Hostname: page-component-7b9c58cd5d-7g5wt Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-03-16T16:16:07.275Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Bertrand colludes more than Cournot

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  14 March 2025

Sigrid Suetens  and
Jan Potters
Sigrid Suetens*
Affiliation:
University of Antwerp, Department of Economics, Prinsstraat 13, B-2000 Antwerp Belgium
Jan Potters*
Affiliation:
Tilburg University, CentER, P.O.Box 90153, 5000 LE Tilburg, The Netherlands
*
e-mail: sigrid.suetens@ua.ac.be
e-mail: j.j.m.potters@uvt.nl
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

On the basis of evidence of past oligopoly experiments, we argue that there is often significantly more tacit collusion in Bertrand price-choice than in Cournot quantity-choice markets.

Keywords

CollusionQuantity-choice and price-choice experiments

JEL classification

D21: Firm Behavior: Theory L00: General L13: Oligopoly and Other Imperfect Markets
Type
Research Article
Information
Experimental Economics , Volume 10 , Issue 1 , March 2007 , pp. 71 - 77
Creative Commons
Creative Common License - CCCreative Common License - BYCreative Common License - NC
This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Noncommercial License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/2.0), which permits any noncommercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author(s) and source are credited.
Copyright
Copyright © 2007 Economic Science Association

References

Altavilla, C., Luini, L., & Sbriglia, P. (2006). Social learning in market games. Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization, forthcoming.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bester, H. & Güth, W. (1998). Is altruism evolutionary stable? Journal of Economic Behavior and Organizationn, 34, 193–2092.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Davis, D. D. (2002). Strategic interactions, market information and predicting the effects of mergers in differentiated product markets. International Journal of Industrial Organization, 20, 1277–1312.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fouraker, L. E., & Siegel, S. (1963). Bargaining behavior. London: McGraw-Hill.Google Scholar
Friedman, J. W. (1971). A non-cooperative equilibrium for supergames. Review of Economic Studies, 38, 1–12.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Holt, C. A. (1995). Industrial organization: a survey of laboratory research. In Kagel, J. H., & Roth, A. E. (Eds.), The handbook of experimental economics (pp. 349–444) New Jersey: Princeton University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Huck, S., Normann, H., & Oechssler, J. (2000). Does information about competitors’ actions increase or decrease competition in experimental oligopoly markets? International Journal of Industrial Organization, 18, 39–57.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Martin, S. (1995). R&D joint ventures and tacit product market collusion. European Journal of Political Economy, 11, 733–741.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Normann, H. and Wallace, B. (2004). The impact of the termination rule in cooperation experiments. Department of Economics, Discussion Paper Series 2004-11, Royal Holloway College, University of London.Google Scholar
Potters, J., Rockenbach, B., Sadrieh, A., & van Damme, E. (2004). Collusion under yardstick competition: an experimental study. International Journal of Industrial Organization, 22, 1017–1038.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Potters, J. and Suetens, S. (2006). Cooperation in experimental games of strategic complements and substitutes. CentER Discussion Paper 2006-48, University of Tilburg.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rotemberg, J. J. (1994). Human relations in the workplace. Journal of Political Economy, 102, 684–717.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Selten, R., & Ostmann, A. (2001). Imitation equilibrium. Homo Oeconomicus, 19, 119–149.Google Scholar
Selten, R., & Stoecker, R. (1986). End behaviour in sequences of finite prisoner's dilemma supergames. Journal of Economic Behavior and Organisation, 3, 47–70.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
van Wegberg, M. (1995). Can R&D alliances facilitate the formation of a cartel? The example of the European IT industry. Research Memorandum 004, Maastricht University, METEOR.Google Scholar