Crossref Citations
This article has been cited by the following publications. This list is generated based on data provided by
Crossref.
Harrison, Glenn W.
and
Rutström, E. Elisabet
2008.
Risk Aversion in Experiments.
Vol. 12,
Issue. ,
p.
41.
James, Duncan
and
Reagle, Derrick
2008.
Experience Weighted Attraction in the First Price Auction and Becker Degroot Marschak.
SSRN Electronic Journal,
Evans, Mary F.
Vossler, Christian A.
and
Flores, Nicholas E.
2009.
Hybrid allocation mechanisms for publicly provided goods.
Journal of Public Economics,
Vol. 93,
Issue. 1-2,
p.
311.
Hey, John D.
Morone, Andrea
and
Schmidt, Ulrich
2009.
Noise and bias in eliciting preferences.
Journal of Risk and Uncertainty,
Vol. 39,
Issue. 3,
p.
213.
Engle-Warnick, Jim
Héroux, Julie
and
Montmarquette, Claude
2009.
Willingness to Pay to Reduce Future Risk.
SSRN Electronic Journal,
Levati, M. Vittoria
Morone, Andrea
and
Fiore, Annamaria
2009.
Voluntary contributions with imperfect information: An experimental study.
Public Choice,
Vol. 138,
Issue. 1-2,
p.
199.
Anderson, Lisa R.
and
Mellor, Jennifer M.
2009.
Are risk preferences stable? Comparing an experimental measure with a validated survey-based measure.
Journal of Risk and Uncertainty,
Vol. 39,
Issue. 2,
p.
137.
Chicaíza, Liliana
García Molina, Mario
and
Romano, Giancarlo
2010.
The Aversion to Risk in the Intake About Medical Decisions: A Revision.
SSRN Electronic Journal,
Pahlke, Julius
Kocher, Martin G.
and
Trautmann, Stefan
2011.
Tempus Fugit: Time Pressure in Risky Decisions.
SSRN Electronic Journal,
Cotten, Stephen J.
and
Santore, Rudy
2012.
Contingent fee caps, screening, and the quality of legal services.
International Review of Law and Economics,
Vol. 32,
Issue. 3,
p.
317.
Cason, Timothy N.
and
Plott, Charles R.
2012.
Misconceptions and Game Form Recognition of the BDM Method: Challenges to Theories of Revealed Preference and Framing.
SSRN Electronic Journal,
Zeisberger, Stefan
Vrecko, Dennis
and
Langer, Thomas
2012.
Measuring the time stability of Prospect Theory preferences.
Theory and Decision,
Vol. 72,
Issue. 3,
p.
359.
Nielsen, Thea
Keil, Alwin
and
Zeller, Manfred
2013.
Assessing farmers’ risk preferences and their determinants in a marginal upland area of Vietnam: a comparison of multiple elicitation techniques.
Agricultural Economics,
Vol. 44,
Issue. 3,
p.
255.
Kocher, Martin G.
Pahlke, Julius
and
Trautmann, Stefan T.
2013.
Tempus Fugit: Time Pressure in Risky Decisions.
Management Science,
Vol. 59,
Issue. 10,
p.
2380.
Cason, Timothy N.
and
Plott, Charles R.
2014.
Misconceptions and Game Form Recognition: Challenges to Theories of Revealed Preference and Framing.
Journal of Political Economy,
Vol. 122,
Issue. 6,
p.
1235.
Collins, Sean M.
and
James, Duncan
2015.
Response mode and stochastic choice together explain preference reversals.
Quantitative Economics,
Vol. 6,
Issue. 3,
p.
825.
Pachur, Thorsten
and
Scheibehenne, Benjamin
2017.
Unpacking buyer-seller differences in valuation from experience: A cognitive modeling approach.
Psychonomic Bulletin & Review,
Vol. 24,
Issue. 6,
p.
1742.
Habib, Sameh
Friedman, Daniel
Crockett, Sean
and
James, Duncan
2017.
Payoff and presentation modulation of elicited risk preferences in MPLs.
Journal of the Economic Science Association,
Vol. 3,
Issue. 2,
p.
183.
Crockett, Erin
and
Crockett, Sean
2019.
Endowments and risky choice.
Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization,
Vol. 159,
Issue. ,
p.
344.
Engle-Warnick, Jim
Héroux, Julie
and
Montmarquette, Claude
2021.
Willingness to pay to reduce future risk: a fundamental issue to invest in prevention behaviour.
Economic and Political Studies,
Vol. 9,
Issue. 1,
p.
17.