Hostname: page-component-745bb68f8f-mzp66 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-02-11T06:27:13.710Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Mollusca from the Insect Limestone (Bembridge Marls Member: Bouldnor Formation: Solent Group), Palaeogene, Isle of Wight, southern England

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  13 May 2014

Martin C. Munt*
Affiliation:
Department of Earth Sciences, Natural History Museum, Cromwell Road, London SW7 5BD, UK. Email: m.munt@nhm.ac.uk
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Molluscs from the Insect Limestone of the Bembridge Marls Member are described. The gastropods Lymnaea (Galba) longiscata (Brongniart 1810), Planorbarius discus (Edwards 1852), Gyraulus similis Férussac, 1814, Hippeutis headonensis Jodot, 1942, Viviparus lentus (Solander 1766) and Viviparus angulosus (J. Sowerby 1817) indicate freshwater alkaline conditions. The cerithioid gastropod Tarebia acuta (J. Sowerby 1822) probably represent more brackish conditions. Polymesoda (Pseudocyrena) obovata (J. Sowerby 1817) is the only bivalve present. All were potentially washed into the depocentre. Despite a wide outcrop of the Insect Limestone on the Isle of Wight's northwest and northeast coasts, there are no records of molluscs other than from the Gurnard/Thorness Bay area on the northwest coast of the island.

Type
Articles
Copyright
Copyright © The Royal Society of Edinburgh 2014 

The objective of this paper is to review the molluscs of the Insect Limestone of the Bembridge Marls Member (Bouldnor Formation: Solent Group) and to draw some palaeoenvironmental inferences from those taxa with reference to modern analogues. Many of these fossils have received no systematic treatment for over one hundred years. As their occurrence is limited to just a few specimens from the Insect Limestone, reference has been made to specimens from other horizons in the Solent Group, specifically type material where possible. The Insect Limestone is not a rich source of molluscan fossils; this is despite occurring between shell beds containing a high abundance but a low diversity of mollusc fauna. The adjacent shell beds are dominated by masses of Tarebia acuta (J. Sowerby Reference Sowerby1822b), Polymesoda obovata (J. Sowerby Reference Sowerby1817), Polymesoda convexa (Brongniart Reference Brongniart1810) and less commonly the potamidid Tympanotonos (Eotympanotonos) funatus (Mantell Reference Mantell1820) subspecies 1 of Munt (Reference Munt2005). These taxa are all indicative of brackish water conditions, and the high abundance, combined with low diversity, can be taken to record stressed environmental conditions. Where molluscs occur in the Insect Limestone, the fauna is dominated by the lymnaeid Lymnaea (Galba) longiscata (Brongniart Reference Brongniart1810).

Within the Insect Limestone, we can confirm scarce isolated specimens, including Viviparus lentus (Solander Reference Solander1766) and Viviparus angulosus (J. Sowerby Reference Sowerby1817). Tarebia acuta (J. Sowerby Reference Sowerby1822b) occurs as scarce isolated specimens; however, there is also a sample at the Natural History Museum (G.24642) which contains circa ten specimens in association with the isopod Eosphaeroma. This specimen is regarded by Andrew Ross (pers. comm. 2006) as not being from the Insect Limestone lithology. More common are the pulmonate gastropods Lymnaea (Galba) longiscata (Brongniart Reference Brongniart1810) and planorbids, including Planorbarius discus (Edwards Reference Edwards1852). The corbiculid Polymesoda (Pseudocyrena) obovata (J. Sowerby Reference Sowerby1817) is the only bivalve recorded from the Insect Limestone. Records of Radix pyramidalis minima (J. Sowerby Reference Sowerby1817) (=Lymnaea minima J. Sowerby, Reference Sowerby1817) in the geological collection of the Isle of Wight Council, refer to juvenile Lymnaea (Galba) longiscata (Brongniart Reference Brongniart1810). Specimens in the same collection assigned to the terrestrial Palaeoglandina costellata (J. Sowerby Reference Sowerby1822b) have also proved to be Lymnaea (Galba) longiscata (Brongniart Reference Brongniart1810), to which it has superficial similarities.

Specimens used in this study are held in two locations. First, within the Palaeontology Department at the Natural History Museum, London; secondly in the Geological Collection of the Isle of Wight Council, care of Dinosaur Isle, Sandown, Isle of Wight. Specimens at the Natural History Museum are from the Hooley Collection, originally found by E. J. A' Court Smith, to whom the publishing of arthropods from the Insect Limestone is first attributed (Jarzembowski Reference Jarzembowski1980). Specimens in the Isle of Wight collection were collected by various people, but include H. F. Poole, J. F Jackson and A. Yule. The scarcity of gastropod specimens from the Insect Limestone has made it necessary to make reference to, and obtain additional measurements from specimens from other horizons.

Institutional abbreviations. BMDG=British Museum Geology Department. GSM=Geological Survey Museum (British Geological Survey). MIWG=Museum of Isle of Wight Geology, and refers to specimens accessioned prior to 1994. IWCMS=Isle of Wight County Museum Service, and is applied to specimens accessioned after 1994. Specimens at the Natural History Museum, London (NHMUK) are prefixed G and GG.

1. Systematic palaeontology

Class Bivalvia Linnaeus, Reference Linnaeus1758

Subclass Eulamellibranchia Pelseneer, Reference Pelseneer1889

Superorder Heterodonta Neumayr, Reference Neumayr1883

Order Veneroida H. & A. Adams, 1856

Superfamily Corbiculoidea J. E. Gray, Reference Gray1847

Family Corbiculidae J. E. Gray, Reference Gray1847

Genus Polymesoda Rafinesque, Reference Rafinesque1820

Subgenus Pseudocyrena Bourguignat, Reference Bourguignat1854

Type species. Cyrena floridana Conrad, Reference Conrad1846, by monotypy, Moore (Reference Moore1969) extant from the northern Caribbean.

Diagnosis. Small to medium-sized shells, rounded to trigonal in shape; well developed periostracum; hinge commonly with strong posterior and anterior lateral teeth, usually serrate. Concentric ornament.

Occurrence. Cosmopolitan, Eocene to Recent.

Remarks. Extant corbiculids occur in large numbers often choking water bodies.

Polymesoda (Pseudocyrena) obovata (J. Sowerby Reference Sowerby1817)

Plate 1, fig. 1

Plate 1 All figures taken with a digital camera (Fuji FinePix S602Z). Scale bars (figs 1–6, 8–10)=10 mm. All specimens, unless stated otherwise are from the Insect Limestone, Bembridge Marls Member: (1) Corbicula obovata (J. Sowerby Reference Sowerby1817), IWCMS.2007.8, Saltmead, Thorness, Isle of Wight; (2) Melanopsis carinata J. de C. Sowerby, Reference Sowerby1826, IWCMS.2005.32, Bembridge Marls Member, Thorness Bay, Isle of Wight; (3) Tarebia acuta (J. Sowerby Reference Sowerby1822b), IWCMS.2007.7, Bembridge Marls Member, Gurnard, Isle of Wight; (4) Potamaclis turritissima (Forbes, Reference Forbes1853), GSM 119911, Bembridge Marls Member, Hamstead Cliff, Isle of Wight; (5) Viviparus angulosus (J. Sowerby Reference Sowerby1817), IWCMS.2007.1, Saltmead, Thorness, Isle of Wight; (6) Viviparus lentus (Solander Reference Solander1766), G.57288, Gurnard, Isle of Wight; (7) ?Acanthinula sp. NHMUK GG.2904, Sticelets, Thorness Bay, Isle of Wight. Specimen height 1.5 mm; (8) Lymnaea (Galba) longiscata (Brongniart Reference Brongniart1810), MIWG.6016, Thorness Bay, Isle of Wight; (9) Lymnaea (Galba) longiscata (Brongniart Reference Brongniart1810), MIWG.4215, Thorness Bay, Isle of Wight; (10) Planorbarius discus (Edwards Reference Edwards1852), MIWG.4535, Saltmead Ledge, Thorness Bay, Isle of Wight; (11) Gyraulus similis (Férussac Reference Férussac1814), IWCMS.2007.15, Saltmead, Thorness Bay, Isle of Wight. Specimen diameter 4 mm; (12) Hippeutis headonensis (Jodot Reference Jodot1942), IWCMS.2007.11, Sticelets, Thorness Bay, Isle of Wight. Specimen diameter 4.5 mm.

  1. 1817 Cycas obovata J. Sowerby, vol. 2 p. 140, pl. 192, figs 4, 5–6.

  2. 1822 Cyrena obovata (J. Sowerby); de Férussac & Deshayes, pl. 5, figs 2–3.

  3. 1854 Cyrena obovata (J. Sowerby); Morris, p. 200.

  4. 1872 Cyrena (Corbicula) obovata (J. Sowerby); Sandberger, p. 261 pl. 15 figs 2, a–b.

  5. 1877 Cyrena obovata (J. Sowerby); Wood, p. 12, pl. B, figs 3 a–c.

  6. 1891 Cyrena obovata (J. Sowerby); Newton, p. 58.

  7. 1901 Corbicula obovata (J. Sowerby); Newton, p. 72.

  8. 1966 Polymesoda (Pseudocyrena) obovata (J. Sowerby); Glibert & Van de Poel, p. 10.

  9. 1971 Corbicula obovata (J. Sowerby); Castell, pl. 11, fig. 1.

Syntypes. NHMUK 43092, Sowerby Collection, Two specimens. However, a third specimen included under the same number excluded from the type series is re-identified herein as Polymesoda convexa (Brongniart Reference Brongniart1810) from the Woolwich Beds (=Woolwich Formation).

Type locality and horizon. Barton Cliff, ‘Barton Clay’.

Referred material. IWCMS.2007.8, from Saltmead, Thorness, Isle of Wight, single right valve.

Diagnosis. Small, equivalved, equilateral, rounded-trigonal in shape. Prominent umbones, height approximately equals length. Posterior margin truncated. Corbiculoid dentition, long serrate laterals.

Distribution. Headon Hill Formation, Bembridge Limestone Formation and Bembridge Marls Member of the Solent Group (Priabonian, Late Eocene to Rupelian, Early Oligocene), Isle of Wight and southwest Hampshire, southern England.

Description. The shell is small and thick, equivalved, equilateral, prosocline, rounded- trigonal in outline shape, inflated. Height, up to 18mm, approximately equals the length. Prominent umbones located towards the anterior of the shell, prosgyrate. The posterior margin, which is truncated/angular to the umbones and ventral margin, is shallowly convex. The ventral margin is shallowly convex, antero-ventral margin convex, antero-dorsal margin concave. The flanks have numerous moderate to strong, regularly spaced growth bands.

The interior of the shell is smooth, the umbonal cavity deep. The pallial line is complete, with a shallow pallial sinus anterior of the posterior abductor muscle. The anterior abductor muscle is large, shallow and oval in shape. The posterior abductor muscle is shallow, large and triangular in shape. The dentition is typically corbiculoid with the formula:

AI AIII 3a 1 3b PI PIII

AII 2a 2b 4b PII

The laterals are serrate, with the anterior laterals approximately half the length of the posterior laterals.

Remarks. This is the most abundant bivalve in the lower part of the Bembridge Marls Member. It occurs as paired, but more frequently disarticulated, valves and rounded fragments. The shells are usually etched. The specimens from the Insect Limestone comprise a single corroded and etched valve and numerous rounded fragments in a single block.

Class Gastropoda Cuvier, Reference Cuvier1797

Infraclass Apogastropoda Salvini-Pläwen & Haszprunar, Reference Salvini-Pläwen and Haszprunar1987

Superorder Caenogastropoda Cox, Reference Cox1960

Order Sorbeoconcha Ponder & Lindberg, Reference Ponder and Lindberg1997

Superfamily Cerithioidea Férussac, Reference Férussac and Deshayes1819

Family Thiaridae Troschel, Reference Troschel1857

Genus Tarebia H. & A. Adams, 1854

Type species. Melania granifera Lamarck, Reference Lamarck1822, by subsequent designation by Brot (Reference Brot, Küster, Martini and Chemnitz1874), natural distribution Southeast Asia, southern China.

Diagnosis. Small to medium-sized, turreted, strong axial ribs, which in later growth become dissolved into two or three spiral rows of tubercles, the axial ornament is replaced by strong spiral ribs at the base of the last whorl.

Occurrence. Southeast Asia, introduced into the Caribbean, southern USA and South Africa, extant.

Remarks. Following Brandt (Reference Brandt1974) and Glaubrecht (Reference Glaubrecht1996) Tarebia is treated herein as a genus and not a subgenus of Melanoides Olivier, Reference Olivier1804. However, Genner et al. (Reference Genner, Todd, Michel, Erpenbeck, Jimoh, Joyce, Piechocki and Pointier2007), based upon mitochondrial DNA sequences of extant thiarids including Melanoides species and Tarebia granifera, have concluded that Tarebia falls within Melanoides and may not be a discrete genus. Moreover, that specimens assigned to Tarebia older than Early Pliocene age cannot be unequivocally identified as such, and that Tarebia in the Priabonian (and Early Oligocene) requires systematic revision. It is not within the capacity of this work to undertake such a revision. Therefore existing taxonomy is retained herein.

Tarebia acuta (J. Sowerby Reference Sowerby1822b)

Plate 1, fig. 3

  1. 1822b Potamides acutus J. Sowerby, vol. 3, p. 53, pl. 341, fig. 2.

  2. 1856 Melania muricata Morris; Forbes, p. 151, pl. iii, fig. 16.

  3. 1856 Melania muricata var. costata Morris; Forbes, p. 148, pl. ii, fig. 14.

  4. 1889 Melania (Tarebia) acuta (J. Sowerby); Vincent, p. cxxix.

  5. 1891 Melania acuta (J. Sowerby); Newton, p. 200.

  6. 1909 Tarebia muricata S. Wood; Cossmann, p. 134.

  7. 1954 Melania (Tarebia) acuta (J. Sowerby); Glibert & Heinzelin, p. 352, pl. v, figs.16a, b.

  8. 1958 Tarebia acuta (J. Sowerby); Castell, pl. 19, figs. 3 & 4.

  9. 1975 Melanoides (Tarebia) acuta (J. Sowerby); Castell, pl. 19, fig. 2.

Syntype. BMGD. 43558. Sowerby Collection, Natural History Museum, London.

Type locality and horizon. ‘Lower Freshwater Formation’ (=Solent Group), Isle of Wight.

Referred material. IWCMS.2007.7 Saltmead, Thorness, Isle of Wight; IWCMS.2003.41 Saltmead, Thorness, Isle of Wight; IWCMS.2007.20 all from Saltmead, Thorness, Isle of Wight; NHMUK G. 24642 Gurnard, Isle of Wight.

Diagnosis. Small, up to 14 mm in height, turreted to turreted-conical, whorls shallowly convex. Suture strong, canaliculate. The ornament is cancellate and variable, comprising up to three lines of linked pustules or spines, strong axial costae. Last whorl comprises half of shell height. Aperture is large and oval.

Distribution. Solent Group (excluding Cranmore Member) (Priabonian, Late Eocene to Rupelian, Early Oligocene), Isle of Wight and southwest Hampshire, southern England.

Description. (Table 1) Small in size, up to 14 mm in height; width at the last whorl up to 5.5 mm. Turreted to turreted-conical in shape. Teleoconch of up to seven flat to shallowly convex whorls. The suture is strong, canaliculate. The strength of the suture and rate of whorl expansion gives the shell a stepped profile. The last whorl comprises one half of the total shell height. The protoconch is variable.

Table 1 Tarebia acuta biometric data

1 Specimens from bulk samples.

The aperture is large and oval. The inductura is smooth and narrow, its leading edge forming a continuous arc from the adapical margin to the base of the aperture. The inner surface of the outer lip is ornamented correspondingly with the main external ornament. The shell is moderately thick. The siphonal canal is very weak, broad and shallow.

The growth lines are very shallowly opisthocyrt, almost orthocline and closely spaced. They vary in strength from faint to very strong and weakly laminar. The ornament is cancellate, which in the early whorls comprises two, becoming three or five in later whorls, lines of linked spiral pustules, tubercles or spines; these are linked by axial costae and varices are formed. Where there are two lines of protruberances they comprise a and d. When there are three lines, they are a, c and d. Where there are five spiral lines, d and e are very closely set, with a, c and d being stronger than b and e. The base of the last whorl carries up to six strong spiral bands.

Remarks. This taxon is highly variable in shape and ornamentation; Morris (Reference Morris and Forbes1856) recognised two varieties (which, under ICZN rules, are now regarded as subspecies), specimens from the Insect Limestone belong to T. acuta sensu stricto.

Family Melanopsidae H. & A. Adams, 1854

Genus Melanopsis Férussac, Reference Férussac1807

Synonymy. Nana Schumacher, Reference Schumacher1817 Melanithes Swainson, Reference Swainson1840 Canthidomus Swainson, Reference Swainson1840 Lyrcaea H. & A. Adams, 1854

Type species. Buccinum costata Gray, Reference Gray1847 (synonym of Buccinum praemorsus Linné, 1758 by original designated from southern Spain and North Africa).

Diagnosis. Subulate to turreted, thin shelled, smooth or ornamented with striations, aperture pyriform or oval, callus smooth.

Melanopsis carinata J. de C. Sowerby, Reference Sowerby1826

Plate 1, fig. 2

  1. 1826 Melanopsis carinata Sowerby, J. de C., vol. 6, p. 41, pl. 523, fig. 1.

  2. 1856 Melanopsis carinata Sowerby, J. de C.; Forbes, p. 156, pl. vi, figs 8 & 9.

  3. 1873 Macrospira carinata (Sowerby, J. de C.); Sandberger, pp. 248, 314; pl. 14, fig. 19; pl. 20, fig. 10.

  4. 1891 Melanopsis carinata Sowerby, J. de C.; Newton, p. 202.

  5. 1889 Melanopsis carinata Sowerby, J. de C.; Bristow et al., p. 292, fig. 66.

  6. 1929 Melanopsis carinata carinata Sowerby, J. de C.; Wenz, p. 2686.

  7. 1962 Melanopsis (Stylospirula) carinata (Sowerby, J. de C.); Glibert, p. 146.

Syntype. BMGD 43548. Sowerby Collection, Natural History Museum, London. Locality not recorded. The specimen appears to have been removed from its original small block as illustrated by Sowerby (Reference Sowerby1826, pl. 523 fig. 1).

Referred material. IWCMS.2007.9 Saltmead, Thorness, Isle of Wight.

Diagnosis. Small sized up to 17 mm, fusiform, slender, aperture pyriform; distinctive carina is formed along the suture.

Distribution. Barton Group to Solent Group (excluding Cranmore Member) (Bartonian, Middle Eocene to Rupelian, Early Oligocene) Isle of Wight, southwest Hampshire and southeast Dorset.

Description. (Table 2) Small in size, up to 17mm in height; width at last whorl up to 8mm. Fusiform in shape, with mean apical angle of 29°. Teleoconch of up to eight whorls. The early whorls may be either concave or shallowly convex. The last whorl, which forms two-thirds of the total shell height, appears to be shallowly convex, but in apertural view is subtly concavo-convex in profile. The adapical and abapical edges of the whorls are markedly flared, forming distinctive carinae along the sutures. The whorls are occasionally imbricate; however, the adapical edge of the whorl may rise above the flare. In the early whorls the suture is faint, becoming strong in the last whorl. The suture often shows ‘V’ and step-like interruptions. The line of the carina/suture may be sinuous. In the last whorl, the concave part of the shell is set above the top of the aperture. The shell is thin.

Table 2 Melanopsis carinata biometric data

The aperture is large and pyriform, becoming slit-like adapically: this slit is closed just behind the outer lip. The inductura is smooth and inflated; it is wide and forms a continuous convex arc from the base of the siphonal canal to the top of the aperture. The siphonal canal is short, deep but narrow, curved slightly towards the front of the shell. The inner surface of the outer lip is smooth.

The growth line is opisthocyrt, sinuous like a laterally flattened ‘S’. The growth line is faint to strong, strong where there is a break in growth indicated, coincident with a step or ‘V’-shaped interruption in the suture.

Remarks. This species is most similar to Melanopsis morrisi Wenz, Reference Wenz1928 which is also found within the Solent Group. However, the shell of M. carinata is more slender/fusiform and a shoulder is not formed. Melanopsis carinata is often very abundant and occurs with freshwater taxa such as Viviparus lentus. Melanopsis carinata is the most common melanopsid in the lower part of the Bembridge Marls Member.

Superfamily Rissooidea Gray, Reference Gray1847

Family Hydrobiidae Troschel, Reference Troschel1857

Subfamily Amnicolinae Tryon, Reference Tryon1863

Genus Potamaclis Sandberger, Reference Sandberger1873

Type species. Melania turritissima Forbes, Reference Forbes1853, by subsequent designation by Clessin (Reference Clessin1880), Oligocene (=Solent Group, Late Eocene–Early Oligocene), Hempstead (=Hamstead, Isle of Wight) and Hordwell (=Hordle, Hampshire), southern England.

Diagnosis. Small sized high-spired, turreted shells with convex whorls.

Occurrence. Europe, Eocene-Pliocene.

Potamaclis turritissima (Forbes Reference Forbes1853)

Plate 1, fig. 4

  1. 1853 Melania turritissima Forbes, p. 266.

  2. 1856 Melania turritissima Forbes; Morris in Forbes, p. 150, pl. 3, fig. 14.

  3. 1873 Potamaclis turritissima (Forbes); Sandberger, p. 312, pl. 10, figs 5–5c.

  4. 1891 Potamaclis turritissima (Forbes); Newton, p. 234.

  5. 1901 Potamaclis turritissima (Forbes); Newton, p. 67.

  6. 1921 Hydrobia (Potamaclis) turritissima (Forbes); Cossmann, p. 111, pl. 3, figs 79–80.

  7. 1929 Potamaclis turritissima (Forbes); Wenz, p. 2630.

  8. 1962 Potamaclis turritissima (Forbes); Glibert, p. 32.

  9. 1975 Potamaclis turritissima (Forbes); Castell, pl. 19, fig. 9.

Holotype. GSM 119911, Forbes Collection, British Geological Survey Museum.

Type locality and horizon. ‘Bembridge Series’ (=Bembridge Marls Member), Hamstead Cliff, Isle of Wight.

Referred material. IWCMS.2007.18, Thorness Bay, Isle of Wight.

Diagnosis. Small, needle-like shell comprising 12 or 13 whorls, slightly asymmetrical convex whorls with strongly adpressed suture.

Distribution. Headon Hill Formation, Bembridge Marls Member and Hamstead Member (Bouldnor Formation) of the Solent Group (Priabonian, Late Eocene to Rupelian, Early Oligocene), Isle of Wight and Hampshire, southern England.

Description. (Table 3) Small, up to 14 mm in height, width of last whorl up to 3 mm. Needle-like turreted in shape, teleoconch typically of 12–13 whorls. The whorls which are slightly asymmetrical are moderately convex. The suture is strong, adpressed. There is a slight overlap of the top of the whorl over the base of the previous whorl. The last whorl comprises approximately one third of the total shell height. The protoconch comprises one and a half whorls, which are smooth and expand rapidly.

Table 3 Potamaclis turritissima biometric data

The aperture is large, oval to slightly pyriform. The inductura is narrow, smooth and irregular in outline. The peristome is holostomatous. The shell is thick, the inner lip is smooth. The growth line is moderate to strongly opisthocyrt, the shell is otherwise smooth.

Remarks. This is a very distinctive taxon that occurs in vast numbers along bedding planes, particularly in the Bembridge Marls Member. Based upon shell shape and co-occurrence with molluscs such as Unio, Paul (Reference Paul1989) considered this extinct genus to have lived in fast-flowing freshwater. Specimen IWCMS.2007.18 comprises a current-aligned mass of shells associated with Melanopsis carinata J. de C. Sowerby, Reference Sowerby1826, a frequent association in the Solent Group (pers. obs.).

Order Architaenioglossa Haller, Reference Haller1890

Superfamily Ampullarioidea Gray Reference Gray1824

Family Viviparidae Gray, Reference Gray1847

Subfamily Viviparinae Gray, Reference Gray1847

Genus Viviparus Montfort, Reference Montfort1810

Synonymy. Vivipara J. Sowerby, Reference Sowerby1813. Paludina Lamarck, Reference Lamarck1822.

Type species. Helix vivipara Linnaeus, Reference Linnaeus1758, by original designation, distributed across Europe.

Diagnosis. Turbinate in shape, 20–60 mm in height, with concentrically growing horny operculum, sexual dimorphism with female shells larger and more inflated.

Occurrence. Northern Eurasia, Europe, Asia Minor and North America. Jurassic–Recent.

Viviparus angulosus (J. Sowerby Reference Sowerby1817)

Plate 1, fig. 5

  1. 1817 Phasianella orbicularis J. Sowerby, vol. 2, p. 167, pl. 175, fig. 1.

  2. 1817 Phasianella angulosa J. Sowerby, vol. 2, p. 168, pl. 175, fig. 2.

  3. 1835 Paludina angulosa (J. Sowerby); J. de C. Sowerby, p. 246.

  4. 1891 Viviparus angulosus (J. Sowerby); Newton, p. 225.

  5. 1975 Viviparus angulosus (J. Sowerby); Castell, pl. 17, fig. 13.

Syntype. BMGD. 43563. Sowerby Collection, Natural History Museum, London (two specimens).

Type locality and horizon. Shalcombe, Isle of Wight, Bembridge Limestone Formation (Solent Group).

Referred material. IWCMS.2007.1, Saltmead, Isle of Wight.

Diagnosis. Large, up to 45 mm turbinate, high spired, globose shell. Convex whorls with strong rounded carina at the whorl base, visible in internal moulds. Large rounded aperture.

Distribution. Headon Hill Formation, Bembridge Limestone Formation and Bembridge Marls Member (Bouldnor Formation), Solent Group (Priabonian, Late Eocene to Rupelian, Early Oligocene), Isle of Wight and Hampshire, southern England.

Description. (Table 4) Large, up to 45mm in height; width at the last whorl up to 40mm. Turbinate, high-spired, globose shell shape. Teleoconch of up to five convex whorls. The whorls are asymmetrical being shallowly convex on the apertural side, more convex on the opposite. The suture is strong, impressed, on internal moulds the suture is canaliculate. The last whorl comprises almost three-quarters of the total shell height. On internal moulds there is a strong, but rounded carina visible at the base of the whorl. Where the shell is preserved, this is not so obvious. Protoconch imperfectly known but comprises of at least one and a half convex whorls. Start of teleoconch defined by onset of shallower whorl development.

Table 4 Viviparus angulosus biometric data

1 Syntypes of Vivipara angulosa, Bembridge Limestone Formation

2 Syntype of Vivipara orbicularis, Bembridge Limestone Formation

3 Syntype of Vivipara orbicularis, ‘Headon Beds’

The aperture is large and round. The inductura is narrow and irregular in extent and surface shape. The peristome is holostomatous. The shell is thin.

The growth lines are moderate to strong, prosocline. Attenuation of growth is marked by strong growth line development. The early whorls carry up to seven evenly spaced fine spiral cords. These eventually (by the third whorl?) become obscured by closely spaced growth lines.

Remarks. This species is found almost exclusively in limestones in the Solent Group and is particularly abundant in the Bembridge Limestone Formation. It is substantially larger than Viviparus lentus (Solander Reference Solander1766), which is found within clastic sediments in the Solent Group. Paul (Reference Paul1989) used the extant Pomacea spp. which occupies well weeded pools in the Florida Everglades as an analogue for V. angulosus. The extant British species V. viviparus and V. fasciatus are both found in hard water areas (Macan Reference Macan1977); the latter is known to occupy stagnant water. Viviparus angulous is known from a single specimen from the Insect Limestone at Thorness. This specimen is extremely useful, as examples from the Bembridge Limestone Formation are usually internal moulds, or the shell is more or less coarsely re-crystallised calcite, which obscures surface details.

Viviparus lentus (Solander Reference Solander1766)

Plate 1, fig. 6

  1. 1766 Helix lenta Solander, p. 29; pl. iv, fig. 60.

  2. 1813 Vivipara lenta (Solander); J. Sowerby, vol. 1, p. 79; pl. 31, fig. 3.

  3. 1891 Viviparus lentus (Solander); Newton, p. 225.

  4. 1975 Viviparus lentus (Solander); Castell, pl. 17, fig. 14.

Holotype. ? NHMUK G.98292 Brander Collection, Natural History Museum, London.

Type locality and horizon. Headon Hill Formation, Hordle, Hampshire.

Referred material. NHMUK G.57288, NHMUK G.57289, Gurnard Bay, Isle of Wight. MIWG.6545, Totland Bay, Isle of Wight.

Diagnosis. Medium-sized, up to 28 mm high, turbinate globose with convex whorls. Suture strong and impressed. Weak spiral ornament largely obscured by strong prosocline growth lines. Aperture large and round.

Distribution. Solent Group (Priabonian, Late Eocene to Rupelian, Early Oligocene), Isle of Wight and southwest Hampshire, southern England.

Description. (Table 5) Medium-sized, up to 28 mm in height, width at last whorl up to 22 mm. Turbinate globose in shape, high-spired with step-like outline. Teleoconch of four moderately convex, shouldered whorls. The suture is strong impressed. The last whorl comprises over two thirds of the total shell height. The protoconch is typically absent.

Table 5 Viviparus lentus biometric data

The aperture is large and round. The inductura is narrow but thick, commonly eroded revealing successive laminae, the leading edge is frequently broken and irregular. However, the inductura is continuous from the base of the aperture to the top of the outer lip. The shell is thick and the inner surface of the shell is smooth. The peristome is holostomatous. The umbilicus, which is mostly obscured, appears to be shallow, with a rounded edge.

The growth lines are fine to strong and densely packed, shallowly prosocline. The shell is ornamented with numerous very fine threads. Otherwise, there are two stronger threads, the upper of which defines the shoulder in the upper one quarter of the whorl and the lower is located along the midline of the whorl, dropping towards the base of the whorl in the last whorl. The shell appears superficially smooth and shiny.

Remarks. Considerably smaller than V. angulosus, Viviparus lentus is abundant in argillaceous sediments within the Solent Group, and is also present in arenaceous units such as the Seagrove Bay Member. Paul (Reference Paul1989) correlated the occurrence of V. lentus with fluvial and lacustrine facies. Viviparus lentus is known from two specimens from the Insect Limestone, collected from Gurnard. The shells appear to be a slightly unusual lithology; however not beyond the range of lithologies seen in the Thorness Bay section.

Subclass Euthyneura Spengel, Reference Spengel1881

Order Pulmonata Cuvier, Reference Cuvier1817

Suborder Stylommatophora A. Schmidt, Reference Schmidt1855

Superfamily Pupilloidea Turton, Reference Turton1831

Family Valloniidae Morse, Reference Morse1864

Subfamily Acanthinulinae Steenberg, Reference Steenberg1917

Genus Acanthinula Beck, Reference Beck1847

Type species. Helix aculeata Müller, Reference Müller1774, by subsequent designated by Albers & Martens (Reference Albers and Marten1860), distributed in northwest and southern Europe.

Diagnosis. Small, conical, with up to four well rounded whorls, aperture round, regularly spaced sharp ribs.

Occurrence. Europe and North America, Eocene to Recent.

Remarks. The extant Acanthinula aculeata (Müller Reference Müller1774) is found in woodland and scrub, occasionally in more open habitats (Kerney & Cameron Reference Kerney and Cameron1979).

?Acanthinula sp.

Plate 1, fig. 7

Material. NHMUK GG. 22904, Sticelets, Thorness Bay, Isle of Wight.

Description. Small, 1.5mm in height and width. Turbinate globose shell shape. Teleoconch of four convex whorls. The suture is strong impressed. The protoconch is unknown. Aperture shape unknown. Growth lines fine opisthocyrt. Numerous fine curved ribs.

Remarks. Resembles Strobilops pseudolabyrinthica (Sandberger Reference Sandberger1873). However, in the specimen from the Insect Limestone, the whorls are slightly more shouldered and convex.

Subordinal Grade Basommatophora Kerferstein, Reference Keferstein and Bronn1864

Superfamily Lymnaeoidea Rafinesque, Reference Rafinesque1815

Family Lymnaeidae Rafinesque, Reference Rafinesque1815

Subfamily Lymnaeinae Rafinesque, Reference Rafinesque1815

Genus Lymnaea Lamarck, Reference Lamarck1799

Subgenus Galba Schrank, Reference Schrank1803

Synonymy. Stagnocola Leach in Jeffreys, Reference Leach and Jeffreys1830 Limnophysa Fitzinger, Reference Fitzinger1833 Omphiscola Beck, Reference Beck1838 non Rafinesque, Reference Rafinesque1819 Leptolimnaea Swainson, Reference Swainson1840

Type species. Buccinum truncatulum Müller, Reference Müller1774, type species by subsequent designated under the plenary powers (ICZN 2001, p. 33), distributed in northwest and southern Europe.

Dignosis. Small to large sized; elongate-oval with convex whorls; aperture narrowly oval; columella straight; umbilicus slit-shaped.

Occurrence. Europe, North America, South America, Asia, Africa. Jurassic–Recent.

Remarks. The type species Lymnaea (Galba) truncatula is extant and widespread in Europe and the Middle East. It is found in rivers and small streams and the edges of ditches (Macan Reference Macan1977).

Lymnaea (Galba) longiscata (Brongniart Reference Brongniart1810)

Plate 1, figs. 8–9

  1. 1809 Lymnée effilée Brard, vol. 14, p. 432, pl. 27, figs 15–16.

  2. 1810 Limneus longiscatus Brongniart, p. 372, pl. 22, fig. 9.

  3. 1822b Limnaea longiscata Brongniart; Sowerby, J., vol. 4, p. 57, pl. 343.

  4. 1852 Limnaea longiscata Brongniart; Edwards, p. 85, pl. xii, figs 3a–3b.

  5. 1863 Limnaea longiscata Brongniart; Deshayes, vol. 2, p. 722.

  6. 1889 Limnaea longiscata Brongniart; Cossmann, fasc. 4, p. 329.

  7. 1891 Limnaea longiscata Brongniart; Newton, p. 278.

  8. 1913 Limnaea longiscata Brongniart; Cossmann & Pissarro, vol. 2, pl. LVI, fig. 53-1.

  9. 1923 Galba (Galba) longiscata longiscata (Brongniart); Wenz, vol. 4, pp 1373–1384.

  10. 1975 Galba longiscata (Brongniart); Castell, p. 84, pl. 27, fig. 7.

  11. 1989 Stagnicola longiscata (Brongniart); Fischer, p. 348.

Type material. Repository unknown.

Type locality and horizon. Unknown.

Referred material. MIWG.852 and MIWG.4215, Thorness Bay, Isle of Wight; MIWG. 3611, MIWG.6013, MIWG.6016, Gurnard, Isle of Wight; MIWG.4536–MIWG.4538, Saltmead, Isle of Wight; MIWG.4551, Gurnard Point, Isle of Wight; IWCMS.2007.17 Saltmead, Isle of Wight; IWCMS.2007.21, Saltmead, Isle of Wight. NHMUK G.37984–G.37989, NHMUK G.57301–NHMUK G.57304, BMGD.57295–BMGD. 57300, all from Gurnard, Isle of Wight.

Diagnosis. Large, up to 35mm, fusiform with moderately convex whorls, strong, adpressed suture, aperture large and flattened oval shape, thin smooth shell.

Distribution. Solent Group (Priabonian, Late Eocene to Rupelian, Early Oligocene), Isle of Wight and Hampshire, southern England. Bacini Continentali (Eocene–Oligocene) Majorca, Spain. La Calcaire Lacustre de Saint-Ouen (Bartonian), Paris Basin, France.

Description. (Table 6) Large-sized, up to 28 mm in height; width at last whorl up to 12 mm. Fusiform in shape, with an apical angle between 34° and 36° (data based upon specimens from the Insect Limestone). Teleoconch of up to six shallowly convex whorls. The suture is strong adpressed. Sutural angle between 15° and 20°. The last whorl, which is sometimes shouldered, comprises two-thirds of the total shell height. Protoconch comprising one and a half shallow, convex whorls.

Table 6 Lymnaea (Galba) longiscata biometric data

The aperture is large, flattened oval-shaped. The inductura is smooth and narrow, with an irregular/broken adaxial margin. The shell is thin, the inner surface of which is smooth. The peristome is uninterrupted; however, the abapical margin of the peristome is slightly flattened. The columella has a single, broad flat plication, there is a small umbilical slit, usually obscured by the inductura. The growth lines are faint, prosocyrt, the shell is smooth.

Remarks. Wenz (Reference Wenz and Pompeckj1923) provides an extensive synonymy for this taxon. Both Sowerby (Reference Sowerby1822b) and Edwards (Reference Edwards1852) noted that this shell is highly variable in form. Edwards proposed a variety (subspecies) distorta (Edwards Reference Edwards1852, p. 86, pl. 12, figs 3e–h) to accommodate the most extreme variation of the shell with a shorter aperture and higher sutural slope, giving a partly uncoiled, distorted appearance. Due to their morphoanatomic uniformity, the classification of the Lymnaeidae into subgenera is difficult (Bargues & Mas-Coma Reference Bargues and Mas-Coma1997). Lymnaea (Galba) longiscata shows a range of characters seen in the extant subgenera of Lymnaea, namely (L.) Lymnaea, Galba and Radix. The subgenus Stagnicola was synonymised on the basis of 18S rDNA sequences with Lymnaea by Bargues & Mas-Coma (Reference Bargues and Mas-Coma1997). Due to the difficulty in separating the different subgenera, herein Galba is retained, as it is the subgeneric name most frequently used to accommodate this widespread taxon.

Specimens collected from the Insect Limestone generally have their shells preserved and are frequently found in groups that appear to have drifted together. Preservation, which is generally excellent, varies from a white-grey colour to black with pyrite growth. This species is particularly abundant in the Bembridge Limestone Formation and throughout the freshwater parts of the Solent Group. Paul (Reference Paul1989) remarked that the numerous forms of Lymnaea described by Edwards (Reference Edwards1852) are almost certainly shape varieties of the larger species (in the Solent Group); therefore care should be used when identifying lymnaeids from the Solent Group. These nominal taxa require further study before formal synonymisation can be undertaken.

There are some similarities between Lymnaea (Galba) longiscata (Brongniart Reference Brongniart1810) and Palaeoglandina costellata (J. Sowerby Reference Sowerby1822b). The latter is ornamented with fine axial ribs, the suture less pronounced, with the proceeding whorl over – lapping the previous whorl.

Superfamily Planorboidea Rafinesque, Reference Rafinesque1815

Family Planorbidae Rafinesque, Reference Rafinesque1815

Subfamily Planorbinae Rafinesque, Reference Rafinesque1815

Genus Planorbarius Froriep, Reference Froriep and Duméril1806

Synonymy. Planorbina Haldeman, Reference Haldeman1842 (part)

Type species. Helix corneus Linnaeus, Reference Linnaeus1758, by original designation, distribution northwest and southern Europe.

Diagnosis. Planispiral, small to large sized, whorls rounded, aperture subcircular-oval.

Occurrence. Late Eocene to Recent, Europe, North Africa and Asia.

Remarks. Historically, planorbid generic assignment has been influenced by geographical distribution (see summary and discussion by McKenna et al Reference Mckenna, Robinson and Taylor1962), with Planorbarius, Froriep, Reference Froriep and Duméril1806 used for some European forms. Based upon the systematic usage of Zilch (Reference Zilch and Schindewolf1959–60), Paul (Reference Paul1989) used Australorbis Pilsbry, Reference Pilsbry1934 to accommodate the larger planorbids from the Solent Group; however, Paul (Reference Paul1989) noted that Australorbis may be a synonym of Biomphalaria Preston, Reference Preston1910. Herein the generic name Planorbarius is retained; however, there is clearly a case for review.

Planorbarius discus (Edwards Reference Edwards1852)

Plate 1, fig. 10

  1. 1852 Planorbis discus Edwards, p. 102; pl. xv, figs 7a–b.

  2. 1873 Planorbis discus Edwards; Sandberger, p. 285; pl. xvi, fig. 4 p.

  3. 1891 Planorbis discus Edwards; Newton, p. 281.

  4. 1923 Planorbina (Planorbina) discus (Edwards); Wenz vol. 5, pp. 482–1484.

  5. 1964 Planorbis (Coretus) cf. discus (Edwards); Soyer, p. 145.

  6. 1971 Planorbina discus (Edwards); Castell, pl. 27, fig. 4.

  7. 1989 Australorbis discus (Edwards); Paul, p. 157.

  8. 1995 Planorbarius cf discus (Edwards); Le Renard, p.66608.

Syntypes. NHMUK GG.6933 and NHMUK GG.6934 (ex BMGD.71078), Sconce, Isle of Wight.

Type locality and horizon. Sconce, Isle of Wight, Bembridge Limestone Formation.

Referred material. BMGD.83039 Gurnard Bay, Isle of Wight. MIWG.4535, Saltmead Ledge, Thorness, Isle of Wight.

Diagnosis. Large, up to 37 mm in diameter, planispiral, four whorls, smooth. Adapical side shallowly convex, abapical side concave.

Distribution. Headon Hill Formation, Bembridge Limestone Formation (Solent Group), Bembridge Marls Member and Hamstead Member (Bouldnor Formation, Solent Group), Isle of Wight and Hampshire, southern England.

Description. (Table 7) Large-sized, up to 37 mm in diameter, height up to 10 mm. Planispiral in shape. Teleoconch of up to four convex whorls. The adapical side is shallowly convex, the abapical side concave. The suture is strong, grooved. The whorls expand gradually. Protoconch obscured.

Table 7 Planorbarius discus (Edwards, Reference Edwards1852) biometric data

The whorls are the same shape as the aperture, which is a shallow asymmetrical oval, with the abapical edge of the peristome more convex adaxially. The shell is thin and the inner surface smooth. The peristome is holostomatous. The growth lines are moderately pronounced and prosocyrt.

Remarks. This taxon is common in the limestones of the Solent Group and is the largest planorbid present in the Insect Limestone.

Genus Gyraulus Charpentier, Reference Charpentier1837

Synonymy. Planaria Brown, Reference Brown1827 non Müller, Reference Müller1774. Trochlea Haldeman, Reference Haldeman1841. Nautilina Stein, Reference Stein1850 (part). Giraulus Moquin-Tandon, Reference Moquin-Tandon1855. Gyrulus Gray, Reference Gray1857.

Type species. Planorbis hispidus Draparnaud, Reference Draparnaud1805, by subsequent designated by Wenz (Reference Wenz and Pompeckj1923, p. 1540). Distributed over Europe, northern Asia and North Africa.

Diagnosis. Planispiral, small to large sized, whorls rounded, aperture subcircular-oval.

Occurrence. Jurassic to Recent, Europe, North Africa and Asia.

Gyraulus similis (Férussac, Reference Férussac1814)

Plate 1 fig. 11

  1. 1809 Planorbe arrondi Brard, p. 433, pl. 27, figs 19–20.

  2. 1810 Planorbis rotundatus Brongniart, p. 370, pl. 22, figs 4–5 non Poiret, Reference Poiret1801.

  3. 1814 Planorbis similis Férussac, p. 61.

  4. 1847 Planorbis platystoma Wood, p. 118.

  5. 1852 Planorbis rotundatus Brongniart; Edwards, p. 100, pl. 15, figs 4a–c.

  6. 1852 Planorbis platystoma Wood; Edwards, p. 103, pl. 15, figs 2a–d.

  7. 1873 Planorbis (Menetus) goniobasis Sandberger, p. 272, pl. 15, figs 21–21b.

  8. 1891 Planorbis goniobasis Sandberger; Newton, p. 282.

  9. 1891 Planorbis platystoma Edwards; Newton, p. 283.

  10. 1901 Planorbis (Menetus) goniobasis Sandberger; Newton, p. 67.

  11. 1901 Planorbis platystoma Edwards; Newton, p. 67.

  12. 1923 Planorbina (Planorbina) similis (Férussac); Wenz, p. 1505.

  13. 1962 Planorbis similis Férussac; Glibert, p. 85.

Type material. Repository unknown.

Type horizon and locality. Unknown.

Referred material. IWCMS.2007.15, IWCMS.2007.16; both from Saltmead, Thorness Bay, Isle of Wight.

Diagnosis. Large, up to 30 mm, planispiral, convex whorls, aperture oval, adapical surface deeply concave.

Distribution. Headon Hill Formation, Bembridge Limestone Formation (Solent Group), Bembridge Marls Member and Hamstead Member (Bouldnor Formation, Solent Group), Isle of Wight and Hampshire, southern England.

Description. Large-sized, up to 30 mm in diameter, height up to 8 mm. Planispiral in shape. Teleoconch of up to seven convex whorls, the adapical surface of which are flattened. The adapical side is very shallowly convex, the abapical side deeply concave. The suture is strong, grooved. The whorls expand gradually. Protoconch obscured.

The aperture is oval in shape. The shell is thin and the inner surface smooth. The peristome is holostomatous. The growth lines are fine to moderately strong, prosocyrt.

Remarks. Small specimens of this taxon are fairly common in the Insect Limestone.

Genus Hippeutis Charpentier, Reference Charpentier1837

Synonymy. Hippeutis Gray, Reference Gray1857.

Type species. Helix complanata Linnaeus, Reference Linnaeus1758, by subsequent designation by Clessin (Reference Clessin, Küster, Martini and Chemnitz1886).

Diagnosis. Planispiral, small sized, whorls carinated, aperture oblique, subcircular-oval.

Occurrence. Paleocene to Recent, Europe, North Africa and Asia.

Hippeutis headonensis (Jodot Reference Jodot1942)

Plate 1, fig. 12

  1. 1852 Planorbis lens sensu Edwards non Brongniart, p. 104, pl. 15, fig 8a–d.

  2. 1891 Planorbis lens Brongniart; Newton, p. 282.

  3. 1901 Planorbis lens Brongniart; Newton, p. 67.

  4. 1942 Planorbis (Hippeutis) headonensis, Jodot, p. 175.

Lectotype. NHMUK G.71081a Edwards Collection, Natural History Museum, London. Edwards (Reference Edwards1852) pl. 15, fig 8a. Paralectotypes, six specimens NHMUK G.71081 b–g, Edwards Collection, Natural History Museum, London.

Type horizon and locality. Headon Hill Formation, Headon Hill, Isle of Wight.

Referred material. IWCMS.2007.11 Sticelets, Thorness Bay, Isle of Wight; IWCMS.2007.14 Saltmead, Thorness Bay, Isle of Wight.

Diagnosis. Small, planispiral, midline of whorl with sharp carina.

Distribution. Headon Hill Formation, Bembridge Limestone Formation (Solent Group), Bembridge Marls Member and Hamstead Member (Bouldnor Formation, Solent Group), Isle of Wight and Hampshire, southern England.

Description. Small-sized, up to 8 mm in diameter, height up to 1.5 mm. Planispiral in shape. Teleoconch of up to four shallowly convex whorls, of which the abapical surfaces are more convex. Above the midline of the whorls there is a rounded carina, giving the whorl an angular shape. The adapical surface is shallowly convex, the abapical side is less shallowly concave. The suture is strong, grooved. The whorls expand rapidly. Protoconch obscured.

The whorls are the same shape as the aperture which is flattened oval in outline. The shell is thin and the inner surface smooth. The peristome is holostomatous. The growth lines are fine to moderately strong, prosocyrt.

Remarks. Edwards (Reference Edwards1852) discussed at length the identity of this shell, concluding that it was identical with Planorbis lens Brongniart, Reference Brongniart1810. Jodot (Reference Jodot1942) observed that the carina in Planorbis lens Brongniart, Reference Brongniart1810 is sharper, the whorls less convex and the sutures less pronounced than those seen in the English shells; there does however seem to be no difference in the position of the carina in both forms. Edwards makes reference to the illustrations of P. lens by Deshayes (Reference Deshayes1837 vol 2, pl. IX, figs 11–13) which show a much flatter shell than the specimens from the Solent Group, supporting Jodot's conclusion (Reference Jodot1942). It is uncommon in the Insect Limestone.

2. Discussion

Only the pulmonate gastropod Lymnaea (Galba) longiscata (Brongniart Reference Brongniart1810) can be said to be common in the Insect Limestone. It is found both as single specimens and as small groupings of shells showing some indication of current alignment (pers. obs.), sometimes associated with leaves of Typha. Extant, large lymnaeids are usually found in bigger water bodies (Macan Reference Macan1977, Boycott Reference Boycott1934). The extant Lymnaea stagnalis (Linnaeus Reference Linnaeus1758) which is larger than Lymnaea (Galba) longiscata, is unable to establish itself in swiftly flowing water, so it is confined to slow-moving rivers, lakes and canals (Ellis Reference Ellis1926), Lymnaea (Galba) truncatula (Müller Reference Müller1774) is common in well-aerated waters, in canals and marshes and on wet mud by rivers, lakes and water meadows (Ellis Reference Ellis1926). Despite some records (see Paul Reference Paul1989) of lymnaeids found in brackish water, they are essentially occupants of freshwater. Plaziat & Younis (Reference Plaziat and Younis2005) recorded that Lymnaea shells commonly float and are stranded on the shores of the Shatt al Arab. Within the Solent Group, Lymnaea (Galba) longiscata can be found in the brackish water setting of the Colwell Bay Member. These could be interpreted as drifted specimens from a nearby freshwater source. Lymnaea (Galba) longiscata is abundant in the underlying Bembridge Limestone Formation and in other limestones within the Solent Group; this can be taken to indicate a preference for alkaline, hard waters.

Of the planorbids, the extant Hippeutis complanatus (Linnaeus Reference Linnaeus1758) is found on weeds in ponds, canals, ditches and marshes, and Planorbarius corneus (Linnaeus Reference Linnaeus1758) is found in ponds, canals, marshes and rivers (Ellis Reference Ellis1926). Plaziat & Younis (Reference Plaziat and Younis2005) recorded that Gyraulus in the tributaries of the Shatt al Arab typically lives on the submerged portions of rooted plants and is usually associated with the most diverse mollusc assemblages. Planorbarius discus (Edwards Reference Edwards1852), like Lymnaea (Galba) longiscata, is abundant in the Bembridge Limestone Formation; likewise indicating a preference for hard water. However, it is uncommon in the Insect Limestone, with just a small number of specimens found. They are both as isolated specimens and in groups associated with Lymnaea (Galba) longiscata. Paul (Reference Paul1989) notes the association of larger planorbids with well weeded water.

The rare finds of Tarebia acuta (J. Sowerby Reference Sowerby1822a) are mostly as isolated specimens. It is found in super-abundance in the Solent Group, in particular the Bembridge Marls Member, the rare finds of these shells in the Insect Limestone indicates they were not living in the Insect Limestone environment. Tarebia granifera (Lamarck Reference Lamarck1822) in Thailand is common in lakes, ponds, rivers, canals and creeks and even enters the tidal zone (Brandt Reference Brandt1974).

Melanopsis spp. are common throughout most of the Solent Group; however, they are rare in limestones (pers. obs.), indicating avoidance of hard water. Colonisation of variable salinity streams by Melanopsis praemorsa (Linné 1758) in southeast Spain was studied by Velasco et al. (Reference Velasco, Millán, Hernández, Cayetano, Abellán, Sánchez and Ruiz2006), who reported that colonisation only occurred when salinities fell below 3.5‰ with water temperatures between 12.3°C and 33.7°C, typically in runs but absent from pools.

As with the lymnaeids and planorbids, viviparids indicate well weeded hard water. Extant Viviparus from Europe live in hard water areas with slight to moderate current and appear to thrive in water where there is a considerable amount of particulate matter in suspension. They are, however, extremely sensitive to any increase in salinity above 3‰ (Fretter & Graham Reference Fretter and Graham1962).

There is a single record of a land snail in the Insect Limestone Acanthinula sp.; extant forms are found in damp woodland habitats (Kerney & Cameron Reference Kerney and Cameron1979), indicating the proximity of such to the depocentre or feeder streams.

Daley (Reference Daley1972) recognised four molluscan assemblages in the Bembridge Marls Member, representing a range of salinity and hydrological conditions. The dominance of pulmonate gastropods was used by Daley to indicate a lake margin setting. The gastropods present in the Insect Limestone represent freshwater conditions. However, the abundance of brine shrimps Brachipodites vectensis and salt pseudomorphs indicates that more saline influences occurred at times. In other Solent Group limestones where Lymnaea (Galba) longiscata occurs, it is in greater abundances than seen in the Insect Limestone. A possible conclusion would be that the gastropods were washed in. Potamaclis turritissima (Forbes Reference Forbes1853) indicates that fast flowing water was feeding into the system. Extant lymnaeids occur in both standing and moving waters; this indicates a flow of hard, freshwater into the environment. If we are to accept Paul's (Reference Paul1989) interpretation of the mode of life of Viviparus angulosus along with the other analogues, we can build up a picture of well weeded freshwater ponds and water courses. An alternative interpretation would require layering of the waters, with a salinity gradient, allowing gastropods to occupy lake margins or the upper parts of plants. Significantly, molluscs seem to be restricted to exposures in the Gurnard and Thorness area, principally near Sticelets and Saltmead. This same pattern was noted for the floral remains by Reid & Chandler (Reference Reid and Chandler1926), possibly indicating proximity to flood prone influxes of freshwater or indeed the water margin.

3. Acknowledgements

Andrew Ross (NMS) is acknowledged for inviting me to write this review of molluscs from the Insect Limestone. I thank Jon Todd (NHM) for access to collections and, along with Steve Tracey, for conversations about snails. Mike Bishop (Isle of Wight County Museum Service) is thanked for access to collections. Most importantly, Andy Yule of Cowes is thanked for the finds, the enthusiasm and the years of effort he has put into the Insect Limestone and its fossils.

References

4. References

Adams, H. & Adams, A. 1853–1858. The genera of recent Mollusca arranged according to their organization. 2 vols. London: J. Van Vorst. 484 pp; 661 pp.Google Scholar
Albers, J. & Marten, E. von. 1860. Die Heliceen nach natuerlicher Verwandtschaft. Vol. 2. Leipzig: Ausgabe. Engelmann. 394 pp.Google Scholar
Bargues, M. D. & Mas-Coma, S. 1997. Phylogenetic analysis of lymnaeid snails based upon 18S rDNA sequences. Molecular Biology and Evolution 14, 569–77.Google Scholar
Beck, H. 1838. Index Molluscorum Praesentis Aevi Musei Principis Augustissimi Christiani Frederici 2, 101124. Hafinae.Google Scholar
Beck, H. 1847. Verrzeichniss einer sammlung von landconchylien aus den Dänischen staaten in Europa, bestehend aus 2058 individuen, darstellend 158 arten, die zu 44 geschlectern gehören, eingesondt in folge allerhöchsten befehls zur versammlung Deutscher natorforscher und aerzte in kiel in jahre 1846 aus dem könglichen particulären zoologischen museum. Bericht üder die Versammlung DeutscherNatorforscher und Aerzle 24, 122–24.Google Scholar
Bourguignat, A. 1854. Aménités malacologiques. XX: Simple note sur les genres Cyrena, Sphaerium et Pisidium. Revue et Magazine Zoologique 6, 663–64.Google Scholar
Boycott, A. E. 1934. The habitats of fresh-water Mollusca in Britain. Journal of Ecology 22, 138.Google Scholar
Brandt, R. A. M. 1974. The non-marine aquatic Mollusca of Thailand. Archiv für Molluskenkunde 105, 1423.Google Scholar
Brard, P. 1809. Mémoire sur les coquilles fossils du genre Lymnée qui se trouvent aux environs de Paris, sur les autres coquilles qui les accompagnent, et sur la nature des pierres qui renferment ces fossils. Annales du Muséum d'Histoire Naturelle 14, 426–40, pl. 27.Google Scholar
Bristow, H. W., Reid, C. & Strahan, A. 1889. The geology of the Isle of Wight. Memoir of the Geological Survey of England and Wales. 349 pp. London: HMSO.Google Scholar
Brongniart, A. 1810. Sur des terrains qui paroissent avoir été formés sous l'eau douce. Annales du Muséum d'Histoire Naturelle 15, 357406.Google Scholar
Brot, A. 1874. Die Melaniaceen (Melanidae) in Abbildungen nach der Natur. pp. 1488, 49 plates. In Küster, H. C., Martini, F. W. & Chemnitz, J. H. (eds) Systematiches Conchylien-Cabinet. Nürnberg: Bauer & Raspe Bd 1 Abt. 24.Google Scholar
Brown, T. 1827. Illustrations of the Conchology of Great Britain. Edinburgh: W. H. & D. Lizars. 52 plates.Google Scholar
Castell, C. P. 1958. British Caenozoic Fossils. London: Trustees of the British Museum (Natural History). 132 pp.Google Scholar
Castell, C. P. 1971. British Caenozoic Fossils. London: Trustees of the British Museum (Natural History). 132 pp.Google Scholar
Castell, C. P. 1975. British Caenozoic Fossils. London: Trustees of the British Museum (Natural History). 132 pp.Google Scholar
Charpentier, J. De. 1837. Catalogue des mollusques terrestres et fluviatiles de la Suisse. Formant la seconde partie de la faune Helvétique. Neue Denkschriften der Allgemeinen Schweizerische Gesellschaft für die Gesammten Naturwissenschaften 1, 128.Google Scholar
Clessin, S. 1880. Studien über die familie dre Paludinen. Malakozoologische Blätter, New Series 2, 161–96.Google Scholar
Clessin, S. 1886. Die familie der Limaeden enthaltend die genera Plamorbis, Limnaeus, Physa, und Amphipeplea. In Küster, H. C., Martini, F. W. & Chemnitz, J. H. (eds) Systematiches Conchylien-Cabinet Band 1, 310430. Nürnberg: Bauer & Raspe.Google Scholar
Conrad, T. A. 1846. Observations of the geology of a part of East Florida, with a catalogue of recent shells of the coast. American Journal of Science and Arts 52, 3645.Google Scholar
Cossmann, M. 1889. Catalogue illustré des coquilles fossiles de l'Eocene des environs de Paris. Annales de la Société Royale Malacologique de Belgique 24. 380 pp.Google Scholar
Cossmann, M. 1909. Essais de Paléoconchologie Comparée. Huitieme Livraison. Paris: Chez l'auteur. 248 pp.Google Scholar
Cossmann, M. 1921. Essais de Paléoconchologie Comparée: Livraison 12. Paris: Published by the author. 338 pp+6 pls.Google Scholar
Cossmann, M. & Pissarro, G. 1910–1913. Iconographie complete des coquilles fossiles de l'Eocene des environs de Paris. 2: Scaphopodes, Gastropodes, Brachiopodes, Céphalopodes & Supplément, Pl. 65. Paris: Hermann.Google Scholar
Cox, L. R. 1960. Thoughts on the classification of the Gastropoda. Proceedings of the Malacological Society of London 33, 267–77.Google Scholar
Cuvier, G. 1797. Tableau élémentaire de l'historie des animaux. Paris: Baillère. 710 pp.Google Scholar
Cuvier, G. 1817. Mémoires pour Servir à l'Histoire et l'Anatomie Des Mollusques. Paris: Déterville.Google Scholar
Daley, B. 1972. Macroinvertebrate asemblages from the Bembridge Marls (Oligocene) of the Isle of Wight, England, and their environmental significance. Palaeogeography, Palaeoclimatology, Palaeoecology 11, 1132.Google Scholar
Deshayes, G. P. 1824–1837. Description des coquilles fossiles des environs de Paris 3, Paris: Baillière. 1206 pp.Google Scholar
Deshayes, G. P. 1856–1866. Description des animaux sans vertèbres découverts dans le bassin de Paris pour servir de supplément à la description des coquilles fossiles des environs de Paris, comprenant une revue générale de toutes les espèces actuellement connues. Paris: Baillière. 2538 pp.Google Scholar
Draparnaud, J. P. R. 1805. Histoire Naturelle des Mollusques Terrestres et Fluviatiles de la France. Paris: D. Colas. 34 pp.Google Scholar
Edwards, F. E. 1852. The Eocene Cephalopoda and univalves of England. Part 2: Pulmonata. Monograph of the Palaeontographical Society 18 (part of Vol. 6), 57122, pls 10–15. London: The Palaeontographical Society.Google Scholar
Ellis, A. E. 1926. British Snails: A guide to the non-marine Gastropoda of Great Britain and Ireland Pliocene to Recent. Oxford: The Clarendon Press, 275 pp.Google Scholar
Férussac, J. B. L. d'Audebard de. 1807. Essai d'une méthode conchyliologique, appliqué aux mollusques fluviatiles et terrestres. Bibliothèque Universelle des Sciences 64, 119360.Google Scholar
Férussac, J. B. L. d'Audebard de. 1814. Mémoires géologiques sur les terrains formés sous l'eau douce par les debris fossils des Mollusques vivants sur la terre ou dans l'eau non sale. Paris: Chez Poulet, Imprimeur-Libraire.Google Scholar
Férussac, J. B. L. d'Audebard de & Deshayes, G. P. 1819–51. Histoire naturelle, générale et particulière des mollusques terrestres et fluviatiles, tant des espèces que l'on trouve aujourd'hui vivantes, que des dépouilles fossils de celles qui n'existent plus, classes d'apres les caractères essentials que presentment ces animaux et leurs coquilles. 4 vols, Paris: Baillière, 1012 pp+247 pls.Google Scholar
Fischer, J. C. 1989. Fossiles de France. Paris: Masson. 479 pp.Google Scholar
Fitzinger, L. F. 1833. Systematisches verzeichniss de rim erzherzothume oesterreich vorkommenden weichthière als prodrum einer fauna derselben. Beiträge zur Landeskunde Österreich's unter der Enns. Herausgegeben auf Verlassung der Nieder-Osesterr. Stände von einem Vereine für Vaterländische Geschichte, Statistik und Topographie 3, 88122.Google Scholar
Forbes, E. 1853. On the Fluvio-Marine Tertiaries of the Isle of Wight. Quarterly Journal of the Geological Society, London 9, 259–70.10.1144/GSL.JGS.1853.009.01-02.37Google Scholar
Forbes, E. 1856. On the Tertiary fluvio-marine formation of the Isle of Wight. Memoirs of the Geological Survey of Great Britain. London: Longman Green & Longman. 162 pp.Google Scholar
Fretter, V. & Graham, A. 1962. British Prosobranch Molluscs. London: The Ray Society. 755 pp.Google Scholar
Froriep, L. F. 1806. In Duméril, C. Analytische Zoologie. Aus dem Französischen mit zusatzen. Weimar: L.F. Froriep. 244 pp.Google Scholar
Genner, J., Todd, J. A., Michel, E., Erpenbeck, D., Jimoh, A., Joyce, D. D., Piechocki, A. & Pointier, J. P. 2007. Amassing diversity in an ancient lake: evolution of a morphologically diverse parthenogenetic gastropod assemblage in Lake Malawi. Molecular Ecology 16, 517–30.Google Scholar
Glaubrecht, M. 1996. Evolutionsökologie und systematic am beispiel von süß und brackwasserschnecken (Mollusca: Caenogastropoda: Cerithioidea): ontogenese-strategien, paläontologissche befunde und historische zoogeographie. Leiden: Backhuys. 499 pp.Google Scholar
Glibert, M. 1962. Les Mesogastropoda fossils du Cénozoïque étranger. Institut Royal des Sciences Naturelles de Belgique Memoires 69, 1305.Google Scholar
Glibert, M. & Heinzelin, B. De. 1954. L'Oligocenè Inférieur Belge. Volume Jubilaire Victor Van Straelen 1, 128438.Google Scholar
Glibert, M. & Van De Poel, L. 1966. Les Bivalvia fossils Cénozoïque étranger, Part 4 Heteroconchia. Institut Royal des Sciences Naturelles de Belgique Memoires 82, 1108.Google Scholar
Gray, J. E. 1824. On some new species of Ampullaride. Philosophical Magazine and Journal 63, 274–77.Google Scholar
Gray, J. E. 1847. A list of the genera of recent Mollusca, their synonyma and types. Proceedings of the Scientific Meetings of the Zoological Society of London 20, 129.Google Scholar
Gray, J. E. 1857. Guide to the systematic distribution of Mollusca in the British Museum. London: British Museum. 230 pp.Google Scholar
Haldeman, S. 1840–1871. A Monograph of the Limniades or Freshwater Univalve Shells of North America. Philadelphia, PA: J. Dobson. 231 pp.Google Scholar
Haldeman, S. S. 1842–1845. A monograph of the freshwater univalve Mollusca of the United States including notices of species in other parts of North America. Philadelphia: E. G. Dorsey. 231 pp.+40 plates.Google Scholar
Haller, B. 1890. Die morphologie der prosobranchier, gesammelt auf einer Erdumsegelung durch die Königl. Gegenbaurs Morphologisches Jahrbuch 16, 873991.Google Scholar
ICZN. 2000. International Code of Zoological Nomenclature. Fourth Edition. London: International Trust for Zoological Nomenclature. 306 pp.Google Scholar
Jarzembowski, E. A. 1980. Fossil insects from the Bembridge Marls, Palaeogene of the Isle of Wight, southern England. Bulletin of the British Museum (Natural History) 33, 237–93.Google Scholar
Jodot, P. 1942. Sur le basin lacustre (Ludien) de Chatillon-sur-Indre (Indre). Comptes Rendu Sommaire des séances de la Société Géologique de France 14, 174–76.Google Scholar
Keferstein, W. 1862–1866. In Bronn, H. G. Klassen und ordungen der Weichthiere (Malacozoa). Leipzig: C. F. Winter'sche Verlagshandlung.Google Scholar
Kerney, M. P. & Cameron, R. A. D. 1979. A field guide to the land snails of Britain and north-west Europe. London: Collins. 288 pp.Google Scholar
Lamarck, J. B. de. 1799. Prodrome d'une nouvelle classification des coquilles, comprenant une redaction appropriée des caractères génériques, et l'etablissement d'un grand nombre de genres nouveaux. Mémoires de la Société d'Histoire Naturalle de Paris 1, 6391.Google Scholar
Lamarck, J. B. de. 1815–1822. Histoire naturelle des animaux sans vertébres. Paris: D'Hautel & Gabon. 711 pp.Google Scholar
Le Renard, J. 1995, Sur la position systématique des Gastropoda eocenes du bassin de Paris classés Parvisipho et Siphonalia. Cossmanniana 3(3), 5764.Google Scholar
Leach, W. E. 1830. In Jeffreys, J. G. A synopsis of the testaceous pneumonobranchous Mollusca of Great Britain. Transactions of the Linnean Society of London 16, 323–92.Google Scholar
Linnaeus, C. 1758. Systema naturae, sive regna tria naturae systematice proposita per classes, ordines, genera et species Vol. 1. Holmiae: Laurentii Salvii. ii+824 pp.Google Scholar
Macan, T. T. 1977. A key to the British fresh- and brackish-water gastropods. Freshwater Biological Association Scientific Publication 13. Ambleside, UK: Freshwater BiologicalAssociation. 46 pp.Google Scholar
Mantell, G. 1820. The fossils of the South Downs, or illustrations of the geology of Sussex. London: Lupton Relfe. 320 pp.Google Scholar
Mckenna, M. C., Robinson, P. & Taylor, D. W. 1962. Notes on Eocene Mammalia and Mollusca from Tabernacle Butte, Wyoming. American Museum Novitates 2102. 17 pp.Google Scholar
Montfort, D. de. 1810. Conchyliologie systématique, et classification méthodique des coquilles; offrant leurs figures, leur arrangement générique, leurs descriptions caractéristiques, leurs noms; ainsi que leur synonymie en plusieurs langues. Ouvrage destine à faciliter l'étude des coquilles, ainsi que leur disposition dans les cabinets d'histoire naturelle. Coquilles univalves, non cloisonnées 2. Paris: Schoell, 676 pp.Google Scholar
Moore, R. C. (ed.) 1969. Treatise on Invertebrate Palaeontology. Part N. Mollusca. Bivalvia. Boulder, Colorado & Lawrence, Kansas: The Geological Society of America and the University of Kansas Press. 951 pp.Google Scholar
Moquin-Tandon, A. 1855. Histoire Naturelle des Mollusques terrestres et fluviatiles de France contenant des étudês générales sur le anatomie et leur physiologie et la description particulière des genres, des espèces et des varieties Volume 2. Paris: Baillière, 646 pp.Google Scholar
Morris, J. 1854. A catalogue of British fossils; comprising all the genera and species hitherto described; with reference to their geological distributions and to the localities in which they have been found. London: John Van Voorst. 222 pp.Google Scholar
Morris, J. 1856. Descriptions of the plates of fossils. In Forbes, E. On the Tertiary fluvio-marine formation of the Isle of Wight. Memoir of the Geological Survey of Great Britain and of the Museum of Practical Geology, 145156.Google Scholar
Morse, E. S. 1864. Observations on the terrestrial Pulmonifera of Maine, including a catalogue of all the species of terrestrial and fluviatile Mollusca known to inhabit the state. Journal of the Portland Society of Natural History 1, 163, +10 pls.Google Scholar
Müller, O. F. 1773–74. Vermium terrestrium et fluvaitilium seu animalium Infusorium, Helminthicorum et Testaceorum, non-marinorum, succincta historia. 2 vols. Havinae & Lipsiae: Heinick & Faber. x+214 pp.Google Scholar
Munt, M. C. 2005. Cerithioidean gastropods with particular reference to the Solent group (Paleogene) of southern England. Unpublished PhD Thesis, University of Portsmouth. 304 pp.Google Scholar
Neumayr, M. 1883. Zur morphologie des Bivalvenschlosses. Sitzungsberrichte der Akademie des Wissenshaften 88, 385418.Google Scholar
Newton, R. B. 1891. Systematic list of the Frederick E. Edwards Collection of the British Museum (Natural History), with references to the type-specimens from similar horizons contained in other collections belonging to the Geological Department of the Museum. London: British Museum (Natural History). 365 pp.Google Scholar
Newton, R. B. 1901. The geological distribution of extinct British non-marine Mollusca. Journal of Conchology 10. 5874.Google Scholar
Olivier, G. A. 1804. Voyage dans L'Empire Othoma, L'Egypte et la Perse fait par ordre du government, pendant les six premiers années de la Republique. Paris: H. Agasse. 355 pp.Google Scholar
Paul, C. R. C. 1989. The molluscan faunal succession in the Hatherwood Limestone Member (Upper Eocene), Isle of Wight. Tertiary Research 10, 147–62.Google Scholar
Pelseneer, P. 1889. Sur la classification phylogénéique des pélécypodes (communication préliminaire). Bulletin Scientifique de la France et de la Belgique 20, 2752.Google Scholar
Pilsbry, H. A. 1934. Review of the Planorbidae of Florida, with notes on other members of the family. Proceedings of the Academy of Natural History of Philadelphia 88, 2966.Google Scholar
Plaziat, J. C. & Younis, W. R. 2005. The modern environments of molluscs in southern Mesopotamia, Iraq: A guide to palaeogeographical reconstruction of Quaternary fluvial, palustrine and marine deposits. Notebooks on Geology 2005/001. http://paleopolis.redris.es./cg (accessed 24/1/2010).Google Scholar
Poiret, J. L. M. 1801. Coquilles Fluviatilies et Terrestres, Observées dans le Département de l'Aisne et aux environs de Paris. Paris: Barrois, Soissons. 119 pp.Google Scholar
Ponder, W. F. & Lindberg, D. R. 1997. Towards a phylogeny of gastropod molluscs: a preliminary analysis using morphological characters. Zoological Journal of the Linnaean Society 19, 83265.Google Scholar
Preston, H. B. 1910. Additions to the non-marine molluscan fauna of British and German East Africa and Lake Albert Edward. Annals and Magazine of Natural History 6, 526–36.Google Scholar
Rafinesque, C. S. 1815. Analyse de la nature, ou tableau de univers et des corps organises. Palermo: Published by the author. 244 pp.Google Scholar
Rafinesque, C. S. 1819. Prodome de 70 nouveaux genres d'animaux découverts dans I'intérieur des états Unis d'Amerique, Durant l'année. Journal de Physique de Chimie et d'Histoire Naturelle 88, 417–29.Google Scholar
Rafinesque, C. S. 1820. Monographie des coquilles bivalves de la riviėre Ohio. Contenant douze genres et Soixante-huit especes. Annales Generales des Sciences Physiques 5, 156.Google Scholar
Reid, E. M. & Chandler, M. E. J. 1926. Catalogue of Cainozoic plants in the Department of Geology Volume 1, The Bembridge Flora. London: Trustees of the British Museum (Natural History). 206 pp+12 pls.Google Scholar
Salvini-Pläwen, L. V. & Haszprunar, G. 1987. The Vetigastropoda and the systematics of streptoneurous Gastropoda (Mollusca). Journal of Zoology A 211, 747–70.Google Scholar
Sandberger, F. 1870–1875. Die land- und süsswasser-conchylien der Vorwelt. Wiesbaden: Kreidel. 983 pp.Google Scholar
Schmidt, A. 1855. Der geslechtsapparat der Stylommatophoren in taxonomischer hinsicht gewürdigit. Abhandlugen des Naturwissenschafflichen Vereins für Sachsen und Thüringen in Halle 1. 52 pp+14 pls.Google Scholar
Schrank, F. Von. 1803. Favna Boica. Durchedachte Geschichte der in Baiern einheimischen und zahmen Thiere. Dritten und Lezten Bandes zweyte Abtheilung. Krüll: Landshut. 372 pp, plates 3–19.Google Scholar
Schumacher, H. C. F. 1817. Essai d'un nouveau systeme des habitations des vers testaces. Copenhagen: Schultz. 287 pp.Google Scholar
Solander, D. C. 1766. Fossilia Hantoniensia, collecta, et in Museo Britannico deposita a Gustavo Brander. London. 43 pp.Google Scholar
Sowerby, J. 1813. The Mineral Conchology of Great Britain. London: Meredith. Vol. 1, pls. 1–102. 234 pp.Google Scholar
Sowerby, J. 1817. The Mineral Conchology of Great Britain. London: Meredith. Vol. 2, pls. 103–203. 251 pp.Google Scholar
Sowerby, J. 1822a. The Mineral Conchology of Great Britain. London: Meredith. Vol. 3, pls. 204–306. 194 pp.Google Scholar
Sowerby, J. 1822b. The Mineral Conchology of Great Britain. London: Meredith. Vol. 4, pls. 307–407. 160 pp.Google Scholar
Sowerby, J de C. 1826. The Mineral Conchology of Great Britain. London: Meredith. Vol. 6, pls. 504–609. 168 pp.Google Scholar
Sowerby, J de C. 1835. Systematic, Stratigraphical and Alphabetical index to the first six volumes of The Mineral Conchology of Great Britain, 241–50. London: Meredith.Google Scholar
Soyer, R. 1964. Niveaux fossilifères dans le Calcaire de Champigny près de Melun (Seine et Marne). Bulletin de la Société Géologigue de la France. 5, 142–46.Google Scholar
Spengel, J. W. 1881. Die Geruchsorgane und das Nervensystem der Mollusken. Zeitschrift für Wissenschaftliche 35, 333–83.Google Scholar
Steenberg, C. M. 1917. Anatomie des Acanthinula et Vallonia. Videnenskabelgie Meddelelser fra Dansk Naturhistorisk Forening 69, 115.Google Scholar
Stein, F. J. P. E. 1850. Die lebenden schnecken und mucheln der umgegend Berlins. Berlin: G. Reiman. 120 pp.Google Scholar
Swainson, W. 1840. A treatise on Malacology; or the natural classification of shells and shell-fish. In Lardner's Cabinet Cyclopaedia. London. 419 pp.Google Scholar
Troschel, F. H. 1856–1863. Das gebiss der schnecken zur begründung einer naturalichen classification. Nicolaische Verlagsbuchhandlung. 409 pp.Google Scholar
Tryon, G. W. 1863. Notes on American fresh water shells, with descriptions of two new species. Proceedings of the Academy of Natural Sciences of Philadelphia 14(9), 451–52.Google Scholar
Turton, W. 1831. A manual of the land and freshwater shells of the British Islands, arranged according to the more modern systems of classification and described from perfect specimens in the author's cabinent and coloured plates of every species. London: Longman. 150 pp.Google Scholar
Velasco, J., Millán, A., Hernández, J., Cayetano, G., Abellán, P. Sánchez, D. & Ruiz, M. 2006. Response of biotic comunities to salinity changes in a Mediterranean hypersaline stream. Saline Systems 2, 12. http://www.salinesystems.org/content/2/1/12. (accessed 3/11/2009).Google Scholar
Vincent, E. 1889. Rectifications de nomenclature. Annalés de la Société Malacologie de Belgique 24, 167–70.Google Scholar
Wenz, W. 1923–1929. Gastropoda Extramarina Tertiaria. In Pompeckj, J. F. Fossilium Catalogus, I. Animalia. Berlin: Junk. 3387 pp.Google Scholar
Wenz, W. 1928. Zur nomankulatur Tertiarer land- und süsswassergastropoden viii. Senckenbergiana 10, 119–20.Google Scholar
WoodS, V. S, V. 1847. On the discovery of an alligator and of several new mammalia in the Hordwell Cliff; with observations upon the geological phenomena of that locality. The London Geological Journal 1, 17.Google Scholar
WoodS, V. S, V. 1877. Supplement to the Eocene Mollusca (Bivalves). Monograph of the Palaeontographical Society 137 (part of Volume 31). 24 pp.Google Scholar
Zilch, A. 1958–60. Gastropoda Teil 2: Euthyneura. In Schindewolf, O. H. Handbuch der Paläozoologie, Band 6. Berlin: Borntraeger. xii+834 pp.Google Scholar
Figure 0

Plate 1 All figures taken with a digital camera (Fuji FinePix S602Z). Scale bars (figs 1–6, 8–10)=10 mm. All specimens, unless stated otherwise are from the Insect Limestone, Bembridge Marls Member: (1) Corbicula obovata (J. Sowerby 1817), IWCMS.2007.8, Saltmead, Thorness, Isle of Wight; (2) Melanopsis carinata J. de C. Sowerby, 1826, IWCMS.2005.32, Bembridge Marls Member, Thorness Bay, Isle of Wight; (3) Tarebia acuta (J. Sowerby 1822b), IWCMS.2007.7, Bembridge Marls Member, Gurnard, Isle of Wight; (4) Potamaclis turritissima (Forbes, 1853), GSM 119911, Bembridge Marls Member, Hamstead Cliff, Isle of Wight; (5) Viviparus angulosus (J. Sowerby 1817), IWCMS.2007.1, Saltmead, Thorness, Isle of Wight; (6) Viviparus lentus (Solander 1766), G.57288, Gurnard, Isle of Wight; (7) ?Acanthinula sp. NHMUK GG.2904, Sticelets, Thorness Bay, Isle of Wight. Specimen height 1.5 mm; (8) Lymnaea (Galba) longiscata (Brongniart 1810), MIWG.6016, Thorness Bay, Isle of Wight; (9) Lymnaea (Galba) longiscata (Brongniart 1810), MIWG.4215, Thorness Bay, Isle of Wight; (10) Planorbarius discus (Edwards 1852), MIWG.4535, Saltmead Ledge, Thorness Bay, Isle of Wight; (11) Gyraulus similis (Férussac 1814), IWCMS.2007.15, Saltmead, Thorness Bay, Isle of Wight. Specimen diameter 4 mm; (12) Hippeutis headonensis (Jodot 1942), IWCMS.2007.11, Sticelets, Thorness Bay, Isle of Wight. Specimen diameter 4.5 mm.

Figure 1

Table 1 Tarebia acuta biometric data

Figure 2

Table 2 Melanopsis carinata biometric data

Figure 3

Table 3 Potamaclis turritissima biometric data

Figure 4

Table 4 Viviparus angulosus biometric data

Figure 5

Table 5 Viviparus lentus biometric data

Figure 6

Table 6 Lymnaea (Galba) longiscata biometric data

Figure 7

Table 7 Planorbarius discus (Edwards, 1852) biometric data