Hostname: page-component-6bf8c574d5-b4m5d Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-02-19T06:15:38.048Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Notes

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  27 October 2009

Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Notes
Information
The Classical Review , Volume 1 , Issue 9 , November 1887 , pp. 280 - 281
Copyright
Copyright © The Classical Association 1887

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1 It is conceivable that Philostratus wrote ⋯λλα τ⋯ς ⋯ργ⋯ς ‘other pretexts not sufficient to excite such anger,’ but it is a great deal more likely that he wrote ἄλλα ἄξια οὔπω κ. τ. λ. and that the ἄξια fell out, as it easily might after ἄλλα.