Hostname: page-component-6dbcb7884d-2bcm2 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-02-13T17:47:30.517Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Una comparación de los diagnósticos de trastorno afectivo de la CIE-8 y la CIE-10. Un estudio de registro de casos de Dinamarca

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  12 May 2020

L. V. Kessing
L. V. Kessing*
Affiliation:
Departamento de Psiquiatría, Universidad de Copenhagen; Rigshospitalet, Blegdamsvej 9, DK 2100Copenhagen 0; Department of Psychiatric Demography, Universidad de Aarhus, Hospital de Psiquiatría, Risskov, Dinamarca
Get access

Resumen

La introducción de la CIE-10 ha cambiado los límites diagnósticos de los trastornos afectivos en la psiquiatría clínica. El actual estudio presenta la concordancia diagnóstica entre diagnósticos de la CIE-8 dados en 1993 y diagnósticos de la CIE-10 dados en 1994 a los mismos pacientes admitidos en ambos años, según el registro danés de admisiones psiquiátricas. En total, 1.487 pacientes tuvieron un diagnóstico de la CIE-8 de psicosis maniacodepresivas en 1993 y fueron readmitidos en 1994. La mayoría de los pacientes (84,0%) con este diagnóstico según la CIE-8 tuvieron un diagnóstico de trastorno afectivo según la CIE-10. Los pacientes con un diagnóstico de trastorno afectivo según la CIE-10 habían sido diagnosticados antes de maniaco-depresivos (69,6%), psicosis psicógenas (8,7%), trastornos de la personalidad (5,5%) o neurosis (3,2%), según la CIE-8. Así, el concepto de trastorno afectivo de la CIE-10 parecía más general y más amplio en comparación con la CIE-8.

Keywords

trastorno afectivoregistro de casosdiagnósticovalidez concurrente
Type
Artículo Original
Information
European Psychiatry (Ed. Española) , Volume 6 , Issue 3 , April 1999 , pp. 146 - 150
Copyright
Copyright © European Psychiatric Association 1999

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Bibliografía

Bech, P.Diagnostic and classification tradition of mental disorders in the 20th century in Scandinavia. In: Sartorius, N, Jablensky, A, Regier, DA, Burke, JD Jr, Hirschfeld, RMA, eds. Sources and traditions of classification in psychiatry. Toronto: Hogrefe & Huber Publishers; 1990; p. 154–69.Google Scholar
Cooper, JE. The structure and presentation of contemporary psychiatric classifications with special reference to ICD-9 and ICD-10. Br J Psychiatry 1988; 152 suppl 1: 21–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Department of Psychiatric Demography, Denmark. Classification of diseases. The Danish edition of ICD-10, chapter V. Psykiske lidelser og adfaerdsmaessige forstyrrelser. Risskov: Department of Psychiatric Demography; 1993.Google Scholar
Dupont, A.A national psychiatric case register as a tool for mental health planning, research, and administration. In: Laska, EM, Gulbinat, WH, Regier, DA, eds. The Danish model. Information support to mental health programs. An international perspective. New York: Human Sciences Press; 1983: p. 257–74.Google Scholar
Farmer, AE, Jenkins, PL, Katz, R, Ryder, L.Comparison of the Catego-derived ICD-8 and DSM-II classifications using the Composite International Diagnostic Interview in severely ill subjects. Br J Psychiatry 1991; 158: 177–82.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Maier, W, Philipp, M, Zaudig, M.Comparison of the ICD-10-classification with the ICD-9- and the DSM-III-classifi-cation of mental disorders. Pharmacopsychiatry 1990; 23: 183–7.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Malt, U, Pape-Ellefsen, E, Vestergaard, P.A comparison of DSM-III and ICD-8 diagnoses for major affective disorders and the use of biological markers for depression. Acta Psychiatr Scand 1986; 328 suppl: 35–44.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Möller, HJ, Hohe-Schramm, M, Cording-Tómmel, C, Schmid-Bode, W, Wittchen, HU, Zaudic, Met al.The classification of functional psychoses and its implication for prognosis. Br J Psychiatry 1989; 154: 467–72.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Munk-Jørgensen, P, Mortensen, P.The Danish Psychiatric Central Register. Danish Med Bull 1997; 44: 82–4.Google ScholarPubMed
National Board of Health, Denmark. Classification of diseases. The Danish edition of ICD-8. Copenhagen: Sundhedsstyrelsen; 1971.Google Scholar
Sartorius, N.International perspectives of psychiatric classification. Br J Psychiatry 1988; 152 suppl 1: 9–14.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wittchen, HU, Semler, G, Von Zerssen, D.A comparison of two diagnostic methods. Arch Gen Psychiatry 1985; 42: 677–84.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
World Health Organisation. The ICD-10 classification of mental and behavioural disorders: clinical descriptions and diagnostic guidelines. Geneva: WHO; 1992.Google Scholar