Hostname: page-component-745bb68f8f-g4j75 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-02-06T11:07:16.164Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Carboniferous conodont biostratigraphy of the Dianzishang section, Zhenning, Guizhou, South China

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  10 July 2013

YUPING QI*
Affiliation:
State Key Laboratory of Palaeobiology and Stratigraphy, Nanjing Institute of Geology and Palaeontology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, 39 East Beijing Road, Nanjing 210008, China
KEYI HU
Affiliation:
State Key Laboratory of Palaeobiology and Stratigraphy, Nanjing Institute of Geology and Palaeontology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, 39 East Beijing Road, Nanjing 210008, China
QIULAI WANG
Affiliation:
State Key Laboratory of Palaeobiology and Stratigraphy, Nanjing Institute of Geology and Palaeontology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, 39 East Beijing Road, Nanjing 210008, China
WEI LIN
Affiliation:
State Key Laboratory of Palaeobiology and Stratigraphy, Nanjing Institute of Geology and Palaeontology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, 39 East Beijing Road, Nanjing 210008, China
*
*Author for correspondence: ypqi@nigpas.ac.cn
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

A preliminary summary of the lower Visean to uppermost Moscovian (Carboniferous) conodont succession and biostratigraphy of the Dianzishang section in Zhenning, Guizhou, South China is presented. Eleven conodont zones, in ascending order, can be recognized: Gnathodus praebilineatus, Gnathodus bilineatus, Lochriea ziegleri, Declinognathodus noduliferus, Neognathodus symmetricus, ‘Streptognathodusexpansus (primitive form), ‘Streptognathodusexpansus, Mesogondolella donbassica – Mesogondolella clarki, Idiognathodus podolskensis, Swadelina fauna and Idiognathodus swadei zones. The first occurrences of Lochriea ziegleri at the base of the Serpukhovian Stage, Declinognathodus noduliferus noduliferus at the base of the Bashkirian Stage and ‘Streptognathodusexpansus at the base of the Moscovian Stage are recognized. The definitions of these stage boundaries, as well as that of the base of the Kasimovian Stage are discussed. Correlations with the Naqing section in South China, Russian and North American sections, as well as other important sections in the world, are considered.

Type
Original Articles
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2013 

1. Introduction

Global tectonics combined with Gondwanan glaciation confounds the subdivision of the Carboniferous and also complicates global correlations. Four Carboniferous stages, including the Serpukhovian of the Mississippian and the Moscovian, Kasimovian and Gzhelian of the Pennsylvanian still do not have Global Stratotype Sections and Points (GSSPs). Four Task Groups were therefore established ten years ago to search for their candidate GSSPs worldwide.

Marine Carboniferous sediments are well developed and widely distributed in South China. Sections with continous carbonate-dominated successions are especially well exposed in Guizhou Province of South China, among which the most representative section is the Naqing section in Luosu, Luodian of Guizhou. It is a candidate section for the GSSPs of the global Serpukhovian, Moscovian, Kasimovian and the Gzhelian stages at present, of which abundant conodonts and foraminifers have been densely studied in the last decade (Wang & Qi, Reference Wang and Qi2003, Reference Wang and Qi2007; Qi & Wang, Reference Qi and Wang2005; Qi et al. Reference Qi, Wang, Wang, Ueno and Wang2007, Reference Qi, Wang, Wang, Lane, Richards, Ueno and Groves2009, Reference Qi, Lambert, Barrick, Groves, Wang, Hu, Wang, Wang, Qi, Groves and Barrick2010a , Reference Qi, Wang and Lambert2010b , Reference Qi, Wang, Richards, Groves, Ueno, Wang, Wu, Hu, Wang, Qi, Groves and Barrick2010c , Reference Qi, Wang, Lambert, Barrick, Wang, Hu and Wang2011, Reference Qi, Hu, Barrick, Wang and Lin2012; Wang et al. Reference Wang, Qi and Wang2008, Reference Wang, Qi, Lambert, Wang, Wang, Hu, Lin and Chen2011; Barrick et al. Reference Barrick, Qi, Wang and Wang2010; Groves et al. Reference Groves, Wang, Qi, Richards, Ueno and Wang2012). The Naqing section is a relatively deep-water section of slope to basin facies containing abundant conodonts, but its foraminifers are not abundant enough for the study of the correlation of the conodont succession with the foraminiferal succession. The other sections of shallower water facies including the Yashui section, the Luokun section, the Dianzishang section, the Narao section and the Fengting section have therefore been studied in recent years.

The Dianzishang section was measured and described by the Guizhou Geological Survey during the mapping project for the 1:200000 geological map of the Wangxingren region (Bureau of Geology and Mineral Resources of Guizhou Province, 1987), while its microfossil succession has been little studied. A preliminary conodont succession and biostratigraphy from lower Visean to uppermost Moscovian in this section is reported in this paper.

The Visean–Moscovian duration not only contains several important stage boundaries, but also records several important geological and biotic events such as initiation of the Late Palaeozoic ice age and Middle Carboniferous mass extinction. The conodont zonation documented here provides the high-resolution time frameworks required for future studies concerning the above events.

2. The studied section, geological and stratigraphic settings

The Dianzishang section (25° 49′ 18″ N, 105° 52′ 35″ E) is located in Shazi, Zhenning, Anshun, Guizhou Province, a distance of 40 km from Zhenning County and 50 km from the city of Anshun. The section can be conveniently accessed by highway from Guiyang and Anshun (Fig. 1). It is part of the eastern limb of the Douluo anticline, which lies within the NW Shuicheng–Ziyun deformation zone (Wang, Reference Wang2000). Palaeogeographically, the section was situated on a middle-slope of the platform south of Upper Yangtze Old Land. A succession of sediments from the Visean to the Moscovian is well exposed, except for a 10 m covered interval of middle Bashkirian age. The Dianzishang section is mainly composed of greyish-black to black, thin- to medium-bedded packstone, wackestone and chert, intercalated with thick bedded grainstone but includes minor shale and slope breccias or slump deposits. This distinctive lithological succession is usually termed the ‘Black Zone’ in the Langdai–Luodian sedimentary zone.

Figure 1. Location map of the Dianzishang section.

The Dianzishang section can be subdivided into two parts (Fig. 2). The lower part is called the Xiaoxibian section, with a thickness of 80.08 m, and includes the beds from Visean to Bashkirian age. The upper part is called the Dalubian section, with a thickness of 94.44 m, and includes the beds from Bashkirian to Moscovian age. About 10 m of section between the lower part and the upper part are covered.

Figure 2. Photographs showing the Dianzishang section. (a, b) Upper part of the section (Dalubian section); and (c, d) lower part of the section (Xiaoxibian section).

3. Conodont biostratigraphy and correlation

The Dianzishang section is composed of typical middle- to upper-slope sediments that mainly contain microfossils such as conodonts and foraminifers. Only conodonts are considered in this paper.

A total of 56 conodont species/subspecies (including more than 10 undetermined forms) belonging to 14 genera are identified (Fig. 3). Eleven conodont zones (sections 3.a.1–3.a.2, 3.b.1, 3.c.1–3.c.3, 3.d.1–3.d.5) are recognized from base to top, which are easily correlated with those of the Naqing section in South China, Russian and North American sections, as well as other important sections in the world (Fig. 4).

Figure 3. Conodont range chart for the Dianzishang section: (a) Visean–Serpukhovian; (b) Serpukhovian–Bashkirian–Moscovian; (c) Moscovian; and (d) Moscovian–Kasimovian.

Figure 4. Conodont zones of the Dianzishang section and their correlations.

3.a. Visean

3.a.1. Gnathodus praebilineatus Zone (DZSC2.0–27.6; Fig. 5)

The base of this zone is marked by the First Appearance Datum (FAD) of Gnathodus praebilineatus Belka, Reference Belka1985 and its top by the FAD of G. bilineatus remus Meischner & Nemyrovska, Reference Nemyrovska1999 or G. bilineatus romulus Meischner & Nemyrovska, Reference Nemyrovska1999. Presently, the base of this zone is not recognized in the Dianzishang section. This zone is characterized by the occurrence of G. praebilineatus, associated with other common forms such as Gnathodus delicatus Branson & Mehl, Reference Branson and Mehl1938, G. girtyi girtyi Hass, Reference Hass1953, G. girtyi meischneri (Austin & Husri, Reference Austin, Husri, Bouckaert and Streel1974), Lochriea comutata (Branson & Mehl, Reference Branson and Mehl1941) and Pseudognathodus homopunctatus (Ziegler, Reference Ziegler1960). This zone is the highest conodont zone in the Lower Visean. Previously, this zone has only been recognized in North Africa (Nemyrovska et al. Reference Nemyrovska, Perret-Mirouse and Weyant2006). It can be roughly correlated with the Hindeodus scitulus – Apatognathus scalenus Zone in North America (Lane & Brenckle, Reference Lane, Brenckle and Heckel2001).

Figure 5. Visean – lower Bashkirian interval in the Dianzishang section, Zhenning, Guizhou, South China. (Nanjing Institute of Geology and Palaeontology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, catalogue numbers 155794–155808.) (a) Lochriea comutata (Branson & Mehl, Reference Branson and Mehl1941) oral view, sample DZSC7.70, cat. no. 155794; (b) Lochriea saharea Nemyrovska, Perret & Weyant, Reference Nemyrovska, Perret-Mirouse and Weyant2006, oral view, sample DZSC7.70, cat. no. 155795; (c, d) Gnathodus praebilineatus Belka, Reference Belka1985, oral views, (c), sample DZSC49.00, (d), sample DZSC64.40, cat. no. 155796, 155797; (e) Lochriea costata (Pazukhin & Nemirovska in Kulagina et al. Reference Kulagina, Rumyantseva, Pazukhin and Kotchetkova1992), oral view, sample DZSC57.80, cat. no. 155798; (f) Lochriea monocostata (Pazukhin & Nemirovska in Kulagina et al. Reference Kulagina, Rumyantseva, Pazukhin and Kotchetkova1992) oral view, sample DZSC57.80, cat. no. 155799; (g) Pseudognathodus homopunctatus (Ziegler, Reference Ziegler1960) oral view, sample DZSC7.70, cat. no. 155800; (h) Gnathodus bilineatus bilineatus (Roundy, Reference Roundy1926) oral view, sample DZSC57.80, cat. no. 155801; (i) Declinognathodus noduliferus noduliferus (Ellison & Graves, Reference Ellison and Graves1941) oral view, sample DZSC59.40, cat. no. 155802; (j, k) Lochriea ziegleri Nemirovskaya, Perret-Mirouse & Meischer, 1994, oral views, (j), sample DZSC49.00, (k) sample DZSC59.40, cat. no. 155803, 155804; (l) Gnathodus bilineatus bollandensis Higgins & Bouckaert, Reference Higgins and Bouckaert1968, oral view, sample DZSC59.40, cat. no. 155805; (m) Gnathodus bilineatus remus Meischner & Nemyrovska, Reference Nemyrovska1999, oral view, sample DZSC64.40, cat. no. 155806; (n) Declinognathodus cf. lateralis (Higgins & Bouckaert, Reference Higgins and Bouckaert1968) oral view, sample DZSC61.80, cat. no. 155807; (o) Gnathodus postbilineatus Nigmadganov & Nemirovskaya, Reference Nigmadganov and Nemirovskaya1992, oral view, sample DZSC61.80, cat. no. 155808.

3.a.2. Gnathodus bilineatus Zone (DZSC27.6–49.0)

The base of this zone is marked by the FAD of Gnathodus bilineatus remus or G. bilineatus romulus and its top by the FAD of Lochriea nodosa (Bischoff, Reference Bischoff1957). L. nodosa has not yet been found in the Dianzishang section. Other commonly associated forms are G. bilineatus bilineatus (Roundy, Reference Roundy1926), G. delicatus, G. praebilineatus, and L. comutata (Branson & Mehl, Reference Branson and Mehl1941). This zone is the lowest conodont zone in the upper Visean. It is also recognized in the Naqing section from Guizhou, South China (Y. P. Qi, unpub. Ph.D. thesis, Graduate University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, 2008) and the Genicera (= Alba) Formation from the Cantabrian Mountains, Spain (Nemyrovska, Reference Nemyrovska2005). It can be correlated with the G. bilineatus bilineatus Zone and L. mononodosa (Rhodes, Austin & Druce, Reference Rhodes, Austin and Druce1969) zone from the Verkhnyaya Kardailovka section, South Urals (Nikolaeva et al. Reference Nikolaeva, Gibshman, Kulagina, Barskov and Pazukhin2002) and the lower part of the G. girtyi collinsoni Zone from the Asbian of Britain and Ireland (Higgins, Reference Higgins1975, Reference Higgins, Higgins and Austin1985).

3.b. Serpukhovian

3.b.1. Lochriea ziegleri Zone (DZSC49.0–59.4; Fig. 5)

The base of this zone is marked by the FAD of Lochriea ziegleri (Nemirovskaya et al. Reference Nemirovskaya, Perret-Mirouse and Meischner1994) and its top by the FAD of L. cruciformis (Clarke, Reference Clarke1960) (Qi & Wang, Reference Qi and Wang2005). L. cruciformis has not yet been found in the Dianzishang section. Other commonly associated forms are Gnathodus bilineatus bilineatus, G. bilineatus remus, G. delicatus, G. praebilineatus, L. comutata, L. costata Pazukhin & Nemirovska in Kulagina et al. Reference Kulagina, Rumyantseva, Pazukhin and Kotchetkova1992, L. monocostata Pazukhin & Nemirovskaya in Kulagina et al. Reference Kulagina, Rumyantseva, Pazukhin and Kotchetkova1992 and L. mononodosa. This zone is the lowest conodont zone in the Serpukhovian. It is also recognized in the Naqing section from South China, Cantabrian Mountains from Spain, Moscow Basin from Russia, South Urals, Donetz Basin and various locations in Eurasia (Nemirovskaya et al. Reference Nemirovskaya, Perret-Mirouse and Meischner1994; Skomposki et al. Reference Skomposki, Alekseev, Meischner, Nemirovskaya, Perret-Mirouse and Varker1995; Nikolaeva et al. Reference Nikolaeva, Gibshman, Kulagina, Barskov and Pazukhin2002; Nemyrovska, Reference Nemyrovska2005; Qi & Wang, Reference Qi and Wang2005; Y. P. Qi, unpub. Ph.D. thesis, Graduate University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, 2008). This zone is coeval with the lower part of G. girtyi simplex – Kladognathus Zone in Britain and Ireland (Higgins, Reference Higgins1975, Reference Higgins, Higgins and Austin1985) and the uppermost G. bilineatus Zone to lower part of Cavusgnathus naviculus Zone from North America (Lane & Straka, Reference Lane and Straka1974; Lane & Brenckle, Reference Lane, Brenckle and Heckel2001).

3.c. Bashkirian

3.c.1. Declinognathodus noduliferus Zone (DZSC59.4–68.5; Figs 5, 6)

The base of this zone is marked by the FAD of Declinognathodus noduliferus noduliferus (Ellison & Graves, Reference Ellison and Graves1941) and its top by the FAD of Idiognathoides sulcatus sulcatus Higgins & Bouckaert, Reference Higgins and Bouckaert1968 (Wang & Qi, Reference Wang and Qi2003). Other commonly associated forms are D. cf. lateralis (Higgins & Bouckaert, Reference Higgins and Bouckaert1968), D. marginodosus (Grayson, Reference Grayson1984), D. noduliferus bernesgae Sanz-Lopez, Blanco-Ferrera, Garcia-Lopez & De Posada, Reference Sanz-López, Blanco-Ferrera, Sánchez De and García-López2006, D. noduliferus inaequalis (Higgins, Reference Higgins1975) and D. noduliferus noduliferus, together with a few Gnathodus bilineatus bilineatus, G. bilineatus bollandensis Higgins & Bouckaert, Reference Higgins and Bouckaert1968, G. bilineatus remus, G. bilineatus romulus, G. postbilineatus Nigmadganov & Nemirovskaya, Reference Nigmadganov and Nemirovskaya1992, Lochriea comutata, L. monocostata, L. mononodosa and L. ziegleri. The ranges of species of Gnathodus and Lochriea extend only to the bottom or middle part of this zone in the Dianzishang section. This zone is widespread over the world in the areas which were not strongly affected by the Middle Carboniferous eustatic event and where the Middle Carboniferous boundary deposits do occur (Nemyrovska, Reference Nemyrovska1999; Nemirovska & Alekseev, Reference Nemirovskaya and Alekseev1994; Lane & Straka, Reference Lane and Straka1974; Higgins, Reference Higgins1975, Reference Higgins, Higgins and Austin1985; Wang et al. Reference Wang, Lane, Manger and Wang1987; Perret, Reference Perret1993).

Figure 6. Lower Bashkirian – lower Moscovian interval in the Dianzishang section. (Nanjing Institute of Geology and Palaeontology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, catalogue numbers 155809–155824.) (a) Idiognathoides corrugates Harris & Hollinsworth, Reference Harris and Hollingsworth1933, oral view, sample DZSC61.80, cat. no. 155809; (b) Idiognathoides sinuatus Harris & Hollingsworth, Reference Harris and Hollingsworth1933, oral view, sample DZSC68.50, cat. no. 155810; (c) Idiognathoides postsulcatus Nemyrovska, Reference Nemyrovska1999, oral view, sample ZXC−18.60, cat. no. 155811; (d) Idiognathoides sulcatus sulcatus Higgins & Bouckaert, Reference Higgins and Bouckaert1968, oral view, sample ZXC−18.60, cat. no. 155812; (e) Neognathodus symmetricus (Lane, Reference Lane1967) oral view, sample ZXC−20.00, cat. no. 155813; (f) ‘Streptognathodusexpansus (primitive form) Igo & Koike, Reference Igo and Koike1964, oral view, sample ZXC−16.60, cat. no. 155814; (g–i) ‘Streptognathodusexpansus Igo & Koike, Reference Igo and Koike1964, oral views, (g) sample ZXC−11.80, (h, i) sample ZXC−12.10, cat. nos 155815–155817; (j–l) ‘Streptognathodussuberectus Dunn, Reference Dunn1966, oral views, (j) sample ZXC−11.80, (k, l) sample ZXC−12.10, cat. nos 155818–155820; (m) Neognathodus kanumai Igo, Reference Igo1974, oral view, sample ZXC−16.60, cat. no. 155821; (n) Declinognathodus marginodosus (Grayson, Reference Grayson1984) oral view, sample ZXC−10.30, cat. no. 155822; (o, p) Neognathodus bothrops Merrill, Reference Merrill1972, oral views, (o) sample ZXC−10.30, (p) sample ZXC−8.50, cat. nos 155823, 155824.

3.c.2. Neognathodus symmetricus Zone (DZSC68.5–ZXC−16.6; Fig. 6)

The base of this zone is marked by the FAD of Neognathodus symmetricus (Lane, Reference Lane1967) and its top by the FAD of N. bassleri (Harris & Hollingsworth, Reference Harris and Hollingsworth1933). N. bassleri has not yet been found in the Dianzishang section. Other commonly associated forms in this zone are Declinognathodus marginodosus, D. noduliferus inaequalis, D. noduliferus noduliferus, Idiognathoides corrugatus Harris & Hollingsworth, Reference Harris and Hollingsworth1933, Id. postsulcatus Nemyrovska, Reference Nemyrovska1999, Id. sinuatus Harris & Hollingsworth, Reference Harris and Hollingsworth1933, Id. sulcatus sulcatus, Streptognathodus sp. and Idiognathodus sp. This zone can be correlated with the N. symmetricus Zone to I. primulus – N. symmetricus Zone at the Naqing section (Wang & Qi, Reference Wang and Qi2003; Wang et al. Reference Wang, Qi, Wang and Wang2004). It is coeval with the same zone in North America (Lane & Straka, Reference Lane and Straka1974; Barrick et al. Reference Barrick, Lambert, Heckel and Boardman2004) and the Neognathodus askynensis – N. symmetricus Zone in South Urals, Russia (Nemirovska & Alekseev, Reference Nemirovskaya, Perret-Mirouse and Meischner1994; Kulagina et al. Reference Kulagina, Pazukhin, Davydov, Puchkov, Kulagina, Nikolaeva and Kochetova2009).

3.c.3. ‘Streptognathodus’ expansus (primitive form) Zone (ZXC−16.6 – −12.1; Fig. 6)

The base of this zone is marked by the FAD of ‘Streptognathodusexpansus (primitive form) and its top by the FAD of ‘S.expansus Igo & Koike, Reference Igo and Koike1964. Other commonly associated forms are Declinognathodus marginodosus, Idiognathoides corrugatus, Id. postsulcatus, Id. sinuatus and Id. sulcatus sulcatus. This zone can be correlated with the ‘Streptognathodus preexpansus’ Zone from the Naqing section (Qi et al. Reference Qi, Wang, Lambert, Barrick, Wang, Hu and Wang2011) and the Idiognathoides sulcatus parva Zone in Western Europe (Higgins, Reference Higgins1975, Reference Higgins, Higgins and Austin1985), and it can be roughly correlated with the Idiognathodus sinuosus Ellison & Graves, Reference Ellison and Graves1941 Zone in Russia and North America (Lane & Straka, Reference Lane and Straka1974; Nemirovska & Alekseev, Reference Nemirovskaya and Alekseev1994; Nemyrovska, Reference Nemyrovska1999; Wang & Qi, Reference Wang and Qi2003; Kulagina et al. Reference Kulagina, Pazukhin, Davydov, Puchkov, Kulagina, Nikolaeva and Kochetova2009). It is also coeval with the previously established Idiognathoides sulcatus parva Zone in the Naqing section (Wang et al. Reference Wang, Qi, Wang and Wang2004). (Note that ‘Streptognathodus preexpansus’ is a new and unpublished species, here identified as ‘Streptognathodusexpansus (primitive form).) ‘Streptognathodusexpansus (primitive form) is used here to replace the unpublished species name and the name of the conodont zone.)

3.d. Moscovian

3.d.1. ‘Streptognathodus’ expansus Zone (ZXC−12.1 – −1.3; Figs 6–8)

The base of this zone is marked by the FAD of ‘Streptognathodusexpansus. The top of this zone is defined as the FAD of Diplognathodus ellesmerensis (Qi et al. Reference Qi, Wang, Lambert, Barrick, Wang, Hu and Wang2011), but D. ellesmerensis has not yet been found in the Dianzishang section. Other commonly associated forms are Idiognathoides corrugatus, Id. fossatus (Branson & Mehl, Reference Branson and Mehl1941), Id. lanei Nemirovskaya, Reference Nemirovskaya1978, Id. postsulcatus, Id. sinuatus, Id. sulcatus sulcatus, Neolochriea glaber (Wirth, Reference Wirth1967), Neol. hisaharui Mizuno,1997, Neognathodus bothrops Merrill, Reference Merrill1972, N. caudatus Lambert, Reference Lambert, Sutherland and Manger1992, N. kanumai Igo, Reference Igo1974, ‘S.’ suberectus (Dunn, Reference Dunn1966), Gondolella spp., Idiognathodus spp. and Streptognathodus spp. This zone is also recognized in the Naqing section (Qi et al. Reference Qi, Wang, Lambert, Barrick, Wang, Hu and Wang2011). It is coeval with the previously established conodont zones in the Naqing section such as ‘S.’ expansus and Id. ouachitensis zones (Wang et al. Reference Wang, Qi, Wang and Wang2004) and the ‘S.’ expansus, Id. ouachitensis and Diplognathodus coloradoensis zones (Wang et al. Reference Wang, Qi and Wang2008). It can also be correlated with ‘S.’ expansus, Idiognathoides tuberculatus-Id. fossatus and Declinognathodus marginodosus zones in the Donets Basin, Ukraine (Nemyrovska, Reference Nemyrovska1999), Declinognathodus marginodosus Zone in South Urals, Russia (Nemirovska & Alekseev, Reference Nemirovskaya and Alekseev1994; Nemyrovska, Reference Nemyrovska1999; Kulagina et al. Reference Kulagina, Pazukhin, Davydov, Puchkov, Kulagina, Nikolaeva and Kochetova2009), Idiognathodus klapperi, Idiognathoides convexus and Id. ouachitensis zones in North America (Lane, Reference Lane, Sutherland and Manger1977; Lane et al. Reference Lane, Baesemann, Brenckle and West1985) and the ‘S.’ expansus–‘S.’ suberectus Zone in Nevada, USA (Dunn, Reference Dunn1970).

Figure 7. Upper Visean – middle Moscovian interval in the Dianzishang section. (Nanjing Institute of Geology and Palaeontology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, catalogue numbers 155825–155836. (a–g) Gondolella spp. lateral views, (a, c) sample ZXC−1.30, (b) sample ZXC−5.00, (d, f, g) sample ZXC 28.30, 5, sample ZXC−10.30, cat. nos 155825–155831; (h) Mestognathodus beckmani Bischoff, Reference Bischoff1957, latero-oral view, sample DZSC42.50, cat. no. 155832; (i, j) Mesogondolella clarki (Koike, Reference Koike1967) oral views, (i), sample ZXC 28.30, (j), sample ZXC−1.30, cat. nos 155833, 155834; (k) Mesogondolella donbassica Kossenko, Reference Kossenko1975, oral view, sample ZXC−1.30, cat. no. 155835; (l) Mesogondolella subclarki Wang & Qi, Reference Wang and Qi2003, oral view, sample ZXC−1.30, cat. no. 155836.

Figure 8. Lower–upper Moscovian interval in the Dianzishang section. (Nanjing Institute of Geology and Palaeontology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, catalogue numbers 155837–155851. (a–f) Idiognathodus spp. oral views, (a) sample ZXC−2.60, (b) sample ZXC 20.50, (c) sample ZXC 38.40, (d) sample ZXC 4.00, (e, f) sample ZXC 28.30, cat. nos 155837–155842; (g) Swadelina sp. 2 Barrick, Qi & Wang, Reference Barrick, Qi, Wang and Wang2010, oral view, sample ZXC 38.40, cat. no. 155843; (h–j) Idiognathodus podolskensis Goreva, Reference Goreva and Menner1984, oral views, (h,i), sample ZXC 38.40, (j) sample ZXC 20.50, cat. nos 155844–155846; (k) Idiognathoides fossatus (Branson & Mehl, Reference Branson and Mehl1941) oral view, sample ZXC−0.20, cat. no. 155847; (l) Idiognathodus amplificus Lambert, Reference Lambert, Sutherland and Manger1992, oral view, sample ZXC−1.30, cat. no. 155848; (m) Neognathodus caudatus Lambert, Reference Lambert, Sutherland and Manger1992, oral view, sample ZXC−8.50, cat. no. 155849; (n) Neolochriea hisaharui Mizuno, Reference Mizuno1997, oral view, sample ZXC−6.00, cat. no 155850; (o) Neolochriea nagatoensis (Igo & Koike, Reference Igo and Koike1965) oral view, sample ZXC 4.00, cat. no. 155851.

3.d.2. Mesogondolella donbassica – Mesogondolella clarki Zone (ZXC−1.3–11.2; Figs 7–9)

The base of this zone is marked by the FAD of Mesogondolella donbassica Kossenko, Reference Kossenko1975 or M. clarki (Koike, Reference Koike1967) and its top by the FAD of Idiognathodus podolskensis Goreva, Reference Goreva and Menner1984 (Wang et al. Reference Wang, Qi and Wang2008; Y. P. Qi, unpub. Ph.D. thesis, Graduate University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, 2008). Other commonly associated forms are I. amplificus Lambert, Reference Lambert, Sutherland and Manger1992, I. obliquus Kossenko in Kozitskaya et al. Reference Kozitskaya, Kossenko, Lipnjagov and Nemirovskaya1978, I. praeobliquus Nemyrovska, Perret-Mirouse & Alekseev, Reference Nemyrovska1999, M. subclarki Wang & Qi, Reference Wang and Qi2003, Neolochriea glaber, Gondolella sp. and I. sp. This zone is also recognized in the Naqing section, and can be roughly correlated with the Streptognathodus transtivus, Neognathodus bothrops, N. medadultimus and Streptognathodus concinus– Idiognathodus robustus zones in Russia (Kulagina et al. Reference Kulagina, Pazukhin, Davydov, Puchkov, Kulagina, Nikolaeva and Kochetova2009), and with the N. bothrops Zone, N. caudatus Zone and the lower part of the N. asymmetricus Zone in North America (Barrick et al. Reference Barrick, Lambert, Heckel and Boardman2004; Wang & Qi, Reference Wang and Qi2003; Wang et al. Reference Wang, Qi and Wang2008).

Figure 9. Lower Moscovian – lower Kasimovian interval in the Dianzishang section. (Nanjing Institute of Geology and Palaeontology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, catalogue numbers 155852–155869. (a–d) Idiognathodus spp. oral views, (a) sample ZXC 31.80, (b) sample ZXC 4.00, (c) sample ZXC 28.30, (d) sample ZXC 20.50, cat. nos 155852–155855; (e) Transitional form from Idiognathodus praeobliquus Nemyrovska, Perret-Mirouse & Alekseev, 1999 to Idiognathodus obliquus Kossenko in Kozitskaya et al. Reference Kozitskaya, Kossenko, Lipnjagov and Nemirovskaya1978, oral view, sample ZXC 28.30, cat. no. 155856; (f) Idiognathodus obliquus Kossenko in Kozitskaya et al. Reference Kozitskaya, Kossenko, Lipnjagov and Nemirovskaya1978, oral view, sample ZXC−0.20, cat. no. 155857; (g) Idiognathoides planus Furduj, Reference Furduj and Einor1975, oral view, sample ZXC 2.50, cat. no. 155858; (h–j) Idiognathodus swadei Rosscoe & Barrick Reference Rosscoe and Barrick2009a , oral views, sample ZXC 67.80, lower Kasimovian cat. nos 155859–155861; (k) ‘Streptognathodussuberectus Dunn, Reference Dunn1966, oral view, sample ZXC 38.40, cat. no. 155862; (l–n) Transitional forms from Idiognathodus swadei Rosscoe & Barrick Reference Rosscoe and Barrick2009a to Idiognathodus turbatus Rosscoe & Barrick Reference Rosscoe and Barrick2009a , oral views, sample ZXC 48.00, cat. nos 155863–155865; (o–r) Idiognathodus juveniles, oral views, sample ZXC 67.80, lower Kasimovian cat. nos 155866–155869.

3.d.3. Idiognathodus podolskensis Zone (ZXC 11.2–38.4; Figs 7–9)

The base of this Zone is marked by the FAD of Idiognathodus podolskensis and its top by the FAD of any species of Swadelina. Other commonly associated forms are I. amplificus, I. planus Furduj, 1979, I. praeobliquus, I. obliquus, Mesogondolella clarki, M. donbassica, M. subclarki, Neolochriea glaber, Neolochriea nagatoensis (Igo & Koike, Reference Igo and Koike1965), Gondolella sp. and Idiognathodus spp. This zone is also recognized in the Naqing section, and can be roughly correlated with the I. podolskensis Zone, N. inaequalis Zone and N. roundyi Zone in Russia, the upper part of the N. asymmetricus Zone and the N. roundyi Zone in North America (Wang & Qi, Reference Wang and Qi2003; Wang et al. Reference Wang, Qi and Wang2008).

3.d.4. Swadelina fauna Zone (ZXC 38.4–48.0; Fig. 8)

The base of this Zone is marked by the FAD of any species of Swadelina, while its top is marked by the FAD of Idiognathodus swadei Rosscoe & Barrick, Reference Rosscoe and Barrick2009a . This zone is characterized by the appearance of Swadelina sp. 2 Barrick, Qi & Wang, Reference Barrick, Qi, Wang and Wang2010 in the Dianzishang section. Other forms in this zone are Gondolella spp. and Idiognathodus spp. Even though the taxonomy of Swadelina, Idiognathodus and Gondolella from the Moscovian in South China are not fully understood at the species level, the Swadelina fauna Zone in the Dianzishang section can be correlated with the beds that yield the latest Moscovian Swadelina fauna worldwide (Lambert et al. Reference Lambert, Heckel and Barrick2003; Wang & Qi, Reference Wang and Qi2007; Barrick et al. Reference Barrick, Qi, Wang and Wang2010; Goreva & Alekseev, Reference Goreva and Alekseev2010; Nemyrovska, Reference Nemyrovska2011).

3.d.5. Idiognathodus swadei Zone (ZXC 48.0–65.0; Fig. 9)

The base of this zone, the latest Moscovian zone, is marked by the FAD of Idiognathodus swadei and its top is marked by the FAD of I. turbatus Rosscoe & Barrick, Reference Rosscoe and Barrick2009a . Although I. turbatus, the greatest-potential boundary marker for the base of global Kasimovian Stage, has not yet been found in the Dianzishang section, the morphology of juveniles of Idiognathodus (Fig. 9o–r) from sample ZXC 67.8 indicate a possible early Kasimovian age. We tentatively put the top of this zone at 65.0 m in this section. This zone is also recognized in the Naqing section (K. Y. Hu, unpub. Masters thesis, Graduate University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, 2012), and it can be correlated with the Idiognathodus sulciferus Zone in North America (S. J. Rosscoe, unpub. Ph.D. dissertation, Graduate Faculty of Texas Tech University, 2008) and I. arendti Subzone in Russia (Barskov, Reference Barskov1984; Barskov et al. Reference Barskov, Alekseev, Goreva, Kononova and Migdisova1984; Goreva & Alekseev, Reference Goreva and Alekseev2010).

4. Discussion

4.a. Visean–Serpukhovian boundary

The GSSP of the base of Serpukhovian has not yet been established, but the majority of the boundary Task Group members agree on using the FAD of Lochriea ziegleri in the evolutionary lineage L. nodosaL. ziegler as the GSSP marker. The species is easy to identify, widely distributed and relatively abundant. These features indisputably indicate that Lochriea ziegleri is a perfect boundary marker despite its first occurrence being a little earlier than the traditionally defined Serpukhovian base (Qi, Wang & Luo, Reference Qi, Wang and Luo2004, Reference Qi, Wang and Lambert2010b , Reference Qi, Wang, Richards, Groves, Ueno, Wang, Wu, Hu, Wang, Qi, Groves and Barrick2010c ; Wang & Jin, Reference Wang and Jin2005; Y. P. Qi, unpub. Ph.D. thesis, Graduate University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, 2008). In the Dianzishang section, the first occurrence of Lochriea ziegleri is at 49.0 m in the lower part of the section (the Xiaoxibian section), which indicates the Visean–Serpukhovian boundary. Unfortunately, Lochriea nodosa, the ancestor of L. ziegleri, has not yet been found in this section.

4.b. Serpukhovian–Bashkirian boundary

The GSSP of the base of Bashkirian was established in 1996 in the Arrow Canyon section, Nevada, USA. The FAD of conodont species Declinognathodus noduliferus was selected as the marker of this boundary (Lane et al. Reference Lane, Brenckle, Baesemenn and Richards1999). In the Dianzishang section, the base of the Bashkirian lies at the first occurrence of Declinognathodus noduliferus noduliferus at 59.4 m of the lower part of the section (the Xiaoxibian section)

4.c. Bashkirian–Moscovian boundary

Presently, the definition of the base of Moscovian is still in dispute. Three candidates for the marker of this boundary have been proposed by the boundary Task Group (Groves & Task Group, Reference Groves2006): (1) the FAD of Declinognathodus donetzianus in the evolutionary lineage of Decl. marginodosus (Grayson) – Decl. donetzianus Nemirovska, Reference Nemirovskaya1990; (2) the FAD of Idiognathoides postsulcatus in the evolutionary lineage Id. sulcatus sulcatus Higgins & Bouckaert, Reference Higgins and Bouckaert1968Id. postsulcatus Nemyrovska, Reference Nemyrovska1999; and (3) the FAD of one of the members of the evolutionary lineage from primitive to advanced forms of Neognathodus nataliae. These candidates all have their limitations for the recognition of the Bashkirian–Moscovian boundary worldwide according to detailed studies of the conodonts in the Naqing section. A new candidate taxon has therefore been proposed: the FAD of Diplognathodus ellesmerensis (Qi et al. Reference Qi, Wang, Wang, Ueno and Wang2007, Reference Qi, Wang, Wang, Lane, Richards, Ueno and Groves2009, Reference Qi, Lambert, Barrick, Groves, Wang, Hu, Wang, Wang, Qi, Groves and Barrick2010a ; Y. P. Qi, unpub. Ph.D. thesis, Graduate University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, 2008; Wang et al. Reference Wang, Qi and Wang2008, Reference Wang, Qi, Lambert, Wang, Wang, Hu, Lin and Chen2011). The FAD of Diplognathodus ellesmerensis is very near a previously defined Moscovian base (the FAD of Declinognathodus donetzianus, Alekseev & Goreva, Reference Alekseev and Goreva2000). Because it is widely distributed and easy to identify, D. ellesmerensis should be a very suitable boundary marker. However, it is not easily recovered due to its small size. Furthermore, the evolutionary lineage of this species is not very clear and requires further investigation. These imperfections led to a dispute on the proposal to use D. ellesmerensis as the boundary marker (Groves & Task Group, Reference Groves2008). Recently, on the basis of detailed studies on conodonts in the Bashkirian–Moscovian boundary interval in South China, a new conodont evolutionary lineage (from primitive form to advanced form in Streptognathodus expansus) was found (Qi et al. Reference Qi, Wang and Lambert2010a ). Streptognathodus expansus was named by Japanese conodont workers in 1964 (Igo & Koike, Reference Igo and Koike1964). According to the description and illustrations, the originally published specimens belong to the advanced form of this species. The newly discovered primitive form may need a new species/subspecies name. In the Naqing section, the FAD of Streptognathodus expansus is near the top of Bashkirian, 5.25 m lower than the FAD of Diplognathodus ellesmerensis. Compared to Diplognathodus ellesmerensis, Streptognathodus expansus is larger, more abundant and also widely distributed. Its lineage is very clear and easy to identify. This species might be an excellent candidate for the marker of the base of Moscovian (Qi et al. Reference Qi, Wang and Lambert2010a , Reference Qi, Wang, Lambert, Barrick, Wang, Hu and Wang2011). In this paper, the Bashkirian–Moscovian boundary is recognized at –12.0 m of the lower part of the section (the Dalubian section), which coincides with the FAD of Streptognathodus expansus.

4.d. Moscovian–Kasimovian boundary

The Working Group on the Moscovian–Kasimovian boundary proposed two potential biostratigraphic markers, Idiognathodus sagittalis Kozitskaya, Reference Kozitskaya, Kossenko, Lipnjagov and Nemirovskaya1978 in Kozitskaya et al. Reference Kozitskaya, Kossenko, Lipnjagov and Nemirovskaya1978 and Idiognathodus turbatus Rosscoe & Barrick, Reference Rosscoe and Barrick2009a , by which the base of the Kasimovian Stage can be marked and correlated globally (Ueno & Task Group, Reference Ueno2009). Idiognathodus sagittalis is based on material from the Donets Basin (Ukraine) and I. turbatus is based on material from mid-continent North America. A lineage from Idiognathodus swadei Rosscoe & Barrick, Reference Rosscoe and Barrick2009a to I. turbatus has been described from mid-continent North America (Rosscoe & Barrick, Reference Rosscoe and Barrick2009b ). Highly abundant conodonts have been recovered from the large collections of the Moscovian–Kasimovian boundary interval in the Naqing section, Guizhou of South China in recent years, among which many transitional morphotypes (similar to I. sagittalis) with rapid morphological transformation from I. swadei to I. turbatus are found. The important conodont evolutionary lineage from I. swadei to I. turbatus is therefore also confirmed in South China.

In the Moscow Basin, Goreva et al. (Reference Goreva, Alekseev, Isakova and Kossovaya2009, fig. 6L) illustrated a specimen as Idiognathodus turbatus that is similar to I. turbatus from the Naqing section. Their I. sagittalis, which occurs below I. turbatus, resembles the I. swadeiI. turbatus transitional forms from the Naqing section. Possibly, I. sagittalis may be the transitional form from I. swadei to I. turbatus. The FAD of I. turbatus in the I. swadeiI. turbatus lineage appears to be the only reasonable biostratigraphic marker for defining the Moscovian–Kasimovian boundary. Unfortunately, I. turbatus has not yet been found in the Dianzishang section, but several transitional forms (Fig. 9l–n) from I. swadei to I. turbatus were found in the upper part of this section and Idiognathodus juveniles (Fig. 5o–r) from sample ZXC 67.8 appear to be possible early Kasimovian morphotypes. We therefore tentatively put the Moscovian–Kasimovian boundary at a level of 65.0 m in the Dianzishang section.

5. Conclusion

The Dianzishang section is intermediate between the lower-slope to basin deposits at Naqing and the shallow-marine platform deposits at Yashui (Richards & Task Group, Reference Richards2010). Abundant conodonts and foraminifers are found in this section. The preliminary conodont succession including only 11 conodont zones and conodont biostratigraphy from lower Visean to uppermost Moscovian are summarized here, which are based on very coarse sampling of the section during the past few years. Additional sampling at finer stratigraphic intervals with larger sample sizes are therefore needed for a more detailed investigation. Studies on foraminiferal biostratigraphy and its correlation with conodont biostratigraphy are badly needed for accurate correlations between shallow-marine and deep-marine sections worldwide.

Acknowledgements

This work was supported by National Natural Science Foundation of China (Grant nos. 41072009, 40772005, 41290260, 40839904) and State Key Laboratory of Palaeobiology and Stratigraphy, Nanjing Institute of Geology and Palaeontology, Chinese Academy of Sciences (Grant no. 20102105). This manuscript was greatly improved by comments from James E. Barrick from Texas Tech University, the anonymous referees and Dr Mark Allen, editor of Geological Magazine.

References

Alekseev, A. S. & Goreva, N. V. 2000. The Conodont Scale for the Moscovian, Kasimovian, and Gzhelian Stages. In Zonal'nye podrazdeleniya karbona obshchei stratigrafi cheskoi shkaly Rossii. Materialy Vserossiiskogo sovesh chaniya (Carboniferous Zonal Units of the General Stratigraphic Scale of Russia. Materials of the All Russian Meeting), pp. 78. Ufa, Gilem.Google Scholar
Alekseev, A. S., Goreva, N. V., Isokova, T. N. & Makhlina, M. Kh. 2003. Biostratigraphy of the Carboniferous of the Moscow syneclise (Russia). XVth International Congress on Carboniferous and Permian Stratigraphy Abstracts, 13–15.Google Scholar
Alekseev, A. S., Goreva, N. V., Isokova, T. N. & Makhlina, M. Kh. 2004. Biostratigraphy of the Carboniferous in the Mosow Syneclise, Russia. Newsletter on Carboniferous Stratigraphy 22, 2835.Google Scholar
Austin, R. L. & Husri, S. 1974. Dinantian conodont faunas of County Clare, County Limerick and County Leitrim. In International Symposium on Belgian Micropaleontological Limits from Emsian to Viséan, Namur, 3 (eds Bouckaert, J. & Streel, M.), pp. 1869. Geological Survey of Belgium, Brussels.Google Scholar
Barrick, J. E. & Heckel, P. H. 2000. A provisional Conodont zonation for Late Pennsylvanian (late Late Carboniferous) strata in Midcontinent region of North America. Newsletter on Carboniferous Stratigraphy 18, 1522.Google Scholar
Barrick, J. E., Lambert, L. L., Heckel, P. H. & Boardman, D. R. 2004. Pennsylvanian conodont zonation for midcontinent North America. Revista Espanola de Micropaleontologia 36, 231–50.Google Scholar
Barrick, J. E., Qi, Y. P. & Wang, Z. H. 2010. Latest Moscovian to Earliest Gzhelian (Pennsylvanian) conodont faunas from the Naqing (Nashui) section, South Guizhou, China. In Carboniferous Carbonate Succession from Shallow Marine to Slope in Southern Guizhou. Field Excursion Guidebook for the SCCS Workshop on GSSPs of the Carboniferous System (eds Wang, X. D. et al.), pp. 78107. Nanjing Institute of Geology and Palaeontology (Chinese Academy of Sciences).Google Scholar
Barskov, I. S. 1984. Upper Carboniferous and Permian (Asselian) conodont zonation and zonal scale and problems of its perfection. In Verkhnii Karbon SSSR. Mezhvedomstvennyi Stratigraficheskii Komitet SSSR. Trudy. T. 13 (Upper Carboniferous of the USSR. Proceedings of the Interdepartmental Stratigraphic Committee of the USSR), pp. 102–7. Nauka, Moscow, 13.Google Scholar
Barskov, I. S., Alekseev, A. S., Goreva, N. V., Kononova, L. I. & Migdisova, A. V. 1984. Carboniferous conodont zonation of the East European Platform. In Paleontologicheskaya kharakteristika stratotipicheskikh i opornykh razrezov karbona Moskovskoi sineklizy (Paleontological Characteristic of Carboniferous Stratotype and Reference Sections in the Moscow Syneclise), pp.143–51. Moscow University Press, Moscow.Google Scholar
Belka, Z. 1985. Lower Carboniferous conodont biostratigraphy in the northern part of the Moravia-Silesia Basin. Acta Geologica Polonica 35, 160.Google Scholar
Bischoff, G. 1957. Die Conodonten-Stratigraphie des rheno-herzynischen Unterkarbons mit Berücksichtigung der Wocklumeria-Stufe und der Karbon/Devon-Grenze. Abhandlungen des Hessischen Landesamtes für Bodenforschung 19, 164.Google Scholar
Branson, E. B. & Mehl, M. G. 1938. Conodonts from the Lower Mississippian of Missouri, in stratigraphy and paleontology of the Lower Mississippian of Missouri, Part II. University of Missouri Studies 13 (3), 128–48.Google Scholar
Branson, E. B. & Mehl, M. G. 1941. New and little known Carboniferous conodont genera. Journal of Paleontology 15, 97106.Google Scholar
Bureau of Geology and Mineral Resources of Guizhou Province. 1987. Regional Geology of Guizhou Province. Geological Publishing House, Beijing, 698 pp. (in Chinese with English abstract).Google Scholar
Clarke, W. J. 1960. Scottish carboniferous conodonts. Transactions of the Edinburgh Geological Society 18, 131.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Davydov, V. L. 2001. The terminal stage of the carboniferous: Orenburgian versus Bursumian. Newsletter on Carboniferous Stratigraphy 19, 5864.Google Scholar
Dunn, D. L. 1966. New Pennsylvanian platform conodonts from southwestern United States. Journal of Paleontology 40, 1294–303.Google Scholar
Dunn, D. L. 1970. Conodont zonation near the Mississippian–Pennsylvanian boundary in western United States. Geological Society of America Bulletin 81, 2959–74.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ellison, S. P. & Graves, R. W. 1941. Lower Pennsylvanian (dimple limestone) conodonts of the Marathon region, Texas. Missouri, University, School of Mines and Metallurgy, Bulletin, Technical Series 14, 113.Google Scholar
Furduj, R. S. 1975. Oraschlenenii karbona Yuzhnogo Urala po konodontam (On the division of the carboniferous of the South Urals by conodonts). In Stratigrafia i Biogeografia Morei i Sushi Kamennougolnogo Perioda na Territorii SSSR (Stratigraphy and Biogeography of the Sea and Land in the Territory of the USSR during the Carboniferous Period) (ed Einor, O. L.), pp. 104–8, Vyshcha Shkola, Kiev (in Russian).Google Scholar
Goreva, N. V. 1984. Conodonts of the Moscovian Stage of the Moscow Syncline. In Paleontological Characteristic of the Types and Key Section of the Moscow Syncline (ed Menner, V. V.), pp. 44122. Moscow State University Press, Moscow (in Russian).Google Scholar
Goreva, N. V. & Alekseev, A. S. 2010. Upper Carboniferous conodont zones of Russia and their global correlation. Stratigraphy and Geological Correlation 18 (6), 593606.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Goreva, N. V., Alekseev, A. S., Isakova, T. I. & Kossovaya, O. 2009. Biostratigraphical analysis of the Moscovian-Kasimovian transition at the neostratotype of Kasimovian Stage (Afanasievo section, Moscow Basin, Russia). Palaeoworld 18, 102–13.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Grayson, R. E. Jr. 1984. Morrowan and Atokan (Pennsylvanian) conodonts from the northeastern margin of the Arbuckle Mountains, southern Oklahoma. Oklahoma Geologieal Survey Bulletin 136, 4163.Google Scholar
Groves, J. & Task Group. 2006. Report to the Task Group to establish a GSSP close to the existing Bashkirian-Moscovian boundary. Newsletter on Carboniferous Stratigraphy 24, 67.Google Scholar
Groves, J. & Task Group. 2008. Report of the Task Group to establish a GSSP close to the existing Bashkirian-Moscovian boundary. Newsletter on Carboniferous Stratigraphy 26, 1011.Google Scholar
Groves, J. R., Wang, Y., Qi, Y. P., Richards, B. C., Ueno, K. & Wang, X. D. 2012. Foraminiferal biostratigraphy of the Visean-Serpukhovian (Mississippian) boundary interval at slope and platform sections in southern Guizhou (South China). Journal of Paleontology 86 (5), 753–74.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Harris, R. W. & Hollingsworth, R. V. 1933. New Pennsylvanian conodonts from Oklahoma. American Journal of Science 25, 193204.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hass, W. H. 1953. Conodonts of the Barnett Formation of Texas. US Geological Survey Professional Paper 243-F, 6994.Google Scholar
Heckel, P. H. 2004. Updated cyclothem grouping chrt and observations on the grouping of Pennsylvanian cyclothems in Midcontinent North America. Newsletter on Carboniferous Stratigraphy 22, 1822.Google Scholar
Heckel, P. H., Boardman, D. R., Barrick, J. E. 2002. Desmoinesian-Missourian regional stage boundary references position for North America. In Carboniferous and Permian of the World. (eds Hills, L. V. & Henderson, C. M.), pp. 710–24. Canadian Society of Petroleum Geologists Memoir no. 19.Google Scholar
Higgins, A. C. 1975. Conodont zonation of the late Viséan-early Westphalian strata of the south and central Pennines of northern England. Bulletin of the Geological Survey of Great Britain 53, 190.Google Scholar
Higgins, A. C. 1985. The Carboniferous System. Part 2: conodonts of the Silesian subsystem from Great Britain and Ireland. In A Stratigraphical Index of Conodonts (eds Higgins, A. C. & Austin, R. L.), pp. 210–27. British Micropalaeontological Society Series.Google Scholar
Higgins, A. C. & Bouckaert, J. 1968. Conodont stratigraphy and palaeontology of the Namurian of Belgium. Mémoire Explicative des Cartes Géologiques et Minières de la Belgique 10, 164.Google Scholar
Igo, H. 1974. Some Upper Carboniferous conodonts from the Akiyoshi Limestone, Southwest Japan. Bulletin of Tokyo Gakugei University 26, 230–8.Google Scholar
Igo, H. & Koike, T. 1964. Carboniferous conodonts from Yobara Akiyoshi Limestone, Japan (Studies of Asiaticconodonts, Part I). Paleontological Society of Japan, Transactions and Proceedings 53, 179–93.Google Scholar
Igo, H. & Koike, T. 1965. Carboniferous conodonts from Yobara, Akiyoshi Limestone, Japan. Transactions and Proceedings of Palaeontological Society of Japan, N.S. 59, 8391.Google Scholar
Isakova, T. N., Goreva, N. V., Alekseev, A. S. & Makhlina, M. Kh. 2001. Fusulinid and Conodont Zonation of the type Moscovian Stage. Newsletter on Carboniferous Stratigraphy 19, 57–8.Google Scholar
Koike, T. 1967. A Carboniferous succession of conodont faunas from the Atetsu Limestone in southwest Japan (studies of Asian Conodonts, Part IV). Science Reports of the Tokyo Bunrika Daigaku, Section C, Geology, Mineralogy and Geography 9, 279318.Google Scholar
Kossenko, Z. A. 1975. New species of conodonts from the deposits of the Moscovian Stage of the southwestern part of the Donets Basin. Geologicheski Zhurnal 35 (5), 126–33 (in Russian).Google Scholar
Kozitskaya, R. I., Kossenko, Z. A., Lipnjagov, O. M. & Nemirovskaya, T. I. 1978. Konodonty Karbona Donetskogobaseina (Carboniferous Conodonts of the Donets Basin). Naukova Dumka, Kiev, Academy of Sciences of Ukraine, 135 pp. (in Russian).Google Scholar
Kulagina, E. I., Pazukhin, V. N. & Davydov, V. I. 2009. Pennsylvanian biostratigraphy of the Basu River section, with emphasis on the Bashkirian-Moscovian transition. In Carboniferous Type Sections in Russia and Potential Global Stratotypes. Proceedings of the International Field Meeting ‘The historical type sections, proposed and potential GSSPs of the Carboniferous in Russia.Southern Urals Session . Ufa-Sibai, 13–18 August (eds Puchkov, V. N., Kulagina, E. I., Nikolaeva, S. V. & Kochetova, N. N.), pp. 64–8. Design Polygraph Service, Ltd.Google Scholar
Kulagina, E. I., Rumyantseva, Z. S., Pazukhin, V. N. & Kotchetkova, N. M. 1992. Granitsa Nizhnego-Srednego Karbona na Yuzhnom Urale i Srednem Tyanshane (Lower/Middle Carboniferous Boundary at South Urals and Middle Tianshan). Nauka, Moskva, 112 pp. (in Russian).Google Scholar
Lambert, L. L. 1992. Atokan and basal Desmoinesian conodonts from central Iowa, reference area for the Desmoinesian Stage. In Recent Advances in Middle Carboniferous Biostratigraphy: A Symposium (eds Sutherland, P. K. & Manger, W. L.), pp. 111–23. Oklahoma Geological Survey Circular 94.Google Scholar
Lambert, L. L., Barrick, J. E. & Heckel, P. H. 2001. Provisional Lower and Middle Pennsylvanian conodont zonation in midcontinent North America. Newsletter on Carboniferous Stratigraphy 19, 5055.Google Scholar
Lambert, L. L., Heckel, P. H. & Barrick, J. E. 2003. Swadelina new genus (Pennsylvanian Conodonta), a taxon with potential chronostratigraphic significance. Micropaleontology 49, 151–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lane, H. R. 1967. Uppermost Mississippian and Lower Pennsylvanian conodonts from the type Morrowan Region, Arkansas. Journal of Paleontology 41, 920–42.Google Scholar
Lane, H. R. 1977. Morrowan (Early Pennsylvanian) conodonts of northwestern Arkansas and northeastern Oklahoma. In Mississipppian–Pennsylvanian Boundary in Northeastern Oklahoma and Northwestern Arkansas. Oklahoma City. (eds Sutherland, P. K. & Manger, W. L.), pp.177–80. Oklahoma Geological Survey Guidebook 18.Google Scholar
Lane, H. R., Baesemann, J. F., Brenckle, P. L. & West, R. R. 1985. Arrow Canyon, Nevada: a potential Mid-Carboniferous boundary stratotype. 10th International Congress, Carboniferous Stratigraphy and Geology, Madrid, 4, 429–39.Google Scholar
Lane, H. R. & Brenckle, P. L. 2001. Type Mississippian subdivision and biostratigraphic succession. In Stratigraphy and Biostratigraphy of the Mississippian Subsystem (Carboniferous Subsystem) in its Type Region, the Mississippian River Vally of Illinois, Missouri and Iowa (ed Heckel, P. H.), pp. 8395. IUGS Subcommission on Carboniferous Stratigraphy, Guidebook for Field Conference, Sept 813.Google Scholar
Lane, H. R., Brenckle, P. L., Baesemenn, J. F. & Richards, B. C. 1999. IUGS Carboniferous in the middle of the Carboniferous, Arrow Canyon, Nevada, USA. Episodes 22 (4), 272–83.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lane, H. R. & Straka, J. J. II. 1974. Late Mississippian and Early Pennsylvanian conodonts, Arkansas and Oklahoma. Geological Society of America Special Papers 152, 1144.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Meischner, D. & Nemyrovska, T. 1999. Origin of Gnathodus bilineatus (Roundy, 1926) related to goniatite zonation in Rhenisches Schiefergebirge, Germany. Bolletino della Società Paleontologica Italiana 37, 427–42.Google Scholar
Merrill, G. K. 1972. Taxonomy, phylogeny and biostratigraphy of Neognathodus in Appalachian Pennsylvanian rocks. Journal of Paleontology 46, 817–29.Google Scholar
Mizuno, Y. 1997. Conodont faunas across the mid-Carboniferous boundary in the Hina Limestone, southwest Japan. Paleontological Research 1, 237–59.Google Scholar
Nemirovskaya, T. I. 1978. Biostratigrafiya serpukhovskogo I bashkirskogo yarusov Donbasa po konodontam (Biostratigraphy of the Serpukhovian and Bashkirian stages of Donbas by Conodonts). Tektonika i Stratigrafia (Naukova Dumka) 14, 8391 (in Russian).Google Scholar
Nemirovskaya, T. I. 1990. Samye pozdnie predstaviteli roda Declinognathodus (konodonty) v pogranichnykh otlozheniyakh bashkirskogo i moskovskogo yarusov Donetskogo baseina. (The last representatives of the genus Declinognathodus in the Bashkirian/Moscovian boundary deposits of the Donbas Carboniferous.) Paleontologischeski Zbornik 27, 3943 (in Russian).Google Scholar
Nemirovskaya, T. I. & Alekseev, A. S. 1994. The Bashkirian conodonts of the Askyn Section, Bashkirian Mountains, Russia. Bulletin de la Société Belge de Géologie 103 (1–2), 109–33.Google Scholar
Nemirovskaya, T. I., Perret-Mirouse, M.-F. & Meischner, D. 1994. Lochriea ziegleri and Lochriea senckenbergica: new conodont species from the latest Visean and Serpukhovian in Europe. Courier Forschungsinstitut Senckenberg 168, 311–17.Google Scholar
Nemyrovska, T. I. 1999. Bashkirian conodonts of the Donets Basin, Ukraine. Scripta Geologica 119, 193.Google Scholar
Nemyrovska, T. I. 2005. Late Viséan/early Serpukhovian conodont succession from the Triollo section, Palencia (Cantabrian Mountains, Spain). Scripta Geologica 129, 1389.Google Scholar
Nemyrovska, T. I. 2011. Late Moscovian (Carboniferous) conodonts of the genus Swadelina from the Donets Basin, Ukraine. Micropaleontology 57 (6), 491505.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nemyrovskaya, T. I., Perret-Mirouse, M.-F. & Alekseev, A. S. 1999. On Moscovian (Late Carboniferous) conodonts of the Donets Basin, Ukraine. Neues Jahrbuch fur Geologie und Palaontologie Abhandlungen 214 (1/2), 169–94.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nemyrovska, T. I., Perret-Mirouse, M.-F. & Weyant, M. 2006. The early Viséan (Carboniferous) conodonts from the Saoura Valley, Algeria. Acta Geologica Polonica 56 (3), 361–70.Google Scholar
Nigmadganov, I. M. & Nemirovskaya, T. I. 1992. Novye vidy konodontov iz pogranichnykh otlozhenij nizhnego I srednego karbona Yuzhnogo Tian-Shanya (New species of conodonts from the boundary deposits of the Lower/Middle Carboniferous of the South Tienshan). Paleontologicheskogo Zhurnal 3, 51–7 (in Russian).Google Scholar
Nikolaeva, S. V., Gibshman, N. B., Kulagina, E. I., Barskov, I. S. & Pazukhin, V. N. 2002. Correlation of the Visean-Serpukhovian boundary in its type region (Moscow Basin) and the South Urals and a proposal of boundary markers (ammonoids, foraminifers, conodonts). Newsletter on Carboniferous Stratigraphy 20, 1621.Google Scholar
Nikolaeva, S. V., Kulagina, E. I., Pazukhin, V. N. & Kochetova, N. N. 2001. Integrated Serpukhovian biostratigraphy in the South Urals. Newsletter on Carboniferous Stratigraphy 19, 3843.Google Scholar
Perret, M.-F. 1993. Recherches micropaléontologiques et biostratigraphiques (Conodontes-Foraminifères) dans le Carbonifère Pyrenéen. Strata 21, 1597.Google Scholar
Qi, Y. P., Hu, K. Y., Barrick, J. E., Wang, Q. L. & Lin, W. 2012. Discovery of the Conodont linage from Idiognathodus swadei to I. turbatus in South China and its implications. Journal of Stratigraphy 36 (3), 551–7 (in Chinese with English abstract).Google Scholar
Qi, Y. P., Lambert, L. L., Barrick, J. E., Groves, J. R., Wang, Z. H., Hu, K. Y. & Wang, X. D. 2010 a. New interpretation of the conodont succession of the Naqing (Nashui) section: candidate GSSP for the base of the Moscovian Stage, Luosu, Luodian, Guizhou, South China. In Carboniferous Carbonate Succession from Shallow Marine to Slope in Southern Guizhou. Field Excursion Guidebook for the SCCS Workshop on GSSPs of the Carboniferous System (eds Wang, X. D., Qi, Y., Groves, J., Barrick, J. et al.), pp. 6577. Nanjing Institute of Geology and Palaeontology, Chinese Academy of Sciences.Google Scholar
Qi, Y. P. & Wang, Z. H. 2005. Serpukhovian conodont sequence and the Visean-Serpukhovian boundary in South China. Rivista Italiana di Paleontologia e Stratigrafia 111 (1), 310.Google Scholar
Qi, Y. P., Wang, X. D. & Lambert, L. L. 2010 b. Status report on conodonts from the Bashkirian-Moscovian boundary interval at the Naqing (Nashui) section, South China. Newsletter on Carboniferous Stratigraphy 28, 4750.Google Scholar
Qi, Y. P., Wang, X. D., Lambert, L. L., Barrick, J. E., Wang, Z. H., Hu, K. Y. & Wang, Q. L. 2011. Three potential levels for the Bashkirian and Moscovian boundary in the Naqing section based on conodonts. Newsletter on Carboniferous Stratigraphy 29, 61–4.Google Scholar
Qi, Y. P., Wang, Z. H. & Luo, H. 2004. Progress and prospect of the biostratigraphic study of the Visean-Serpukhovian Boundary Interval. Journal of Stratigraphy 28 (3), 281–8 (in Chinese with English abstract).Google Scholar
Qi, Y. P., Wang, X. D., Richards, B. C., Groves, J. R., Ueno, K., Wang, Z. H., Wu, X. H. & Hu, K. Y. 2010 c. Recent progress on conodonts and foraminifers from the candidate GSSP of the Carboniferous Visean-Serpukhovian boundary in the Naqing (Nashui) section of south China. In Carboniferous Carbonate Succession from Shallow Marine to Slope in Southern Guizhou. Field Excursion Guidebook for the SCCS Workshop on GSSPs of the Carboniferous System (eds Wang, X. D., Qi, Y., Groves, J., Barrick, J. et al.), pp. 3564. Nanjing Institute of Geology and Palaeontology, Chinese Academy of Sciences.Google Scholar
Qi, Y. P., Wang, X. D., Wang, Z. H., Lane, H. R., Richards, B. C., Ueno, K. & Groves, J. R. 2009. Conodont biostratigraphy of the Naqing (Nashui) section in South China: candidate GSSPs for both the Serpukhovian and Moscovian Stages. Permophiles 53, 3940.Google Scholar
Qi, Y. P., Wang, Z. H., Wang, Y., Ueno, K. & Wang, X. D. 2007. Stop 1: Nashui section. In Pennsylvanian and Lower Permian Carbonate Successions from Shallow Marine to Slope in Southern Guizhou. XVI International Congress on the Carboniferous and Permian, June 2124, Nanjing China. Guide Book for Field Excursion C3, pp. 816.Google Scholar
Rhodes, F. H. T., Austin, R. L. & Druce, E. C. 1969. British Avonian (Carboniferous) conodont faunas, and their value in local and intercontinental correlation. Bulletin of the British Museum (Natural History) 5, 1313.Google Scholar
Richards, B. C. & Task Group 2010. Report of the Task Group to establish a GSSP close to the existing Visean-Serpukhovian boundary. Newsletter on Carboniferous Stratigraphy 28, 30–3.Google Scholar
Rosscoe, S. J. & Barrick, J. E. 2009 a. Revision of Idiognathodus species from the Desmoinesian–Missourian (~Moscovian–Kasimovian) boundary interval in the Midcontinent Basin, North America. Palaeontographica Americana 62, 115–47.Google Scholar
Rosscoe, S. J. & Barrick, J. E. 2009 b. Idiognathodus turbatus and other key taxa of the Moscovian–Kasimovian boundary interval in the Midcontinent region, North America. Newsletter on Carboniferous Stratigraphy 27, 21–5.Google Scholar
Roundy, P. V. 1926. The micro-fauna in Mississippian formations of San Saba County, Texas. US Geological Survey Professional Paper 146, 163.Google Scholar
Sanz-López, J., Blanco-Ferrera, S., Sánchez De, Posada L. C. & García-López, S. 2006. The mid-Carboniferous boundary in northern Spain: difficulties for correlation of the global stratotype section and point. Rivista Italiana di Paleontologia e Stratigrafia 112, 322.Google Scholar
Skomposki, S., Alekseev, A., Meischner, D., Nemirovskaya, T., Perret-Mirouse, M.-F. & Varker, W. J. 1995. Conodont distribution across the Visean/Namurian boundary. Courier Forschungsinstitut Senckenberg 188, 177209.Google Scholar
Ueno, K. & Task Group 2009. Report of the Task Group to establish the Moscovian-Kasimovian and Kasimovian-Gzhelian boundaries. Newsletter on Carboniferous Stratigraphy 27, 1418.Google Scholar
Wang, X. D. & Jin, Y. G. 2005. Achievements in the establishment of the Carboniferous GSSPs. Journal of Stratigraphy 29 (2), 147–53 (in Chinese with English abstract).Google Scholar
Wang, X. D., Qi, Y. P., Lambert, L. L., Wang, Z. H., Wang, Y., Hu, K. Y., Lin, W. & Chen, B. 2011. A potential global standard stratotype-section and point of the Moscovian Stage (Carboniferous). Acta Geologica Sinica (English Edition) 85 (2), 366–72.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wang, Z. H. 1996. Mid-Carboniferous boundary and the conodonts across this boundary in south Guizhou and north Guangxi. Acta Micropalaeontologica Sinica 13 (3), 261–76 (in Chinese with English abstract).Google Scholar
Wang, Z. H., Lane, H. R. & Manger, W. L. 1987. Conodont sequence across the mid-Carboniferous boundary in China and its correlation with England and North America. In Carboniferous Boundaries in China (ed Wang, C. Y.), pp. 89106. Science Press, Beijing.Google Scholar
Wang, Z. H. & Qi, Y. P. 2003. Report on the Upper Visean–Serpukhovian conodont zonation in South China. Newsletter on Carboniferous Stratigraphy 21, 22–4.Google Scholar
Wang, Z. H. & Qi, Y. P. 2007. The Upper Carboniferous conodont sequence across the Moscovian-Kasimovian boundary in South China. Acta Micropaleontologica Sinica 24, 385–92.Google Scholar
Wang, Z. H., Qi, Y. P. & Wang, X. D. 2008. Stage boundaries of the Pennsylvanian in the Nashui Section, Luodian of Guizhou, south China. Acta Micropalaeontologica Sinica 25 (3), 205–14.Google Scholar
Wang, Z. H., Qi, Y. P., Wang, X. D. & Wang, Y. J. 2004. Restudy of the Upper Carboniferous (Pennsylvanian) strata from Nashui of Luodian, Guizhou. Acta Micropalaeontologica Sinica 21 (2), 119–29 (in Chinese with English abstract).Google Scholar
Wang, Z. S. 2000. Characteristics of the north-westward structure of Shazigou District in Zhenning, Guizhou. Guizhou Geology 17 (01), 30–9 (in Chinese with English abstract).Google Scholar
Winkler, P. C. F. 1990. SCCS Working Group on the subdivision on the Upper Carboniferous S. L. (‘Pennsylvanian’): a summary report. Courier Forschungsinstiut Senckenberg 130, 297306.Google Scholar
Wirth, M. 1967. Zur Gliederung des höheren Paläozoikums (Givet-Namur) im Gebiet des Quinto Real (Westpyrenäen) mit Hilfe vn Conodonten. Neues Jahrbuch für Geologie und Paläontologie, Abhandlungen 127, 179224.Google Scholar
Ziegler, W. 1960. Die Conodonten aus den Geröllen des Zechsteinkonglomerates von Rossenray (südwestlich Rheinberg/Niederrhein). Fortschritte in der Geologie von Rheinland und Westfalen 6, 391405.Google Scholar
Figure 0

Figure 1. Location map of the Dianzishang section.

Figure 1

Figure 2. Photographs showing the Dianzishang section. (a, b) Upper part of the section (Dalubian section); and (c, d) lower part of the section (Xiaoxibian section).

Figure 2

Figure 3. Conodont range chart for the Dianzishang section: (a) Visean–Serpukhovian; (b) Serpukhovian–Bashkirian–Moscovian; (c) Moscovian; and (d) Moscovian–Kasimovian.

Figure 3

Figure 4. Conodont zones of the Dianzishang section and their correlations.

Figure 4

Figure 5. Visean – lower Bashkirian interval in the Dianzishang section, Zhenning, Guizhou, South China. (Nanjing Institute of Geology and Palaeontology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, catalogue numbers 155794–155808.) (a) Lochriea comutata (Branson & Mehl, 1941) oral view, sample DZSC7.70, cat. no. 155794; (b) Lochriea saharea Nemyrovska, Perret & Weyant, 2006, oral view, sample DZSC7.70, cat. no. 155795; (c, d) Gnathodus praebilineatus Belka, 1985, oral views, (c), sample DZSC49.00, (d), sample DZSC64.40, cat. no. 155796, 155797; (e) Lochriea costata (Pazukhin & Nemirovska in Kulagina et al. 1992), oral view, sample DZSC57.80, cat. no. 155798; (f) Lochriea monocostata (Pazukhin & Nemirovska in Kulagina et al. 1992) oral view, sample DZSC57.80, cat. no. 155799; (g) Pseudognathodus homopunctatus (Ziegler, 1960) oral view, sample DZSC7.70, cat. no. 155800; (h) Gnathodus bilineatus bilineatus (Roundy, 1926) oral view, sample DZSC57.80, cat. no. 155801; (i) Declinognathodus noduliferus noduliferus (Ellison & Graves, 1941) oral view, sample DZSC59.40, cat. no. 155802; (j, k) Lochriea ziegleri Nemirovskaya, Perret-Mirouse & Meischer, 1994, oral views, (j), sample DZSC49.00, (k) sample DZSC59.40, cat. no. 155803, 155804; (l) Gnathodus bilineatus bollandensis Higgins & Bouckaert, 1968, oral view, sample DZSC59.40, cat. no. 155805; (m) Gnathodus bilineatus remus Meischner & Nemyrovska, 1999, oral view, sample DZSC64.40, cat. no. 155806; (n) Declinognathodus cf. lateralis (Higgins & Bouckaert, 1968) oral view, sample DZSC61.80, cat. no. 155807; (o) Gnathodus postbilineatus Nigmadganov & Nemirovskaya, 1992, oral view, sample DZSC61.80, cat. no. 155808.

Figure 5

Figure 6. Lower Bashkirian – lower Moscovian interval in the Dianzishang section. (Nanjing Institute of Geology and Palaeontology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, catalogue numbers 155809–155824.) (a) Idiognathoides corrugates Harris & Hollinsworth, 1933, oral view, sample DZSC61.80, cat. no. 155809; (b) Idiognathoides sinuatus Harris & Hollingsworth, 1933, oral view, sample DZSC68.50, cat. no. 155810; (c) Idiognathoides postsulcatus Nemyrovska, 1999, oral view, sample ZXC−18.60, cat. no. 155811; (d) Idiognathoides sulcatus sulcatus Higgins & Bouckaert, 1968, oral view, sample ZXC−18.60, cat. no. 155812; (e) Neognathodus symmetricus (Lane, 1967) oral view, sample ZXC−20.00, cat. no. 155813; (f) ‘Streptognathodusexpansus (primitive form) Igo & Koike, 1964, oral view, sample ZXC−16.60, cat. no. 155814; (g–i) ‘Streptognathodusexpansus Igo & Koike, 1964, oral views, (g) sample ZXC−11.80, (h, i) sample ZXC−12.10, cat. nos 155815–155817; (j–l) ‘Streptognathodussuberectus Dunn, 1966, oral views, (j) sample ZXC−11.80, (k, l) sample ZXC−12.10, cat. nos 155818–155820; (m) Neognathodus kanumai Igo, 1974, oral view, sample ZXC−16.60, cat. no. 155821; (n) Declinognathodus marginodosus (Grayson, 1984) oral view, sample ZXC−10.30, cat. no. 155822; (o, p) Neognathodus bothrops Merrill, 1972, oral views, (o) sample ZXC−10.30, (p) sample ZXC−8.50, cat. nos 155823, 155824.

Figure 6

Figure 7. Upper Visean – middle Moscovian interval in the Dianzishang section. (Nanjing Institute of Geology and Palaeontology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, catalogue numbers 155825–155836. (a–g) Gondolella spp. lateral views, (a, c) sample ZXC−1.30, (b) sample ZXC−5.00, (d, f, g) sample ZXC 28.30, 5, sample ZXC−10.30, cat. nos 155825–155831; (h) Mestognathodus beckmani Bischoff, 1957, latero-oral view, sample DZSC42.50, cat. no. 155832; (i, j) Mesogondolella clarki (Koike, 1967) oral views, (i), sample ZXC 28.30, (j), sample ZXC−1.30, cat. nos 155833, 155834; (k) Mesogondolella donbassica Kossenko, 1975, oral view, sample ZXC−1.30, cat. no. 155835; (l) Mesogondolella subclarki Wang & Qi, 2003, oral view, sample ZXC−1.30, cat. no. 155836.

Figure 7

Figure 8. Lower–upper Moscovian interval in the Dianzishang section. (Nanjing Institute of Geology and Palaeontology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, catalogue numbers 155837–155851. (a–f) Idiognathodus spp. oral views, (a) sample ZXC−2.60, (b) sample ZXC 20.50, (c) sample ZXC 38.40, (d) sample ZXC 4.00, (e, f) sample ZXC 28.30, cat. nos 155837–155842; (g) Swadelina sp. 2 Barrick, Qi & Wang, 2010, oral view, sample ZXC 38.40, cat. no. 155843; (h–j) Idiognathodus podolskensis Goreva, 1984, oral views, (h,i), sample ZXC 38.40, (j) sample ZXC 20.50, cat. nos 155844–155846; (k) Idiognathoides fossatus (Branson & Mehl, 1941) oral view, sample ZXC−0.20, cat. no. 155847; (l) Idiognathodus amplificus Lambert, 1992, oral view, sample ZXC−1.30, cat. no. 155848; (m) Neognathodus caudatus Lambert, 1992, oral view, sample ZXC−8.50, cat. no. 155849; (n) Neolochriea hisaharui Mizuno, 1997, oral view, sample ZXC−6.00, cat. no 155850; (o) Neolochriea nagatoensis (Igo & Koike, 1965) oral view, sample ZXC 4.00, cat. no. 155851.

Figure 8

Figure 9. Lower Moscovian – lower Kasimovian interval in the Dianzishang section. (Nanjing Institute of Geology and Palaeontology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, catalogue numbers 155852–155869. (a–d) Idiognathodus spp. oral views, (a) sample ZXC 31.80, (b) sample ZXC 4.00, (c) sample ZXC 28.30, (d) sample ZXC 20.50, cat. nos 155852–155855; (e) Transitional form from Idiognathodus praeobliquus Nemyrovska, Perret-Mirouse & Alekseev, 1999 to Idiognathodus obliquus Kossenko in Kozitskaya et al. 1978, oral view, sample ZXC 28.30, cat. no. 155856; (f) Idiognathodus obliquus Kossenko in Kozitskaya et al. 1978, oral view, sample ZXC−0.20, cat. no. 155857; (g) Idiognathoides planus Furduj, 1975, oral view, sample ZXC 2.50, cat. no. 155858; (h–j) Idiognathodus swadei Rosscoe & Barrick 2009a, oral views, sample ZXC 67.80, lower Kasimovian cat. nos 155859–155861; (k) ‘Streptognathodussuberectus Dunn, 1966, oral view, sample ZXC 38.40, cat. no. 155862; (l–n) Transitional forms from Idiognathodus swadei Rosscoe & Barrick 2009a to Idiognathodus turbatus Rosscoe & Barrick 2009a, oral views, sample ZXC 48.00, cat. nos 155863–155865; (o–r) Idiognathodus juveniles, oral views, sample ZXC 67.80, lower Kasimovian cat. nos 155866–155869.