Hostname: page-component-6bf8c574d5-7jkgd Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-02-15T10:26:30.260Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Ἀθηναίων Πολιτεία 22. 4

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  27 February 2009

Robin Seager
Robin Seager
Affiliation:
Lincoln College, Oxford
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Review Article
Information
The Classical Review , Volume 12 , Issue 3 , December 1962 , pp. 201 - 202
Copyright
Copyright © The Classical Association 1962

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1 Hignett, , Hist. Ath. Const., p. 161Google Scholar; Robinson, , A.J.A. lvi (1952), p. 24Google Scholar; Jacoby, F.G.H. iiib Supp. i, 1231Google Scholar. The great majority of writers, whether on ostracism or on Ath. Pol., say nothing; even the commentators ad loc. (Sandys, Mathieu, von Fritz–Kapp) are silent.

2 εἴων οἰκεῖν τ⋯ν π⋯λιν need not imply any marked lapse of time. As soon as A, B, and C had been expelled, it could be said that the Athenians continued to allow X, Y, and Z to live in the city.

3 My argument is concerned only with the correct understanding of Ath. Pol.'s account; it should not be taken to imply that I believe that Cleisthenes in fact introduced the law or that Hipparchus was ever his opponent.