Crossref Citations
This article has been cited by the following publications. This list is generated based on data provided by
Crossref.
Wilcox, Nathaniel T.
2008.
Risk Aversion in Experiments.
Vol. 12,
Issue. ,
p.
197.
Chaudhuri, Ananish
2010.
Journal of Economic Psychology,
Vol. 31,
Issue. 6,
p.
1057.
Wilcox, Nathaniel T.
2011.
‘Stochastically more risk averse:’ A contextual theory of stochastic discrete choice under risk.
Journal of Econometrics,
Vol. 162,
Issue. 1,
p.
89.
Buschena, David E.
and
Atwood, Joseph A.
2011.
Evaluation of similarity models for expected utility violations.
Journal of Econometrics,
Vol. 162,
Issue. 1,
p.
105.
Scholten, Marc
and
Read, Daniel
2011.
Descriptive Models of Intertemporal Choice Part 1: Anomalies in Choices Between Less Sooner and More Later.
SSRN Electronic Journal,
Pahlke, Julius
Kocher, Martin G.
and
Trautmann, Stefan
2011.
Tempus Fugit: Time Pressure in Risky Decisions.
SSRN Electronic Journal,
Conte, Anna
Hey, John D.
and
Moffatt, Peter G.
2011.
Mixture models of choice under risk.
Journal of Econometrics,
Vol. 162,
Issue. 1,
p.
79.
von Gaudecker, Hans-Martin
van Soest, Arthur
and
WengstrÖm, Erik
2011.
Heterogeneity in Risky Choice Behavior in a Broad Population.
American Economic Review,
Vol. 101,
Issue. 2,
p.
664.
Alós-Ferrer, Carlos
Granić, Đura-Georg
Shi, Fei
and
Wagner, Alexander K.
2012.
Choices and preferences: Evidence from implicit choices and response times.
Journal of Experimental Social Psychology,
Vol. 48,
Issue. 6,
p.
1336.
Baltussen, Guido
Post, G. Thierry
van den Assem, Martijn J.
and
Wakker, Peter P.
2012.
Random incentive systems in a dynamic choice experiment.
Experimental Economics,
Vol. 15,
Issue. 3,
p.
418.
Kocher, Martin G.
Pahlke, Julius
and
Trautmann, Stefan T.
2013.
Tempus Fugit: Time Pressure in Risky Decisions.
Management Science,
Vol. 59,
Issue. 10,
p.
2380.
Loomes, Graham
and
Pogrebna, Ganna
2014.
Measuring Individual Risk Attitudes when Preferences are Imprecise.
The Economic Journal,
Vol. 124,
Issue. 576,
p.
569.
Ubeda, Paloma
2014.
The consistency of fairness rules: An experimental study.
Journal of Economic Psychology,
Vol. 41,
Issue. ,
p.
88.
Achtziger, Anja
and
Alós-Ferrer, Carlos
2014.
Fast or Rational? A Response-Times Study of Bayesian Updating.
Management Science,
Vol. 60,
Issue. 4,
p.
923.
Davies, Anna C.
Nicol, Christine J.
Persson, Mia E.
Radford, Andrew N.
and
Addessi, Elsa
2014.
Behavioural and Physiological Effects of Finely Balanced Decision-Making in Chickens.
PLoS ONE,
Vol. 9,
Issue. 10,
p.
e108809.
Loomes, Graham
2015.
The Wiley Blackwell Handbook of Judgment and Decision Making.
p.
658.
Clithero, John A.
2016.
Improving Out-of-Sample Predictions Using Response Times and a Model of the Decision Process.
SSRN Electronic Journal,
Alós-Ferrer, Carlos
Granić, Ðura-Georg
Kern, Johannes
and
Wagner, Alexander K.
2016.
Preference reversals: Time and again.
Journal of Risk and Uncertainty,
Vol. 52,
Issue. 1,
p.
65.
Clithero, John A.
2016.
Response Times in Economics: Looking Through the Lens of Sequential Sampling Models.
SSRN Electronic Journal,
Gregg, Daniel
and
Rolfe, John
2016.
Using experiments to improve understanding of limits to decision making in Grazing Land Management.
Land Use Policy,
Vol. 54,
Issue. ,
p.
508.