No CrossRef data available.
Article contents
Introduction to the Symposium in Experimental Economics in memory of John Van Huyck
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 14 March 2025
Abstract
An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Keywords
- Type
- Original Paper
- Information
- Experimental Economics , Volume 21 , Issue 3: Special Issue in Honor of John Van Huyck , September 2018 , pp. 481 - 486
- Copyright
- Copyright © 2018 Economic Science Association
References
Arifovic, J, & Ledyard, J (2018). Learning to alternate. Experimental Economics.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Camera, G, & Casari, M (2017). Monitoring institutions in indefinitely repeated games. Experimental Economics.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Camerer, C (2003). Behavioral game theory: Experiments in strategic interaction, Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Cason, TN, Sheremeta, RM, & Zhang, J (2017). Asymmetric and endogenous within-group communication in competitive coordination games. Experimental Economics.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cooper, DJ, & Van Huyck, J (2017). Coordination and transfer. Experimental Economics.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Devetag, G, & Ortmann, A (2007). When and why? A critical survey on coordination failure in the laboratory. Experimental Economics, 10(3), 331–344. 10.1007/s10683-007-9178-9CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Duffy, J, & Fehr, D (2017). Equilibrium selection in similar repeated games: Experimental evidence on the role of precedents. Experimental Economics.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Feliz-Ozbey, E, Ham, JC, Kagel, JH, & Ozbay, EY (2016). The role of cognitive ability and personality traits for men and women in gift exchange outcomes. Experimental Economics.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fudenberg, D, & Levine, DK (1998). The theory of learning in games, Cambridge: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Harsanyi, JC, & Selten, R (1988). A general theory of equilibrium selection in games, Cambridge: MIT Press Books.Google Scholar
Jacquemet, N, Luchini, S, Shogren, JF, & Zylberstejn, A (2017). Coordination and communication under oath. Experimental Economics.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kurz, V, Orland, A, & Posadzy, K (2017). Fairness versus efficiency: How procedural fairness concerns affect coordination. Experimental Economics.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Leng, A, Friesen, L, Kalayci, K, & Man, P (2017). A minimum effort coordination game experiment in continuous time. Experimental Economics.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rankin, F, Van Huyck, JB, & Battalio, RC (2000). Strategic similarity and emergent conventions: Evidence from similar stag hunt games. Games and Economic Behavior, 32(2), 315–337. 10.1006/game.1999.0711CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Van Huyck, JB, Battalio, RC, & Beil, RO (1990). Tacit coordination games, strategic uncertainty, and coordination failure. The American Economic Review, 80(1), 234–248.Google Scholar
Van Huyck, JB, Battalio, RC, & Beil, RO (1991). Strategic uncertainty, equilibrium selection, and coordination failure in average opinion games. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 106(3), 885–910. 10.2307/2937932CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Van Huyck, JB, Cook, JP, & Battalio, RC (1994). Selection dynamics, asymptotic stability, and adaptive behavior. Journal of Political Economy, 102(5), 975–1005. 10.1086/261961CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Van Huyck, JB, & Stahl, DO (2017). Conditional behavior and learning in similar stag hunt games. Experimental Economics.CrossRefGoogle Scholar