Hostname: page-component-6bf8c574d5-g4kps Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-02-14T12:25:00.611Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Two Emendations in Harpogration1

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  27 February 2009

John J. Keaney
John J. Keaney
Affiliation:
Princeton University
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Review Article
Information
The Classical Review , Volume 20 , Issue 2 , June 1970 , pp. 139 - 140
Copyright
Copyright © The Classical Association 1970

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1 De Din. 12. Here the speech is entitled Συνηγορ⋯α Ἡγελ⋯χῳ ὑπ⋯ρ ⋯πικλ⋯ρου.

2 There is a parallel, if the text is sound, in Eusebius,P.A. x. 3: Δε⋯ναρχος ⋯ν τῷ αΚατ⋯ Κλεομ⋯δοντος αἰκ⋯ας. Again, Dionysius knows only one speech. Cf. Shoemaker, G., Dinarchus (Columbia diss., 1968), 63–64.Google Scholar

3 Harpocration is frequently indifferent to aspiration: cp. κατ⋯ Ἱμερα⋯ου (s.v. Ἀμμων⋯ς) and καθ’ Ἱμερα⋯ου (s.v. Νομοφὑλακες).

4 For examples of suprascript letters brought down on to the line, cf. C.P. Ixiii (1968), 281.