb–206Pb/204Pb correlation diagram (Fig. 2b), plotting above the Northern Hemisphere Reference Line (NHRL) where enriched mantle reservoirs (EMI, EMII) are identified (Zindler & Hart, Reference Zindler and Hart1986). The Pb isotopic compositions plot within the large OIB field and close to the MORB field (Rollinson, Reference Rollinson1993). Sample WRB-1 plots closest to the MORB field, while sample WRB-3, with distinctly high 206Pb/204Pb, falls below NHRL approaching the HIMU field.

The analysed mafic rock samples have Pb isotope ratios that cluster close to those of Triassic, rift-related mafic rocks from Greece (Pe-Piper, Reference Pe-Piper1998). Our samples from the Serbo-Macedonian and Rhodope massifs and those reported from Pelagonia by Pe-Piper (Reference Pe-Piper1998) all plot within the OIB field (closest to the MORB field), and mostly show high 206Pb/204Pb and 208Pb/204Pb ratios. When 206Pb/204Pb is plotted against εNdt = 228, the isotopic ratios of our samples cluster between the Bulk Silica Earth (BSE) and MORB fields (Fig. 2c). The Nd isotopes are available only for two samples from the Triassic rift-related rocks in Pelagonia (Pe-Piper, Reference Pe-Piper1998); when plotted as εNdt = 210 values together with our samples, both rock suites display strong similarities in terms of Nd–Pb isotopic compositions (Fig. 2c).

4. Discussion and conclusions

The Nd isotope compositions obtained in this study are consistent with N-MORB to E-MORB and OIB signatures of the samples displayed by their trace element and REE geochemistry (Bonev & Dilek, Reference Bonev and Dilek2010). The range of Nd isotopes is consistent with the values of the oceanic crust developed in seafloor spreading centres, indicating their origin from a MORB mantle source, with contributions of enriched OIB-type, within-plate melts. We infer, therefore, the involvement of multiple mantle reservoirs in the mantle source region. The Pb isotope data suggest a more pronounced contribution of an OIB source, possibly due to a small degree of melting (e.g. Hickey-Vargas et al. Reference Hickey-Vargas, Savov, Bizimis, Ishii, Fujioka, Christie, Fisher, Lee and Givens2007) of an OIB component mixed into the source mantle. The range of Sr isotopes also supports mixed mantle components in the source region, but in addition shows the enrichment process via crustal contamination, explaining the variations and an extremely high 87Sr/86Sr ratio in sample WRB-3. We infer a contribution from continental crust to explain the elevated 87Sr/86Sr ratio (0.7098) observed in this sample. This value is indistinguishable from that of regional crystalline basement of the Serbo-Macedonian Massif (87Sr/86Sr = 0.7096) (Himmerkus, Reischmann & Kostopoulos, Reference Himmerkus, Reischmann and Kostopoulos2009).

Triassic rift-related mafic volcanic rocks showing enriched mantle and within-plate chemical signatures (E-MORB and OIB) are abundant in the Hellenides to the west. These volcanic assemblages have Nd–Pb isotopic signatures indicating an enriched, hydrated mantle source and plume-related HIMU component (Pe-Piper, Reference Pe-Piper1998), although the sample closest to HIMU compositions is contaminated sample WRB-3. This feature of sample WRB-3, together with similar Pb isotopes of the Triassic rift-related rocks in Pelagonia that are both shifted toward the upper crust EMII reservoir (Fig. 2b), point to likely crustal influence in the melt source of the mafic rock assemblages in the region. This latter feature additionally points to an isotopic continuity of our TVG samples with the Triassic rift-related mafic volcanic suites in Pelagonia.

Our findings highlight coherent Nd–Sr–Pb isotopic ratios of the mafic rocks, indicating generation of magmas by partial melting of a mantle source ranging from MORB- to OIB-source mantle. These isotopic data indicate variable contamination of magmas by continental crust material. These features are compatible with an intra-continental rift to spreading centre setting. Comparison of the Nd–Sr–Pb isotope results with analogous data from Triassic rift-related mafic rocks in the Aegean region demonstrates regionwide similarity of the isotopic compositions, which in turn provides additional support for the proposed rift-related origin for the metamafic rocks of the western Rhodope and the Serbo-Macedonian massifs.

Acknowledgements

The US Department of State Fulbright Scholarship to NB at Miami University is gratefully acknowledged, together with the support from the Sofia University research grant 002/2011. JMH thanks the Canadian Natural Sciences and Research Council (NSERC) for support for this research in the form of a Discovery Grant, and Memorial University of Newfoundland for additional financial support for this project. Thanks go to Dr Alain Potrel for help running the TIMS analyses.

References

Bazylev, B. A., Zakariadze, G. S., Zeljazkova-Panayotova, M. D., Kolcheva, K., Obërhansli, R. & Solovieva, N. V. 1999. Petrology of ultrabasites from the ophiolitic association in crystalline basement of the Rhodope Massif. Petrology 7, 191212.Google Scholar
Bonev, N. & Beccaletto, L. 2007. From syn- to post-orogenic Tertiary extension in the north Aegean region: constraints on the kinematics in the eastern Rhodope-Thrace, Bulgaria-Greece and the Biga Peninsula, NW Turkey. In The Geodynamics of the Aegean and Anatolia (eds Taymaz, T., Yilmaz, Y. & Dilek, Y.), pp. 113–42. Geological Society of London, Special Publication no. 291.Google Scholar
Bonev, N. & Dilek, Y. 2010. Geochemistry and tectonic significance of proto-ophiolitic metamafic units from the Serbo-Macedonian and western Rhodope massifs (Bulgaria-Greece). International Geology Review 52, 298335.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Burg, J.-P., Godfriaux, I. & Ricou, L.-E. 1995. Extension of the Mesozoic Rhodope thrust units in the Vertiskos-Kerdilion Massifs (northern Greece). Comptes Rendus de l'Academie des Sciences Paris 320, 889–96.Google Scholar
Burg, J.-P., Ricou, L.-E., Ivanov, Z., Godfriaux, I., Dimov, D. & Klain, L. 1996. Syn-metamorphic nappe complex in the Rhodope Massif. Structure and kinematics. Terra Nova 8, 615.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Christofides, G., Koroneos, A., Soldatos, T., Eleftheriadis, G. & Kilias, A. 2001. Eocene magmatism (Sithonia and Elatia plutons) in the internal Hellenides and implications for Eocene-Miocene geological evolution of the Rhodope massif (Northern Greece). Acta Vulcanologica 13, 7389.Google Scholar
DePaolo, D. J. 1988. Neodymium Isotope Geochemistry. New York: Springer, 183 pp.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dilek, Y. 2006. Collision tectonics of the Eastern Mediterranean region: causes and consequences. In Postcollisional Tectonics and Magmatism in the Mediterranean Region and Asia (eds Dilek, Y. & Pavlides, S.), pp. 1–13. Geological Society of America Special Paper no. 409.Google Scholar
Dimitriadis, S. & Asvesta, A. 1993. Sedimentation and magmatism related to the Triassic rifting and later events in the Vardar-Axios zone. Bulletin of the Geological Society of Greece 28, 149–68.Google Scholar
Dimitrijevic, M. D. 1974. Sur l'age du métamorphisme et de plissements dans la masse Sérbo-Macédonienne. Bulletin de l'Association Géologique Carpatho-Balkanique 21, 45–8.Google Scholar
Dinter, D. A. 1998. Late Cenozoic extension of the Alpine collisional orogen, northeastern Greece: origin of the north Aegean basin. Geological Society of America Bulletin 110, 1208–30.Google Scholar
Dinter, D. A., Macfarlane, A. M., Hames, W., Isachsen, C., Bowring, S. & Royden, L. 1995. U-Pb and 40Ar/39Ar geochronology of the Symvolon granodiorite: implications for the thermal and structural evolution of the Rhodope metamorphic core complex, northeastern Greece. Tectonics 14, 886908.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dixon, J. E. & Dimitriadis, S. 1984. Metamorphosed ophiolitic rocks from the Serbo-Macedonian Massif, near Lake Volvi, north-east Greece. In Tectonic Evolution of the Eastern Mediterranean (eds Robertson, A. H. F. & Dixon, J. E.), pp. 603–18. Geological Society of London, Special Publication no. 17.Google Scholar
Hart, S. R. 1984. A large-scale isotope anomaly in the Southern Hemisphere mantle. Nature 309, 753–57.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hickey-Vargas, R., Savov, I. P., Bizimis, M., Ishii, T. & Fujioka, K. 2007. Origin of diverse geochemical signatures in igneous rocks from the West Philippine Basin: implications for tectonic models. In Back-Arc Spreading Systems – Geological, Biological, Chemical, and Physical Interactions (eds Christie, D., Fisher, C. R., Lee, S.-M. & Givens, S.), pp. 287303. American Geophysical Union, Geophysical Monograph vol. 166. Washington, DC, USA.Google Scholar
Himmerkus, F., Reischmann, T. & Kostopoulos, D. 2009. Triassic rift-related meta-granites in the Internal Hellenides. Geological Magazine 146, 252–65.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Himmerkus, F., Zachariadis, P., Reischmann, T. & Kostopoulos, D. 2005. The mafic complexes of the Athos-Volvi-Zone – a suture zone between the Serbo-Macedonian Massif and the Rhodope Massif? Geophysical Research Abstracts 7, paper EGU05-A-10240.Google Scholar
Kockel, F., Mollat, H. & Walther, H. W. 1971. Geologie des Serbo-Mazedonischen massiv und seines mesozoischen Rahmens (Nordgriechenland). Geologisches Jahrbuch 89, 529–51.Google Scholar
Kockel, F., Mollat, H. & Walther, H. W. 1977. Erlauterungen zur geologicschen karte der Chalkidiki und angrenzender Gebiete 1/100.000 (Nord Griechenland). Hanover: Bundesanstalt für Geowissenschaften und Rohstoffe, 119 pp.Google Scholar
Kockel, F. & Walther, H. W. 1965. Die Strimonlinie als Grenze zwischen Serbo-Mazedonischen und Rila-Rhodope Massiv in Ost-Mazedonien. Geologisches Jahrbuch 83, 575602.Google Scholar
Kolcheva, K. & Eskenazy, G. 1988. Geochemistry of metaeclogites from the Central and Eastern Rhodope Mts. Geologica Balcanica 18, 6178.Google Scholar
Koukouvelas, I. & Doutsos, T. 1990. Tectonic stages along a traverse cross-cutting the Rhodopian zone (Greece). Geologische Rundschau 79, 753–76.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kronberg, P., Meyer, W., & Pilger, A. 1970. Geologie der Rila-Rhodope-Masse zwischen Strimon und Nestos (Nordgriechenland). Beihtrage Geologisches Jahrbuch 88, 133–80.Google Scholar
Liati, A. 2005. Identification of repeated Alpine (ultra) high-pressure metamorphic events by U-Pb SHRIMP geochronology and REE geochemistry of zircon: the Rhodope zone of Northern Greece. Contributions to Mineralogy and Petrology 150, 608–30.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Liati, A., Gebauer, D. & Fanning, C. M. 2011. Geochronology of the Alpine UHP Rhodope zone: a review of isotopic ages and constraints on the geodynamic evolution. In Ultrahigh-Pressure Metamorphism 25 Years after the Discovery of Coesite and Diamond (eds Dobrzhinetskaya, L. F., Faryad, S. W., Wallis, S. & Cuthbert, S.), pp. 295324. Amsterdam: Elsevier.Google Scholar
Liati, A. & Mposkos, E. 1990. Evolution of eclogites in the Rhodope zone of northern Greece. Lithos 25, 8999.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lips, A. L. W., White, S. H. & Wijbrans, J. R. 2000. Middle-Late Alpine thermotectonic evolution of the southern Rhodope Massif, Greece. Geodinamica Acta 13, 281–92.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Machev, P. 2002. Metabasites from the Kabul mixed complex (western Rila Mountains) – magmatic and metamorphic evolution. Proceedings of the Annual Conference of the Bulgarian Geological Society, pp. 8–10.Google Scholar
Mercier, J. 1966. Paléogéographie, orogénèse, métamorphisme et magmatisme des zones internes des Hellénides en Macédonie (Grèce): vue d'ensemble. Bulletin de la Societe géologique de France 8, 1020–49.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Papanikolaou, D. 2009. Timing of tectonic emplacement of the ophiolites and terrane paleogeography in the Hellenides. Lithos 108, 262–80.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Papanikolaou, D. & Panagopoulos, A. 1981. On the structural style of southern Rhodope, Greece. Geologica Balcanica 11, 1322.Google Scholar
Pe-Piper, G. 1998. The nature of Triassic extension-related magmatism in Greece: evidence from Nd and Pb isotope chemistry. Geological Magazine 135, 331–48.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Peytcheva, I., Von Quadt, A., Ovtcharova, M., Handler, R., Neubauer, F., Salnikova, E., Kostitsin, Y., Sarov, S. & Kolcheva, K. 2004. Metagranitoids from the eastern part of the Central Rhodopean Dome (Bulgaria): U-Pb, Rb-Sr and 40Ar/39Ar timing of emplacement and isotopic-geochemical features. Mineralogy and Petrology 82, 131.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ricou, L.-E., Burg, J.-P., Godfriaux, I. & Ivanov, Z. 1998. The Rhodope and Vardar: the metamorphic and the olistostromic paired belts related to the Cretaceous subduction under Europe. Geodinamica Acta 11, 285309.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Robertson, A. H. F., Dixon, J. E., Brown, S., Collins, A., Morris, A., Pickett, E., Sharp, I. & Ustaömer, T. 1996. Alternative tectonic models for the Late Palaeozoic-Early Tertiary development of Tethys in the Eastern Mediterranean region. In Paleomagnetism and Tectonics of the Mediterranean Region (eds Morris, A. & Tarling, D. H.), pp. 239–63. Geological Society of London, Special Publication no. 105.Google Scholar
Rollinson, H. 1993. Using geochemical data: evaluation, presentation, interpretation. Harlow, Essex: Pearson Education Limited, 343 pp.Google Scholar
Tanaka, T., Togashi, S., Kamioka, H., Amakawa, H., Kagami, H., Hamamoto, T., Yuhara, M., Orihashi, Y., Yoneda, S., Shimizu, H., Kunimaru, T., Takahashi, K., Yanagi, T., Nakano, T., Fujimaki, H., Shinjo, R., Asahara, Y., Tanimizu, M. & Dragusanu, C. 2000. JNdi-1: a neodymium isotopic reference in consistency with La Jolla neodymium. Chemical Geology 168, 279–81.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Turpaud, P. & Reischmann, T. 2010. Characterization of igneous terranes by zircon dating: implications for UHP occurrences and suture identification in the Central Rhodope, northern Greece. International Journal of Earth Sciences 99, 567–91.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Todt, W., Cliff, R. A., Hanser, A. & Hofmann, A. W. 1993. Recalibration of NBS lead standard using 202Pb + 205Pb double spike. Terra Abstracts 5, 396.Google Scholar
Zagorčev, I. S. 1994. Structure and tectonic evolution of the Pirin-Pangeon structural zone (Rhodope Massif, southern Bulgaria and northern Greece). Geological Journal 29, 241–68.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zagorchev, I. 2001. Introduction to the geology of SW Bulgaria: an overview. Geologica Balcanica 31, 352.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zagorchev, I., Moorbath, S. & Lilov, P. 1987. Radiogeochronological data on the Alpine igneous activity in the western part of the Rhodope Massif. Geologica Balcanica 17, 5971.Google Scholar
Zindler, A. & Hart, S. R. 1986. Chemical geodynamics. Annual Review of Earth and Planetary Sciences 14, 493571.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Figure 0

Figure 1. Tectonic map of the Serbo-Macedonian Massif and the western-central Rhodope Massif in southern Bulgaria and northern Greece and adjacent units (adapted from Kockel, Mollat & Walther, 1977; Zagorčev, 1994; Ricou et al. 1998), showing the locations of studied samples listed in Table 1. Inset: Tectonic framework of the Alpine system in the Aegean domain of the eastern Mediterranean region. The main exposures of Jurassic ophiolites are shown in black using data from Papanikolaou (2009).

Figure 1

Table 1. Nd, Sr and Pb isotopic compositions of metamafic rocks from the Serbo-Macedonian and western Rhodope massifs

Figure 2

Figure 2. Correlation diagrams for Nd–Sr–Pb isotopes of the metamafic rocks. (a)143Nd/144Nd v. 87Sr/86Sr diagram. DMM and EMI mantle reservoirs from Hart (1984); (b) 207Pb/204Pb v. 206Pb/204Pb correlation diagram. The NHRL and the fields of reference mantle reservoirs are after Zindler & Hart (1986), and the fields of OIB and MORB from Rollinson (1993); (c) εNdt v. 206Pb/204Pb diagram. Mantle reservoirs are after Zindler & Hart (1986).