Hostname: page-component-7b9c58cd5d-dlb68 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-03-16T16:19:37.819Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Marketmaking in the Laboratory: Does Competition Matter?

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  14 March 2025

Jan Pieter Krahnen  and
Martin Weber
Jan Pieter Krahnen*
Affiliation:
Goethe Universitaet Frankfurt, Finance Department (Germany), CFS Center for Financial Studies, and CEPR
Martin Weber*
Affiliation:
Universitaet Mannheim, Lehrstuhl Bankbetiiebs Lehre (Germany)
*
email: krahnen@wiwi.uni-frankfurt.de
email: weber@bank.bwl.uni-mannheim.de
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

This paper is the first experimental study of the effects of competition and adverse selection on the performance of market maker (MM-) markets. Information distribution may is either symmetric or heterogeneous. MM-markets are either monopolistic (the specialist markets), or competitive (the multi MM-market). Welfare comparisons are with respect to a continuous double auction (DA-) market. Informed subjects receive an imperfect signal of the true state of the world. We find three main results. First, competition among market makers significantly reduces the bid-ask spread, and increases transaction volume. Second, competition among market makers induces competitive undercutting, yielding net trading losses for market makers as a group in most periods. Third, from the perspective of uninformed traders, a competing MM-regime is optimal, since it minimizes their expected trading losses.

Keywords

market microstructuredealer marketbid-ask spreadcompetition

JEL classification

C91: Laboratory, Individual Behavior G14: Information and Market Efficiency • Event Studies • Insider Trading
Type
Research Article
Information
Experimental Economics , Volume 4 , Issue 1 , June 2001 , pp. 55 - 85
Copyright
Copyright © 2001 Economic Science Association

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

*

Author to whom all correspondence should be addressed.

References

Admati, A. and Pfleiderer, P. (1989). “Divide and Conquer: A Theory of Intraday and Day-of-the-week Mean Effects.” Review of Financial Studies. 2, 189–224.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Amihud, Y. and Mendelson, H. (1986). “Asset Pricing and the Bid-Ask Spread.” Journal of Financial Economics. 17, 223–249.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bloomfield, R. (1996). “Quotes, Prices and Estimates in a Laboratory Market.” Journal of Finance. 51, 17911808.Google Scholar
Bloomfield, R. and O’Hara, M. (1999). “Market Transparency: Who Wins and Who Loses?” Review of Financial Studies. 12, 5–35.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bloomfield, R. and O’Hara, M. (2000). “Can Transparent Markets Survive?” Journal of Financial Economics. 55, 425–459.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Borsenzeitung, , (1995). Zur führenden Börsenorganisation in der europäischen Zeitzone werden, No. 63, March 30, 8.Google Scholar
Christie, W. and Schultz, P. (1994). “Why Do NASDAQ Market Makers Avoid Odd-Eighth Quotes?” Journal of Finance. 49, 1813–1840.Google Scholar
Christie, W., Harris, J., and Schultz, P. (1994). “Why Did NASDAQ Market Makers Stop Avoiding Odd-Eighth Quotes?” Journal of Finance. 49, 1841–1860.Google Scholar
Roundtable, Financial Economists (1996). “Statement on the Structure of the NASDAQ Stock Market.” Journal of Financial Services Research. 10, 105–107.Google Scholar
Times, Financial. (1997). Derivatives: Fierce battle rages for market share (author: Samer Iskander), June 27. Freihube, T., Kehr, C., and Krahnen, J.P. (1999). “Was leisten die Kursmakler: Eine empirische Untersuchung der Frankfurter Wertpapierbörse.” Kredit und Kapital. 32, 426–460.Google Scholar
Friedman, D. (1984). “On the Efficiency of Experimental Double Auction Markets.” American Economic Review. 74, 60–72.Google Scholar
Friedman, D. (1991). “A Simple Testable Model of Double Auction Markets.” Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization. 15, 47–70.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Friedman, D. (1993). “Privileged Traders and Asset Market Efficiency: A Laboratory Study.” Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis. 28, 515–534.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Garman, M. (1976). “Market Microstructure.” Journal of Financial Economics. 3, 257–275.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Glosten, L.R. (1989). “Insider Trading, Liquidity, and the Role of the Monopolist Specialist.” Journal of Business. 62, 211–235.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Glosten, L.R. and Harris, L.E. (1988). “Estimating the Components of the Bid/Ask Spread.” Journal of Financial Economics. 21, 123–142.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Glosten, L.R. and Milgrom, P. (1985). “Bid, Ask, and Transaction Prices in an Specialist Market with Heterogeneously Informed Traders.” Journal of Financial Economics. 13, 71–100.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hasbrouck, J. (1988). “Trades, Quotes, Inventory, and Information.” Journal of Financial Economics. 22, 229–252.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ho, T. and Stoll, H. (1981). “Optimal Market Maker Pricing under Transactions and Return Uncertainty.” Journal of Financial Economics. 9, 47–73.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ho, T. and Maoris, R.G. (1985). “Market Making and the Changing Structure of the Securities Industries.” In Amihud, Y., Ho, T.S.Y., and Schwartz, R.A. (eds.), Market Making and the Changing Structure of the Securities Industry, Lexington: MA, 41–66.Google Scholar
Huang, R. and Stoll, H. (1996). “Dealer versus Auction Markets: A Paired Comparison of Execution Costs on NASDAQ and the NYSE.” Journal of Financial Economics. 41, 313–357.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Krahnen, J.P. (1993). “Market Makers and Traders in an Experimental Stock Market.” Working Paper, University of Giessen.Google Scholar
Krahnen, J.P., Rieck, C., and Theissen, E. (1999). “Designing an Experimental Asset Market.” In Buhler, W., Hax, H., and Schmidt, R. (eds.), Empirical Research on the German Capital Market, Heidelberg: Springer, 27–54.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Krahnen, J.P. and Weber, M. (1999). “Does Information Aggregation Depend on Market Structure? Market Makers versus Double Auction.” Zeitschrift für Wirtschafts- und Sozialwissenschaften. 119, 1–21.Google Scholar
Kyle, A. (1985). “Continuous Auctions and Insider Trading.” Econometrica. 53, 1315–1336.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kyle, A.S. (1989). “Informed Speculation with Imperfect Competition.” Review of Economic Studies. 56, 317–355.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lamoureux, C.G. and Schnitzlein, C.R. (1997). “When it's not the only Game in Town.” Journal of Finance. 52, 683–712.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Leach, J.C. and Madhavan, A.N. (1993). “Price Experimentation and Security Market Structure.” Review of Financial Studies. 6, 375–404.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
LeRoy, S.F. (1989). “Efficient Capital Markets and Martingales.” Journal of Economic Literature. 27, 1583–1621.Google Scholar
Milgrom, P. and Stokey, N. (1982). “Information, Trade and Common Knowledge.” Journal of Economic Theory. 26, 17–27.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Madhavan, A. (1992). “Trading Mechanisms in Securities Markets.” Journal of Finance. 47, 607–642.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Madhavan, A. and Sofianos, G. (1994). “Auction and Market Maker Markets: An Empirical Analysis of NYSE Specialist Trading.” NYSE Working Paper #94-01.Google Scholar
O’Hara, M. (1995). Market Microstructure Theory. Cambridge, Mass.: Blackwell Publishers.Google Scholar
Pagano, M. and Roell, A. (1996). “Transparency and Liquidity: A Comparison of Auction and Market Maker Makets with Informed Trading.” Journal of Finance. 51, 579–612.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Plott, Charles R. and Sunder, S. (1982). “Efficiency of Experimental Security Markets with Insider Information: An Application of Rational-Expectations Models.” Journal of Political Economy. 90(4), 663–698.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Plott, Charles R. and Sunder, S. (1988). “Rational Expectations and the Aggregation of Diverse Information in Laboratory Security Markets.” Econometrica. 56, 1085–1118.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Plott, C.R. and Gray, P. (1990). “The Multiple Unit Double Auction.” Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization. 13, 245–258.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Seppi, D.J. (1997). “Liquidity Provision with Limit Orders and a Strategic Specialist.” Review of Financial Studies. 10, 103–150.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Spulber, D.F. (1996). “Marketmicrostructure and Intermediation.” Journal of Economic Perspectives. 10(3), 135152.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Theissen, E. (1996). “Market Structure and the Aggregation of Information: An Experimental Investigation.” Working paper, University of Frankfurt.Google Scholar
Wahal, S. (1997). “Entry, Exit, Market Makers, and the Bid-Ask-Spread.” Review of Financial Studies. 10, 871901.CrossRefGoogle Scholar