Crossref Citations
This article has been cited by the following publications. This list is generated based on data provided by
Crossref.
Königstein, Manfred
Kovács, Judit
and
Zala-Mezö, Enikö
2003.
Fairness in a one-principal-two-agents game – a post-experimental questionnaire analysis.
Journal of Economic Psychology,
Vol. 24,
Issue. 4,
p.
491.
Harbring, Christine
and
Irlenbusch, Bernd
2004.
Anreize zu produktiven und destruktiven Anstrengungen durch relative Entlohnung.
Schmalenbachs Zeitschrift für betriebswirtschaftliche Forschung,
Vol. 56,
Issue. 6,
p.
546.
Fehr, Ernst
and
Schmidt, Klaus M.
2004.
Fairness and Incentives in a Multi‐task Principal–Agent Model.
The Scandinavian Journal of Economics,
Vol. 106,
Issue. 3,
p.
453.
Van Herpen, Marco
Van Praag, Mirjam
and
Cools, Kees
2005.
The Effects of Performance Measurement and Compensation on Motivation: An Empirical Study.
De Economist,
Vol. 153,
Issue. 3,
p.
303.
Cochard, François
and
Willinger, Marc
2005.
Fair Offers in a Repeated Principal–Agent Relationship with Hidden Actions.
Economica,
Vol. 72,
Issue. 286,
p.
225.
Wu, Steven
and
Roe, Brian
2006.
Tournaments, Fairness, and Risk.
American Journal of Agricultural Economics,
Vol. 88,
Issue. 3,
p.
561.
Fehr, Ernst
and
Schmidt, Klaus M.
2006.
Foundations.
Vol. 1,
Issue. ,
p.
615.
Fehr, Ernst
Klein, Alexander
and
Schmidt, Klaus M
2007.
Fairness and Contract Design.
Econometrica,
Vol. 75,
Issue. 1,
p.
121.
Lukas, Christian
2007.
Get more for less? Experimental evidence on repeated decision making under non-monotone incentives.
Journal of Business Economics,
Vol. 77,
Issue. 4,
p.
351.
Keser, Claudia
and
Willinger, Marc
2007.
Theories of behavior in principal–agent relationships with hidden action.
European Economic Review,
Vol. 51,
Issue. 6,
p.
1514.
Grimalda, Gianluca
Kar, Anirban
and
Proto, Eugenio
2008.
On the value of participation: endogenous emergence of social norms in a three-player ultimatum game experiment.
International Review of Economics,
Vol. 55,
Issue. 1-2,
p.
127.
Bowles, Samuel
and
Hwang, Sung-Ha
2008.
Social preferences and public economics: Mechanism design when social preferences depend on incentives.
Journal of Public Economics,
Vol. 92,
Issue. 8-9,
p.
1811.
Harbring, Christine
and
Irlenbusch, Bernd
2008.
How many winners are good to have?.
Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization,
Vol. 65,
Issue. 3-4,
p.
682.
Leopold-Wildburger, Ulrike
and
Mietek, Arleta
2010.
Bonus or flat wage? An experiment into the principal–agent problem.
Applied Mathematics and Computation,
Vol. 217,
Issue. 3,
p.
1141.
Brandl, B.
Leopold-Wildburger, U.
Mietek, A.
and
Pickl, S.
2010.
How do commission rates influence a firm’s success? statistical analysis of a corporate strategy simulation experiment.
Central European Journal of Operations Research,
Vol. 18,
Issue. 4,
p.
553.
Brosig, Jeannette
Lukas, Christian
and
Riechmann, Thomas
2010.
The Monotonicity Puzzle: An Experimental Investigation of Incentive Structures.
Business Research,
Vol. 3,
Issue. 1,
p.
8.
GOERRES, ACHIM
and
TEPE, MARKUS
2010.
Age‐based self‐interest, intergenerational solidarity and the welfare state: A comparative analysis of older people's attitudes towards public childcare in 12 OECD countries.
European Journal of Political Research,
Vol. 49,
Issue. 6,
p.
818.
Charness, Gary
and
Kuhn, Peter
2011.
Vol. 4,
Issue. ,
p.
229.
Cabrales, Antonio
Charness, Gary
and
Villeval, Marie Claire
2011.
Hidden information, bargaining power, and efficiency: an experiment.
Experimental Economics,
Vol. 14,
Issue. 2,
p.
133.
Ding, Mingtao
Wei, Fangqiang
and
Hu, Kaiheng
2012.
Property insurance against debris-flow disasters based on risk assessment and the principal–agent theory.
Natural Hazards,
Vol. 60,
Issue. 3,
p.
801.