Hostname: page-component-745bb68f8f-cphqk Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-02-11T07:10:27.314Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Crosstalk between cancer cells and blood endothelial and lymphatic endothelial cells in tumour and organ microenvironment

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  30 January 2015

Esak Lee
Affiliation:
Department of Biomedical Engineering, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD 21205, USA
Niranjan B. Pandey
Affiliation:
Department of Biomedical Engineering, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD 21205, USA
Aleksander S. Popel*
Affiliation:
Department of Biomedical Engineering, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD 21205, USA Department of Oncology and the Sidney Kimmel Comprehensive Cancer Center, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD 21231, USA
*
*Corresponding author: Department of Biomedical Engineering, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, 611 Traylor Research Building, 720 Rutland Avenue, Baltimore, MD 21205, USA. E-mail: apopel@jhu.edu
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Tumour and organ microenvironments are crucial for cancer progression and metastasis. Crosstalk between multiple non-malignant cell types in the microenvironments and cancer cells promotes tumour growth and metastasis. Blood and lymphatic endothelial cells (BEC and LEC) are two of the components in the microenvironments. Tumour blood vessels (BV), comprising BEC, serve as conduits for blood supply into the tumour, and are important for tumour growth as well as haematogenous tumour dissemination. Lymphatic vessels (LV), comprising LEC, which are relatively leaky compared with BV, are essential for lymphogenous tumour dissemination. In addition to describing the conventional roles of the BV and LV, we also discuss newly emerging roles of these endothelial cells: their crosstalk with cancer cells via molecules secreted by the BEC and LEC (also called angiocrine and lymphangiocrine factors). This review suggests that BEC and LEC in various microenvironments can be orchestrators of tumour progression and proposes new mechanism-based strategies to discover new therapies to supplement conventional anti-angiogenic and anti-lymphangiogenic therapies.

Type
Review Article
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2015 

Introduction

Hallmarks of cancer have been proposed by Hanahan and Weinberg: the hallmarks include proliferative signalling, evading growth suppressors, resisting cell death, enabling replicative immortality, inducing angiogenesis, and activating invasion and metastasis (Ref. Reference Hanahan and Weinberg1). Recently, tumour and organ microenvironments have been emerging as targets to effectively treat tumour growth and metastasis (Refs Reference Spano and Zollo2, Reference Langley and Fidler3). Non-cancer stromal and parenchymal cells residing in these microenvironments largely contribute to cancer progression through their crosstalk with cancer cells, extracellular matrix (ECM) and other non-cancer cells (Ref. Reference Catalano4). This crosstalk is achieved by numerous secreted factors from diverse cell types, and their corresponding receptor signalling pathways (Ref. Reference Chen5). These cell-to-cell cross-communications promote tumour growth (Ref. Reference Whiteside6), angiogenesis (Ref. Reference Watnick7) and invasion (Ref. Reference Funasaka and Raz8); provide cancer cells with stem cell-like properties (Ref. Reference Lin and Yun9) and epithelial-to-mesenchymal transition (EMT) phenotypes (Ref. Reference Gao and Mittal10); and cause tumour drug resistance (Ref. Reference Tredan11) and modify host immunity to protect cancer cells from anti-tumour immune reaction. Importantly, these non-cancer cells are genetically stable, thus more targetable, compared with cancer cells that undergo frequent genetic mutations, epigenetic alterations and exhibit heterogeneity (Ref. Reference Polyak, Haviv and Campbell12). Therefore, targeting these non-cancer cell types and their secreted factors and signals in the tumour and organ microenvironments can serve as an effective strategy to defeat cancer.

Among the crucial cell types in the tumour and organ microenvironments, blood and lymphatic endothelial cells (BEC and LEC) are the components of blood vessels (BV) and lymphatic vessels (LV), respectively (Refs Reference Samples, Willis and Klauber-Demore13, Reference Li14). Tumour  BV play a role as conduits for blood supply into the tumour, which is pivotal for tumour growth. These BV also contribute to haematogenous tumour cell spreading. Tumour  LV are particularly important for metastasis, as the LV are only sparsely covered by pericytes and smooth muscle cells, and thus more permeable compared with BV (Ref. Reference Cao15). These are among the reasons that in certain cancers, such as breast cancer, tumour dissemination occurs preferentially via stromal and peritumoural LV. The conventional roles of BV and LV are limited to their functions as conduits for the delivery of oxygen, nutrients, lymph fluid and for metastatic tumour cells. Roles of the factors secreted by BV and LV and the signals mediated by them in the promotion of cancer and metastasis in particular are relatively less well understood. Recently, it has been reported that the cells lining the blood (BEC) and lymphatic (LEC) vessels exhibit distinct gene expression profiles (Ref. Reference Hirakawa16), suggesting that BV and LV and the diverse set of proteins they secrete may play more inductive roles in cancer progression. The subsets of proteins present in the conditioned media from cultured cells are referred to as ‘secretomes’ (Ref. Reference Volmer17). Specifically, BEC- and LEC-secreted factors are referred to as ‘angiocrine’ (Ref. Reference Butler, Kobayashi and Rafii18) and ‘lymphangiocrine’ factors, respectively (Ref. Reference Alitalo19). These endothelium-derived factors are actively involved in tumour progression. Therefore, the understanding of the angiocrine and lymphangiocrine factors adds BEC and LEC to cancer-promoting orchestrators in microenvironments beyond their conventional roles as components of the passive conduits and suggests more improved, mechanism-based strategies upon current anti-angiogenic or anti-lymphangiogenic therapies.

In this review, we first discuss tumour and organ microenvironments, with a focus on angiogenesis and lymphangiogenesis in these microenvironments. We next discuss BEC- and LEC-secreted factors and their roles in cancer. Lastly, we address clinical implications and applications and outstanding research questions.

Microenvironment in cancer

Directly targeting tumour cells, which are genetically unstable and prone to mutations, often leads to resistance to therapy and a risk of tumour recurrence. However, because the non-cancer cell types in the tumour and organ microenvironments are genetically stable, targeting them and the microenvironmental regulation of tumour progression is an attractive alternative. Here we discuss two distinct microenvironments in cancer: the tumour microenvironment and the organ microenvironment.

Tumour microenvironment

The tumour microenvironment is the cellular environment in which the tumour exists and it consists of ECM and diverse types of non-malignant cells, including cancer-associated fibroblasts (CAF), pericytes, macrophages, dendritic cells (DC), mast cells, lymphocytes, endothelial cells and their precursors in tumours (Ref. Reference Catalano4). Among them, immune cells and mesenchymal cell types have been well studied.

Immune cells (e.g. macrophages, DC, lymphocytes and mast cells) are recruited to the TME where they express diverse tumour-promoting signals. Tumour-associated macrophages (TAM) are well-studied immune cell types and are generally known to be immunosuppressive and pro-angiogenic. TAM are one of the myeloid-derived suppressor cells (MDSC) which are a heterogeneous population of myeloid cells with a potential to repress T cell responses (Ref. Reference Bronte20). Specifically, the M2-type TAM overexpress and secrete pro-angiogenic factors such as vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF), tumour necrosis factor alpha (TNFα), fibroblast growth factor basic (bFGF), matrix metalloproteinase (MMP)-2, -7, -9 and -12, as well as epidermal growth factor (EGF) to facilitate tumour growth, invasion and metastasis (Ref. Reference Stearman21). TAM also induce lymphangiogenesis (Ref. Reference Schoppmann22). Subpopulations of TAM expressing VEGFC/D and vascular endothelial growth factor receptor 3 (VEGFR3) have been identified. It is thought that the TAM-expressed VEGFC/D could induce peritumoural lymphangiogenesis (Ref. Reference Schoppmann22). TAM express immunosuppressive factors, including prostaglandin E2, interleukin 10 (IL10) and transforming growth factor beta (TGFβ) to facilitate escape of the tumour from attack by the immune system (Ref. Reference Pollard23). DC are the most potent antigen-presenting cells (APC) in general, thus they can activate T lymphocytes and trigger antigen-specific anti-tumour immune responses (Ref. Reference Banchereau24). However, the DC recruited to the TME are impaired in their immunity and start to produce pro-angiogenic factors such as TNFα, TGFβ and granulocyte macrophage colony-stimulating factor (GM-CSF; Ref. Reference Sozzani25). Mechanistically, tumour-secreted factors such as IL6 and TNF suppress DC maturation by activating the phospho-signal transducer and activator of transcription 3 (Stat3) pathways or inhibiting the toll-like receptor (TLR) pathways (Ref. Reference Fainaru26). Tumour infiltrating lymphocytes (TIL) and their modifications are also crucial for tumour cell survival in TME (Refs Reference Pages27, Reference Galon, Fridman and Pages28). Although the TIL are supposed to be anti-tumourigenic, TME induces apoptosis of the TIL by secreting tumour exosomes that contain apoptosis ligands (Ref. Reference Valenti29). T lymphocytes activity in TME can also be edited by LV activity. CCL21 expressed by the LV recruits CCR7-positive naive T cells into the lymphatic systems in the tumour stroma where they can be conditioned to be less immune reactive by tumour-secreted cytokines (Ref. Reference Swartz and Lund30). Tumour-secreted TGFβ promotes tumour-associated regulatory T cell (T reg) and MDSC activities. These cells impair cytotoxic T lymphocytes (CTL) and helper T1 cell functions (Ref. Reference Swartz and Lund30).

Mesenchymal cell types, such as fibroblasts are also pivotal for tumour progression (Refs Reference Madar, Goldstein and Rotter31, Reference Guan and Chen32). Physiological fibroblasts or their precursors are recruited to the TME where several paracrine factors from cancer cells or stromal cells reprogram the fibroblasts to be pro-tumourigenic: these pathological fibroblasts are referred to as CAF (Ref. Reference Cortez, Roswall and Pietras33). CAF can also be derived from pericytes, smooth muscle cells and mesenchymal stem cells in the TME. CAF generally feature rapid self-proliferation and up-regulation of tumour-promoting genes [CXC chemokine ligand 12 (CXCL12); TGFβ; hepatocyte growth factor (HGF)], pro-inflammatory genes (IL6, IL8) and pro-angiogenic genes [MMPs; platelet-derived growth factors (PDGFs)] (Ref. Reference Madar, Goldstein and Rotter31). CAF also confer cancer cells with resistance to RAF inhibitors by HGF production (Ref. Reference Straussman34); with resistance to anti-VEGF therapy by activating the PDGFC signal (Ref. Reference Crawford35). Moreover, CAF modify host immunity (Refs Reference Feig36, Reference Kraman37) and induce cancer cells to undergo EMT (Ref. Reference Yu38).

Organ microenvironment

Metastasis requires multiple steps; tumour cell intravasation into the vasculature at the primary tumour site, recruitment and survival of the tumour cells in the blood during circulation, extravasation into the metastatic organ, and seeding, proliferation, angiogenesis and colonisation in the organ microenvironment (Refs Reference Stracke and Liotta39, Reference Sahai40). The organ microenvironment is the cellular environment in which organ-specific parenchymal and stromal cells exist and tumour cells can metastasise (Ref. Reference Langley and Fidler3). Specific organ microenvironment serves as metastatic niche and determines the extent of tumour cell proliferation, invasion and survival (Ref. Reference Fidler, Kim and Langley41).

According to the ‘seed and soil hypothesis’ by Stephen Paget (Ref. Reference Paget42), metastatic cancer cells function as ‘seeds’ and a particular organ microenvironment serves as the ‘soil’. The ‘soil’ must be prepared and pre-conditioned to properly function as a metastatic niche. A number of studies have shown evidence supporting this hypothesis. For example, orthotopic versus ectopic murine tumour models revealed that cancer cells implanted in ectopic sites grow slowly and metastasise rarely compared with those in orthotopic sites (Ref. Reference Fidler43). Organs with low incidence of neoplasm metastasis have been reported and it has been found that these organs are also associated with poor metastatic niche formation (Ref. Reference Araki44). Some organs that are vulnerable to metastasis such as lymph nodes (LN), bone marrow and lungs are found to promote tumour cell recruitment, immune modification, vascular remodelling and enhanced angiogenesis (Refs Reference Nishida, Tsukushi, Urakawa, Sugiura, Nakashima, Yamada and Ishiguro45, Reference Dos Santos46, Reference Hirasawa47). It has also been reported that tumour metastasis is organ-specific (Refs Reference Lu48, Reference Rigamonti and De Palma49, Reference Lorusso and Ruegg50, Reference Nguyen, Bos and Massague51). Breast cancer mostly metastasise to the bones, lungs, brain and liver (Ref. Reference Lorusso and Ruegg50). Leukaemias metastasise preferentially to certain parts of the nervous system; they metastasise to the leptomeninges, which are the two innermost layers of the membrane that envelops the brain and spinal cord, but rarely to the brain parenchyma (Ref. Reference Nolan and Abrey52). Most head and neck cancers metastasise to the regional LN (e.g. cervical LN) and salivary glands, while distal metastases are uncommon (Ref. Reference Patel53). For example, autopsies of over 4000 patients who died of head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (HNSCC) showed that the fraction of distant metastasis was <1% of local spread (Ref. Reference Allen54). These data suggest that the nature of the organ microenvironment has a significant influence on tumour metastasis. Therefore, a better understanding of the molecular mechanisms that link the organ microenvironment to metastasis should provide ideas for more effective anti-metastatic therapies.

Several mechanistic studies have demonstrated how the organ microenvironments are primed to facilitate cancer metastasis. TGFβ promotes breast tumour cell seeding in the lungs by activating angiopoietin-like four induced tumour cell extravasation (Ref. Reference Padua55). Other mediators (Angiopoietin 2, MMP3, MMP10, TGFβ and TNFα) of vascular remodelling that are important in metastasis to the lungs have also been discovered (Refs Reference Gupta56, Reference Goncharova57). CXCL12 and insulin-like growth factor 1 (IGF1) are two key mesenchymal signals that select seeds from breast tumours to metastasise and colonise the bone (Ref. Reference Zhang58). Tumour-conditioned media (TCM) from triple negative breast cancer cells induced lymphangiogenesis and angiogenesis in regional LN (Ref. Reference Lee, Pandey and Popel59). Increased angiogenesis in tumour-draining LN (TDLN) were observed and correlated with LN metastasis and lower survival in breast cancer patients (Refs Reference Guidi60, Reference Edel, Harvey and Papadimitriou61, Reference Lee, Lee, Koskimaki, Han, Pandey and Popel62). Exosomes are microvesicles derived from tumours and their role in tumour–organ communication for metastatic progression is emerging. Exosomes secreted from melanoma-induced LN angiogenesis and BV remodelling (Ref. Reference Hood, San and Wickline63). Melanoma exosome-mediated cMet and its effects on bone marrow-derived cells and organ niche formation have been reported (Ref. Reference Peinado64). These examples suggest that tumour-draining secretions, organ-residing cells, and their resulting signals and phenotypes can be targeted to improve upon current therapeutic strategies.

Angiogenesis and lymphangiogenesis in cancer

BV and LV are important components of both the tumour and the organ microenvironments. Once tumours or metastases are formed either at primary sites or distal organs, adjacent BEC and LEC, lining the pre-existing BV and LV are activated, migrate and proliferate under the influence of angiogenic and lymphangiogenic signals initiated by tumour cells or microenvironments to support continuous tumour growth and metastasis. These processes are referred to as tumour /organ angiogenesis and lymphangiogenesis (Refs Reference Butler, Kobayashi and Rafii18, Reference Alitalo19). We briefly discuss the state of understanding of these phenomena in cancer (Fig. 1).

Figure 1. Tumour and organ microenvironment. Tumour cells express angiogenic growth factors and lymphangiogenic growth factors, promoting tumour angiogenesis and lymphangiogenesis. Tumour blood vessels primarily serve as conduits for blood supply and a route for haematogenous tumour spreading. Tumour lymphatic vessels particularly play a role in tumour cell escape from the primary tumour by expressing tumour cell recruiting chemokine factors. Tumour secretions from primary tumours or metastases can promote angiogenesis and lymphangiogenesis in pre-metastatic organs such as lymph nodes and distant organs. Sentinel lymph nodes are initially invaded by tumour cells (also called tumour-draining lymph nodes, TDLN). The TDLN serve as a reservoir for tumour cells before distal metastasis. Angiogenesis in the TDLN is a way to facilitate metastatic colonisation and further dissemination; lymphangiogenesis in TDLN is crucial for initial tumour invasion and tumour immune tolerance by modifying host immunity. Tumour cells in the lymphatic system can be transported into the blood vessels through the LN vein and thoracic duct and subclavian vein where the blood and lymphatic systems are temporarily fused each other. Vascular permeability in the lung is critical for tumour cell extravasation. BV, blood vessels; LN, lymph node; LV, lymphatic vessels.

Angiogenesis

Angiogenesis, the formation of new BV from pre-existing BV, has been recognised as a target to inhibit primary tumour growth and haematogenous tumour cell dissemination (Ref. Reference Potente, Gerhardt and Carmeliet65). In general, cells have to be located within 150–200 μm of blood capillaries to survive, although the distance can vary depending on the cell type (Ref. Reference Jain66). For this reason, tumours are not able to grow to more than 1–2 mm3 without angiogenesis within the stroma (Ref. Reference Folkman67). Tumour cells under hypoxia express and secrete VEGFA, which is up-regulated by the transcription factor hypoxia inducible factor 1 alpha (HIF1α), to trigger tumour angiogenesis and make the tumour resistant to hypoxia (Ref. Reference Ferrara68). Though other growth factors are also involved in angiogenesis, the signals mediated by VEGFR and neuropilin (NRP) are relatively well understood (Ref. Reference Mac Gabhann69). There are five growth factors in the VEGF family: VEGFA/B/C/D, and placental growth factor (PlGF); and three VEGF receptors: VEGFR1/2/3. Two neuropilins (NRP1/2) are also involved in VEGFR signalling. Among them, angiogenesis is primarily regulated by VEGFA, VEGFR1, VEGFR2 and NRP1. VEGFC/D, VEGFR3 and NRP2 regulate lymphangiogenesis. NRP1 makes a co-receptor complex with VEGFR2, promoting VEGFA-induced VEGFR2 signalling in BECs. The current understanding of how anti-angiogenic therapies targeting VEGFA or VEGFR2 signalling work is that they inhibit BV formation in tumours, thus limiting the blood supply, depriving the tumour of oxygen and nutrients, and hence induce severe hypoxia and necrosis of the tumours leading to an inhibition of tumour growth (Ref. Reference Sarmiento70).

The stromal BV also serve as routes of haematogenous spread of cancer cells from the primary tumour (Ref. Reference Labelle and Hynes71). Haematogenous metastasis has been studied using the tail vein or intracardiac tumour injection models (Refs Reference Rashid72, Reference Zadnik73). In addition to the stromal BV, organ-residing BV are also important for metastasis. They facilitate tumour cell extravasation, seeding, and colonisation. Particularly, permeability of the organ BV (e.g. lung vascular permeability and blood–brain barrier integrity) is crucial for extravasation of tumour cells from the circulating blood (Ref. Reference Padua55). Several studies have shown mechanisms of how the tight junctions between BEC in different organ microenvironments are opened to facilitate extravasation of tumour cells (Refs Reference Arshad74, Reference Irmisch and Huelsken75). Moreover, the enhancement of organ angiogenesis is essential for tumour cell survival and colonisation. It is well established that up-regulation of angiogenesis in the organ microenvironment is synchronised with the increase in oncogenic activation and the mutation of tumour suppressor genes (Ref. Reference Bergers and Benjamin76). For example, activation of the Ras oncogene promotes VEGF expression in tissues and p53 mutation results in reduced expression of the anti-angiogenic factor, thrombospondin 1. However, it is still not clear whether the angiogenic switch is turned on before the actual metastasis to prepare and condition the pre-metastatic niches, or initiated only after tumour cell invasion into the niches (Refs Reference Hood, San and Wickline63, Reference Farnsworth77). In addition to enhanced angiogenesis, remodelling of the blood vasculature in the organ microenvironment also contributes to metastasis. For example, high endothelial venules (HEV) in LN experience morphological changes during LN metastasis. The HEV are modified so that they are more dilated and cancer cells and red blood cells are detected within the lumen rather than the expected immune cells in tongue cancer compared with normal, physiological LN (Ref. Reference Lee78).

Lymphangiogenesis

Tumour cells express and secrete lymphangiogenic factors, including VEGFC/D, angiopoietins, PDGF-BB/AA and bFGF to promote tumour lymphangiogenesis, the formation of new LV in the tumour stroma (Refs Reference Cao15, Reference Von Marschall79, Reference Kesler80). LV are distinct from BV in their anatomy, growth signals, gene expression and functions (Refs Reference Hirakawa16, Reference Mohammed81). The LV lack a well-defined basement and are scarcely covered by pericytes or smooth muscle cells thus are much more permeable than BV (Ref. Reference Cao15). Due to their leaky nature, LV play a role as a reservoir for proteins and cells that have leaked from the BV and function to transport them back from the tissues to the blood circulation (Ref. Reference Alitalo19). Tumour lymphangiogenesis has not been studied as long as tumour angiogenesis primarily because of the relatively recent discoveries of lymphatic markers such as VEGFR3 (Ref. Reference Kaipainen82), lymphatic vessel endothelial hyaluronan receptor 1 (LYVE1; Ref. Reference Banerji83), prospero homeobox protein 1 (Prox1; Ref. Reference Wigle and Oliver84), NRP2 (Ref. Reference Yuan85) and podoplanin (Ref. Reference Schacht86). It is, however, well understood that the tumour lymphatic vasculature serves as the initial route of tumour lymphatic dissemination (Ref. Reference Kesler80). Lymphatic metastasis occurs at least as frequently as BV-mediated metastasis (Ref. Reference Cao15), and in certain kinds of cancer, such as breast cancer, LV are the primary routes of tumour dissemination (Refs Reference Porter87, Reference Perou88, Reference Moskowitz89). Slow lymphatic flow rates and tumour cell survival factors, such as hyaluronic acids in the lymph fluid also support lymphogenous metastasis (Refs Reference Matsuo90, Reference Lipponen91). Tumour LV are connected to the regional LN (Refs Reference Skobe92, Reference Tammela and Alitalo93) and the tumour cell positive or tumour secretion influenced LN are referred to as TDLN (Ref. Reference Swartz and Lund30). These TDLN are considered to be transient reservoirs of metastatic tumour cells, and as a support system for helping the tumour cells make colonies for further metastasis to distant organs (Refs 94, Reference Boughey95). From the lymphatic system, cancer cells can also be transported back to the circulating blood from where they extravasate and invade distant organs (Ref. Reference Sleeman, Cady and Pantel96). Thus blocking tumour lymphangiogenesis can inhibit metastasis by limiting the likelihood of initial tumour dissemination via intra- and peritumoural LV (Refs Reference Jain and Padera97, Reference Achen, Mann and Stacker98). Lymphangiogenesis in the pre-metastatic organs is also central for successful metastasis (Refs Reference Hirakawa99, Reference Harrell, Iritani and Ruddell100, Reference Alitalo and Detmar101). For example, LV in the TDLN are connected with the tumour LV so that they can serve as direct routes for invasion of the tumour into the LN (Ref. Reference Quagliata102). Also, LV in the pre-metastatic organs can modify host immunity, so that cancer cells can escape immune attack (Ref. Reference Thomas103). This pro-tumour immuno-editing activity is regulated by LEC-secreted factors. We discuss this in more detail in the next section. Recently, we developed a new type of metastasis model in which we inject TCM subcutaneously into animals for 2 weeks followed by orthotopic breast cancer cell inoculation (Refs Reference Lee, Pandey and Popel59, Reference Lee104). We saw very rapid formation of metastases in the LN and lungs in this model. At the same time the TCM treatment resulted in enhanced lymphangiogenesis in the pre-metastatic organs (Ref. Reference Lee105). These results suggest that both organ lymphangiogenesis and tumour lymphangiogenesis may be therapeutic targets to efficiently treat metastasis.

BEC- and LEC-secreted factors and signals

Now we discuss BV- and LV-mediated signals and their inductive roles. First, we discuss BEC- and LEC-mediated signals in physiology. Second, we focus on BEC-derived signals in cancer. Lastly, LEC-induced signals in cancer are discussed.

BEC- and LEC-mediated signals in physiology

BEC secrete a large number of molecules, including proteins, lipids and metabolites. These molecules are called angiocrine factors (Ref. Reference Nolan106). These factors allow BEC to communicate with other cells and they play a role in maintaining physiological homeostasis, regulating cell fate and host immunity, and promoting tissue regeneration (Ref. Reference Butler, Kobayashi and Rafii18). For example, angiocrine factors balance self-renewal and differentiation of haematopoietic stem cells (HSC) to maintain haematopoietic homeostasis (Ref. Reference Kobayashi107). The blood endothelium also maintains blood fluidity and immunity through crosstalk with platelets (Ref. Reference Ruggeri108). There have been several studies claiming that angiocrine factors are central for tissue regeneration; e.g. angiocrine signals from liver sinusoidal endothelial cells (LSEC) are required for liver regeneration (Ref. Reference Ding109); angiocrine signals induce and maintain the regeneration of lung alveoli (Ref. Reference Ding110).

LV are distinct from BV in that they do not have a well-defined basement membrane, do not carry erythrocytes, and are composed of LEC that are phenotypically different from BEC. Generally LV function as reservoirs for immune cells, antigens, lipids and macromolecules that have leaked from the vascular system and transport lymph fluid back to the circulatory system (Ref s Reference Tammela and Alitalo93, Reference Weech, Goettsch and Reeves111). If the LV are abnormal, the lymph fluid cannot be efficiently drained and results in lymphedema. LV also function in fat absorption and lipid transport and the consumption of fatty foods increases lymph flow in humans (Ref. Reference Turner and Barrowman112). The lymphatic endothelium also expresses several adhesion molecules and chemokine ligands that interact with immune cells to facilitate maintenance of the host immunity. LEC express CC chemokine ligand 21 (CCL21) (Ref. Reference Nykanen113). CCL21 or CCL19 can attract CC chemokine receptor 7 (CCR7) positive DC and APC (Ref s Reference Forster, Davalos-Misslitz and Rot114, Reference Scandella115, Reference Riedl116). These DC and APC are transported into LN where they meet T lymphocytes in the T cell zone: the T lymphocytes and DC are activated and matured in the LN and depart from the LN through the efferent LV. In addition, resident T and B lymphocytes are important in the regulation of lymphangiogenesis in the LN. T lymphocytes negatively regulate lymphangiogenesis via interferon gamma-mediated mechanisms (Ref. Reference Kataru117). On the other hand, B lymphocytes promote lymphangiogenesis in the LN (Ref. Reference Angeli118).

BEC-mediated signals in cancer

As discussed above, tumour angiogenesis is a target for inhibiting tumour growth by blocking the supply of oxygen to the growing tumour. Recently tumour-associated BEC have been revisited with a focus on BEC-secreted factors and their crosstalk with cancer cells and other stromal cells (Ref. Reference Butler, Kobayashi and Rafii18). BEC-mediated signals in cancer are summarised in Figure 2.

Figure 2. Crosstalk between blood endothelial cells and cancer cells. Tumour cell and blood endothelial cell -secreted factors, ECM components, microRNAs, and membrane bound or soluble receptors can mediate tumour/blood endothelial crosstalk signals to promote tumour cell proliferation, migration, invasion, EMT, and cancer stem cell phenotypes. Question marks represent unknown mechanisms. ADAM17, ADAM metallopeptidase domain 17; EMT, epithelial-to-mesenchymal transition; miRxx, micro RNA xx; mTOR, mammalian target of rapamycin; NRP1, neuropilin1; S1PR1, Sphingosine-1-phosphate receptor 1; Slit2, Slit homolog 2 protein; TGFβ, transforming growth factor beta; VEGFA, vascular endothelial growth factor A; VEGFR2, vascular endothelial growth factor receptor 2.

There have been a number of studies that show that BEC-cancer cell crosstalk regulates cancer cell proliferation and migration. Slit homologue protein 2 (Slit2), which is negatively regulated by Ephrin A2 receptor (EphA2) in BEC, is a breast tumour suppressive angiocrine factor (Ref. Reference Brantley-Sieders119). Tumour BEC express high levels of EphA2. Enhanced EphA2 expression in BEC is associated with low Slit2 expression in the tumour blood endothelium and this predicted poor prognosis in human breast cancer patients (Ref. Reference Brantley-Sieders119). Large-cell lymphoma cell growth and migration were stimulated by conditioned media obtained from liver-, lung-, brain- microvascular endothelial cells (MEC), suggesting that tumour angiocrine factors induce tumour cell growth and migration (Ref. Reference Hamada120). Tetraspanin CD151, which is expressed in breast cancer cells, regulates breast tumourigenesis by interacting with integrins α3β1 and α6β4 on BEC (Ref. Reference Sadej121). Although CD151 did not influence the inherent proliferative potential of breast cancer cells, it positively affected tumour cell proliferation in a cancer cell-BEC co-culture system (Ref. Reference Sadej121). BEC also promoted invasion of oral squamous cell carcinoma and Kaposi's sarcoma through CXC chemokine signalling (Ref. Reference Warner122). CXCL1 and CXCL8 were up-regulated in VEGF-treated EC, and these CXC chemokines initiated the invasion of CXCR2-positive tumour cells (Ref. Reference Warner122). Surprisingly, perlecan-expressing BEC suppressed breast and lung carcinoma tumourigenesis by reducing pro-tumourigenic and pro-inflammatory signalling in the cancer cells. Perlecan silencing in BEC eliminated this tumour suppressive activity of the endothelial cells via increasing IL6 secretion by the cancer cells (Ref. Reference Franses, Baker, Chitalia and Edelman123).

BEC-cancer cell crosstalk regulates tumour angiogenesis as well. Tumour blood endothelium-derived microRNAs influence tumour progression by regulating tumour angiogenesis (Ref. Reference Heusschen124). A number of studies have explored diverse microRNAs, reporting that Let7f, miR17/5p, miR18a, miR19a, miR21, miR31, miR93, miR126, miR130, miR155, miR210 and miR296 are BEC-expressed pro-angiogenic miRNAs and that miR20a, miR92a, miR221, miR222 and miR320 are anti-angiogenic miRNAs (Ref. Reference Heusschen124). Crosstalk between BEC and breast cancer cells also results in reciprocal regulation of some angiogenic factors, including VEGF and angiopoietin 1/2. Co-culture of BEC with breast cancer cells resulted in enhanced VEGF and angiopoietin 2 expression but reduced angiopoietin 1 expression in the breast cancer cells compared with a monoculture of the breast cancer cells. These changes increased vascular sprouting and destabilisation (Ref. Reference Buchanan125). In a recent study, sphingosine-1-phosphate receptor (S1PR1), one of the G-protein-coupled receptors (GPCR) expressed in BEC, regulated tumour vascular permeability and modulated tumour growth (Ref. 126). When S1PR1 signalling was very low or very high, tumour growth was delayed while, when S1PR1 signalling was intermediate, tumour growth was enhanced. The intermediate levels of S1PR1 appear to be important for stabilising tumour BV and promoting tumour growth (Ref. 126).

BEC-cancer cell crosstalk also influences the stem cell-like properties of cancer cells. BEC-derived VEGF inhibited anoikis, a form of programmed cell death, of head and neck cancer stem cells (CSC) by activating protein kinase B (PKB, also known as Akt) signalling pathways (Ref. Reference Campos127). Conditioned media obtained from brain BEC maintained glioblastoma stem-like cell expansion through the mammalian target of rapamycin (mTOR) pathway (Ref. Reference Galan-Moya128). BEC-derived signalling promoted survival and self-renewal of CSC in HNSCC (Ref. Reference Krishnamurthy129). Selective inhibition of tumour-associated BEC by transducing a caspase-based artificial death switch (iCaspase-9) reduced CSC in the HNSCC tumour xenografts (Ref. Reference Krishnamurthy129). The EC-derived soluble form of Jagged 1 generated by the proteolytic activity of ADAM metallopeptidase domain 17 (ADAM17), led to Notch activation in human colorectal cancer (CRC) cells, promoting CSC phenotypes in CRC (Ref. Reference Lu130).

BEC-cancer cell crosstalk also induces EMT in cancer cells. Conditioned media from bovine aortic endothelial cells (BAEC) induced EMT in A549 and PANC-1 tumour cell lines. In that study, neutralising antibody against either TGFβ1 or TGFβ2 did not reverse endothelial-dependent EMT, but simultaneous inhibition of both TGFβ1 and TGFβ2 abolished the EMT (Ref. Reference Kimura131). Three-dimensional (3D) culture of BEC and breast epithelial cells induced EMT in the breast epithelial cells, and basal-like breast tumours contained cells undergoing EMT around the vascular-rich areas of the tumours (Ref. Reference Sigurdsson132).

LEC-mediated signals in cancer

Tumour lymphangiogenesis, initiated by lymphangiogenic signals from tumour cells, is a therapeutic target to inhibit tumour dissemination through the lymphatic system. Tumour-associated LEC, the LEC-secreted factors (also called ‘lymphangiocrine factors’) and their crosstalk with cancer cells and stromal cells have been studied with this possibility in mind. LEC-mediated signals in cancer are summarised in Figure 3.

Figure 3. Crosstalk between lymphatic endothelial cells and cancer cells. Tumour cell and lymphatic endothelial cell-secreted factors, ECM components, and membrane bound receptors can mediate tumour/lymphatic endothelial crosstalk signals to promote tumour cell migration, recruitment and adhesion. Lymphatic endothelial cell-secreted factors also induce angiogenesis and enhance vascular permeability in pre-metastatic organs. They can also modify host immunity to mediate tumour immune escape by recruiting immature dendritic cells (iDC) and naïve T cells. Question marks represent unknown mechanisms. CCRxx, CC chemokine receptor xx; CCLxx, CC chemokine ligand xx; DARC, duffy antigen receptor for chemokines; HIF1, hypoxia inducible factor 1; iDC, immature dendritic cells; IL6, interleukin 6; IL6R, interleukin 6 receptor; KAl1, Kallmann syndrome 1; LYVE1, lymphatic vessel endothelial hyaluronan receptor 1; LN, lymph node; LE, lymphatic endothelium; NRP1, neuropilin1; Stat3, signal transducer and activator of transcription 3; T reg, regulatory T cells; CTL, cytotoxic T lymphocytes; T H1, helper T 1; VEGFC/D, vascular endothelial growth factorC/D; VEGFR3, vascular endothelial growth factor receptor 3 (homodimer); VEGFR 2/3, vascular endothelial growth factor receptor 2/3 (heterodimer).

Crosstalk between LEC and cancer cells can facilitate the recruitment of cancer cells from the primary tumours to the lymphatic system. The lymphatic endothelium expresses CXCL12 and CCL21 chemokines and these chemokines recruit CXCR4- or CCR7-expressing cancer cells by chemoattraction (Refs Reference Kim133, Reference Wiley134, Reference Hwang135). CXCL12 and CCL21 expression was observed in physiological LEC as well where they function to recruit immune cells to maintain host immunity. The chemokines secreted by LEC in highly metastatic oral cancer cell conditioned media was reported to be highly altered compared with that by normal LEC (Ref. Reference Zhuang136), suggesting that there can be tumour-specific LEC-mediated chemokine ligand/receptor mechanisms for tumour cell invasion into the LV. Recently, Lee et al. showed that triple-negative breast tumour-induced LEC secrete CCL5 and recruit CCR5-expressing cancer cells into the lymphatic system, supporting LN metastasis (Ref. Reference Lee104). This recruitment was inhibited by maraviroc, the CCR5 inhibitor with anti-retroviral activity. In that study, tumour secreted IL6-induced Stat3 phosphorylation in LEC resulting in enhanced CCL5 expression and secretion by the LEC. Inhibition of IL6 or Stat3 signalling resulted in reduced CCL5 secretion by the LEC and significant reduction of lymphogenous metastasis (Ref. Reference Lee104). Hyaluronan (HA), which is expressed in cancer cells, also mediates cancer cell adhesion to the lymphatic endothelium by binding to LYVE1 (Refs Reference Banerji83, Reference Du137) and induces tumour cell invasion into the LV. Other adhesion molecules such as CLEVER-1/Stabilin-1, mannose receptor and Thy1 (CD90) have also been reported to contribute to tumour cell adhesion to LV (Ref. Reference Paupert, Sounni and Noel138). A morphological study of the interaction between M21 melanoma cells and LEC showed that tumour cells adhere via pseudopodia to LEC at the site near the intercellular junction. Upon tumour cell adhesion, the LEC junctions between LEC appear to dissociate and allow invasion by the tumour cells (Ref. Reference Ding139). A recent discovery showed that tumour cell derived 15-lipoxygenase-1 mediates LN metastasis by allowing the tumour cells to make circular holes in the lymphatic endothelium. Selective inhibition of 15-lipoxygenase-1 in tumour cells repressed formation of the circular defects in the LV and resulted in reduced LN metastasis (Ref. Reference Kerjaschki140).

LEC-cancer cell crosstalk can also regulate cancer cell proliferation. Interaction of the duffy antigen receptor for chemokines (DARC) in LEC with the Kallmann syndrome 1 (KAI1) ligand from cancer cells reduces cancer cell proliferation and metastatic progression. This model suggests that tumour-expressed KAI1 can have a tumour suppressing activity by interacting with the host LV (Ref. Reference Iiizumi, Bandyopadhyay and Watabe141). LEC conditioned by MDA-MB-231 breast TCM express EGF and PDGF-BB to promote tumour cell proliferation, angiogenesis and pericyte infiltration into the stroma (Ref. Reference Lee, Pandey and Popel142).

Recently LEC-induced immune modification and tumour immune tolerance has been reported (Refs Reference Swartz and Lund30, Reference Swartz143). Tumour cell spreading is mediated by sentinel, TDLN. Hence, the presence of tumour cells in the TDLN is used as an important prognostic indicator of metastasis in several cancers, such as breast cancer and skin cancer. Generally, LN are the primary organs that regulate host immunity, as diverse immune cells are travelling through the LV and the LN; lymphocytes are abundant in the T–B cell regions of the LN, and antigen-specific immune reactions normally occur in the LN. Thus, the LN can establish and maintain immunity against pathogens and possibly tumour cells. However, interestingly, many studies have shown that TDLN do not function as normal LN do against normal inflammation or infection. They instead appear to play a role as transient reservoirs of tumour cells for distal metastasis (Ref. Reference Zheng144). These results suggest that tumour cells or tumour secretions can modify the LN or lymphatic systems in the LN, thus impairing their original functions. Mechanistically, CCL21 expressed by the lymphatic endothelium can recruit CCR7-positive naive T cells into the lymphatic systems in the TDLN and tumour stroma where they are educated to be less immune reactive; similarly, CCR7-positive DC are maintained in their immature state [immature dendritic cells (iDC)] in the tumour and the TDLN. The iDC promotes tumour-associated regulatory T cell (T reg) activity to suppress CTL (Ref. Reference Swartz and Lund30). Cytokines around the lymphatic endothelium in the various microenvironments also contribute to immune tolerance. High amounts of TGFβ are secreted by the tumour ECM, as the tumour matrix tension caused by interstitial flow influences TGFβ expression. TGFβ inhibits natural killer cell functions. TGFβ can also promote tumour-associated regulatory T cell (T reg) and MDSC activities: these immune suppressive cell activities impair CTL and helper T1 cell (T H1) functions, causing tumour cell immune tolerance (Ref. Reference Swartz and Lund30).

Clinical implications and applications

Therapeutic strategies to target blood and LV

Multiple strategies to target the tumour and organ microenvironments, particularly the BV and LV are in the clinic and in development. To target the BV in the microenvironment, several drugs, including the anti-VEGF monoclonal antibody bevacizumab, the receptor tyrosine kinase inhibitor sunitinib and the decoy receptor aflibercept (VEGF-trap) are clinically used. Anti-angiogenic monotherapy, such as anti-VEGF treatment, has shown limitation in clinic. This can be partially explained by that even after inhibiting single factor or pathway, other tumour-secreted factors or signals continue to support angiogenesis persistently (Refs Reference Crawford35, Reference Cascone145, Reference Jain146, Reference Kerbel147). New data on the combination of anti-angiogenic therapies and other pathway blockages showed improved outcomes. For example, anti-VEGF therapy with COX-2 inhibition more potently blocked the angiogenesis, compared with just anti-VEGF treatment by blocking COX-2 derived prostaglandin E2 (PGE2) production. PGE2 is a VEGF-independent pro-angiogenic factor secreted by COX-2 expressing tumour cells (Ref. Reference Xu148). No drugs are clinically used to target the LV but some are in preclinical development. They mostly target VEGFC/D, VEGFR3 and NRP2. Although anti-angiogenic therapies have shown promising outcomes in reducing tumour size, a large number of patients suffer from tumour metastasis facilitated by tumour LV which current anti-angiogenic agents are not able to inhibit. Specifically in breast cancer, tumour LV are the predominant routes of tumour dissemination. Thus current interest in the application of anti-angiogenic agents as cancer therapeutics has led to strategies combining inhibitors of angiogenesis and lymphangiogenesis with the goal of developing more effective anti-cancer therapies (Refs Reference Lee, Lee, Koskimaki, Han, Pandey and Popel62, Reference Lee105, Reference Lee149, Reference Koskimaki150).

Therapeutic and diagnostic values of the tumour–endothelial crosstalk signals

As described in this review, BEC and LEC secretomes play important roles in tumour progression, suggesting that we can target tumour–endothelial crosstalk signals in addition to targeting conventional tumour angiogenesis and lymphangiogenesis. In our previous study, we found that breast tumour cell secreted IL6 educated LEC in the pre-metastatic organs to express CCL5 and facilitate metastatic breast tumour recruitment into those organs (Ref. Reference Lee104). In that study, we blocked IL6 and CCR5 resulting in dramatic reduction in lung and LN metastasis. These signalling molecules governing tumour–endothelial crosstalk have a diagnostic value as well. Human sample-based bioinformatics analysis of TCGA (The Cancer Genome Atlas) showed higher levels of IL6 and CCL5 mRNAs in highly metastatic human triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC) tumour samples compared with those in less metastatic human oestrogen receptor positive (ER+) tumour samples. Furthermore, TNBC tumours obtained from LN positive patients showed better correlation of IL6 and CCL5 gene expression compared with those from LN negative patients. These results suggest that repurposing the anti-retroviral CCR5 inhibitor (maraviroc) or the anti-rheumatoid arthritis IL6 receptor antibody (tocilizumab) for advanced and metastatic breast cancer may have substantial clinical benefit (Ref. Reference Lee104). Also these repurposed drugs can be combined with conventional anti-angiogenic drugs (e.g. anti-VEGF antibodies) or chemotherapies. For example, we showed that an anti-VEGF antibody exhibited additive anti-metastatic effects when it was combined with maraviroc.

Research in progress and outstanding research questions

Over the past 40 years, much progress has been made in understanding the role of angiogenesis in tumour growth and metastasis. This understanding has facilitated anti-angiogenic drug development to efficiently treat primary tumour growth in patients. It is very important that the current interest in tumour lymphangiogenesis also results in the development of drugs to target tumour LV formation and lymphogenous metastasis. Possibly these anti-angiogenic and anti-lymphangiogenic therapies can be combined with each other for improved outcomes for patients. Other recent studies of tumour and organ microenvironments have also contributed to our understanding of diverse non-cancer cell types that can promote tumour growth, metastasis, immune tolerance, drug resistance, etc. However, the perspective that BEC and LEC can be important orchestrators in the microenvironments are still under-appreciated compared with the role of other cell types such as immune cells, bone marrow-derived cells and mesenchymal like cells. Analyses of secretome of BEC and LEC from different kinds of tumours (breast, gastric, brain tumours, etc.), from metastatic versus non-metastatic tumours, from different sites of metastases (LN, lung, bone metastases, etc.) need to be further investigated to generate more informative secretome libraries. Tumour secretomes can cause dysregulation of endothelial secretomes, thus we also need to understand which factors (cytokines, nucleic acids, small molecules, etc.) in tumour secretomes are governing these tumour-promoting scenarios.

Acknowledgements and funding

This work was supported by the National Institutes of Health grants R01 CA138264, R21 CA152473 and the Safeway Foundation.

Conflicts of Interest

None.

References

1. Hanahan, D. and Weinberg, R.A. (2011) Hallmarks of cancer: the next generation. Cell 144, 646-674 CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
2. Spano, D. and Zollo, M. (2012) Tumor microenvironment: a main actor in the metastasis process. Clinical & Experimental Metastasis 29, 381-395 CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
3. Langley, R.R. and Fidler, I.J. (2007) Tumor cell-organ microenvironment interactions in the pathogenesis of cancer metastasis. Endocrine Reviews 28, 297-321 CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
4. Catalano, V. et al. (2013) Tumor and its microenvironment: a synergistic interplay. Seminars in Cancer Biology 23(6 Pt B), 522-532 CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
5. Chen, S.T. et al. (2008) Breast tumor microenvironment: proteomics highlights the treatments targeting secretome. Journal of Proteome Research 7, 1379-1387 CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
6. Whiteside, T.L. (2008) The tumor microenvironment and its role in promoting tumor growth. Oncogene 27, 5904-5912 CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
7. Watnick, R.S. (2012) The role of the tumor microenvironment in regulating angiogenesis. Cold Spring Harbor Perspectives in Medicine 2, a006676CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
8. Funasaka, T. and Raz, A. (2007) The role of autocrine motility factor in tumor and tumor microenvironment. Cancer and Metastasis Review 26, 725-735 CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
9. Lin, Q. and Yun, Z. (2010) Impact of the hypoxic tumor microenvironment on the regulation of cancer stem cell characteristics. Cancer Biology & Therapy 9, 949-956 CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
10. Gao, D. and Mittal, V. (2012) Tumor microenvironment regulates epithelial-mesenchymal transitions in metastasis. Expert Review of Anticancer Therapy 12, 857-859 CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
11. Tredan, O. et al. (2007) Drug resistance and the solid tumor microenvironment. Journal of the National Cancer Institute 99, 1441-1454 CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
12. Polyak, K., Haviv, I. and Campbell, I.G. (2009) Co-evolution of tumor cells and their microenvironment. Trends in Genetics 25, 30-38 CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
13. Samples, J., Willis, M. and Klauber-Demore, N. (2013) Targeting angiogenesis and the tumor microenvironment. Surgical Oncology Clinics of North America 22, 629-639 CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
14. Li, T. et al. (2012) Molecular regulation of lymphangiogenesis in development and tumor microenvironment. Cancer Microenvironment 5, 249-260 CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
15. Cao, Y. (2005) Opinion: emerging mechanisms of tumour lymphangiogenesis and lymphatic metastasis. Nature Reviews Cancer 5, 735-743 CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
16. Hirakawa, S. et al. (2003) Identification of vascular lineage-specific genes by transcriptional profiling of isolated blood vascular and lymphatic endothelial cells. American Journal of Pathology 162, 575-586 CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
17. Volmer, M.W. et al. (2004) Tumor suppressor Smad4 mediates downregulation of the anti-adhesive invasion-promoting matricellular protein SPARC: landscaping activity of Smad4 as revealed by a ‘secretome’ analysis. Proteomics 4, 1324-1334 CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
18. Butler, J.M., Kobayashi, H. and Rafii, S. (2010) Instructive role of the vascular niche in promoting tumour growth and tissue repair by angiocrine factors. Nature Reviews Cancer 10, 138-146 CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
19. Alitalo, K. (2011) The lymphatic vasculature in disease. Nature Medicine 17, 1371-1380 CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
20. Bronte, V. (2009) Myeloid-derived suppressor cells in inflammation: uncovering cell subsets with enhanced immunosuppressive functions. European Journal of Immunology 39, 2670-2672 CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
21. Stearman, R.S. et al. (2008) A macrophage gene expression signature defines a field effect in the lung tumor microenvironment. Cancer Research 68, 34-43 CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
22. Schoppmann, S.F. et al. (2002) Tumor-associated macrophages express lymphatic endothelial growth factors and are related to peritumoral lymphangiogenesis. American Journal of Pathology 161, 947-956 CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
23. Pollard, J.W. (2009) Trophic macrophages in development and disease. Nature Reviews Immunology 9, 259-270 CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
24. Banchereau, J. et al. (2000) Immunobiology of dendritic cells. Annual Review of Immunology 18, 767-811 CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
25. Sozzani, S. et al. (2010) Trafficking properties of plasmacytoid dendritic cells in health and disease. Trends in Immunology 31, 270-277 CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
26. Fainaru, O. et al. (2010) Tumor growth and angiogenesis are dependent on the presence of immature dendritic cells. FASEB Journal 24, 1411-1418 CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
27. Pages, F. et al. (2010) Immune infiltration in human tumors: a prognostic factor that should not be ignored. Oncogene 29, 1093-1102 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
28. Galon, J., Fridman, W.H. and Pages, F. (2007) The adaptive immunologic microenvironment in colorectal cancer: a novel perspective. Cancer Research 67, 1883-1886 CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
29. Valenti, R. et al. (2007) Tumor-released microvesicles as vehicles of immunosuppression. Cancer Research 67, 2912-2915 CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
30. Swartz, M.A. and Lund, A.W. (2012) Lymphatic and interstitial flow in the tumour microenvironment: linking mechanobiology with immunity. Nature Reviews Cancer 12, 210-219 CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
31. Madar, S., Goldstein, I. and Rotter, V. (2013) 'Cancer associated fibroblasts'–more than meets the eye. Trends in Molecular Medicine 19, 447-453 CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
32. Guan, J. and Chen, J. (2013) Mesenchymal stem cells in the tumor microenvironment. Biomedical Reports 1, 517-521 CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
33. Functional subsets of mesenchymal cell types in the tumor microenvironment. Cortez, E, Roswall, P, Pietras, K. Semin Cancer Biol (2014). Apr; 25:3-9. doi: 10.1016/j.semcancer.2013.12.010. Epub 2014 Jan 7.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
34. Straussman, R. et al. (2012) Tumour micro-environment elicits innate resistance to RAF inhibitors through HGF secretion. Nature 487, 500-504 CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
35. Crawford, Y. et al. (2009) PDGF-C mediates the angiogenic and tumorigenic properties of fibroblasts associated with tumors refractory to anti-VEGF treatment. Cancer Cell 15, 21-34 CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
36. Feig, C. et al. (2013) Targeting CXCL12 from FAP-expressing carcinoma-associated fibroblasts synergizes with anti-PD-L1 immunotherapy in pancreatic cancer. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 110, 20212-20217 CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
37. Kraman, M. et al. (2010) Suppression of antitumor immunity by stromal cells expressing fibroblast activation protein-alpha. Science 330, 827-830 CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
38. Yu, B. et al. (2013) Stromal fibroblasts in the microenvironment of gastric carcinomas promote tumor metastasis via upregulating TAGLN expression. BMC Cell Biology 14, 17 CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
39. Stracke, M.L. and Liotta, L.A. (1992) Multi-step cascade of tumor cell metastasis. In Vivo 6, 309-316 Google ScholarPubMed
40. Sahai, E. (2007) Illuminating the metastatic process. Nature Reviews Cancer 7, 737-749 CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
41. Fidler, I.J., Kim, S.J. and Langley, R.R. (2007) The role of the organ microenvironment in the biology and therapy of cancer metastasis. Journal of Cellular Biochemistry 101, 927-936 CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
42. Paget, S. (1989) The distribution of secondary growths in cancer of the breast. Cancer and Metastasis Review 8, 98-101 Google ScholarPubMed
43. Fidler, I.J. (1991) Orthotopic implantation of human colon carcinomas into nude mice provides a valuable model for the biology and therapy of metastasis. Cancer and Metastasis Review 10, 229-243 CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
44. Araki, C. (1968) Organs with low incidence of neoplasm metastasis through blood circulation. Nihon Rinsho 26, 3217-3221 Google ScholarPubMed
45. High incidence of regional and in-transit lymph node metastasis in patients with alveolar rhabdomyosarcoma. Nishida, Y, Tsukushi, S, Urakawa, H, Sugiura, H, Nakashima, H, Yamada, Y, Ishiguro, N. Int J Clin Oncol. 2014 Jun; 19(3): 536-43. doi: 10.1007/s10147-013-0571-4. Epub 2013 Jun 4.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
46. Dos Santos, L.A. et al. (2011) Incidence of lymph node and adnexal metastasis in endometrial stromal sarcoma. Gynecologic Oncology 121, 319-322 CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
47. Hirasawa, T. et al. (2009) Incidence of lymph node metastasis and the feasibility of endoscopic resection for undifferentiated-type early gastric cancer. Gastric Cancer 12, 148-152 CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
48. Lu, X. et al. (2010) In vivo dynamics and distinct functions of hypoxia in primary tumor growth and organotropic metastasis of breast cancer. Cancer Research 70, 3905-3914 CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
49. Rigamonti, N. and De Palma, M. (2013) A role for angiopoietin-2 in organ-specific metastasis. Cell Reports 4, 621-623 CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
50. Lorusso, G. and Ruegg, C. (2012) New insights into the mechanisms of organ-specific breast cancer metastasis. Seminars in Cancer Biology 22, 226-233 CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
51. Nguyen, D.X., Bos, P.D. and Massague, J. (2009) Metastasis: from dissemination to organ-specific colonization. Nature Reviews Cancer 9, 274-284 CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
52. Nolan, C.P. and Abrey, L.E. (2005) Leptomeningeal metastases from leukemias and lymphomas. Cancer Treatment and Research 125, 53-69 CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
53. Patel, V. et al. (2011) Decreased lymphangiogenesis and lymph node metastasis by mTOR inhibition in head and neck cancer. Cancer Research 71, 7103-7112 CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
54. Allen, C.T. et al. (2013) Emerging insights into head and neck cancer metastasis. Head Neck 35, 1669-1678 CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
55. Padua, D. et al. (2008) TGFbeta primes breast tumors for lung metastasis seeding through angiopoietin-like 4. Cell 133, 66-77 CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
56. Gupta, G.P. et al. (2007) Mediators of vascular remodelling co-opted for sequential steps in lung metastasis. Nature 446, 765-770 CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
57. Goncharova, E.A. (2013) mTOR and vascular remodeling in lung diseases: current challenges and therapeutic prospects. FASEB Journal 27, 1796-1807 CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
58. Zhang, X.H. et al. (2013) Selection of bone metastasis seeds by mesenchymal signals in the primary tumor stroma. Cell 154, 1060-1073 CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
59. Lee, E., Pandey, N.B. and Popel, A.S. (2014) Pre-treatment of mice with tumor-conditioned media accelerates metastasis to lymph nodes and lungs: a new spontaneous breast cancer metastasis model. Clinical & Experimental Metastasis 31, 67-79 CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
60. Guidi, A.J. et al. (2000) Association of angiogenesis in lymph node metastases with outcome of breast cancer. Journal of the National Cancer Institute 92, 486-492 CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
61. Edel, M.J., Harvey, J.M. and Papadimitriou, J.M. (2000) Comparison of vascularity and angiogenesis in primary invasive mammary carcinomas and in their respective axillary lymph node metastases. Clinical & Experimental Metastasis 18, 695-702 CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
62. Inhibition of breast cancer growth and metastasis by a biomimetic peptide. Lee, E, Lee, SJ, Koskimaki, JE, Han, Z, Pandey, NB, Popel, AS. (2014). Sci Rep. 2014 Nov 20;4:7139. doi: 10.1038/srep07139.Google Scholar
63. Hood, J.L., San, R.S. and Wickline, S.A. (2011) Exosomes released by melanoma cells prepare sentinel lymph nodes for tumor metastasis. Cancer Research 71, 3792-3801 CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
64. Peinado, H. et al. (2012) Melanoma exosomes educate bone marrow progenitor cells toward a pro-metastatic phenotype through MET. Nature Medicine 18, 883-891 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
65. Potente, M., Gerhardt, H. and Carmeliet, P. (2011) Basic and therapeutic aspects of angiogenesis. Cell 146, 873-887 CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
66. Jain, R.K. (1999) Transport of molecules, particles, and cells in solid tumors. Annual Review of Biomedical Engineering 1, 241-263 CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
67. Folkman, J. (1971) Tumor angiogenesis: therapeutic implications. New England Journal of Medicine 285, 1182-1186 Google ScholarPubMed
68. Ferrara, N. (2002) VEGF and the quest for tumour angiogenesis factors. Nature Reviews Cancer 2, 795-803 CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
69. Mac Gabhann, F. et al. (2010) Systems biology of pro-angiogenic therapies targeting the VEGF system. Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews: System Biology and Medicine 2, 694-707 Google ScholarPubMed
70. Sarmiento, R. et al. (2009) Antiangiogenic therapies in breast cancer. Current Opinion in Investigational Drugs 10, 1334-1345 Google ScholarPubMed
71. Labelle, M. and Hynes, R.O. (2012) The initial hours of metastasis: the importance of cooperative host-tumor cell interactions during hematogenous dissemination. Cancer Discovery 2, 1091-1099 CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
72. Rashid, O.M. et al. (2013) Is tail vein injection a relevant breast cancer lung metastasis model? Journal of Thoracic Disease 5, 385-392 Google ScholarPubMed
73. Zadnik, P. et al. (2013) A novel animal model of human breast cancer metastasis to the spine: a pilot study using intracardiac injection and luciferase-expressing cells. Journal of Neurosurgery: Spine 18, 217-225 Google Scholar
74. Arshad, F. et al. (2010) Blood-brain barrier integrity and breast cancer metastasis to the brain. Pathology Research International 2011, 920509Google ScholarPubMed
75. Metastasis: new insights into organ-specific extravasation and metastatic niches. Irmisch, A, Huelsken, J. Exp Cell Res. 2013 Jul 1; 319(11): 1604-10. doi: 10.1016/j.yexcr.2013.02.012. Epub 2013 Feb 21.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
76. Bergers, G. and Benjamin, L.E. (2003) Tumorigenesis and the angiogenic switch. Nature Reviews Cancer 3, 401-410 CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
77. Farnsworth, R.H. et al. (2011) A role for bone morphogenetic protein-4 in lymph node vascular remodeling and primary tumor growth. Cancer Research 71, 6547-6557 CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
78. Lee, S.Y. et al. (2012) Changes in specialized blood vessels in lymph nodes and their role in cancer metastasis. Journal of Translational Medicine 10, 206 CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
79. Von Marschall, Z. et al. (2005) Vascular endothelial growth factor-D induces lymphangiogenesis and lymphatic metastasis in models of ductal pancreatic cancer. International Journal of Oncology 27, 669-679 Google ScholarPubMed
80. Kesler, C.T. et al. (2013) Lymphatic vessels in health and disease. Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews: System Biology and Medicine 5, 111-124 Google ScholarPubMed
81. Mohammed, R.A. et al. (2011) Lymphatic and blood vessels in basal and triple-negative breast cancers: characteristics and prognostic significance. Modern Pathology 24, 774-785 CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
82. Kaipainen, A. et al. (1995) Expression of the fms-like tyrosine kinase 4 gene becomes restricted to lymphatic endothelium during development. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 92, 3566-3570 CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
83. Banerji, S. et al. (1999) LYVE-1, a new homologue of the CD44 glycoprotein, is a lymph-specific receptor for hyaluronan. Journal of Cell Biology 144, 789-801 CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
84. Wigle, J.T. and Oliver, G. (1999) Prox1 function is required for the development of the murine lymphatic system. Cell 98, 769-778 CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
85. Yuan, L. et al. (2002) Abnormal lymphatic vessel development in neuropilin 2 mutant mice. Development 129, 4797-4806 CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
86. Schacht, V. et al. (2003) T1alpha/podoplanin deficiency disrupts normal lymphatic vasculature formation and causes lymphedema. EMBO Journal 22, 3546-3556 CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
87. Porter, G.J. et al. (2004) Patterns of metastatic breast carcinoma: influence of tumour histological grade. Clinical Radiology 59, 1094-1098 CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
88. Perou, C.M. et al. (2000) Molecular portraits of human breast tumours. Nature 406, 747-752 CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
89. Moskowitz, M. et al. (1975) Breast cancer screening. Preliminary report of 207 biopsies performed in 4, 128 volunteer screenees. Cancer 36, 2245-2250 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
90. Matsuo, S. (1974) Studies on the factors inducing metastasis of breast cancer to lymph node. I. Lymph flow in the thoracic wall. Acta Medica Okayama 28, 259-270 Google ScholarPubMed
91. Lipponen, P. et al. (2001) High stromal hyaluronan level is associated with poor differentiation and metastasis in prostate cancer. European Journal of Cancer 37, 849-856 CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
92. Skobe, M. et al. (2001) Induction of tumor lymphangiogenesis by VEGF-C promotes breast cancer metastasis. Nature Medicine 7, 192-198 CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
93. Tammela, T. and Alitalo, K. (2010) Lymphangiogenesis: molecular mechanisms and future promise. Cell 140, 460-476 CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
94. J Clin Oncol. 2014 May 1; 32(13): 1365-83. doi:10.1200/JCO.2013.54.1177. Epub 2014 Mar 24. Sentinel lymph node biopsy for patients with early-stage breast cancer: American Society of Clinical Oncology clinical practice guideline updateCrossRefGoogle Scholar
95. Boughey, J.C. et al. (2013) Sentinel lymph node surgery after neoadjuvant chemotherapy in patients with node-positive breast cancer: the ACOSOG Z1071 (Alliance) clinical trial. Journal of American Medical Association 310, 1455-1461 CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
96. Sleeman, J.P., Cady, B. and Pantel, K. (2012) The connectivity of lymphogenous and hematogenous tumor cell dissemination: biological insights and clinical implications. Clinical & Experimental Metastasis 29, 737-746 CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
97. Jain, R.K. and Padera, T.P. (2002) Prevention and treatment of lymphatic metastasis by antilymphangiogenic therapy. Journal of the National Cancer Institute 94, 785-787 CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
98. Achen, M.G., Mann, G.B. and Stacker, S.A. (2006) Targeting lymphangiogenesis to prevent tumour metastasis. British Journals of Cancer 94, 1355-1360 CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
99. Hirakawa, S. et al. (2007) VEGF-C-induced lymphangiogenesis in sentinel lymph nodes promotes tumor metastasis to distant sites. Blood 109, 1010-1017 CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
100. Harrell, M.I., Iritani, B.M. and Ruddell, A. (2007) Tumor-induced sentinel lymph node lymphangiogenesis and increased lymph flow precede melanoma metastasis. American Journal of Pathology 170, 774-786 CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
101. Interaction of tumor cells and lymphatic vessels in cancer progression. Alitalo, A, Detmar, M. Oncogene. 2012 Oct 18;31(42):4499-508. doi: 10.1038/onc.2011.602.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
102. Quagliata, L. et al. (2014) Inhibition of VEGFR-3 activation in tumor-draining lymph nodes suppresses the outgrowth of lymph node metastases in the MT-450 syngeneic rat breast cancer model. Clinical & Experimental Metastasis 31, 351-365 CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
103. Thomas, S.N. et al. (2014) Targeting the tumor-draining lymph node with adjuvanted nanoparticles reshapes the anti-tumor immune response. Biomaterials 35, 814-824 CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
104. Lee, E. et al. (2014) Breast cancer cells condition lymphatic endothelial cells within pre-metastatic niches to promote metastasis. Nature Communications 5, 4715 CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
105. Lee, E. et al. (2013) Inhibition of lymphangiogenesis and angiogenesis in breast tumor xenografts and lymph nodes by a peptide derived from transmembrane protein 45A. Neoplasia 15, 112-124 CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
106. Nolan, D.J. et al. (2013) Molecular signatures of tissue-specific microvascular endothelial cell heterogeneity in organ maintenance and regeneration. Developmental Cell 26, 204-219 CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
107. Kobayashi, H. et al. (2010) Angiocrine factors from Akt-activated endothelial cells balance self-renewal and differentiation of haematopoietic stem cells. Nature Cell Biology 12, 1046-1056 CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
108. Ruggeri, Z.M. (2003) Von Willebrand factor, platelets and endothelial cell interactions. Journal of Thrombosis and Haemostasis 1, 1335-1342 CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
109. Ding, B.S. et al. (2010) Inductive angiocrine signals from sinusoidal endothelium are required for liver regeneration. Nature 468, 310-315 CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
110. Ding, B.S. et al. (2011) Endothelial-derived angiocrine signals induce and sustain regenerative lung alveolarization. Cell 147, 539-553 CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
111. Weech, A.A., Goettsch, E. and Reeves, E.B. (1934) The flow and composition of lymph in relation to the formation of edema. Journal of Experimental Medicine 60, 63-84 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
112. Turner, S.G. and Barrowman, J.A. (1977) Intestinal lymph flow and lymphatic transport of protein during fat absorption. Quaterly Journal of Experimental Physiology and Cognate Medical Sciences 62, 175-180 CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
113. Nykanen, A.I. et al. (2010) Targeting lymphatic vessel activation and CCL21 production by vascular endothelial growth factor receptor-3 inhibition has novel immunomodulatory and antiarteriosclerotic effects in cardiac allografts. Circulation 121, 1413-1422 CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
114. Forster, R., Davalos-Misslitz, A.C. and Rot, A. (2008) CCR7 and its ligands: balancing immunity and tolerance. Nature Reviews Immunology 8, 362-371 CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
115. Scandella, E. et al. (2004) CCL19/CCL21-triggered signal transduction and migration of dendritic cells requires prostaglandin E2. Blood 103, 1595-1601 CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
116. Riedl, K. et al. (2003) Overexpression of CCL-21/secondary lymphoid tissue chemokine in human dendritic cells augments chemotactic activities for lymphocytes and antigen presenting cells. Molecular Cancer 2, 35 CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
117. Kataru, R.P. et al. (2011) T lymphocytes negatively regulate lymph node lymphatic vessel formation. Immunity 34, 96-107 CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
118. Angeli, V. et al. (2006) B cell-driven lymphangiogenesis in inflamed lymph nodes enhances dendritic cell mobilization. Immunity 24, 203-215 CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
119. Brantley-Sieders, D.M. et al. (2011) Angiocrine factors modulate tumor proliferation and motility through EphA2 repression of Slit2 tumor suppressor function in endothelium. Cancer Research 71, 976-987 CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
120. Hamada, J. et al. (1992) Separable growth and migration factors for large-cell lymphoma cells secreted by microvascular endothelial cells derived from target organs for metastasis. British Journal of Cancer 66, 349-354 CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
121. Sadej, R. et al. (2009) CD151 regulates tumorigenesis by modulating the communication between tumor cells and endothelium. Molecular Cancer Research 7, 787-798 CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
122. Warner, K.A. et al. (2008) Endothelial cells enhance tumor cell invasion through a crosstalk mediated by CXC chemokine signaling. Neoplasia 10, 131-139 CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
123. Stromal endothelial cells directly influence cancer progression. Franses, JW, Baker, AB, Chitalia, VC, Edelman, ER. Sci Transl Med. 2011 Jan 19;3(66):66ra5. doi: 10.1126/scitranslmed.3001542.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
124. Heusschen, R. et al. (2010) MicroRNAs in the tumor endothelium: novel controls on the angioregulatory switchboard. Biochimica et Biophysica Acta 1805, 87-96 Google ScholarPubMed
125. Buchanan, C.F. et al. (2012) Cross-talk between endothelial and breast cancer cells regulates reciprocal expression of angiogenic factors in vitro. Journal of Cellular Biochemistry 113, 1142-1151 CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
126. Am J Physiol Cell Physiol. 2014 Jul 1; 307 (1): C14–24. doi: 10.1152/ajpcell.00043.2014. Epub 2014 Apr 16. Host endothelial S1PR1 regulation of vascular permeability modulates tumor growthGoogle Scholar
127. Campos, M.S. et al. (2012) Endothelial derived factors inhibit anoikis of head and neck cancer stem cells. Oral Oncology 48, 26-32 CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
128. Galan-Moya, E.M. et al. (2011) Secreted factors from brain endothelial cells maintain glioblastoma stem-like cell expansion through the mTOR pathway. EMBO Reports 12, 470-476 CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
129. Krishnamurthy, S. et al. (2010) Endothelial cell-initiated signaling promotes the survival and self-renewal of cancer stem cells. Cancer Research 70, 9969-9978 CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
130. Lu, J. et al. (2013) Endothelial cells promote the colorectal cancer stem cell phenotype through a soluble form of Jagged-1. Cancer Cell 23, 171-185 CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
131. Kimura, C. et al. (2013) Endothelium-dependent epithelial-mesenchymal transition of tumor cells: exclusive roles of transforming growth factor beta1 and beta2. Biochimica et Biophysica Acta 1830, 4470-4481 CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
132. Sigurdsson, V. et al. (2011) Endothelial induced EMT in breast epithelial cells with stem cell properties. PLoS ONE 6, e23833 CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
133. Kim, M. et al. (2010) CXCR4 signaling regulates metastasis of chemoresistant melanoma cells by a lymphatic metastatic niche. Cancer Research 70, 10411-10421 CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
134. Wiley, H.E. et al. (2001) Expression of CC chemokine receptor-7 and regional lymph node metastasis of B16 murine melanoma. Journal of the National Cancer Institute 93, 1638-1643 CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
135. Hwang, T.L. et al. (2012) CCL7 and CCL21 overexpression in gastric cancer is associated with lymph node metastasis and poor prognosis. World Journal of Gastroenterology 18, 1249-1256 CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
136. Zhuang, Z. et al. (2010) Altered phenotype of lymphatic endothelial cells induced by highly metastatic OTSCC cells contributed to the lymphatic metastasis of OTSCC cells. Cancer Science 101, 686-692 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
137. Du, Y. et al. (2013) The interaction between LYVE-1 with hyaluronan on the cell surface may play a role in the diversity of adhesion to cancer cells. PLoS ONE 8, e63463 Google ScholarPubMed
138. Paupert, J., Sounni, N.E. and Noel, A. (2011) Lymphangiogenesis in post-natal tissue remodeling: lymphatic endothelial cell connection with its environment. Molecular Aspects of Medicine 32, 146-158 CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
139. Ding, Z. et al. (2005) Morphological study of the interaction between M21 melanoma and lymphatic endothelium. Lymphology 38, 87-91 Google ScholarPubMed
140. Kerjaschki, D. et al. (2011) Lipoxygenase mediates invasion of intrametastatic lymphatic vessels and propagates lymph node metastasis of human mammary carcinoma xenografts in mouse. Journal of Clinical Investigation 121, 2000-2012 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
141. Iiizumi, M., Bandyopadhyay, S. and Watabe, K. (2007) Interaction of Duffy antigen receptor for chemokines and KAI1: a critical step in metastasis suppression. Cancer Research 67, 1411-1414 CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
142. Lee, E., Pandey, N.B. and Popel, A.S. (2014) Lymphatic endothelial cells support tumor growth in breast cancer. Scientific Reports 4, 5853 CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
143. Swartz, M.A. et al. (2012) Tumor microenvironment complexity: emerging roles in cancer therapy. Cancer Research 72, 2473-2480 CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
144. Zheng, R. et al. (2007) Significance of regional draining lymph nodes in the development of tumor immunity: implications for cancer immunotherapy. Cancer Treatment and Research 135, 223-237 CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
145. Cascone, T. et al. (2011) Upregulated stromal EGFR and vascular remodeling in mouse xenograft models of angiogenesis inhibitor-resistant human lung adenocarcinoma. Journal of Clinical Investigation 121, 1313-1328 CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
146. Jain, R.K. et al. (2009) Biomarkers of response and resistance to antiangiogenic therapy. Nature Reviews Clinical Oncology 6, 327-338 CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
147. Kerbel, R.S. (2011) Reappraising antiangiogenic therapy for breast cancer. Breast 20(Suppl 3), S56-S60 CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
148. Xu, L. et al. (2014) Sci Transl Med. 2014 Jun 25; 6(242): 242ra84. doi: 10.1126/scitranslmed.3008455. COX-2 inhibition potentiates antiangiogenic cancer therapy and prevents metastasis in preclinical models. Science Translational Medicine 6, 242 CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
149. Lee, E. et al. (2011) Small peptides derived from somatotropin domain-containing proteins inhibit blood and lymphatic endothelial cell proliferation, migration, adhesion and tube formation. International Journal of Biochemistry & Cell Biology 43, 1812-1821 CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
150. Koskimaki, J.E. et al. (2013) Synergy between a collagen IV mimetic peptide and a somatotropin-domain derived peptide as angiogenesis and lymphangiogenesis inhibitors. Angiogenesis 16, 159-170 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Figure 0

Figure 1. Tumour and organ microenvironment. Tumour cells express angiogenic growth factors and lymphangiogenic growth factors, promoting tumour angiogenesis and lymphangiogenesis. Tumour blood vessels primarily serve as conduits for blood supply and a route for haematogenous tumour spreading. Tumour lymphatic vessels particularly play a role in tumour cell escape from the primary tumour by expressing tumour cell recruiting chemokine factors. Tumour secretions from primary tumours or metastases can promote angiogenesis and lymphangiogenesis in pre-metastatic organs such as lymph nodes and distant organs. Sentinel lymph nodes are initially invaded by tumour cells (also called tumour-draining lymph nodes, TDLN). The TDLN serve as a reservoir for tumour cells before distal metastasis. Angiogenesis in the TDLN is a way to facilitate metastatic colonisation and further dissemination; lymphangiogenesis in TDLN is crucial for initial tumour invasion and tumour immune tolerance by modifying host immunity. Tumour cells in the lymphatic system can be transported into the blood vessels through the LN vein and thoracic duct and subclavian vein where the blood and lymphatic systems are temporarily fused each other. Vascular permeability in the lung is critical for tumour cell extravasation. BV, blood vessels; LN, lymph node; LV, lymphatic vessels.

Figure 1

Figure 2. Crosstalk between blood endothelial cells and cancer cells. Tumour cell and blood endothelial cell -secreted factors, ECM components, microRNAs, and membrane bound or soluble receptors can mediate tumour/blood endothelial crosstalk signals to promote tumour cell proliferation, migration, invasion, EMT, and cancer stem cell phenotypes. Question marks represent unknown mechanisms. ADAM17, ADAM metallopeptidase domain 17; EMT, epithelial-to-mesenchymal transition; miRxx, micro RNA xx; mTOR, mammalian target of rapamycin; NRP1, neuropilin1; S1PR1, Sphingosine-1-phosphate receptor 1; Slit2, Slit homolog 2 protein; TGFβ, transforming growth factor beta; VEGFA, vascular endothelial growth factor A; VEGFR2, vascular endothelial growth factor receptor 2.

Figure 2

Figure 3. Crosstalk between lymphatic endothelial cells and cancer cells. Tumour cell and lymphatic endothelial cell-secreted factors, ECM components, and membrane bound receptors can mediate tumour/lymphatic endothelial crosstalk signals to promote tumour cell migration, recruitment and adhesion. Lymphatic endothelial cell-secreted factors also induce angiogenesis and enhance vascular permeability in pre-metastatic organs. They can also modify host immunity to mediate tumour immune escape by recruiting immature dendritic cells (iDC) and naïve T cells. Question marks represent unknown mechanisms. CCRxx, CC chemokine receptor xx; CCLxx, CC chemokine ligand xx; DARC, duffy antigen receptor for chemokines; HIF1, hypoxia inducible factor 1; iDC, immature dendritic cells; IL6, interleukin 6; IL6R, interleukin 6 receptor; KAl1, Kallmann syndrome 1; LYVE1, lymphatic vessel endothelial hyaluronan receptor 1; LN, lymph node; LE, lymphatic endothelium; NRP1, neuropilin1; Stat3, signal transducer and activator of transcription 3; Treg, regulatory T cells; CTL, cytotoxic T lymphocytes; TH1, helper T 1; VEGFC/D, vascular endothelial growth factorC/D; VEGFR3, vascular endothelial growth factor receptor 3 (homodimer); VEGFR 2/3, vascular endothelial growth factor receptor 2/3 (heterodimer).