Hostname: page-component-7b9c58cd5d-f9bf7 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-03-16T02:47:51.450Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Novavit Opvs - Ernst-Alfred Kirfel: Untersuchungen zur Briefform der Heroides Ovids. (Noctes Romanae, 11.) Pp. viii+133; 3 plates. Bern and Stuttgart:Paul Haupt, 1969. Paper, 28 Sw. fr.

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  27 February 2009

E. J. Kenney
E. J. Kenney
Affiliation:
Peterhouse, Cambridge
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Reviews
Information
The Classical Review , Volume 20 , Issue 2 , June 1970 , pp. 195 - 197
Copyright
Copyright © The Classical Association 1970

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

page 196 note 1 Similarly the fact that Haemonis at xiii. 2 is ἄπαξ ε⋯ρημ⋯νον has no bearing on the authenticity of the couplet. The same is true of, for instance, Achaias (or rather Achaeias) at iii. 71.

page 196 note 2 Cf. Luck, G., Untersuchangen zur Textgeschichte Ovids (1969), p. 14Google Scholar; contra, U. Fischer, lgnotum hoc aliis ilk novavit opus (diss. Augsburg, 1969), p. 17.

page 197 note 1 Pegasis is in form a patronymic; but Oenone was not a fountain-nymph, but the daughter of a river-god. All this and more was pointed out by Madvig, Adv. Crit. ii. 71–2.