No CrossRef data available.
Article contents
Irma Taavitsainen and Turo Hiltunen (eds.). Late Modern English Medical Texts: Writing medicine in the eighteenth century. Amsterdam: John Benjamins, 2019. Pp. xix + 432. ISBN 9789027203229.
Review products
Irma Taavitsainen and Turo Hiltunen (eds.). Late Modern English Medical Texts: Writing medicine in the eighteenth century. Amsterdam: John Benjamins, 2019. Pp. xix + 432. ISBN 9789027203229.
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 26 April 2022
Abstract
An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
![Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'](https://static-cambridge-org.ezproxyberklee.flo.org/content/id/urn%3Acambridge.org%3Aid%3Aarticle%3AS1360674321000307/resource/name/firstPage-S1360674321000307a.jpg)
- Type
- Book Review
- Information
- Copyright
- Copyright © The Author, 2022. Published by Cambridge University Press
References
Crespo, Begoña & Moskowich, Isabel. 2020. Astronomy, philosophy, life sciences and history texts: Setting the scene for the study of modern scientific writing. English Studies. https://doi.org/10.1080/0013838X.2020.1798635CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kronick, David Abraham. 1994. Medical ‘publishing societies’ in eighteenth-century Britain. Bulletin of the American Library Association 82(3), 277–82.Google ScholarPubMed
Marttila, Ville. 2014. Creating digital editions for corpus linguistics: The case of Potage Dyvers, a family of six Middle English recipe collections. PhD dissertation, University of Helsinki.Google Scholar
Moskowich, Isabel & López, Javier Parapar. 2008. Writing science, compiling science: The Coruña Corpus of English Scientific Writing. In Lorenzo Modia, María Jesús (ed.), Proceedings of the 31st AEDEAN Conference, 531–44. A Coruña: Universidade da Coruña.Google Scholar
Puente-Castelo, Luis & Monaco, Leida Maria. 2016. ‘It is proper subserviently, to inquire into the nature of experimental chemistry’: Difficulties to harmonize disciplinary particularities and compilation criteria during the selection of samples for CECheT. EPiC Series in Language and Linguistics 1, 351–60. https://easychair.org/publications/paper/66NcGoogle Scholar
Rodríguez-Puente, Paula, Fanego, Teresa, López-Couso, María José, Méndez-Naya, Belén & Núñez-Pertejo, Paloma. 2016. Corpus of Historical English Law Reports 1535–1999 (CHELAR). University of Santiago de Compostela: Research Unit for Variation, Linguistic Change and Grammaticalization, Department of English and German. www.usc-vlcg.es/CHELAR.htmGoogle Scholar
Taavitsainen, Irma. 2016. Genre dynamics in the history of English. In Kytö, Merja & Pahta, Päivi (eds.), The Cambridge handbook of English historical linguistics, 271–85. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Taavitsainen, Irma & Pahta, Päivi. 2010. Early Modern English Medical Texts: Corpus description and studies. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wilson, Adrian. 1990. The politics of medical improvement in Hanoverian London. In Cunningham, Andrew & French, Roger (eds.), The medical enlightenment of the eighteenth century, 4–39. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar