Hostname: page-component-745bb68f8f-g4j75 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-02-11T06:47:01.913Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

COUNTERFACTUAL SUCCESS AND NEGATIVE FREEDOM

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  31 July 2007

KEITH DOWDING
Affiliation:
London School of Economics
MARTIN VAN HEES
Affiliation:
University of Groningen
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

Recent theories of negative freedom see it as a value-neutral concept; the definition of freedom should not be in terms of specific moral values. Specifically, preferences or desires do not enter into the definition of freedom. If preferences should so enter then Berlin's problem that a person may enhance their freedom by changing their preferences emerges. This paper demonstrates that such a preference-free conception brings its own counter-intuitive problems. It concludes that these problems might be avoided if the description of the constraints which specify an agent's lack of freedom include the intentions of those who constrain the agents.

Type
Essay
Copyright
2007 Cambridge University Press

Footnotes

Versions of this paper have been read to a diverse set of academics in Bayreuth, Germany; Groningen, Netherlands; LSE, UK; and in Dublin, Ireland. We would like to thank participants at those sessions for their comments. We also thank anonymous referees, Ian Carter and Luc Bovens for their help in improving the paper.