Crossref Citations
This article has been cited by the following publications. This list is generated based on data provided by
Crossref.
Butler, David J
and
Loomes, Graham C
2007.
Imprecision as an Account of the Preference Reversal Phenomenon.
American Economic Review,
Vol. 97,
Issue. 1,
p.
277.
Blavatskyy, Pavlo
2007.
Stochastic Utility Theorem.
SSRN Electronic Journal,
Blavatskyy, Pavlo
2008.
Probabilistic Choice and Stochastic Dominance.
SSRN Electronic Journal,
Houser, Daniel E.
2008.
The New Palgrave Dictionary of Economics.
p.
1.
Wilcox, Nathaniel T.
2008.
Risk Aversion in Experiments.
Vol. 12,
Issue. ,
p.
197.
Harrison, Glenn W.
2008.
NEUROECONOMICS: A CRITICAL RECONSIDERATION.
Economics and Philosophy,
Vol. 24,
Issue. 3,
p.
303.
Blavatskyy, Pavlo R.
2008.
Stochastic utility theorem.
Journal of Mathematical Economics,
Vol. 44,
Issue. 11,
p.
1049.
Booij, Adam S.
and
van Praag, Bernard M.S.
2009.
A simultaneous approach to the estimation of risk aversion and the subjective time discount rate.
Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization,
Vol. 70,
Issue. 1-2,
p.
374.
Pinkovskiy, Maxim L.
2009.
Rational Inattention and Choice Under Risk: Explaining Violations of Expected Utility Through a Shannon Entropy Formulation of the Costs of Rationality.
Atlantic Economic Journal,
Vol. 37,
Issue. 1,
p.
99.
von Gaudecker, Hans-Martin
van Soest, Arthur H. O.
and
Wengström, Erik
2009.
Heterogeneity in Risky Choice Behaviour in a Broad Population.
SSRN Electronic Journal,
Braga, Jacinto
Humphrey, Steven J.
and
Starmer, Chris
2009.
Market experience eliminates some anomalies—and creates new ones.
European Economic Review,
Vol. 53,
Issue. 4,
p.
401.
Andersen, Steffen
Harrison, Glenn W.
Lau, Morten Igel
and
Rutström, Elisabet E.
2010.
Behavioral econometrics for psychologists.
Journal of Economic Psychology,
Vol. 31,
Issue. 4,
p.
553.
Blavatskyy, Pavlo R.
2010.
Reverse common ratio effect.
Journal of Risk and Uncertainty,
Vol. 40,
Issue. 3,
p.
219.
Houser, Daniel E.
2010.
Behavioural and Experimental Economics.
p.
146.
Day, Brett
and
Loomes, Graham
2010.
Conflicting violations of transitivity and where they may lead us.
Theory and Decision,
Vol. 68,
Issue. 1-2,
p.
233.
Di Caprio, Debora
and
Santos-Arteaga, Francisco J.
2011.
Cardinal versus ordinal criteria in choice under risk with disconnected utility ranges.
Journal of Mathematical Economics,
Vol. 47,
Issue. 4-5,
p.
588.
Wilcox, Nathaniel T.
2011.
‘Stochastically more risk averse:’ A contextual theory of stochastic discrete choice under risk.
Journal of Econometrics,
Vol. 162,
Issue. 1,
p.
89.
Bernasconi, Michele
Choirat, Christine
and
Seri, Raffaello
2011.
A re-examination of the algebraic properties of the AHP as a ratio-scaling technique.
Journal of Mathematical Psychology,
Vol. 55,
Issue. 2,
p.
152.
von Gaudecker, Hans-Martin
van Soest, Arthur
and
WengstrÖm, Erik
2011.
Heterogeneity in Risky Choice Behavior in a Broad Population.
American Economic Review,
Vol. 101,
Issue. 2,
p.
664.
Moscati, Ivan
and
Tubaro, Paola
2011.
Becker random behavior and the as-if defense of rational choice theory in demand analysis.
Journal of Economic Methodology,
Vol. 18,
Issue. 2,
p.
107.