Hostname: page-component-745bb68f8f-b6zl4 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-02-05T20:51:42.486Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

What Are the Aims of Education?

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  03 January 2012

Frederick Schmitt
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

Theorists of education have long debated the ultimate aims of education, often proposing one or another cognitive aim, such as true belief or critical thinking. I will argue first that there are no ultimate aims common to all kinds of education, apart from the vacuous ones of transmitting cognition and improving the student's cognition. In light of this conclusion, the matter to investigate is the ultimate aims of certain broad kinds of education. I will restrict my inquiry here to cognitive ultimate aims, and I will focus on liberal arts education. I will propose that the organizing cognitive ultimate aim of liberal arts education is justified belief rather than true belief.

Type
Research Article
Information
Episteme , Volume 1 , Issue 3 , February 2005 , pp. 223 - 234
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2005

References

Goldman, Alvin I. (1999). Knowledge in a Social World. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Marples, Roger, ed. (1999). The Aims of Education. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Schmitt, Frederick F. (1992). Knowledge and Belief. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Schmitt, Frederick F. (2000). “Veritistic Value.” Social Epistemology 14: 259–280.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Siegel, Harvey (1997). Rationality Redeemed?: Further Dialogues on an Educational Ideal. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Siegel, Harvey (2004). “Epistemology and Education: An Incomplete Guide to the Social-Epistemological Issues.” EPISTEME: 1.CrossRefGoogle Scholar