No CrossRef data available.
Article contents
Abstract
An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
![Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'](https://static-cambridge-org.ezproxyberklee.flo.org/content/id/urn%3Acambridge.org%3Aid%3Aarticle%3AS0009840X00083335/resource/name/firstPage-S0009840X00083335a.jpg)
- Type
- Original Contributions
- Information
- Copyright
- Copyright © The Classical Association 1900
References
page 394 note 1 With Ven. II and Vat. Δ but these, at least in the Philebus, are demonstrably copied from B.
page 394 note 2 It seems to be assumed that the φ⋯σιν of ‘γσΞCH’ is merely a corruption. The readings of T (the original of these MSS.) in the Philebus are as yet unpublished, but I am in a position to state that it has φ⋯σιν quite unmistakably.—J.B.