The original publication contains erroneous illustrations. The correct versions of Table 1, Table 3, Table 4, and Table 5 are entailed in this corrigendum.
Table 1. Solution paths for military participation in the anti-Daesh coalition
![](https://static.cambridge.org/binary/version/id/urn:cambridge.org:id:binary:20220826132853635-0841:S1755773922000091:S1755773922000091_tab1.png?pub-status=live)
Note: Black circles indicate the presence of a condition, crossed-out circles refer to the absence of the condition.
Table 3. EU governments and explanatory conditions
![](https://static.cambridge.org/binary/version/id/urn:cambridge.org:id:binary:20220826132853635-0841:S1755773922000091:S1755773922000091_tab2.png?pub-status=live)
Table 4. Testing for necessary conditions
![](https://static.cambridge.org/binary/version/id/urn:cambridge.org:id:binary:20220826132853635-0841:S1755773922000091:S1755773922000091_tab3.png?pub-status=live)
Table 5. Truth table for military participation in the anti-Daesh coalition
![](https://static.cambridge.org/binary/version/id/urn:cambridge.org:id:binary:20220826132853635-0841:S1755773922000091:S1755773922000091_tab4.png?pub-status=live)
Notes: T = External Threat, A = Alliance Value, R = Right Executive, V = Parliamentary Veto Rights,
P = Public Threat Perception, MP = Military Participation, bold cases hold membership >0.50 in the outcome. Empty rows are omitted for presentational purposes (see online appendix for a table with logical remainders).