Hostname: page-component-745bb68f8f-lrblm Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-02-11T04:27:34.877Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

SOIL BIOLOGICAL AND BIOCHEMICAL QUALITY OF WHEAT-MAIZE CROPPING SYSTEM IN LONG-TERM FERTILIZER EXPERIMENTS

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  09 June 2011

CHENG HU
Affiliation:
Institute of Plant Protection and Soil Science, Hubei Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Wuhan 430064, P. R. China
YING-CHUN QI*
Affiliation:
College of Life Science and Technology, Huazhong Agricultural University, Wuhan 430070, P. R. China
*
§Corresponding author: qiych@yahoo.com.cn
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Summary

Two long-term field experiments, each consisting of three treatments (organic compost treatment, chemical fertilizer treatment and an untreated control) were established in 1993 and 1997, respectively. Soil samples were collected from each plot in June 2004 and 2005 after crop harvest and were used to determine soil physical-chemical properties, biological and biochemical activity, and the nematode community. Soil physicochemical parameters, microbial biomass, biological activities and nematode communities were significantly influenced by long-term application of organic compost. In general, soil total organic carbon, dissolved organic carbon, total nitrogen, alkaline-hydrolysable nitrogen, available phosphorus, and available potassium, microbial biomass, basal respiration, urease activities, total number of nematodes and bacterial-feeding nematodes were significantly higher in the compost plots than in the chemical fertilizer and control plots at two experimental sites and two sampling dates. Soil bulk density and pH values were significantly lower in the compost plots. We conclude that soil physical-chemical properties, size and activity of soil microbial biomass, metabolic quotient (qCO2), urease activity, total number of nematodes and bacteria-feeding nematodes could be used as indicators of soil quality.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2011

INTRODUCTION

In order to meet the demands of food grain production, maintaining soil quality is essential (Mandal et al., Reference Mandal, Patra, Singh, Swarup and Masto2007). Soil quality does not only depend on soil physical and chemical properties, but it is also very closely correlated with its biological properties (Van Eekeren et al., Reference Van Eekeren, De Boer, Bloem, Schouten, Rutgers, De Goede and Brussaard2009).

Soil microbial biomass, the living component of the soil organic matter, which comprises 1–5% of soil total organic carbon (Nsabimana et al., Reference Nsabimana, Haynes and Wallis2004), can be used as an important bioindicator of soil quality (Gil-Sotres et al., Reference Gil-Sotres, Trasar-Cepeda, Leirós and Seoane2005). Soil respiration is a well-established parameter to monitor soil organic matter decomposition, but it is also highly variable and can show wide natural fluctuation depending on substrate availability, moisture and temperature (Masto et al., Reference Masto, Chhonkar, Singh and Patra2006). Soil enzymes are important components involved in soil nutrient transformations; furthermore, soil enzyme activity is considered to be a major contributor to soil quality (Masto et al., Reference Masto, Chhonkar, Singh and Patra2006). Phosphatases are involved in the transformation of organic and inorganic phosphorus compounds in soil (Amador et al., Reference Amador, Glucksman, Lyons and Gorres1997) and soil ureases are closely associated with releasing inorganic nitrogen (N) (Bandick and Dick, Reference Bandick and Dick1999).

Soil nematodes are ubiquitous and are the most abundant metazoans; they are well adapted to a wide range of environmental conditions and respond rapidly to soil disturbance (Cheng and Grewal, Reference Cheng and Grewal2009). The structure of the nematode community is an efficient instrument as a biological indicator of soil quality, because the soil nematodes belong to several trophic levels, namely, plant feeders, bacterial feeders, fungal feeders, omnivores and predators, and occupy central positions in the soil detritus food web (Neher, Reference Neher2001; Villenave et al., Reference Villenave, Djigal, Brauman and Rouland-Lefevre2009). They are also linked closely to soil ecological processes such as decomposition of soil organic matter, N mineralization, nutrient cycling and plant growth (Wu et al., Reference Wu, Fu, Chen and Chen2002).

Some studies have suggested that the nematode community structure and trophic group diversity may be useful and readily measured bioindicators of soil quality (Ferris et al., Reference Ferris, Venette and Lau1996; Fu et al., Reference Fu, Zou and Coleman2009; Urzelai et al., Reference Urzelai, Hernández and Pastor2000). Analysis of nematode community structure can help to estimate responses of the soil environment to perturbation, such as, application of fertilizer (Vestergård, Reference Vestergård2004), tillage (Fu et al., Reference Fu, Coleman, Hendrix and Crossley2000), irrigation (Porazinska et al., Reference Porazinska, McSorley, Duncan, Graham, Wheaton and Parsons1998; Reference Porazinska, Duncanb, McSorley and Graham1999) and pesticides (Yardim and Edwards, Reference Yardim and Edwards1998). Additionally, Bongers (Reference Bongers1990) put forward a maturity index according to nematode life history characteristics; this is used as a tool to assess soil quality for references sites (Bongers and Ferris, Reference Bongers and Ferris1999).

Although some studies have reported effects of long-term application of manure and fertilizer on soil biological and biochemical activities (Mandal et al., Reference Mandal, Patra, Singh, Swarup and Masto2007), only single measures of microbial biomass, enzyme activity or the nematode community were carried out. Information on biological processes, such as size and activity of soil microbial biomass, soil enzyme activities and the nematode community is limited. In the Northern China Plain, the integrated influence of long-term application of compost and chemical fertilizer on the soil microbial biomass, biochemical properties and nematode community are still poorly understood. The objective of this study was to determine the impact of long-term addition of organic and inorganic fertilizers on soil physical, chemical, biochemical, microbial characteristics, free-living nematode community and crop yields in a wheat-maize cropping system.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Experimental site and design

The experiment sites were located at Qu-Zhou experimental station of China Agricultural University in Hebei Province, Northern China (36°52′N; 115°01′E). The experimental station is in a continental temperate monsoon zone and the climate in the region is warm and semi-humid with summer rainfall and dry, cold winters. The mean annual temperature is 13.2 °C and ranges from a minimum of −2.9 °C in January to a maximum of 26.8 °C in July. The mean annual precipitation is 542.7 mm, of which 60% occurs from July to September, and the annual non-frost period is 201 days. Spring drought is very severe. The soil at the study site is an improved silt fluvo-aquic soil (Hu et al., Reference Hu, Cao, Chen and Dawson2008).

The long-term field experiment was conducted at two experimental sites, one was initiated in 1993 (experimental site A), and the other, in 1997 (experimental site B). The experiment was designed with three treatments and three replications, with nine plots laid out in a randomized complete block design at each experimental site. Plots, (3 m × 10.5 m each plot at site A and 4 m × 8 m each plot at site B), were planted with wheat (Triticum aestivum) in winter and with maize (Zea mays) in summer every year. Three treatments consisted of compost treatment (OF) (15 t ha−1), chemical fertilizer treatment (IF) (265.5 kg N ha−1 and 90 kg P2O5 ha−1) and a control (no fertilizer, NF). The compost was 60% straw, 30% livestock dung, 5% cottonseed-pressed trash and 5% bran (with a mean nutrient content of 100.5 kg N ha−1, 36 kg P2O5 ha−1 and 196.2 kg K2 O ha−1). Before planting summer maize and winter wheat every year, the OF plots were treated with compost, and the IF plots were treated with chemical fertilizer respectively, while the control (NF) plots did not receive any soil amendment. The compost and chemical fertilizer were not applied during the crop growth stages during the experiment.

Sampling

Soil samples were collected from the 0–20 cm soil layer at both sites, using a 2.5 cm diameter soil auger after wheat harvesting and before maize sowing on 8 June 2004 and on 10 June 2005. Each soil sample consisted of 15 cores (2.5 cm diameter × 20 cm deep), which were mixed to form a bulk sample, and samples were collected from each plot. The soil samples were stored in insulated and tied plastic bags to prevent moisture loss and were transported to the laboratory as soon as possible. All soil assays were completed within a week of soil sampling.

Laboratory analysis

Soil bulk density was determined using the core volume and dry soil weight (stainless steel cylinders with diameter and height of 5 cm). The bulk density was expressed by dividing the weight of the dried soil by the volume of the core used. Soil moisture in each sample was determined gravimetrically by drying the soil samples at 105 °C for 48 hours. Soil subsamples were air-dried for 14 days at room temperature, sieved through a 1-mm screen and mixed, and sub-samples were assayed for alkaline hydrolysable N, available phosphorus (P), available potassium (K) and soil pH.

The air-dried sub-samples were ground to pass through a 0.25-mm sieve for determination of soil organic matter and total N content. The potassium dichromate external heating method (Blakemore et al., Reference Blakemore, Searle and Daly1972) was used to determine soil organic matter content. The semi-micro Kjeldahl method and the alkaline-hydrolysable diffusion method (Bremner, Reference Bremner and Sparks1996) were used to determine total N and alkaline-hydrolysable N content.

Soil available P was extracted with 0.5 mol l−1 NaHCO3 (soil: solution = 1:20) and measured with the Olsen method (Blakemore et al., Reference Blakemore, Searle and Daly1972). Soil available K was extracted with 1 mol l−1 NH4 Ac (soil: solution = 1:10) and measured with the flame photometry method (Blakemore et al., Reference Blakemore, Searle and Daly1972). Soil pH was measured in 0.01 mol l−1 CaCl2 slurry (soil: solution = 1:2.5) using a glass electrode. All the data were expressed on dry mass basis.

Soil basal respiration was determined by placing 50 g field moist soil samples into 50 ml beakers and incubating the samples in the dark at 25 °C in 1000 ml sealed jars along with a beaker contained 5 ml of 1 mol l−1 NaOH solutions, which captured respired CO2. Then, the NaOH solution was removed and titrated to determine the amount of CO2 evolved from the soil microbial respiration (Hu and van Bruggen, Reference Hu and Bruggen1997). Microbial biomass C was analysed using chloroform fumigation-extraction based on the difference between carbon extracted with 0.5 mol l−1 K2SO4 from chloroform-fumigated and the unfumigated soil samples (Vance et al., Reference Vance, Brookes and Jenkinson1987). Microbial biomass C was calculated as the difference between fumigated and non-fumigated samples divided by the K2SO4 extract efficiency factor for microbial C (Kc = 0.379) (Vance et al., Reference Vance, Brookes and Jenkinson1987). The data were expressed on dry mass basis. The metabolic quotient (qCO2) was calculated as the ratio of basal respiration to microbial biomass C (Anderson and Domsch, Reference Anderson and Domsch1993). The qCO2 is a specific parameter for evaluating the effects of environmental conditions on the soil microbial biomass. The metabolic quotient was expressed as basal respiration rate (mg CO2-C h−1) per g−1 of microbial biomass C.

Soil alkali phosphatase enzyme activities (field moist soil samples) were determined using the p-nitrophenol (pNP) method (Tabatabai, Reference Tabatabai, Weaver, Angel and Bottomley1994), and the activity was expressed as μg p-nitrophenol (pNP) per g dry soil and incubation time. Soil urease activity (field moist soil samples) was measured by using urea as the substrate, and the released ammonium was determined spectrophotometrically at 578 nm (Tabatabai, Reference Tabatabai, Weaver, Angel and Bottomley1994). Urease activity was expressed as μg N-NH4+ produced per g dry soil and incubation time.

Nematodes were extracted from 100 g composite fresh soil samples using the sugar flotation and centrifugation method (Barker et al., Reference Barker, Carter and Sasser1985). The nematodes recovered were counted and preserved in 4% formaldehyde. A randomly selected 100 specimens per sample were identified to genus level, using an inverted compound microscope. The nematode populations were expressed per 100 g dry soil (Pen-mouratov et al., Reference Pen-mouratov, Barness and Steinberger2008).

Nematode index

The characteristics of the nematode communities were described by the following approaches: (1) total number of nematodes per 100 g dry soil (TNEM); (2) trophic groups, including bacteria-feeders, fungi-feeders, plant-parasites, omnivores-predators (Yeates et al., Reference Yeates, Bongers, De Goede, Freckman and Georgieva1993); (3) F/B, fungi-feeders/bacteria-feeders ratio (Twinn et al., Reference Twinn, Dickinson and Pugh1974); (4) T, trophic diversity, T = 1/∑pi2, in which pi is the proportion of the i-th trophic group in the nematode community (Heip et al., Reference Heip, Herman, Soetaert, Higgins and Thiel1988); (5) H’, Shannon index, H’ = −∑pi(lnpi), where pi is the proportion of individuals in the i-th taxon (Shannon and Weaver, Reference Shannon and Weaver1949); (6) MI, maturity index, MI = ∑vipi, where vi, is the c-p value for free-living nematodes assigned by Bongers (Reference Bongers1990) to the i-th nematode genus and pi is the proportion of the genus in the nematode community; (7) PPI, plant-parasite index, PPI = ∑vipi, where vi, is the c-p value for plant-parasitic nematodes assigned by Bongers (Reference Bongers1990) to the i-th nematode genus and pi is the proportion of the genus in the nematode community; (8) MMI, modified maturity index, including plant-parasitic nematodes, MMI = ∑vipi, where vi is the c-p value for free-living and plant parasitic nematodes assigned by Bongers (Reference Bongers1990) to the i-th nematode genus and pi is the proportion of the genus in the nematode community (Yeates, Reference Yeates1994).

Data analysis

All data were subjected to statistical analysis of variance (ANOVA) using the SPSS 11.5 software package and were used to evaluate differences between separate means. Difference obtained at p < 0.05 level was considered as statistically significant using the LSD (least significant difference) test.

RESULTS

Soil physical-chemical properties

The long-term application of organic and inorganic fertilizers caused significant changes in soil physicochemical properties (Table 1). Soil bulk density and pH values were significantly (p < 0.01) lower in the compost plot than in the chemical fertilizer and control plots for the two sites. Soil total organic carbon, dissolved organic carbon, total N, alkaline-hydrolysable N, available P and available K content were significantly (p < 0.001) higher in the compost plots than in the chemical fertilizer and control plots for both sites. Moreover, these parameters, except available K content, were higher in the chemical fertilizer plots than in the control plots for both sites. All these parameters were significantly (p < 0.01) influenced by fertilizers, but only soil bulk density and available K content were significantly (p < 0.05) affected by experimental sites and only soil total organic carbon, available P and available K content were significantly (p < 0.05) affected by interaction effects.

Table 1. Soil physicochemical property under different treatments for two experimental sites in 2004.

OF: organic compost treatment; IF: inorganic fertilizer treatment; NF: no fertilizer treatment (control). Different letters (a, b, c) indicate significant differences (p < 0.05) between treatments according to LSD multiple comparison.

Soil microbial biomass carbon and basal respiration

Soil microbial biomass carbon (MBC) content was significantly (p < 0.001) higher in the compost plots than in the chemical fertilizer and control plots for both sites in 2004 and 2005 (Figure 1i). Furthermore, soil MBC content in the chemical fertilizer plots was higher than in the control plots for both sites in both years. The soil MBC was significantly (p < 0.05) influenced by fertilizers and experiment sites in 2004, but significantly (p < 0.001) influenced only by fertilizers in 2005; the interaction effect was not significant.

Figure 1. Soil microbial parameter under the long-term fertilizer experiment in 2004 and 2005. Different letters (a, b, c) indicate significant differences (p < 0.05) between treatments according to LSD multiple comparison. Bars indicate standard errors (n = 3). i) soil microbial biomass C; ii) soil basal respiration; iii) metabolic quotient (qCO2). OF: organic compost treatment; IF: inorganic fertilizer treatment; NF: no fertilizer.

Soil basal respiration (BR) showed similar trends to those for soil MBC content. The soil BR was significantly (p < 0.001) higher in the compost plots than in the chemical fertilizer and control plots for both sites in both years (Figure 1ii). Moreover, the soil BR was higher in the chemical fertilizer plots than in control plots for both sites in 2004, but this was reversed in 2005. The soil BR was significantly (p < 0.05) influenced by fertilizers in both years, and significantly (p < 0.01) influenced only by experimental sites in 2005; the interaction effect was not significant.

In the compost plots qCO2 was significantly (p < 0.001) lower than in the chemical fertilizer and control plots for both sites in 2004, and it was significantly (p < 0.001) lower in the compost plots than in the control plots for both sites in 2005 (Figure 1iii). Like soil BR, the qCO2 value was significantly (p < 0.01) influenced by fertilizers in 2004 and 2005, and significantly (p < 0.01) influenced only by experimental sites in 2005, but a significant (p < 0.05) interaction effect was found only in 2004.

Soil enzyme activity

The soil alkaline phosphatase activities were significantly (p < 0.001) higher in the compost plots than in the chemical fertilizer and control plots for both sites in 2004, and were higher in the compost and control plots than in the chemical fertilizer plots for both sites in 2005 (Figure 2i). The alkaline phosphatase activities were significantly (p < 0.05) influenced by fertilizers and experimental sites in 2004, but the interaction effect was not significant. However, treatments, experimental sites and their interaction effect were not significant in 2005.

Figure 2. Soil enzyme activity under the long-term fertilizer experiment in 2004 and 2005. Different letters (a, b, c) indicate significant differences (p < 0.05) between treatments according to LSD multiple comparison. Bars indicate standard errors (n = 3). i): alkaline phosphatase activity; ii) urease activity. OF: organic compost treatment; IF: inorganic fertilizer treatment; NF: no fertilizer.

The soil urease activities were significantly (p < 0.01) higher in the compost plots than in the chemical fertilizer and control plots for both sites in 2004 and in 2005. Soil urease activities were higher in the chemical fertilizer plots than in the control plots for both sites in 2004 and 2005 (Figure 2ii). The soil urease activities were significantly (p < 0.001) influenced only by fertilizers in 2004, and were significantly (p < 0.05) influenced by fertilizers and experimental sites in 2005, but the interaction effect was not significant in either year.

Nematode community structure

The total number of nematodes were significantly (p < 0.001) higher in the compost plots than in the chemical fertilizer and control plots for both sites in both years (Figure 3; supplementary tables 2 and 3 (available at journals.cambridge.org/eag)). The total number of nematodes in the control plots was higher than in the chemical fertilizer plots for both years under experimental site A, whereas the total number of nematodes in the chemical fertilizer plots was higher than in the control plots for both years under experimental site B. The total number of nematodes were significantly (p < 0.05) influenced by fertilizers and experimental sites in 2004 and 2005, but significant (p < 0.001) interaction effect was found only in 2004.

Figure 3. Total number of nematodes in soils under the long-term fertilizer experiment in 2004 and 2005. Different letters (a, b, c) indicate significant differences (p < 0.05) between treatments according to LSD multiple comparison. Bars indicate standard errors (n = 3). OF: organic compost treatment; IF: inorganic fertilizer treatment; NF: no fertilizer.

Bacteria-feeding nematodes showed similar trends to those for total number of nematodes. Bacteria-feeding nematodes were significantly (p < 0.001) higher in the compost plots than in the chemical fertilizer and control plots for both sites in both years (Figure 4i). Bacteria-feeding nematodes in the control plots were higher than in the chemical fertilizer plots for both years at experimental site A, whereas bacteria-feeding nematodes in the chemical fertilizer plots was higher than in the control plots in 2004 at experimental site B. The relative abundance of bacteria-feeding nematodes in the compost plots were significantly (p < 0.05) higher than in the chemical fertilizer plots at both sites in both years. Bacteria-feeding nematodes were significantly (p < 0.001) influenced by fertilizers in both years, but experimental sites effect and interaction effect were not significant.

Figure 4. Nematode trophic group in soils under the long-term fertilizer experiment in 2004 and 2005. Different letters (a, b, c) indicate significant differences (p < 0.05) between treatments according to LSD multiple comparison. Bars indicate standard errors (n = 3). i) bacteria-feeding nematodes; ii) fungi-feeding nematodes; iii) plant-parasitic nematodes; iv) omnivore-predator nematodes. OF: organic compost treatment; IF: inorganic fertilizer treatment; NF: no fertilizer.

Fungi-feeding nematodes were the least abundant trophic group. Fungi-feeding nematodes were higher in the compost plots than in the chemical fertilizer plots, and were higher in the chemical fertilizer plots than in the control plots for both sites in 2005 (Figure 4ii). Fungi-feeding nematodes also showed a similar trend at experimental site B in 2004. Fungi-feeding nematodes were significantly (p < 0.01) influenced only by experimental site in 2004.

Plant parasitic nematodes were the most dominant trophic groups in the present study. Plant parasites were significantly (p < 0.05) higher in the compost plots than in the control plot for both years in experimental site B, and were higher in the chemical fertilizer plots than in the control plots (Figure 4iii). Nevertheless, the relative abundance of plant-parasites in the compost plots was lower than in the chemical fertilizer plot for both sites in both years. Plant parasites were significantly (p < 0.05) influenced by fertilizers and interaction effect in both years, but were significantly (p < 0.01) influenced by experimental sites only in 2004.

The omnivores-predators were higher in the compost plots than in the chemical fertilizer and control plots for both sites in 2005 (Figure 4iv). The omnivores-predators were significantly (p < 0.01) influenced by fertilizers and experimental sites in 2004, but were significantly (p < 0.001) influenced only by experimental sites in 2005.

Nematode community indices

The fungi-feeders/bacteria-feeders ratio (F/B) values ranged from 0.01 to 0.72 (Figure 5i). The F/B was significantly (p < 0.05) higher in the chemical fertilizer plots than in the compost and control plots in 2005. The F/B value was significantly (p < 0.05) influenced by experimental site in 2004, but was significantly (p < 0.05) influenced by fertilizers in 2005. The trophic group (T) values ranged from 1.80 to 2.51 (Figure 5ii). The T value was higher in the compost plots than in the chemical fertilizer and control plots in 2005. The T value was significantly (p < 0.05) influenced by experimental sites in 2004, and was significantly (p < 0.05) affected by fertilizers and interaction effect in 2005. The Shannon index (H’) values ranged from 1.96 to 2.68 (Figure 5iii). The H’ values were significantly influenced (p < 0.01) by fertilizers and experimental sites, and interaction effect in 2004, but no significant effect was found in 2005.

Figure 5. Community indices of soil nematodes under the long-term fertilizer experiment in 2004 and 2005. Different letters (a, b, c) indicate significant differences (p < 0.05) between treatments according to LSD multiple comparison. Bars indicate standard errors (n = 3). i) fungi-feeders/bacteria-feeders ratio (F/B); ii) trophic diversity (T); iii) Shannon index (H’); iv) maturity index (MI); v) modified maturity index (MMI); vi) plant-parasite index (PPI). OF: organic compost treatment; IF: inorganic fertilizer treatment; NF: no fertilizer.

The MI values ranged from 1.19 to 2.72 (Figure 5iv). The MI values were lower in the compost plots than in the chemical fertilizer and control plots in 2004. The MI values were significantly (p < 0.01) influenced by fertilizers and experimental sites in 2004, but no significant effect was found in 2005. The MMI values ranged from 1.91 to 2.71 (Figure 5v). The MMI values were lower in the compost plots than in the chemical fertilizer and control plots for both years in experimental site A. The PPI values ranged from 2.63 to 3.05 (Figure 5vi). The PPI values were significantly (p < 0.01) influenced only by experimental sites in 2004.

Crop yields

Grain yields of wheat were significantly (p < 0.001) higher in the compost plots than in the chemical fertilizer plots, and were significantly (p < 0.001) higher in the chemical fertilizer plots than in the control plots for both sites and years (Figure 6). Grain yields of wheat were significantly (p < 0.001) affected by fertilizers, but not by experimental sites and interaction effect.

Figure 6. Grain yields of wheat under the long-term fertilizer experiment in 2004 and 2005. Different letters (a, b, c) indicate significant differences (p < 0.05) between treatments according to LSD multiple comparison. Bars indicate standard errors (n = 3). OF: organic compost treatment; IF: inorganic fertilizer treatment; NF: no fertilizer.

DISCUSSION

Soil physicochemical properties

Soil physicochemical properties were significantly influenced by fertilizers, consistent with the study of Singh et al. (Reference Singh, Singh, Ladha, Khind, Gupta, Meelu and Pasuquin2004), who reported that soil total organic C, and available K contents were significantly increased with the application of organic manure. Nevertheless, soil total organic C and total N contents in the chemical fertilizer plots were found to be slightly increased compared to the controls, which is in contrast with the result of Mandal et al. (Reference Mandal, Patra, Singh, Swarup and Masto2007), who found that total organic C and total N contents were significantly higher in chemical fertilizer plots than in controls. Gami et al. (Reference Gami, Ladha, Pathak, Shah, Pasuquin, Pandey, Hobbs, Joshy and Mishra2001) reported available P contents were increased with the long-term application of manure and chemical fertilizers, which is similar to our result. The bulk density and pH values of saline-alkaline soil have shown to decrease with application of organic manure (Lee et al., Reference Lee, Lee, Jung, Park, Lee and Kim2009).

Soil biological properties

The soil MBC content showed a significant increase in the compost plots compared to the chemical fertilizer and control plots at both experimental sites and sampling dates. Increased microbial biomass content after application of organic manure was also reported by Elfstrand et al. (Reference Elfstrand, Hedlund and Mårtensson2007), and the most important factor was the amount of carbon from organic manure input into soils because carbon was often the limiting factor for soil microbial propagation (Gunapala and Scow, Reference Gunapala and Scow1998). Application of compost increased readily available C and N sources leading to stimulation of the soil microbial community. The increased MBC levels after application of chemical fertilizer, which is in accordance with the study of Mandal et al. (Reference Mandal, Patra, Singh, Swarup and Masto2007), may be due to high levels of chemical fertilizer increasing plant root biomass and crop residue and improving soil organic carbon, and thus enhancing the size of microbial community (Gong et al., Reference Gong, Yan, Wang, Hu and Gong2009; Gu et al., Reference Gu, Zhang, Tu and Lindstrom2009).

Microbial biomass alone did not provide information on microbial activity. So, soil respiration was measured to assess soil microbial activity; soil respiration is also considered to reflect the availability of carbon for microbial maintenance (Masto et al., Reference Masto, Chhonkar, Singh and Patra2006). The increase of basal respiration after application of organic manure was compatible with the study by Masto et al. (Reference Masto, Chhonkar, Singh and Patra2006), who considered that high respiration activity in organic manure plots was associated with higher organic carbon levels, which had built up with continuous additions of organic manure.

The compost plots had the lowest qCO2 values compared to the other plots at both sites and sampling dates, which confirmed previous observations that qCO2 is lower in soil treated with organic manure than soil treated with chemical fertilizer (Böhme et al., Reference Böhme, Langer and Böhme2005). The highest qCO2 was found in the control plots at both sites, and it may be assumed that in these plots microbial populations living under carbon resource stress (Nsabimana et al., Reference Nsabimana, Haynes and Wallis2004).

Soil enzyme activities

Phosphatases are important enzymes, because they provide P for plant uptake by releasing PO4 from immobile organic P (Amador et al., Reference Amador, Glucksman, Lyons and Gorres1997). The increase of soil alkaline phosphatase activities after application of organic manure is in agreement with other studies (Böhme et al., Reference Böhme, Langer and Böhme2005). Soil urease activities were increased after application of organic manure, which was similar to the result reported by Bandick and Dick (Reference Bandick and Dick1999). Soil urease activities closely correlated with available N (Bandick and Dick, Reference Bandick and Dick1999). The long-term effect of organic amendments on enzyme activities is probably a combined effect of a higher degree of stabilization of enzymes on humic substances, and an augmentation of microbial biomass with increased soil C content (Elfstrand et al., Reference Elfstrand, Hedlund and Mårtensson2007). Furthermore, as well as being the substrate for microbial activity, soil organic matter plays an important role in protecting soil enzymes since they become immobilized in a three-dimensional network of clay and humus complexes (Tabatabai, Reference Tabatabai, Weaver, Angel and Bottomley1994).

Soil nematode community

The total number of soil free-living nematodes in the present study (ranging from 172 to 629 individuals per 100 g dry soils) was similar to the study by DuPont et al. (Reference DuPont, Ferris and Horn2009), who reported that total nematode density ranged from 435 to 617 individuals per 100 g dry soils in organic agriculture systems of the USA. But our observations were lower than those found following long-term application of fertilizer agriculture soil reported by Liang et al. (Reference Liang, Lou, Li, Zhong, Zhang and Wang2009), where the values ranged from 225 to 899 individuals per 100 g dry soils. This indicates a difference between different agriculture ecosystems. Increased nematode density after application of organic manure was also reported by Villenave et al. (Reference Villenave, Bongers, Ekschmitt, Pernandes and Oliver2003) and Forge et al. (Reference Forge, Bittman and Kowalenko2005); the reason was that the increase of nematode populations could be linked directly to higher food resources associated with the input of organic manure (Bulluck et al., Reference Bulluck III, Barker and Ristaino2002).

The plant-parasitic nematodes were the most dominant trophic group in the present study, similar to the findings of Ou et al. (Reference Ou, Liang, Jiang, Li and Wen2005) in maize fields, but incompatible with the study of DuPont et al. (Reference DuPont, Ferris and Horn2009), who found that bacteria-feeding nematodes were the dominant trophic group in organic agriculture systems. The bacterial feeders were higher in the compost plot than in the other plots, which revealed that application of organic manure could increase soil microbial community, and confirmed previous results (Bittman et al., Reference Bittman, Forge and Kowalenko2005). We found that the number of omnivores-predators was increased due to application of organic compost in 2005. Increased omnivores-predators may contribute to enhancement of nutrient mineralization, via the feeding of predatory nematodes, as nutrients passed from microbes to bacteria-feeding nematodes are released at the predator trophic levels (Yeates and Wardle, Reference Yeates and Wardle1996), as well as through predation on other nematodes including plant-parasitic nematodes (Khan and Kim Reference Khan and Kim2007).

The number of nematode genera in the present study was 43, higher than the result (37) obtained by Li et al. (Reference Li, Xu, Liang, Zhong, Zheng and Zhu2009) in a rice-wheat cropping system. Nematode genus richness could reflect diversity of soil habitat (Ekschmitt et al., Reference Ekschmitt, Bakonyi, Bongers, Bongers, Boström, Dogan, Harrison, Nagy, O'Donell, Papatheodoru, Sohlenius, Stamou and Wolters2001). The number of nematode genera was greater in the compost plots than in the chemical fertilizer and control plots, which reflected a greater diversity of soil habitat in the compost plots.

Ecological indexes are known to be useful in elucidating differences between treatments. The F/B ratio, which reflects the status of the decomposition pathway in detrital food webs and the structure of the microflora community, was found to differentiate between the two components of fungi and bacteria (Ruess, Reference Ruess2003). F/B values were lower in the compost plots than in the chemical fertilizer plots, which indicated that there were more microbial communities in the compost plots (Freckman and Ettema, Reference Freckman and Ettema1993). The trophic diversity index (T) demonstrates the diversity of the functional groups within the nematode community and affords greater weight to common taxa and a higher index indicates greater diversity (Heip et al., Reference Heip, Herman, Soetaert, Higgins and Thiel1988). However, we only observed the higher T values in the compost plots, compared to the other plots, in 2005. The maturity index (MI) is a measurement based on the composition of the nematode community and could reflect the degree of stability of the soil ecosystem (Bongers, Reference Bongers1990). The modified maturity index (ΣMI) includes the plant-parasitic nematode population in order to better reflect the ecosystem development (Yeates, Reference Yeates1994). The MI values obtained (1.19–2.72) are comparable to values in agriculture systems in the USA (2.19–2.32) (Neher et al., Reference Neher, Wu, Barbercheck and Anas2005). The MMI values obtained (1.91 to 2.71) are comparable to values found in tomato fields (1.9–2.9) (Bulluck et al., Reference Bulluck III, Barker and Ristaino2002). Bongers (Reference Bongers1999) demonstrated that MI values decreased with increasing fertility, whereas we only observed the lower MI values in the compost plots in comparison to the other plots for two sites in 2004.

CONCLUSION

This study has shown that soil physicochemical parameters, microbial biomass, biological activities, and nematode communities were influenced by long-term application of fertilizers. In general, soil total organic carbon, dissolved organic carbon, total N, alkaline-hydrolysable N, available P, and available K, microbial biomass, basal respiration, soil enzyme activities, total number of nematodes and bacterial-feeding nematodes were significantly higher in the compost plots than in the chemical fertilizer and control plots at two experimental sites for two sampling dates, whereas soil bulk density and pH values were significantly lower. As a result, we conclude that integrated factors, such as physical-chemical, biochemical and biological parameters should be taken into account as soil quality indicators.

Acknowledgements

This research was supported by the Key Project of the National ‘10th-FiveYear-Plan’ of China (grant no. 2004BA508B01).

Supplementary data available at journals.cambridge.org/eag.

References

REFERENCES

Amador, J. A., Glucksman, A. M., Lyons, J. B. and Gorres, J. H. (1997). Spatial distribution of soil phosphatase activity within a riparian forest. Soil Science 162: 808825.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Anderson, T. H. and Domsch, K. H. (1993). The metabolic quotient for CO2 (qCO2) as a specific activity parameter to assess the effects of environmental conditions, such as pH, on the microbial biomass of forest soils. Soil Biology & Biochemistry 25: 251255.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bandick, A. K and Dick, R. P. (1999). Field management effects on soil enzyme activities. Soil Biology & Biochemistry 31: 14711479.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Barker, K. R., Carter, C. C. and Sasser, J. N. (1985). An Advanced Treatise on Meloidogyne, Methodology, Vol. 2. Raleigh, NC: North Carolina State University Graphics.Google Scholar
Bittman, S., Forge, T. A. and Kowalenko, C. G. (2005). Responses of the bacterial and fungal biomass in a grassland soil to multi-year applications of dairy manure slurry and fertilizer. Soil Biology & Biochemistry 37: 613623.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Blakemore, L. C., Searle, P. L. and Daly, B. K. (1972). Methods for chemical analysis of soils. New Zealand Soil Bureau Report 10. Government Printer, Wellington.Google Scholar
Böhme, L., Langer, U. and Böhme, F. (2005). Microbial biomass, enzyme activities and microbial community structure in two European long-term field experiments. Agriculture, Ecosystems & Environment 109: 141152.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bongers, T. (1990). The maturity index: An ecological measure of environmental disturbance based on nematode species composition. Oecologia 83: 1419CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bongers, T. (1999). The Maturity Index, the evolution of nematode life history traits, adaptive radiation and cp-scaling. Plant and Soil 212: 1322.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bongers, T. and Ferris, H. (1999). Nematode community structure as a bioindicator in environmental monitoring. Trends in Ecology and Evolution 14: 224228.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bremner, J. M., 1996. Nitrogen-total. In Methods of Soil Analysis. Part 3, 10851086 (Ed.Sparks, D. L.). Soil Science Society of America Book Series 5, Madison.Google Scholar
Bulluck III, L. R., Barker, K. R. and Ristaino, J. B. (2002). Influences of organic and synthetic soil fertility amendments on nematode trophic groups and community dynamics under tomatoes. Applied Soil Ecology 21: 233250.Google Scholar
Cheng, Z. Q. and Grewal, P. S. (2009). Dynamics of the soil nematode food web and nutrient pools under tall fescue lawns established on soil matrices resulting from common urban development activities. Applied Soil Ecology 42: 107117.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
DuPont, S. T., Ferris, H. and Horn, M. V. (2009). Effects of cover crop quality and quantity on nematode-based soil food webs and nutrient cycling. Applied Soil Ecology 41: 157–16.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ekschmitt, K., Bakonyi, G., Bongers, M., Bongers, T., Boström, S., Dogan, H., Harrison, A., Nagy, P., O'Donell, A. G., Papatheodoru, E. M., Sohlenius, B., Stamou, G. P. and Wolters, V. (2001). Nematode community structure as indicator of soil functioning in European grassland soils. European Journal of Soil Biology 37: 263268.Google Scholar
Elfstrand, S., Hedlund, K. and Mårtensson, A., 2007. Soil enzyme activities, microbial community composition and function after 47 years of continuous green manuring. Applied Soil Ecology 35: 610621.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ferris, H, Venette, R. C. and Lau, S. S. (1996). Dynamics of nematode communities in tomatoes grown in conventional and organic farming systems, and their impact on soil fertility. Applied Soil Ecology 3: 161173.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Forge, T. A., Bittman, S. and Kowalenko, C. G. (2005). Responses of grassland soil nematodes and protozoa to multi-year and single-year applications of dairy manure slurry and fertilizer. Soil Biology & Biochemistry 37: 17511762.Google Scholar
Freckman, D. W. and Ettema, C. H. (1993). Assessing nematode communities in agroecosystems of varying human intervention. Agriculture, Ecosystems & Environment 45: 239261.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fu, S. L., Coleman, D. C., Hendrix, P. F. and Crossley, D. A. Jr. (2000). Responses of trophic groups of soil nematodes to residue application under conventional tillage and no-till regimes. Soil Biology & Biochemistry 32: 17311741.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fu, S. L., Zou, X. M. and Coleman, D. (2009). Highlights and perspectives of soil biology and ecology research in China. Soil Biology & Biochemistry 41: 868876.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gami, S. K., Ladha, J. K., Pathak, H., Shah, M. P., Pasuquin, E., Pandey, S. P., Hobbs, P. R., Joshy, D. and Mishra, R. (2001). Long-term changes in yield and soil fertility in a twenty-year rice-wheat experiment in Nepal. Biology and Fertility of Soils 34: 7378.Google Scholar
Gil-Sotres, F., Trasar-Cepeda, C., Leirós, M. C. and Seoane, S. (2005). Different approaches to evaluating soil quality using biochemical properties. Soil Biology & Biochemistry 37: 877887.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gong, W., Yan, X. Y., Wang, J. Y., Hu, T. X. and Gong, Y. B. (2009). Long-term manuring and fertilization effects on soil organic carbon pools under a wheat-maize cropping system in North China Plain. Plant and Soil 314: 6776.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gu, Y. F., Zhang, X. P., Tu, S. H. and Lindstrom, K. (2009). Soil microbial biomass, crop yields, and bacterial community structure as affected by long-term fertilizer treatments under wheat-rice cropping. European Journal of Soil Biology 45: 239246.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gunapala, N. and Scow, K. M. (1998). Dynamics of soil microbial biomass and activity in conventional and organic farming systems. Soil Biology & Biochemistry 30: 805816.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Heip, C., Herman, P.M. J. and Soetaert, K. (1988). Data processing, evaluation and analysis. In Introduction to the Study of Meiofauna, 197231 (Eds Higgins, R. P. and Thiel, H.), Washington, DC, Smithsonian Institution Press.Google Scholar
Hu, C., Cao, Z. P., Chen, Y. F. and Dawson, R. (2008). Dynamics of soil microbial biomass carbon, mineral nitrogen and nitrogen mineralization in long-term field experiment, Northern China. Journal of Sustainable Agriculture 32: 287302.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hu, S. and van Bruggen, A. H. C. (1997). Microbial dynamics associated with multiphasic decomposition of 14 C-Labeled cellulose in soil. Microbial Ecology 33, 134143.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Khan, Z. and Kim, Y. H. (2007). A review on the role of predatory soil nematodes in the biological control of plant parasitic nematodes. Applied Soil Ecology 35: 370379.Google Scholar
Lee, S. B., Lee, C. H., Jung, K. Y., Park, K. D., Lee, D. and Kim, P. J. (2009). Changes of soil organic carbon and its fractions in relation to soil physical properties in a long-term fertilized paddy. Soil & Tillage Research 104: 227232.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Li, Q., Xu, C. G., Liang, W. J., Zhong, S., Zheng, X. H. and Zhu, J. G. (2009). Residue incorporation and N fertilization affect the response of soil nematodes to the elevated CO2 in a Chinese wheat field. Soil Biology & Biology 41: 14971503.Google Scholar
Liang, W. J., Lou, Y. L., Li, Q., Zhong, S., Zhang, X. K. and Wang, J. K. (2009). Nematode faunal response to long-term application of nitrogen fertilizer and organic manure in Northeast China. Soil Biology & Biochemistry 41: 883890.Google Scholar
Mandal, A., Patra, A. K., Singh, D., Swarup, A. and Masto, R. E. (2007). Effect of long-term application of manure and fertilizer on biological and biochemical activities in soil during crop development stages. Bioresource Technology 98: 35853592.Google Scholar
Masto, R. E., Chhonkar, P. K., Singh, D. and Patra, A. K. (2006). Changes in soil biological and biochemical characteristics in a long-term field trial on a sub-tropical inceptisol. Soil Biology & Biochemistry 38: 15771582.Google Scholar
Neher, D. A. (2001). Role of nematodes in soil health and their use as indicators. Journal of Nematology 33: 161168.Google ScholarPubMed
Neher, D. A., Wu, J., Barbercheck, M. E. and Anas, O. (2005). Ecosystem type affects interpretation of soil nematode community measures. Applied Soil Ecology 30: 4764.Google Scholar
Nsabimana, D., Haynes, R. J. and Wallis, F. M. (2004). Size, activity and catabolic diversity of the soil microbial biomass as affected by land use. Applied Soil Ecology 26: 8192.Google Scholar
Ou, W., Liang, W. J., Jiang, Y., Li, Q. and Wen, D. Z. (2005). Vertical distribution of soil nematodes under different land use types in an aquic brown soil. Pedobiologia 49: 139148.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pen-mouratov, S., Barness, G. and Steinberger, Y. (2008). Effect of desert plant ecophysiological adaptation on soil nematode communities. European Journal of Soil Biology 44: 298308.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Porazinska, D. L., Duncanb, L. W., McSorley, R. and Graham, J. H. (1999). Nematode communities as indicators of status and processes of a soil ecosystem influenced by agricultural management practices. Applied Soil Ecology 13: 6986.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Porazinska, D. L., McSorley, R., Duncan, L. W., Graham, J. H., Wheaton, T. A. and Parsons, L. R. (1998). Nematode community composition under various irrigation schemes in a citrus soil ecosystem. Journal of Nematology 30: 170178.Google Scholar
Ruess, L. (2003). Nematode soil faunal analysis of decomposition pathways in different ecosystems. Nematology 5: 179181.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shannon, C. E. and Weaver, W. (1949). The Mathematical Theory of Communication. Urbana, IL: University of Illinois Press.Google Scholar
Singh, Y., Singh, B., Ladha, J. K., Khind, C. S., Gupta, R. K., Meelu, O. P. and Pasuquin, E. (2004). Long-term effects of organic inputs on yield and soil fertility in the rice-wheat rotation. Soil Science Society of America Journal 68: 845853.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tabatabai, M. A. (1994). Soil enzymes. In Methods of Soil Analysis: Chemical and Microbiological Properties, Part 2, 797798 (Weaver, R. W., Angel, G. S. and Bottomley, P. S.), Soil Science Society of America Book Series No. 5, Madison.Google Scholar
Twinn, D. C., Dickinson, C. H. and Pugh, G. J. F. (1974). Nematodes. Biology of Plant Litter Decomposition, 421465. London: Academic Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Urzelai, A., Hernández, A. J. and Pastor, J. (2000). Biotic indices based on soil nematode communities for assessing soil quality in terrestrial ecosystems. Science of Total Environment 247, 253261.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Van Eekeren, N., De Boer, H., Bloem, J., Schouten, T., Rutgers, M., De Goede, R. and Brussaard, L. (2009). Soil biological quality of grassland fertilized with adjusted cattle manure slurries in comparison with organic and inorganic fertilizers. Biology and Fertility of Soils 45: 595608.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vance, E. D., Brookes, P. C. and Jenkinson, D. S. (1987). An extraction method for measuring soil microbial C. Soil Biology & Biochemistry 19: 703707.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vestergård, M. (2004). Nematode assemblages in the rhizosphere of spring barley (Hordeum vulgare L.) depended on fertilisation and plant growth phase. Pedobiologia 48: 257265.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Villenave, C., Bongers, T., Ekschmitt, K., Pernandes, P. and Oliver, R. (2003). Changes in nematode communities after in millet fields in Senegal. Nematology 5: 351358.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Villenave, C., Djigal, D., Brauman, A. and Rouland-Lefevre, C. (2009). Nematodes, indicators of the origin of the soil used by termites to construct biostructures. Pedobiologia 52: 301307.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wu, J. H., Fu, C. Z., Chen, S. S. and Chen, J. K. (2002). Soil faunal response to land use: effect of estuarine tideland reclamation on nematode communities. Applied Soil Ecology 21: 131147.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Yardim, E. N. and Edwards, C. A. (1998). The effects of chemical pest, disease and weed management pratices on the trophic structure of nematode populations in tomato agroecosystems. Applied Soil Ecology 7: 137147.Google Scholar
Yeates, G. W. (1994). Modification and qualification of the nematode maturity index. Pedobiologia 38: 97101.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Yeates, G. W., Bongers, T., De Goede, R. G. M., Freckman, D. and Georgieva, S. S. (1993). Feeding habits in soil nematode families and genera – an outline for soil ecologists. Journal of Nematology 25: 315331.Google ScholarPubMed
Yeates, G. W. and Wardle, D. A. (1996). Nematodes as predators and prey: relationships to biological control and soil processes. Pedobiologia 40: 4350.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Figure 0

Table 1. Soil physicochemical property under different treatments for two experimental sites in 2004.

Figure 1

Figure 1. Soil microbial parameter under the long-term fertilizer experiment in 2004 and 2005. Different letters (a, b, c) indicate significant differences (p < 0.05) between treatments according to LSD multiple comparison. Bars indicate standard errors (n = 3). i) soil microbial biomass C; ii) soil basal respiration; iii) metabolic quotient (qCO2). OF: organic compost treatment; IF: inorganic fertilizer treatment; NF: no fertilizer.

Figure 2

Figure 2. Soil enzyme activity under the long-term fertilizer experiment in 2004 and 2005. Different letters (a, b, c) indicate significant differences (p < 0.05) between treatments according to LSD multiple comparison. Bars indicate standard errors (n = 3). i): alkaline phosphatase activity; ii) urease activity. OF: organic compost treatment; IF: inorganic fertilizer treatment; NF: no fertilizer.

Figure 3

Figure 3. Total number of nematodes in soils under the long-term fertilizer experiment in 2004 and 2005. Different letters (a, b, c) indicate significant differences (p < 0.05) between treatments according to LSD multiple comparison. Bars indicate standard errors (n = 3). OF: organic compost treatment; IF: inorganic fertilizer treatment; NF: no fertilizer.

Figure 4

Figure 4. Nematode trophic group in soils under the long-term fertilizer experiment in 2004 and 2005. Different letters (a, b, c) indicate significant differences (p < 0.05) between treatments according to LSD multiple comparison. Bars indicate standard errors (n = 3). i) bacteria-feeding nematodes; ii) fungi-feeding nematodes; iii) plant-parasitic nematodes; iv) omnivore-predator nematodes. OF: organic compost treatment; IF: inorganic fertilizer treatment; NF: no fertilizer.

Figure 5

Figure 5. Community indices of soil nematodes under the long-term fertilizer experiment in 2004 and 2005. Different letters (a, b, c) indicate significant differences (p < 0.05) between treatments according to LSD multiple comparison. Bars indicate standard errors (n = 3). i) fungi-feeders/bacteria-feeders ratio (F/B); ii) trophic diversity (T); iii) Shannon index (H’); iv) maturity index (MI); v) modified maturity index (MMI); vi) plant-parasite index (PPI). OF: organic compost treatment; IF: inorganic fertilizer treatment; NF: no fertilizer.

Figure 6

Figure 6. Grain yields of wheat under the long-term fertilizer experiment in 2004 and 2005. Different letters (a, b, c) indicate significant differences (p < 0.05) between treatments according to LSD multiple comparison. Bars indicate standard errors (n = 3). OF: organic compost treatment; IF: inorganic fertilizer treatment; NF: no fertilizer.

Supplementary material: File

Cheng Supplementary Material

Cheng Supplementary Material

Download Cheng Supplementary Material(File)
File 186.4 KB