Hostname: page-component-745bb68f8f-kw2vx Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-02-11T10:01:25.087Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

The big bang? Three questions without a reply

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  28 April 2005

JEAN-CLAUDE PECKER
Affiliation:
Collège de France, 3 rue d'Ulm, FR-75231, Paris Cedex 05, France. E-mail: j.c.pecker@wanadoo.fr
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

Putting the big bang in its historical perspective makes it appear as the result of a succession of random thinking, animated by new observations – although constrained by their reference frame – and that of concepts often frozen. It appeared first as the only solution able to account for the existing observations; with newer observations, it appears now just like the old Ptolemaïc system, to which Aristotelians, Platonians or Pythagorean of the Renaissance worked hard to add epicycles, and again new epicycles, against all the principles of simplicity claimed in their beginnings, in order to save the basic principles of the model.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
© Academia Europaea 2005