Hostname: page-component-745bb68f8f-b95js Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-02-06T07:12:31.392Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

The first Furongian (late Cambrian) echinoderm from the British Isles

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 June 2012

SAMUEL ZAMORA*
Affiliation:
Department of Palaeontology, The Natural History Museum, Cromwell Road, London SW7 5BD, UK
*
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Furongian (late Cambrian) echinoderms are extremely rare in the fossil record and only two previous reports have been described from the Paibian Stage worldwide. Here, the third occurrence of an echinoderm from the Paibian, and the first ever reported in the Furongian of Britain is presented. It is a primitive pelmatozoan which shows intermediate characteristics between eocrinoids with columnal-bearing stems and primitive glyptocystitid rhombiferans. The palaeobiogeographic affinities of Cambrian echinoderm faunas from Britain, eastern Avalonia, are shown to be with Gondwana.

Type
Rapid Communication
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2012

1. Introduction

Throughout Europe, Furongian (late Cambrian) echinoderms are extremely poorly known, with only two localities where very rare complete specimens have been recorded (Zamora et al. in press). These are: (i) Montagne Noire (France) where a fauna including rhombiferans, rare stylophorans and a questionable edrioasteroid have been reported (Ubaghs, Reference Ubaghs1999) and, (ii) Holy Cross Mountains (Poland) where only the primitive eocrinoid Cambrocrinus has been described (Orłowski, Reference Orłowski1968; Dzik & Orłowski, Reference Dzik and Orłowski1993).

Different causes have been proposed to understand why Furongian echinoderms are rare, including global sea level regression (Smith, Reference Smith1988), which resulted in a scarcity of rocks from this time interval, reducing potential preservation of echinoderm-Lagerstätte. Taphonomy, sampling bias and anoxia are also important causes that affect the rarity of echinoderms described from this time interval (Zamora et al. in press).

Here I report an assemblage of echinoderms from the Furongian of Britain coming from the Maentwrog Formation in central Wales (see Allen, Jackson & Rushton, Reference Allen, Jackson and Rushton1981 for more details on stratigraphy). This find is noteworthy because, after decades of sampling in Britain, these are the first articulated echinoderms ever reported from the Furongian. It is a primitive pelmatozoan and has a thecal and stem organization that places it between Cambrian eocrinoids with columnals in the stem and more derived glyptocystitid rhombiferans. This is also remarkable because the age of these levels is Paibian and only two other localities in the world, one in North America (Laurentia) and the other in Poland (Baltica), have yielded echinoderms from this time interval (Zamora et al. in press).

2. Palaeobiogeographic implications of British Cambrian echinoderms

The inclusion of Avalonia in the supercontinent Gondwana (McKerrow, Scotese & Brasier, Reference McKerrow, Scotese and Brasier1992; Cocks & Fortey, Reference Cocks, Fortey and Bassett2009) or as an independent terrane (Landing, Reference Landing, Nance and Thompson1996, Reference Landing2005) in the Cambrian is controversial. Echinoderms easily disarticulate after death and are thus a good indicator of endemicity, suffering little or no post-mortem transport.

Only a few localities in Britain have reported Cambrian echinoderms. The oldest remains are isolated plates with calcite composition and a distinct stereom structure from the lower Cambrian (Cambrian Series 2) Fucoid beds in Scotland (McKie & Donovan, Reference McKie and Donovan1992) and from the Comley Limestone of England (Donovan & Paul, Reference Donovan and Paul1982). In both cases these records are of disarticulated ossicles assigned to an eocrinoid of uncertain affinities, and thus provide no useful information.

The classic middle Cambrian (Cambrian Series 3) from Wales provides a more diverse and richer fauna that includes cinctans, stylophorans and ctenocystoids. Cinctans are represented by two species, Davidocinctus pembrokensis and Elliptocinctus barrandei (Friedrich, Reference Friedrich1993, Reference Friedrich1995). Stylophorans are represented by the single armoured stylophoran Protocystites meneviensis (Jefferies, Lewis & Donovan, Reference Jefferies, Lewis and Donovan1987) and ctenocystoids by Pembrocystis gallica (Domínguez-Alonso, 1999). The latter, although included in a different genus, is very similar to Ctenocystis from France, Australia and North America and to Etoctenocystis from Bohemia, all three belonging to the family Ctenocystidae (Domínguez-Alonso, 1999). These middle Cambrian (Series 3) echinoderm faunas show clear Gondwanan affinities as was previously noted (Cocks & Fortey, Reference Cocks, Fortey and Bassett2009). Armoured stylophorans are endemic to Gondwanan margin assemblages (Lefebvre, Reference Lefebvre2007; Rahman, Zamora & Geyer, Reference Rahman, Zamora and Geyer2010), and cinctans are largely confined to Gondwana, although there are rare occurrences from Siberia (Friedrich, Reference Friedrich1993; Rozhnov, Reference Rozhnov2006; Smith & Zamora, Reference Smith and Zamora2009; Zamora & Álvaro, Reference Zamora and Álvaro2010). Ctenocystoids are biogeographically widespread, being present in Laurentia (North America and Canada), Baltica (Poland) and Gondwana (Spain, Bohemia and Australia) (Robison & Sprinkle, Reference Robison and Sprinkle1969; Jell, Burrett & Banks, Reference Jell, Burrett and Banks1985; Ubaghs, Reference Ubaghs1987).

The new Furongian pelmatozoan is thus important, as pelmatozoans of this age are strongly differentiated palaeobiogeographically. In Laurentia, the assemblages are dominated by trachelocrinids, a group endemic to this area (Sprinkle, Reference Sprinkle1973; Sumrall, Sprinkle & Guensburg, Reference Sumrall, Sprinkle and Guensburg1997), and are accompanied by other endemic forms with a much-reduced stem, such as Eustipocystis (Sprinkle, Reference Sprinkle1973). The assemblages of Gondwana and Baltica are composed of columnal-bearing pelmatozoans, including primitive glyptocystitids (Velieuxicystis and Barroubiocystis) from France (Ubaghs, Reference Ubaghs1999) and eocrinoids, such as Cambrocrinus, from Poland (Dzik & Orłowski, Reference Dzik and Orłowski1993) and Ridersia from Australia (Jell, Burrett & Banks, Reference Jell, Burrett and Banks1985). The eocrinoid Pareocrinus is the only pelmatozoan described from the Furongian of Siberia (Yakovlev, Reference Yakovlev1956) but its morphology is poorly known. There are also unpublished occurrences of glyptocystitids in Spain, Korea and China. The presence of ?Cambrocrinus in Wales thus indicates Baltic affinities in the Furongian, as indeed do many trilobites (Olenids) from this area (Rushton, Reference Rushton, Basset and Dean1982; Álvaro et al. Reference Álvaro, Elicki, Geyer, Rushton and Shergold2003).

Cambrian echinoderm faunas therefore support a Gondwanan placement for Avalonia rather than as an independent terrane with its own endemic fauna, as proposed among others, by Cocks & Fortey (2009).

3. Systematic palaeontology

Specimens are housed in Lapworth Museum of Geology in Birmingham, England, under repository number Bu 5247.

Phylum ECHINODERMATA Bruguière, Reference Bruguière1791
(ex Klein, Reference Klein1734)
Class EOCRINOIDEA
Order and Family uncertain
?Cambrocrinus sp.
Figure 1

Material. A single slab with five partially complete specimens showing brachioles, theca and stem (Fig. 1a). They are preserved in dark shales as natural moulds and occur with the trilobites Olenus micrurus Salter and the agnostoid Homagnostus obesus (Belt).

Figure 1. ?Cambrocrinus sp. from the Maentwrog Formation, Paibian (Furongian Series, Cambrian) 7 km north of Bronaber, near Trawsfyndd, in North Wales. (a) General view showing five specimens preserved as natural moulds. (b) Latex cast of proximal columnals showing large lumen and wide external flange. (c) Detail of proximal stem; arrow indicates the transition from the theca to the stem. (d) Detail of thecal plating in two specimens; arrow indicates the summit from where brachioles arise. (e) Complete specimen preserving stem (st), theca (th) and brachioles (br). All photographs were taken directly from the natural fossil with the exception of (b), which is a latex cast whitened with NH4Cl sublimate.

Locality. Furongian, O. cataractes Zone, Maentwrog Formation, Mawdach Group, at Ffrid Dol y Moch, 7 km north of Bronaber, near Trawsfyndd, in North Wales. See locality details in Allen, Jackson & Rushton (Reference Allen, Jackson and Rushton1981, fig. 4). These levels correlate with the Paibian Stage (Rushton, Reference Rushton, Rushton, Brück, Molyneux, Williams and Woodcock2011).

Description. The theca is elongate (up to 24 mm in height) with an expanded summit and a narrow base (Fig. 1e). It is composed of multiple circlets (between eight to ten circlets) of polygonal, roughly hexagonal plates that are smooth, slightly raised towards their centre and lack epispires or any other respiratory structure (Fig. 1d). The majority of the plates are similar in size (2 mm in length/1 mm in width) but they become slightly smaller towards the base where they articulate with the stem.

The transition between the stem and the theca is abrupt (Fig. 1c). The stem is differentiated into proximal and distal parts but is missing its distalmost part. Proximal columnals are wider that tall, have a large circular lumen (Fig. 1b, c) and are alternately flanged and probably non-flanged, although sutures are difficult to indentify in the specimens. The external flange on the columnals is very wide and very sharp compared with the inner one (Fig. 1b). Distal columnals are more cylindrical and lack any obvious flange. They are slightly wider than tall and have a small lumen.

The feeding appendages are partially preserved in several specimens (Fig. 1e). They are very thin, non-spiralated and at least as long as the theca. Brachiolars are as wide as tall and have a rectangular outline.

The oral area and apertures of the theca (anal pyramid, hydropore, gonopore) cannot be observed in the studied specimens. However, the periproct probably opens in the oral surface because thecal plates are not modified (i.e. showing invaginated borders) to house this structure.

Discussion. This specimen is tentatively assigned to Cambrocrinus based on the arrangement of thecal plates into more than four circlets, lack of epispires or any other respiratory structures, and construction of the stem. Cambrocrinus regularis Orłowski, Reference Orłowski1968 has thecal plates that are ornamented with ridges, but the absence of such ornamentation in ?Cambrocrinus sp. could be due to the poor state of preservation in the available material.

Primitive glyptocystitid rhombiferans (i.e. Velieuxicystis and Barroubiocystis) have a similar stem to ?Cambrocrinus and also lack rhombs. However, these taxa can easily be distinguished as they have a more derived thecal plating composed of just four circlets. In addition, Velieuxicystis has its periproct opening in a lateral position and framed by thecal plates.

The primitive eocrinoids Ubaghsicystis and Akadocrinus are also easy to distinguish as they have an undifferentiated stem with columnals and have epispires in the theca.

The comparison of ?Cambrocrinus with other pelmatozoans shows that it retains the primitive multiplated thecal arrangement of primitive eocrinoids (i.e. Akadocrinus) but has the derived stem differentiated into proximal and distal parts that characterize glyptocystitids. In having a large number of organized circlets of thecal plates, ?Cambrocrinus is intermediate between primitive eocrinoids (which have only irregular thecal plating) and glyptocystitids (which have just four circlets).

Acknowledgements

This is a contribution to the project CGL2006–12975/BTE funded by the Spanish Ministry of Science and Education MEC-FEDER-EU. SZ holds a post-doctoral grant from MEC (EX2009–0815). Special thanks are due to the amateur collector Ms Ffion Carrington-Roberts who found the specimens and made them available for study. Andrew Cox provided invaluable fieldwork assistance. One anonymous referee provided useful comments to an earlier version of this manuscript. I am indebted to Adrian Rushton (NHM, London) for his comments on the Cambrian of Wales and to Andrew Smith (NHM, London) for field assistance and for improvements to a previous draft of this paper.

References

Allen, P. M., Jackson, A. A. & Rushton, A. W. A. 1981. The stratigraphy of the Mawddach Group in the Cambrian succession of North Wales. Proceedings of the Yorkshire Geological Society 43, 295329.Google Scholar
Álvaro, J. J., Elicki, O., Geyer, G., Rushton, A. W. A. & Shergold, J. H. 2003. Palaeogeographical controls on the Cambrian trilobite immigration and evolutionary patterns reported in the western Gondwana margin. Palaeogeography, Palaeoclimatology, Palaeoecology 195, 535.Google Scholar
Bruguière, J. G. 1791. Tableau Encyclopédique et Méthodique des Trois Règnes de la Nature, contenant l'Helminthologie, ou les Vers Infusoires, les Vers Intestins, les Vers Mollusques, etc., Volume 7. Paris: Panckoucke.Google Scholar
Cocks, L. R. M. & Fortey, R.A. 2009. Avalonia: a long-lived terrane in the Lower Palaeozoic? In Early Palaeozoic Peri-Gondwana Terranes: New Insights from Tectonics and Biogeography (ed. Bassett, M. G.), pp. 141–55. Geological Society of London, Special Publication no. 325.Google Scholar
Domínguez-Alonso, P. 2004. Sistemática, anatomía, estructura y función de Ctenocystoidea (Echinodermata Carpoidea del Paleozoico inferior). Ph.D. thesis, Universidad Complutense, Madrid, Spain, 538 pp. Published thesis. Available online at: http://eprints.ucm.es/tesis/bio/ucm-t23248.pdf Google Scholar
Donovan, S. K. & Paul, C. R. C. 1982. Lower Cambrian echinoderm plates from Comley, Shropshire, England. Geological Magazine 119, 611–14.Google Scholar
Dzik, J. & Orłowski, S. 1993. The Late Cambrian eocrinoid Cambrocrinus . Acta Palaeontologica Polonica 38, 2134.Google Scholar
Friedrich, W. P. 1993. Systematik und Funktionsmorphologie mittelkambrischer Cincta (Carpoidea, Echinodermata). Beringeria 7, 1190.Google Scholar
Friedrich, W. P. 1995. Neue Nachweise mittelkambrischer Cincta (Carpoidea, Echinodermata) aus Marokko, Sardinien und Süd-Wales. Beringeria, Special Issue 2, 255–69Google Scholar
Jefferies, R. P. S., Lewis, M. & Donovan, S. K. 1987. Protocystites menevensis – a stem-group chordate (Cornuta) from the Middle Cambrian of South Wales. Palaeontology 30, 429–84.Google Scholar
Jell, P. A., Burrett, C. F. & Banks, M. R. 1985. Cambrian and Ordovician echinoderms from eastern Australia. Alcheringa 9, 183208.Google Scholar
Klein, J. T. 1734. Naturalis Dispositio Echinodermatum. Accessit Lucubratiuncula de Aculeis Echinorum Marinorum, cum Spicilegio de Belemnitis. Gedani: Schreiber, 79 pp.Google Scholar
Landing, E. 1996. Avalon-insular continent by the latest Precambrian. In Avalonian and Related Peri-Gondwanan Terranes of the Circum-North Atlantic (eds by Nance, R. D. & Thompson, M.), pp. 2764. Geological Society of America, Special Paper 304.Google Scholar
Landing, E. 2005. Early Paleozoic Avalon–Gondwana unity: an obituary – Response to ‘Palaeontological Evidence Bearing on Global Ordovician–Silurian Continental Reconstructions’ by R. R. Fortey and L. R. M. Cocks. Earth-Science Reviews 69, 169–75.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lefebvre, B. 2007. Early Palaeozoic palaeobiogeography and palaeoecology of stylophoran echinoderms. Palaeogeography, Palaeoclimatology, Palaeoecology 245, 156–99.Google Scholar
McKerrow, W. S., Scotese, C. R. & Brasier, M. D. 1992. Early Cambrian continental reconstructions. Journal of the Geological Society, London 149, 599606.Google Scholar
McKie, T. & Donovan, S. K. 1992. Lower Cambrian echinoderm ossicles from the Fucoid Beds, northwest Scotland. Scottish Journal of Geology 28, 4953.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Orłowski, S. 1968. Upper Cambrian fauna of the Holy Cross Mts. Acta Geologica Polonica 18, 257–91.Google Scholar
Rahman, I. A., Zamora, S. & Geyer, G. 2010. The oldest stylophoran echinoderm: a new Ceratocystis from the Middle Cambrian of Germany. Paläontologische Zeitschrift 84, 227–37.Google Scholar
Robison, R. A. & Sprinkle, J. 1969. Ctenocystoidea: new class of primitive echinoderms. Science 166, 1512–14.Google Scholar
Rozhnov, S. V. 2006. Carpozoan echinoderms from the Middle Cambrian (Mayaktakh Formation) of Siberia (lower reaches of the Lena river). Paleontological Journal 40, 266–75.Google Scholar
Rushton, A. W. A. 1982. The biostratigraphy and correlation of the Merioneth-Tremadoc Series boundary in North Wales. In The Cambrian-Ordovician Boundary: Sections, Fossils Distributions, and Correlations (eds Basset, M. G. & Dean, W. T.), pp. 4159. National Museum of Wales, Geological Series no. 3.Google Scholar
Rushton, A. W. A. 2011. Chronostratigraphical subdivisions of the Cambrian period. In A Revised Correlation of the Cambrian Rocks in the British Isles (eds Rushton, A. W. A., Brück, P. M., Molyneux, S. G., Williams, M. & Woodcock, N. H.), pp. 35. The Geological Society, Special Report no. 25.Google Scholar
Smith, A. B. 1988. Patterns of diversification and extinction in Early Palaeozoic echinoderms. Palaeontology 31, 799828.Google Scholar
Smith, A. B. & Zamora, S. 2009. Rooting phylogenies of problematic fossil taxa; a case study using cinctans (stem-group echinoderms). Palaeontology 52, 803–21.Google Scholar
Sprinkle, J. 1973. Morphology and Evolution of Blastozoan Echinoderms. Harvard University Museum of Comparative Zoology, Special Publication, 283 pp.Google Scholar
Sumrall, C. D., Sprinkle, J. & Guensburg, T. E. 1997. Systematics and paleoecology of Late Cambrian echinoderms from the western United States. Journal of Paleontology 71, 1091–109.Google Scholar
Ubaghs, G. 1987. Echinodermes nouveaux du Cambrien moyen de la Montagne Noire (France). Annales de Paléontologie 73, 127.Google Scholar
Ubaghs, G. 1999. Echinodermes nouveaux du Cambrien supérieur de la Montagne Noire. Geobios 31, 809–29.Google Scholar
Yakovlev, N. N. 1956. Pervaja nachodka morskoj lilii v kembrii SSSR (First find of crinoids in the Cambrian of SSSR.). Doklady Akademii Nauk SSSR 108, 726–7.Google Scholar
Zamora, S. & Álvaro, J. J. 2010. Testing for a decline in diversity prior to extinction: Languedocian (latest Mid-Cambrian) distribution of Cinctans (Echinodermata) in the Iberian Chains, NE Spain. Palaeontology 53, 1349–68.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zamora, S., Lefebvre, B., Álvaro, J. J., Clausen, S., Elicki, O., Fatka, O., Jell, P., Kouchinsky, A., Lin, J-P., Nardin, E., Parsley, R., Rozhnov, S., Sprinkle, J., Sumrall, C. D., Vizcaïno, D. & Smith, A. B. In press. Cambrian echinoderm diversity and palaeobiogeography. In Early Palaeozoic Palaeobiogeography and Palaeogeography (eds Harper, D. & Servais, T.). Geological Society of London, Special Publication.Google Scholar
Figure 0

Figure 1. ?Cambrocrinus sp. from the Maentwrog Formation, Paibian (Furongian Series, Cambrian) 7 km north of Bronaber, near Trawsfyndd, in North Wales. (a) General view showing five specimens preserved as natural moulds. (b) Latex cast of proximal columnals showing large lumen and wide external flange. (c) Detail of proximal stem; arrow indicates the transition from the theca to the stem. (d) Detail of thecal plating in two specimens; arrow indicates the summit from where brachioles arise. (e) Complete specimen preserving stem (st), theca (th) and brachioles (br). All photographs were taken directly from the natural fossil with the exception of (b), which is a latex cast whitened with NH4Cl sublimate.