Hostname: page-component-745bb68f8f-hvd4g Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-02-06T06:25:51.584Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Global Upper Ordovician correlation by means of δ13C chemostratigraphy: implications of the discovery of the Guttenberg δ13C excursion (GICE) in Malaysia

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  19 March 2010

STIG M. BERGSTRÖM*
Affiliation:
School of Earth Sciences, Division of Geological Sciences, The Ohio State University, 155 S. Oval Mall, Columbus, Ohio 43210, USA
SACHIKO AGEMATSU
Affiliation:
Graduate School of Life and Environmental Sciences, University of Tsukuba, Ibaraki, 305-8572, Japan
BIRGER SCHMITZ
Affiliation:
GeoBiosphere Science Centre, Department of Geology, Lund University, Sölvegatan 12, SE-223 62 Lund, Sweden
*
Author for correspondence: stig@geology.ohio-state.edu
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Apart from a single study of the early Katian δ13C chemostratigraphy in two regions in China, no investigations of the Sandbian and Katian chemostratigraphy have been published from anywhere in Asia. A recent study of the conodont biostratigraphy of the classical Ordovician succession on Langkawi Islands, peninsular Malaysia, showed the presence there of strata coeval with those having the Guttenberg Carbon Excursion (GICE) on the Yangtze Platform. In an effort to establish for the first time the presence of this widespread δ13C excursion in southern Asia, a series of samples from the upper part of the Kaki Bukit Formation was isotopically analysed. This resulted in the discovery of a conspicuous δ13C excursion with peak values of ~ 2 ‰ above the baseline values. The excursion is located just above the Baltoniodus alobatus Subzone and near the level of the first appearance of Hamarodus europaeus, hence the same stratigraphic position as the GICE on the Yangtze Platform. Using the GICE, the Malaysian study interval is closely correlated with the GICE intervals at three localities representing an approximately 23 000 km long transect from Malaysia across Baltoscandia to central North America. This shows the usefulness of δ13C chemostratigraphy to clarify previously obscure stratigraphic relationships between geographically very widely separated localities.

Type
Original Article
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2010

1. Introduction

Some of the southernmost occurrences of Ordovician rocks in Asia occur in peninsular Malaysia (Hamada et al. Reference Hamada, Igo, Kobayashi and Koike1975). The presence of Ordovician strata in this region was established as late as 1955 (Jones, Reference Jones1968), and despite the various investigations that have been carried out in the ensuing years (for summaries, see, for instance, Jones, Reference Jones1968, Reference Jones1981; Hamada et al. Reference Hamada, Igo, Kobayashi and Koike1975 and Cocks, Fortey & Lee, Reference Cocks, Fortey and Lee2005), many aspects of the geology of these deposits remain incompletely known. Some of the most important and most studied occurrences of Ordovician strata in peninsular Malaysia are situated on the Langkawi Islands just off the coast in the northwesternmost part of the country (Fig. 1). The palaeontology and stratigraphy of the Langkawi Islands Ordovician succession, which ranges in age from the Tremadocian to the Hirnantian, have been investigated by, among others, Kobayashi (Reference Kobayashi1959a,Reference Kobayashib), Jones (Reference Jones1961, Reference Jones1968, Reference Jones1981), Hamada et al. (Reference Hamada, Igo, Kobayashi and Koike1975) and Kobayashi & Hamada (Reference Kobayashi and Hamada1978). For a useful recent review, including the new stratigraphic nomenclature used herein, see Cocks, Fortey & Lee (Reference Cocks, Fortey and Lee2005). In this region, a succession of mainly carbonate rocks, which is estimated to have a thickness of more than 1 km, is now classified as the Kaki Bukit Formation. It contains a sparse and not very diverse shelly fauna as well as conodonts. Pioneer work on the conodonts was published by Igo & Koike (Reference Igo and Koike1967), based on a very small number of samples. More recent records of Floian conodonts have been published by Metcalfe (Reference Metcalfe1980) and Laurie & Burrett (Reference Laurie and Burrett1992). Recently, using 40 systematically collected samples from the top 150 m of the Kaki Bukit Formation, Agematsu, Sashida & Ibrahim (Reference Agematsu, Sashida and Ibrahim2008) provided a modern reappraisal of the conodont biostratigraphy of this interval. Judging from that study, and that of Laurie & Burrett (Reference Laurie and Burrett1992), the major part of Kaki Bukit Formation, perhaps as much as the lower 1 km, is of Early to early Middle Ordovician (Tremadocian to Dapingian) age, whereas the presence of Darriwilian and early Sandbian strata remains to be fully documented.

Figure 1. Maps showing the location of the study section on Langgun Island, Langkawi Islands, northwesternmost Malaysia. As shown in (c), the investigated section is along the northwestern shore of Langgun Island. Numbers refer to samples collected for conodont research and used in the present study. Map slightly modified from Agematsu, Sashida & Ibrahim (Reference Agematsu, Sashida and Ibrahim2008).

Agematsu, Sashida & Ibrahim (Reference Agematsu, Sashida and Ibrahim2008) showed that the late Sandbian and Katian conodont species successions exhibit a striking similarity to those in the interval of the globally distributed Guttenberg δ13C excursion (GICE) in the Pagoda Formation of the Yangtze Platform in southern China as recorded by Bergström et al. (Reference Bergström, Chen, Schmitz, Young, Rong and Saltzman2009b). This gave us the impetus to examine the δ13C chemostratigraphy in the Malaysian succession. The purpose of this report is to present the results of this study, which is the first of its kind carried out on Lower Palaeozoic rocks in southernmost Asia. Despite the limited scope of this pioneer project, the chemostratigraphic data obtained markedly improve our understanding of the international, previously very incompletely known, stratigraphic relations of the study succession. The new information also confirms the idea that the GICE is a globally distributed perturbation in the Ordovician carbon cycle.

2. Geological framework

In terms of location of continental blocks, islands located and seas, the Ordovician palaeogeography of what is now southern and southeastern Asia differed conspicuously from today's geography. According to recent interpretations, in the presumably relatively large region between the giant continent of Gondwana and the smaller Siberian and Baltic plates, there were several terranes that were separated by moderately wide oceanic areas (for recent discussions, see Cocks, Fortey & Lee, Reference Cocks, Fortey and Lee2005; Agematsu et al. Reference Agematsu, Sashida, Salyapongse and Sardsud2007). Two of these smaller, but nevertheless substantial, terranes were the Sibumasu and Indochina blocks that in terms of present day geography extend from Yunnan in southern China and Vietnam and Laos, respectively (Cocks, Fortey & Lee, Reference Cocks, Fortey and Lee2005, fig. 1). These blocks are today separated by a prominent suture zone known as the Raub-Bentong suture in peninsular Malaysia and the Sra-Kae-Chanthaburi suture in Thailand (Fig. 1a).

In most respects, especially in terms of lithology and fauna, the Ordovician geology differs greatly between these blocks. Whereas most of the Sibumasu successions consist of relatively shallow-water, little deformed, cratonic sediments including prominent carbonate units, coeval Indochina terrane strata are dominated by siliciclastic, mostly more or less tectonized, partly metamorphosed, poorly fossiliferous rocks with ophiolites. Jones (Reference Jones1968, figs 2, 3) interpreted the former rocks as representing miogeosynclinal shelf and basin deposits and the latter as eugeosynclinal basinal strata. In his interpretation, the western shallow-water shelf region was separated from the eastern deeper-water region by a geanticline consisting mostly of argillaceous rocks and volcanic rocks. In a more recent, very different, interpretation, the Sibumasu and Indochina terranes are regarded as separate land masses, which were separated by deep sea regions (see, for instance, Agematsu, Sashida & Ibrahim, Reference Agematsu, Sashida and Ibrahim2008, fig. 7). However, as noted by Cocks, Fortey & Lee (Reference Cocks, Fortey and Lee2005), many features in the Lower Palaeozoic palaeogeography of this region remain obscure.

Ordovician rocks of the Sibumasu block are exposed in several areas from northwestern Thailand southward through the western part of peninsular Malaysia (Agematsu et al. Reference Agematsu, Sashida, Salyapongse and Sardsud2007, fig. 1, and references therein). Perhaps the best known, and most studied, of these occurrences is on the Langkawi Islands in northwesternmost peninsular Malaysia (for informative maps and description, see Jones, Reference Jones1968, Reference Jones1981). The focus of the present investigation is an Upper Ordovician (Sandbian–Katian) section in this region.

3. Samples and biostratigraphy

The present chemostratigraphic research is based on limestone samples used for conodont work by Agematsu, Sashida & Ibrahim (Reference Agematsu, Sashida and Ibrahim2008) that were collected from exposures along the shore of the northwestern side of Langgun Island ( = Palau Langgun of Jones, Reference Jones1968; Langgon Island of Igo & Koike, Reference Igo and Koike1967; Langoon Island of Agematsu, Sashida & Ibrahim, Reference Agematsu, Sashida and Ibrahim2008). This section, which is situated on an island off the northeastern corner of Langkawi Island (Fig. 1), has previously been studied by Igo & Koike (Reference Igo and Koike1967) and Jones (Reference Jones1968). For this investigation, we used samples 27–30, 32–37, 39, 80 and 79 of Agematsu, Sashida & Ibrahim (Reference Agematsu, Sashida and Ibrahim2008), which provided suitable material for δ13Ccarb analysis. Other samples collected by these authors had been completely dissolved for conodonts. The geographic and stratigraphic locations of these samples are shown schematically in Figures 1 and 2, respectively.

Figure 2. δ13Ccarb curve and vertical ranges of important conodont taxa in the late Sandbian–early Katian part of the Kaki Bukit Formation on Langgun Island. Note the conspicuous increase in δ13C values from baseline values of ~+1 ‰ to excursion values of ~+3 ‰, which is followed by a gradual decline toward baseline values in the uppermost part of the formation. Darriw. – Darriwilian. As mentioned in the text, Darriwilian strata are still incompletely documented in the study area.

As is a necessity for any study of this type, the samples are tied into an adequate biostratigraphic framework. The best biostratigraphic control of the study succession is provided by the conodonts as described by Agematsu, Sashida & Ibrahim (Reference Agematsu, Sashida and Ibrahim2008). To clarify the conodont biostratigraphic framework, the significant conodont taxa and their importance are briefly discussed below. For vertical distribution data, see Figure 2. Unless noted otherwise, we use the global stage terminology recently ratified by the International Commission on Stratigraphy (for a review, see Bergström et al. Reference Bergström, Chen, Gutiérrez-Marco and Dronov2009a).

The conodont faunas from the lowermost portion of the Kaki Bukit Formation include Cordylodus sp. and other taxa indicating a Tremadocian age. Overlying strata yield Floian–Darriwilian(?) faunas that show similarities to tropical zone faunas from Australia and China (Agematsu, Sashida & Ibrahim, Reference Agematsu, Sashida and Ibrahim2008). Analysis of these faunas is outside the scope of this study, which is centred on the uppermost Sandbian–Katian portion of the Kaki Bukit Formation.

Among the taxa present in this interval, Dapsilodus mutatus, Protopanderodus liripipus and Scabbardella altipes are relatively long-ranging and hence of limited value for detailed biostratigraphic correlation. The two latter species appear near the base of the early Sandbian Amorphognathus tvaerensis Zone in Sweden (Bergström, Reference Bergström2007), whereas Dapsilodus mutatus occurs already in Darriwilian strata (Zhang, Reference Zhang1998). Of greater biostratigraphic significance is Baltoniodus alobatus. The Malaysian specimens compare favourably with those identified as Baltoniodus alobatus (= Baltoniodus or Prioniodus linguatus in An, Reference An1987 and some older Chinese papers) from the uppermost Miaopo Formation and coeval strata of the Yangtze Platform. In having a platform-like posterior process with a rounded lateral expansion, the Pb element of this morphotype is closely similar to the Pb element of the typical Baltoniodus alobatus from Baltoscandia (Bergström, Reference Bergström1971, pl. 2, figs 4, 5). However, at least some of the Langkawi Islands M elements have an unusually long denticulate posterior process (Agematsu, Sashida & Ibrahim, Reference Agematsu, Sashida and Ibrahim2008, fig. 11:12a, b), a feature not seen in the mostly fragmentary Baltoscandic specimens. Other Malaysian M elements, such as that figured by Agematsu, Sashida & Ibrahim (Reference Agematsu, Sashida and Ibrahim2008, fig. 11:13a), appear indistinguishable from the Baltoscandic specimens. Based on the fact that as far as is known, this species is restricted to the Baltoniodus alobatus Subzone of the Amorphognathus tvaerensis Zone (Bergström, Reference Bergström1971, Reference Bergström2007), we conclude that the interval of samples 27–30 of Agematsu, Sashida & Ibrahim (Reference Agematsu, Sashida and Ibrahim2008) represents this conodont subzone, which is of late Sandbian age. Importantly, this subzone is in China and Baltoscandia located slightly below the level of the beginning of the GICE (Männik & Viira, Reference Männik, Viira and Põldvere2005; Bergström et al. Reference Bergström, Chen, Schmitz, Young, Rong and Saltzman2009b).

Another conodont species of biostratigraphic significance in the Langkawi Islands succession is Hamarodus europeus. This species is known from the Amorphognathus superbus and A. ordovicicus zones at many localities in Baltoscandia (Bergström, Reference Bergström2007) and has also been recorded from sections elsewhere in Europe (see, for instance, Serpagli, Reference Serpagli1967; Orchard, Reference Orchard1980; Dzik, Reference Dzik and Urbanek1994; Ferretti & Barnes, Reference Ferretti and Barnes1997), but in North America, it has been safely identified only from Nevada (Sweet, Reference Sweet2000). Although used as a zone fossil in China (An, Reference An1987; Ni & Li, Reference Ni and Li1987), Thailand (Agematsu et al. Reference Agematsu, Sashida, Salyapongse and Sardsud2007) and recently in peninsular Malaysia (Agematsu, Sashida & Ibrahim, Reference Agematsu, Sashida and Ibrahim2008), the fact that it ranges through virtually the entire Katian Stage (Bergström, Reference Bergström2007) greatly reduces its value for correlation of a particular stratigraphic interval. Nevertheless, the first appearance of this morphologically distinctive species appears to be at essentially the same stratigraphic level in Baltoscandia, Poland (Dzik, Reference Dzik and Urbanek1994), China (Bergström et al. Reference Bergström, Chen, Schmitz, Young, Rong and Saltzman2009b, fig. 6) and Malaysia, namely in the uppermost Amorphognathus tvaerensis Zone as this zone was originally defined by Bergström (Reference Bergström1971).

The few available Langkawi Islands specimens of the biostratigraphically important genus Amorphognathus are unfortunately not identifiable to species. Stratigraphically similar occurrences of specimens of this genus are known from the Pagoda Formation of the Yangtze Platform, China (An, Reference An1987; Ni & Li, Reference Ni and Li1987; Bergström et al. Reference Bergström, Chen, Schmitz, Young, Rong and Saltzman2009b). A specimen that apparently represents a dextral Pa element of Amorphognathus superbus was recorded (as Amorphognathus sp.) from an approximately coeval horizon in the Pa Kae Formation of southern Thailand by Agematsu et al. (Reference Agematsu, Sashida, Salyapongse and Sardsud2007, fig. 13:1a, b). However, additional specimens are clearly needed to establish the species identity of the morphotype(s) from the Langkawi Islands succession.

As a whole, the Sandbian–Katian conodont fauna recorded by Agematsu, Sashida & Ibrahim (Reference Agematsu, Sashida and Ibrahim2008) from the Kaki Bukit Formation is closely similar not only to that of the Pagoda Formation but also to that of the upper Pa Kae Formation. The latter fauna was recorded from the type section of the formation in outcrops near the Khlong Husi Ba River about 50 km N of Langkawi Islands. The rich trilobite fauna from reddish-weathering limestones in the top 50 m of the formation at this locality described by Fortey (Reference Fortey1997) shows a striking similarity to that of the Pagoda Formation. Based on the ranges of key conodonts, such as Hamarodus europaeus and Amorphognathus superbus, this top part of the Pa Kae Formation would appear to correspond to the lower to middle part of the Pagoda Formation at the Puxihe Quarry. Hence, there is excellent agreement between the evidence furnished by conodonts and trilobites regarding the biostratigraphic relations between the Pa Kae and Pagoda successions.

4. δ13Ccarb chemostratigraphy

4.a. Sample preparation

Powdered, homogenized bulk-rock samples were analysed for 13C/12C and 18O/16O ratios at the Stable Isotope Laboratory, Department of Geology, Copenhagen University. The samples were dissolved in vacuum in 100% phosphoric acid at 25 °C. The carbon dioxide evolved was analysed in a Finnigan-MAT 250 mass spectrometer. The results are reported in per mil (‰) deviations from the V-PDB (Vienna-Pee Dee Belemnite) standard. Reproducibility is better than ±0.03 for δ13C and ±0.05 for δ18O expressed as ±σ (standard deviation) for ten identical samples. Only the δ13C results are presented herein.

4.b. The Langkawi Islands δ13Ccarb curve

The results of analysis of 13 limestone samples from an approximately 60 m thick interval of nodular limestone in the upper Kaki Bukit Formation are plotted in the δ13C curve shown in Figure 2. The stratigraphically lowermost four samples (samples 27–30) show δ13C values of ~+1 ‰ that we interpret as baseline values. The sample 32 shows a significantly higher δ13C value of +1.9 ‰, which represents the beginning of the excursion, the peak values of which range up to +3 ‰ in the samples 33–35. The excursion peak is followed by a gradual decline in δ13C values to ~+2 ‰ or less in the following samples 36, 37, 39, 80 and 79. Further studies are needed to clarify if the δ13C curve returns to the previous baseline values of ~+1 ‰ in the uppermost part of the Kaki Bukit Formation from which no samples were available. Importantly, the excursion peak values are in the approximately 10 m thick interval between the stratigraphically highest occurrence of Baltoniodus alobatus (sample 31) and the first appearance of Hamarodus europaeus (sample 34). Although the available conodont biostratigraphic evidence is not very extensive, it shows that the δ13C excursion is present within an interval that is slightly younger than the Baltoniodus alobatus Subzone of the Amorphognathus tvaerensis Zone.

The conodont species succession around the excursion interval in the Malaysian study succession is virtually identical to that in the GICE interval on the Yangtze Platform of China (Bergström et al. Reference Bergström, Chen, Schmitz, Young, Rong and Saltzman2009b) (Fig. 3) and there are also close similarities to that of the corresponding excursion interval in Baltoscandia (Bergström et al. Reference Bergström, Huff, Saltzman, Kolata and Leslie2004, Reference Bergström, Chen, Schmitz, Young, Rong and Saltzman2009b; Männik &Viira, Reference Männik, Viira and Põldvere2005; Barta et al. Reference Barta, Bergström, Saltzman and Schmitz2007). In North America and Baltoscandia, the excursion interval is in the topmost part of the Amorphognathus tvaerensis Zone (Young, Saltzman & Bergström, Reference Young, Saltzman and Bergström2005). Although conclusive biostratigraphic evidence is not yet available, the data at hand clearly suggest that the excursion interval on the Langkawi Islands is of this age and hence, that the δ13C excursion represents the GICE. This is the first documentation of the GICE in any part of Asia outside China.

Figure 3. Comparison of δ13Ccarb curves and the vertical distribution of important conodont taxa between Langkawi Islands and the Puxihe Quarry, Hubei Province, China. The data from Puxihe Quarry are from Bergström et al. (Reference Bergström, Chen, Schmitz, Young, Rong and Saltzman2009b) and the conodont data from Langkawi Islands are from Agematsu, Sashida & Ibrahim (Reference Agematsu, Sashida and Ibrahim2008). Inset map shows the very long distance (approximately 2800 km) between the Langkawi Islands and the Puxihe Quarry. Note the close similarity in the shape of the curves and in the ranges of important conodont taxa which suggest that the study interval in the Kaki Bukit Formation corresponds to the uppermost Miaopo Formation and lower Pagoda Formation at the Puxihe Quarry.

5. Regional comparisons

In a recent paper, Bergström et al. (Reference Bergström, Chen, Schmitz, Young, Rong and Saltzman2009b) described the δ13C chemostratigraphic relations in the GICE interval between the Yangtze Platform, Sweden, and Kentucky in North America. As an expansion of that study, it is appropriate to examine how the Malaysian δ13C curve can be correlated with the GICE curves from not only the Yangtze Platform but also those from Baltoscandia and North America. For such a comparison, we use GICE curves from the Fjäcka section, Province of Dalarna, central Sweden (Bergström et al. Reference Bergström, Huff, Saltzman, Kolata and Leslie2004, Reference Bergström, Schmitz, Saltzman and Huff2010; Barta et al. Reference Barta, Bergström, Saltzman and Schmitz2007), the Dexter Quarry–Roaring Brook composite section, Jefferson and Lewis counties, New York State, USA (Barta et al. Reference Barta, Bergström, Saltzman and Schmitz2007), and the McGregor Quarry, Clayton County, State of Iowa, USA (Ludvigson et al. Reference Ludvigson, Witzke, Schneider, Smith, Emerson, Carpenter and González2002). As illustrated in Figure 4, Baltoscandia and North America were widely separated geographically from peninsular Malaysia in Katian time, whereas the latter region is thought to have been situated relatively close to the Yangtze Platform. The transect from Langkawi Islands to Iowa illustrated in Figure 5 represents a distance of as much as approximately 23 000 km in terms of today's geography.

Figure 4. Sketch-map showing Katian (Upper Ordovician) inferred positions of major continental plates (modified after Agematsu, Sashida & Ibrahim, Reference Agematsu, Sashida and Ibrahim2008) and the palaeogeographic location of the Malaysian, Chinese, Swedish and North American localities discussed in the text. Note that the South China and Sibumasu plates are interpreted not to have been very widely separated at this time and to have been located at about the same latitude as southern Baltoscandia, which is consistent with the similarity of the Katian conodont faunas from these three regions. The conodont faunas of the North American localities, which were situated at significantly lower latitudes in Ordovician time, are strikingly different and represent the Midcontinent Province. Locality designations (black squares): 1 – Langkawi Islands, Malaysia; 2 – Puxihe Quarry, Hubei Province, China; 3 – Fjäcka, Sweden; 4 – New York State, USA; 5 – McGregor Quarry, Iowa, USA.

Figure 5. Comparison of the δ13Ccarb curves with the GICE from Langkawi Islands, central Sweden (Fjäcka; after Bergström et al. Reference Bergström, Huff, Saltzman, Kolata and Leslie2004), New York State, USA (after Barta et al. Reference Barta, Bergström, Saltzman and Schmitz2007), and the Upper Mississippi Valley, USA (McGregor Quarry, Iowa; after Ludvigson et al. Reference Ludvigson, Witzke, Schneider, Smith, Emerson, Carpenter and González2002). The diagram illustrates the usefulness of GICE for very detailed long-distance correlations.

5.a. Puxihe Quarry, China

In terms of both conodont biostratigraphy and δ13C chemostratigraphy, the succession of the Miaopo Formation and Pagoda Formation on the Yangtze Platform offers a remarkably close parallel to the study interval in the upper Kaki Bukit Formation. The conodont species sequence from the Baltoniodus alobatus Subzone in the upper Miaopo Formation into the Hamarodus europaeus interval in the Pagoda Formation at the Puxihe Quarry (Bergström et al. Reference Bergström, Chen, Schmitz, Young, Rong and Saltzman2009b, fig. 4) is virtually identical to that in the upper Kaki Bukit Formation (Fig. 3). Also, the appearance of an unidentified species of Amorphognathus, in all likelihood the same species as in the Pagoda Formation, is only slightly higher stratigraphically in the Langkawi Islands succession. However, in view of the general scarcity of conodont specimens in the Malaysian study interval and the fact that elements of Amorphognathus are relatively rare, it is quite likely that additional collecting may extend the range of this species somewhat downward to approach its level of appearance in the Yangtze Platform section.

As shown in Figure 3, the shape of the δ13C curve through the study interval in the Kaki Bukit Formation is very similar to that in the Pagoda Formation at the Puxihe Quarry. The baseline values are ~+1 ‰ in both successions, and the rapid increase in δ13C values near the last occurrence of Baltoniodus alobatus to peak values close to the level of first occurrence of Hamarodus europaeus is almost identical. A slight difference is that the peak values of the Malaysian section are ~+3 ‰, whereas they are only < 2.5 ‰ at the Puxihe Quarry. Interestingly, the stratigraphic thickness of the δ13C peak interval is > 30 m in the Kaki Bukit Formation but only about 10 m in the Pagoda Formation, which indicates a significantly higher rate of net deposition in the Malaysian succession.

The extraordinary close agreement in both biostratigraphy and δ13C chemostratigraphy between these two sections clearly indicates that the studied succession in the upper Kaki Bukit Formation is an equivalent to the uppermost Miaopo Formation and lower half of the Pagoda Formation at the Puxihe Quarry. Although no shaly strata similar to those of the Miaopo Formation have been recorded from the Langkawi Islands succession, part of the excursion interval in the Kaki Bukit Formation exhibits close lithological similarity to the Pagoda Formation (cf. Agematsu, Sahida & Ibrahim, Reference Agematsu, Sashida and Ibrahim2008, fig. 4 with Zhan & Jin, Reference Zhan and Jin2007, fig. 37). Interestingly, in the case of the peak GICE interval, the precision of this long-range correlation appears to be < 2 m in terms of the Chinese succession. As suggested by the δ13C chemostratigraphy, the Pagoda Formation is to some extent diachronous across the Yangtze Platform (Bergström et al. Reference Bergström, Chen, Schmitz, Young, Rong and Saltzman2009b) with the GICE present at somewhat different levels within the Pagoda Formation at other localities. Obviously, this fact needs to be considered when making a detailed GICE-based correlation between Langkawi Islands and localities on the Yangtze Platform.

5.b. Fjäcka, Sweden

For almost 150 years, the fauna and biostratigraphy of the Fjäcka section have been subjected to a great amount of study (see, for instance, Jaanusson & Martna, Reference Jaanusson and Martma1948; Jaanusson, Reference Jaanusson1963, Reference Jaanusson and Bassett1976, Reference Jaanusson, Bruton and Williams1982; Laufeld, Reference Laufeld1967; Bergström, Reference Bergström1971, Reference Bergström2007; Holmer, Reference Holmer1989; Nõlvak, Grahn & Sturkell, Reference Nõlvak, Grahn and Sturkell1999) that has made the Sandbian–Katian succession at this classical locality the best known of this age in Sweden. The stratigraphic subdivision of the interval pertinent to the present study follows Jaanusson (Reference Jaanusson1963, Reference Jaanusson, Bruton and Williams1982), who recognized the Dalby, Skagen and Moldå formations. In terms of conodont biostratigraphy (Bergström, Reference Bergström2007), the topmost portion of the Dalby Formation, up to the Kinnekulle K-bentonite, belongs to the Baltoniodus alobatus Subzone of the Amorphognathus tvaerensis Zone. The non-diverse conodont fauna of the Skagen and lower part of the Moldå formations lacks zone index species but most likely represents the uppermost part of the Amorphognathus tvaerensis Zone. The levels of first appearance of Amorphognathus complicatus, A. superbus and Hamarodus europaeus are in the upper part of the Moldå Formation that belongs to the Amorphognathus superbus Zone.

As is the case in the Langkawi Islands study succession, the δ13C baseline values are ~+1 ‰ in the late Sandbian part of the Fjäcka curve. However, the GICE peak values in the Malaysian curve are higher (~+3 ‰) than at Fjäcka (a little less than +2 ‰). Also, the Fjäcka GICE curve has two, rather than one peak, and the first appearance of Hamarodus europaeus there is a little higher stratigraphically in relation to the peaks of the GICE. As shown by, for instance, Ludvigson et al. (Reference Ludvigson, Witzke, González, Carpenter, Schneider and Hasiuk2004), Young, Saltzman & Bergström (Reference Young, Saltzman and Bergström2005) and Kaljo, Martma & Saadre (Reference Kaljo, Martma and Saadre2007), one-peak GICE curves are in some cases present at localities that are relatively close to sites with 2-peak curves, and we do not attach any particular significance to this feature, and do not consider it to be a unique characteristic of the GICE. We regard the chemostratigraphic differences between the Malaysian study section and that at Fjäcka as minor, and based on both biostratigraphy and δ13C chemostratigraphy, the correlation of their GICE intervals appears well established.

5.c. New York State

The Black River and Trenton groups in New York State and adjacent parts of Ontario have traditionally served as a reference standard for the regional Mohawkian (Middle Ordovician) Series in North America (see, for instance, Ross et al. Reference Ross1982). Recent lithostratigraphic and biostratigraphic studies (see Goldman et al. Reference Goldman, Mitchell, Bergström, Delano and Tice1994; Brett & Baird, Reference Brett and Baird2002; Brett et al. Reference Brett, McLaughlin, Cornell and Baird2004; Richardson & Bergström, Reference Richardson and Bergström2003) have resulted in significant revisions of the complex stratigraphic classification and separation of biostratigraphic and lithostratigraphic units. The Selby, Napanee, Kings Falls and Sugar River formations listed in Figure 5 are lithostratigraphic units. The conodont biostratigraphy of the Trenton Group is now well known (Schopf, Reference Schopf1966; Richardson & Bergström, Reference Richardson and Bergström2003; Barta et al. Reference Barta, Bergström, Saltzman and Schmitz2007) and adequately tied into the δ13C chemostratigraphy. Importantly, in this region it is possible to directly demonstrate in a continuous succession that the Amorphognathus tvaerensis/Amorphognathus superbus Zone boundary is located significantly above the GICE interval (~ 60 m above the GICE in the Roaring Brook, Martinsburg succession). The conodont faunas of the Trenton Group are of Midcontinent type (Schopf, Reference Schopf1966; Barta et al. Reference Barta, Bergström, Saltzman and Schmitz2007) and have as a whole little in common with those of the Langkawi Islands succession.

As is the case in the Langkawi Islands succession, the δ13C baseline value is ~+1 ‰ and the GICE peak values ~+3 ‰ in the New York State composite δ13C curve of Barta et al. (Reference Barta, Bergström, Saltzman and Schmitz2007). The GICE has two peaks similar to those in the Fjäcka curve. There is a rapid rise from the baseline value to the peak δ13C values that are followed by a gradual decline toward background values. The GICE interval is approximately 15 m thick in the New York State composite curve compared with about 30 m in the Langkawi Islands succession. Although the key conodonts Baltoniodus alobatus and Hamarodus europaeus have not been found in New York State or Ontario, there is little doubt about how the GICE interval of this region correlates with that of the Langkawi Islands.

5.d. McGregor Quarry, Iowa

Since the 1980s a very considerable amount of δ13C work has been carried out in the large Ordovician outcrop area in the Upper Mississippi Valley, especially in Iowa, Missouri and Minnesota (Ludvigson et al. Reference Ludvigson, Witzke, González, Carpenter, Schneider and Hasiuk2004). The GICE was first recognized in Iowa (Hatch et al. Reference Hatch, Jacobson, Witzke, Risatti, Anders, Watney, Newell and Vuletich1987) and this excursion is currently recorded from more than a dozen sections in the Upper Mississippi Valley. In these sections, it is located in the Guttenberg Member of the Decorah Formation. The early Katian strata of this region are richly fossiliferous (see, for instance, Sloan, Reference Sloan2005) and the conodont fauna of the Decorah Formation and associated strata is well known (Webers, Reference Webers1966; Sweet, Reference Sweet and Sloan1987). However, this conodont fauna is of typical Midcontinent type and quite unlike that of apparently coeval strata on Langkawi Islands and at Fjäcka but resembles that of the Trenton Group. The Millbrig K-bentonite, which occurs in the Spechts Ferry Member (Kolata, Huff & Bergström, Reference Kolata, Huff and Bergström1996), is a useful marker horizon for correlation with the same volcanic ash bed in the Selby Formation of New York State (Mitchell et al. Reference Mitchell, Adhya, Bergström, Joy and Delano2004). This bed may also correspond to the widespread Kinnekulle K-bentonite in Baltoscandia (Bergström et al. Reference Bergström, Huff, Saltzman, Kolata and Leslie2004).

Among the several sections in the Upper Mississippi Valley that have been investigated for δ13C chemostratigraphy, we selected for long-range comparison that at the McGregor Quarry, Clayton County, Iowa (Ludvigson et al. Reference Ludvigson, Witzke, Schneider, Smith, Emerson, Carpenter and González2002), because of its typical GICE curve and stratigraphically continuous surface exposure of the GICE interval. Although one sample from the Turinian Platteville Formation and one from the overlying Spechts Ferry Member of the Decorah Formation show unusually low δ13C values of ~−3 ‰ (Fig. 5), the baseline values in the uppermost Platteville Formation and the Spechts Ferry Member are between −2 ‰ and −1 ‰. Near the base of the Guttenberg Member there is a conspicuous and sudden increase in δ13C values to ~+1.4 ‰, which is followed by a decrease to 0 ‰. Above this in the δ13C curve is another curve segment with values of >+1 ‰. This produces a 2-peak curve similar to the composite one from New York State and that of Lexington, Kentucky (Bergström et al. Reference Bergström, Huff, Saltzman, Kolata and Leslie2004; Young, Saltzman & Bergström, Reference Young, Saltzman and Bergström2005). The second peak in δ13C values is followed by a decrease to ~−0.5 ‰ in the upper part of the Guttenberg Member. In the overlying Ion Member, the δ13C values fluctuate around −1 ‰.

As just noted, there are no stratigraphically diagnostic fossils that can be used for a direct biostratigraphic comparison between the successions in the McGregor Quarry and on the Langkawi Islands. Because the biostratigraphic relations between the Sandbian–early Katian successions in Iowa and New York State are well established and non-controversial (see, for instance, Sweet, Reference Sweet and Bruton1984, fig. 3) and consistent with the δ13C chemostratigraphy, we are confident that the excursion interval in the upper Kaki Bukit Formation corresponds to that of the typical GICE in the Upper Mississippi Valley (Fig. 5). Interestingly, the magnitude of the GICE is slightly larger in Iowa (~2.5–3 ‰) than in the Langkawi Islands succession (~2 ‰). It should also be noted that the baseline values in Iowa (~−2.5 ‰) are significantly lighter than in the Malaysian section (~+1 ‰). The reasons for these differences require further study.

6. Graptolite zone correlation of the GICE

A recent pioneer δ13Corg investigation (Goldman et al. Reference Goldman, Leslie, Nõlvak, Young, Bergström and Huff2007) resulted in the documentation of an excursion identified as the GICE in the lowermost Diplacanthograptus caudatus Zone in a lowermost Katian deep-water clastic succession in Oklahoma. This suggests that the GICE interval in the Kaki Bukit Formation is coeval with this part of this standard graptolite zone. However, further studies are needed to confirm this correlation, because as shown by Young et al. (Reference Young, Saltzman, Bergström, Leslie and Chen2008), the δ13Ccarb and δ13Corg GICE curves are not always of a closely similar shape, even when using the same set of samples.

7. Conclusions

The principal results of the present investigation may be summarized as follows.

(1) There is an obvious similarity in the conodont faunas, and to some extent also in the lithology, between an interval of early Katian age of the Kaki Bukit Formation of Langkawi Islands, peninsular Malaysia and the Pagoda Formation of the Yangtze Platform of southern China. This supports the idea expressed in some recent palaeogeographic reconstructions that these regions were located relatively close to each other during Late Ordovician time.

(2) For the first time, the Guttenberg Isotopic Carbon Excursion (GICE) is documented from southern Asia, namely in an interval within the upper 60 m of the Kaki Bukit Formation. The only previous Asian records of this excursion are from a few localities in China.

(3) Based on δ13C chemostratigraphy, and to some extent biostratigraphy, we suggest that the studied part of the Kaki Bukit Formation corresponds to the uppermost Miaopo Formation and part of the Pagoda Formation in China, the upper Dalby, Skagen and lower Moldå formations in Sweden, the Selby, Napanee and lower part of the Kings Falls formations in New York State, and the Decorah Formation in the Upper Mississippi Valley. In terms of regional stages, its equivalents would be in the upper Haljala, Keila and Oandu stages in Baltoscandia, and in the uppermost Turinian and Chatfieldian stages in North America. It would also correspond to the upper part of Stage Slice Sa2 and lower part of Stage Slice Ka1 of Bergström et al. (Reference Bergström, Chen, Gutiérrez-Marco and Dronov2009a).

(4) The discovery of the GICE in peninsular Malaysia extends the known geographic range of this carbon excursion thousands of kilometres in terms of today's geography and confirms that in all probability, it has a worldwide distribution and is comparable to the latest Ordovician HICE in terms of its utility for the establishment of both local and very long-range stratigraphic relationships. Having a magnitude of only 1–3 ‰ at most localities, the GICE is a smaller excursion than the HICE, which may have values of > 8 ‰; nevertheless, the GICE is readily distinguishable in the δ13C curves, especially in the cratonic carbonate successions.

(5) It is expected that future work in the Ordovician of other Asian regions, such as the vast Siberian craton, will result in the recognition of the GICE elsewhere and further prove its usefulness for the identification of a relatively brief time interval in the early Katian.

Acknowledgements

K. Sashida is thanked for his support in the field investigation in Malaysia. We are also grateful to the Department of Mineral and Geoscience of Malaysia for providing facilities for the field research.

References

Agematsu, S., Sashida, K. & Ibrahim, A. B. 2008. Biostratigraphy and paleobiogeography of Middle and Late Ordovician conodonts from the Langkawi Islands, northwestern peninsular Malaysia. Journal of Paleontology 82, 957–73.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Agematsu, S., Sashida, K., Salyapongse, S. & Sardsud, A. 2007. Ordovician conodonts from the Satun area, southern peninsular Thailand. Journal of Paleontology 81, 1937.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
An, Taixiang. 1987. The Lower Paleozoic conodonts of South China. Beijing University Press, 238 pp.Google Scholar
Barta, N. C., Bergström, S. M., Saltzman, M. R. & Schmitz, B. 2007. First record of the Ordovician Guttenberg δ13C excursion (GICE) in New York State and Ontario: Local and regional chronostratigraphic implications. Northeastern Geology and Environmental Sciences 29, 276–98.Google Scholar
Bergström, S. M. 1971. Conodont biostratigraphy of the Middle and Upper Ordovician of Europe and eastern North America. Geological Society of America Memoir 127, 83159.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bergström, S. M. 2007. The Ordovician conodont biostratigraphy in the Siljan region, south-central Sweden: a brief review of an international reference standard. In WOGOGOB 2007, 9th meeting of the Working Group on Ordovician Geology of Baltoscandia. Field Guide and Abstracts, pp. 26–41, 63–78. Sveriges Geologiska Undersökning Rapporter och Meddelanden 128.Google Scholar
Bergström, S. M., Chen, Xu, Gutiérrez-Marco, J. C. & Dronov, A. 2009 a. The new chronostratigraphic classification of the Ordovician System and its relations to major regional series and stages and δ13C chemostratigraphy. Lethaia 42, 97107.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bergström, S. M., Chen, Xu, Schmitz, B., Young, S. A., Rong, Jia-Yu & Saltzman, M. E. 2009 b. First documentation of the Ordovician Guttenberg δ13C excursion (GICE) in Asia: chemostratigraphy of the Pagoda and Yanwashan formations in southestern China. Geological Magazine 146, 111.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bergström, S. M., Huff, W. D., Saltzman, M. R., Kolata, D. R. & Leslie, S. A. 2004. The greatest volcanic ash falls in the Phanerozoic: Trans-Atlantic relations of the Ordovician Millbrig and Kinnekulle K-bentonites. The Sedimentary Record 2, 48.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bergström, S. M., Schmitz, B., Saltzman, M. R. & Huff, W. D. 2010. The Upper Ordovician Guttenberg δ13C excursion (GICE) in North America and Baltoscandia: Occurrence, chronostratigraphic significance, and paleoenvironmental relationships. Geological Society of America Special Paper, in press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brett, C. E. & Baird, G. C. 2002. Revised stratigraphy of the Trenton Group in the type area, central New York State: sedimentology, and tectonics of a Middle Ordovician shelf-to-basin succession. Physics and Chemistry of the Earth 27, 231–63.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brett, C. E., McLaughlin, P. I., Cornell, S. R. & Baird, G. C. 2004. Comparative sequence stratigraphy of two classic Upper Ordovician successions, Trenton Shelf (New York–Ontario) and Lexington Platform (Kentucky–Ohio): implications for eustasy and local tectonism in eastern Laurentia. Palaeogeography, Palaeoclimatology, Palaeoecology 210, 295329.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cocks, L. R. M., Fortey, R. A. & Lee, C. P. 2005. A review of Lower and Middle Palaeozoic biostratigraphy in west peninsular Malaysia and southern Thailand in its context within the Sibumasu Terrane. Journal of Asian Earth Sciences 24, 703–17.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dzik, J. 1994. Conodonts of the Mójcza Limestone. In Ordovician carbonate platform ecosystem of the Holy Cross Mountains (ed. Urbanek, A.), pp. 43–128. Palaeontologia Polonica 53.Google Scholar
Ferretti, A. & Barnes, C. R. 1997. Upper Ordovician conodonts from the Kalkbank Limestone of Thuringia, Germany. Palaeontology 40, 1442.Google Scholar
Fortey, R. A. 1997. Late Ordovician trilobites from southern Thailand. Palaeontology 40, 397449.Google Scholar
Goldman, D., Leslie, S. A., Nõlvak, J., Young, S., Bergström, S. M. & Huff, W. D. 2007. The Global Stratotype Section and Point (GSSP) for the base of the Katian Stage of the Upper Ordovician Series at Black Knob Ridge, southeastern Oklahoma, USA. Episodes 30, 258–70.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Goldman, D., Mitchell, C. E., Bergström, S. M., Delano, J. W. & Tice, S. 1994. K-bentonites and graptolite biostratigraphy in the Middle Ordovician of New York State and Quebec: a new chronostratigraphic model. Palaios 9, 124–43.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hamada, T., Igo, H., Kobayashi, T. & Koike, T. 1975. Older and middle Palaeozoic formations and fossils of Thailand and Malaysia. Japanese Journal of Geology and Geography 45, 139.Google Scholar
Hatch, J. R., Jacobson, S. R., Witzke, B. J., Risatti, J. B., Anders, D. E., Watney, W. L., Newell, K. D. & Vuletich, A. K. 1987. Possible late Middle Ordovician carbon isotope excursion: evidence from Ordovician oils and hydrocarbon source rocks, Mid-continent and East-Central United States. American Association of Petroleum Geologists Bulletin 71, 1342–54.Google Scholar
Holmer, L. E. 1989. Middle Ordovician phosphate inarticulate brachiopods from Västergötland and Dalarna, Sweden. Fossils and Strata 26, 1172.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Igo, H. & Koike, T. 1967. Ordovician and Silurian conodonts from the Langkawi Islands, Malaya. Geology and Palaeontology of Southeast Asia 3, 129.Google Scholar
Jaanusson, V. 1963. Lower and middle Viruan (middle Ordovician) of the Siljan district. Bulletin of the Geological Institutions of the University of Uppsala 42, 140.Google Scholar
Jaanusson, V. 1976. Faunal dynamics in the Middle Ordovician (Viruan) of Balto-Scandia. In The Ordovician System: Proceedings of a Palaeontological Association Symposium (ed. Bassett, M. G.), pp. 301–26. Cardiff: University of Wales Press.Google Scholar
Jaanusson, V. 1982. The Siljan District. In Fourth International Symposium on the Ordovician System. Field Excursion Guide (eds Bruton, D. & Williams, S. H.), pp. 15–42. Paleontological Contributions from the University of Oslo 279.Google Scholar
Jaanusson, V. & Martma, J. 1948. A section from the upper Chasmops series to the lower Tretaspis series at Fjäcka rivulet in the Siljan area, Dalarna; a preliminary report. Bulletin of the Geological Institutions of the University of Uppsala 32, 183–93.Google Scholar
Jones, C. R. 1961. A revision of the stratigraphical sequence of Langkawi Islands, Federation of Malaysia. Ninth Pacific Science Congress, Bangkok 1957 Proceedings 12, 287300.Google Scholar
Jones, C. R. 1968. Lower Paleozoic rocks of Malay Peninsula. American Association of Petroleum Geologists Bulletin 52, 1259–78.Google Scholar
Jones, C. R. 1981. The geology and mineral resources of Perlis, north Kedah and the Langkawi Islands. Geological Survey of Malaysia District Memoir 17, 1257.Google Scholar
Kaljo, D., Martma, T. & Saadre, T. 2007. Post-Hunnebergian Ordovician carbon isotope trend in Baltoscandia, its environmental implications and some similarities with that of Nevada. Palaeogeography, Palaeoclimatology, Palaeoecology 245, 138–55.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kobayashi, T. 1959 a. On some Ordovician fossils from the Thailand–Malayan borderland. Japanese Journal of Geology and Geography 29, 223–31.Google Scholar
Kobayashi, T. 1959 b. On some fossils from northern Malaya and her adjacence. Tokyo University Journal of Faculty Science 11, 387407.Google Scholar
Kobayashi, T. & Hamada, T. 1978. Upper Ordovician trilobites from the Langkawi Islands, Malaysia. Geology and Palaeontology of Southeast Asia 19, 127.Google Scholar
Kolata, D. R., Huff, W. D. & Bergström, S. M. 1996. Ordovician K-bentonites of eastern North America. Geological Society of America Special Paper 313, 184.Google Scholar
Ludvigson, G., Witzke, B. J., González, L. A., Carpenter, S., Schneider, C. L. & Hasiuk, F. 2004. Late Ordovician (Turinian–Chatfieldian) carbon isotope excursions and their stratigraphic and paleoceanographic significance. Palaeogeography, Palaeoclimatology, Palaeoecology 210, 187214.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ludvigson, G. A., Witzke, B. J., Schneider, C. L., Smith, E. A., Emerson, N. R., Carpenter, S. J. & González, L. A. 2002. Profile of the Mid-Caradoc (Ordovician) carbon isotope excursion at the McGregor Quarry, Clayton County, Iowa. Geological Society of Iowa Guidebook 70, 2531.Google Scholar
Laufeld, S. 1967. Caradocian chitinozoa from Dalarna, Sweden. Geologiska Föreningens i Stockholm Förhandlingar 89, 275349.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Laurie, J. R. & Burrett, C. 1992. Biogeographic significance of Ordovician brachiopods from Thailand and Malaysia. Journal of Paleontology 66, 1623.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Männik, P. & Viira, V. 2005. Distribution of Ordovician conodonts. In Mehikoorma (421) drill core (ed. Põldvere, A.), pp. 16–20. Estonian Geological Sections Bulletin 6.Google Scholar
Metcalfe, I. 1980. Ordovician conodonts from the Kaki Bukit area, Perlis, west Malaysia. Warta Geologi 6, 63–8.Google Scholar
Mitchell, C. E., Adhya, S., Bergström, S. M., Joy, M. P. & Delano, J. W. 2004. Discovery of the Ordovician Millbrig K-bentonite in the Trenton Group of New York State: Implications for regional correlation and sequence stratigraphy in eastern North America. Palaeogeography, Palaeoclimatology, Palaeoecology 210, 331–46.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ni, Shi-Zhao & Li, Zhi-Hong. 1987. The Ordovician conodonts from the Yangtze Gorges area. In Biostratigraphy of the Yangtze Gorges area (2) Early Palaeozoic Era, pp. 102–14, 386447. Beijing: Geological Publishing House.Google Scholar
Nõlvak, J., Grahn, Y. & Sturkell, E. F. F. 1999. Chitinozoan biostratigraphy of the Middle Ordovician Dalby Limestone in the Fjäcka section, Siljan district, Sweden. Proceedings of the Estonian Academy of Sciences, Geology, 1999 48, 7585.Google Scholar
Orchard, M. J. 1980. Upper Ordovician conodonts from England and Wales. Geologica et Palaeontologica 14, 944.Google Scholar
Richardson, J. G. & Bergström, S. M. 2003. Regional stratigraphic relations of the Trenton Limestone (Chatfieldian, Ordovician) in the eastern North American Midcontinent. Northeastern Geology and Environmental Sciences 18, 93115.Google Scholar
Ross, R. J. Jr & 28 co-authors. 1982. The Ordovician System in the United States. Correlation chart and explanatory notes. International Union of Geological Sciences Publication 12, 173.Google Scholar
Schopf, T. J. M. 1966. Conodonts of the Trenton Group (Ordovician) in New York, southern Ontario, and Quebec. New York State Museum and Science Service Bulletin 405, 1105.Google Scholar
Serpagli, E. 1967. I conodonti dell’ Ordoviciano superiore (Ashgilliano) delle alpi Carniche. Bollettino della Società Paleontologica Italiana 6, 30111.Google Scholar
Sloan, R. E. 2005. Minnesota fossils and fossiliferous rocks. Winona, Minnesota, 218 pp.Google Scholar
Sweet, W. C. 1984. Graphic correlation of upper Middle and Upper Ordovician rocks North American Midcontinent Province. In Aspects of the Ordovician System (ed. Bruton, D. L.), pp. 23–35. Palaeontological Contributions from the University of Oslo 295.Google Scholar
Sweet, W. C. 1987. Distribution and significance of conodonts in Middle and Upper Ordovician strata of the Upper Mississippi Valley region. In Middle and Late Ordovician lithostratigraphy and biostratigraphy of the Upper Mississippi Valley (ed. Sloan, R. E.), pp. 167–72. Minnesota Geological Survey Report of Investigations 35.Google Scholar
Sweet, W. C. 2000. Conodonts and biostratigraphy of Upper Ordovician strata along a shelf to basin transect in central Nevada. Journal of Paleontology 74, 1148–60.2.0.CO;2>CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Webers, G. F. 1966. The Middle and Upper Ordovician conodont faunas of Minnesota. Minnesota Geological Survey Special Publication 4, 1123.Google Scholar
Young, S. A., Saltzman, M. R. & Bergström, S. M. 2005. Upper Ordovician (Mohawkian) carbon isotope (δ13C) stratigraphy in eastern and central North America: Regional expression of a perturbation of the global carbon cycle. Palaeogeography, Palaeoclimatology, Palaeoecology 222, 5376.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Young, S. A., Saltzman, M. R., Bergström, S. M., Leslie, S. A. & Chen, Xu. 2008. Paired δ13Ccarb and δ13Corg records of Upper Ordovician (Sandbian–Katian) carbonates in North America and China: Implications for paleoceanographic change. Palaeogeography, Palaeoclimatology, Palaeoecology 270, 166–78.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zhan, Renbin & Jin, Jisuo. 2007. Ordovician–Early Silurian (Llandovery) stratigraphy and Palaeontology of the Upper Yangtze Platform, South China. Beijing: Science Press, 169 pp.Google Scholar
Zhang, Jianhua. 1998. Conodonts from the Guniutan Formation (Llanvirnian) in Hubei and Hunan Provinces, south-central China. Stockholm Contributions in Geology 46, 1161.Google Scholar
Figure 0

Figure 1. Maps showing the location of the study section on Langgun Island, Langkawi Islands, northwesternmost Malaysia. As shown in (c), the investigated section is along the northwestern shore of Langgun Island. Numbers refer to samples collected for conodont research and used in the present study. Map slightly modified from Agematsu, Sashida & Ibrahim (2008).

Figure 1

Figure 2. δ13Ccarb curve and vertical ranges of important conodont taxa in the late Sandbian–early Katian part of the Kaki Bukit Formation on Langgun Island. Note the conspicuous increase in δ13C values from baseline values of ~+1 ‰ to excursion values of ~+3 ‰, which is followed by a gradual decline toward baseline values in the uppermost part of the formation. Darriw. – Darriwilian. As mentioned in the text, Darriwilian strata are still incompletely documented in the study area.

Figure 2

Figure 3. Comparison of δ13Ccarb curves and the vertical distribution of important conodont taxa between Langkawi Islands and the Puxihe Quarry, Hubei Province, China. The data from Puxihe Quarry are from Bergström et al. (2009b) and the conodont data from Langkawi Islands are from Agematsu, Sashida & Ibrahim (2008). Inset map shows the very long distance (approximately 2800 km) between the Langkawi Islands and the Puxihe Quarry. Note the close similarity in the shape of the curves and in the ranges of important conodont taxa which suggest that the study interval in the Kaki Bukit Formation corresponds to the uppermost Miaopo Formation and lower Pagoda Formation at the Puxihe Quarry.

Figure 3

Figure 4. Sketch-map showing Katian (Upper Ordovician) inferred positions of major continental plates (modified after Agematsu, Sashida & Ibrahim, 2008) and the palaeogeographic location of the Malaysian, Chinese, Swedish and North American localities discussed in the text. Note that the South China and Sibumasu plates are interpreted not to have been very widely separated at this time and to have been located at about the same latitude as southern Baltoscandia, which is consistent with the similarity of the Katian conodont faunas from these three regions. The conodont faunas of the North American localities, which were situated at significantly lower latitudes in Ordovician time, are strikingly different and represent the Midcontinent Province. Locality designations (black squares): 1 – Langkawi Islands, Malaysia; 2 – Puxihe Quarry, Hubei Province, China; 3 – Fjäcka, Sweden; 4 – New York State, USA; 5 – McGregor Quarry, Iowa, USA.

Figure 4

Figure 5. Comparison of the δ13Ccarb curves with the GICE from Langkawi Islands, central Sweden (Fjäcka; after Bergström et al. 2004), New York State, USA (after Barta et al. 2007), and the Upper Mississippi Valley, USA (McGregor Quarry, Iowa; after Ludvigson et al. 2002). The diagram illustrates the usefulness of GICE for very detailed long-distance correlations.