Hostname: page-component-745bb68f8f-g4j75 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-02-10T22:17:53.209Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Dramatic resolution of a prenatally diagnosed massive cardiac rhabdomyoma in left ventricle with everolimus therapy in a neonate

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  03 February 2025

Roma Verma
Affiliation:
The Fetal Cardiology Division, Department of Pediatric Cardiology and Department of Radiology, Amrita University, AIMS Ponekkara PO, Amrita Institute of Medical Sciences, Kochi, Kerala, India
Akshay Desale
Affiliation:
The Fetal Cardiology Division, Department of Pediatric Cardiology and Department of Radiology, Amrita University, AIMS Ponekkara PO, Amrita Institute of Medical Sciences, Kochi, Kerala, India
Balu Vaidyanathan*
Affiliation:
The Fetal Cardiology Division, Department of Pediatric Cardiology and Department of Radiology, Amrita University, AIMS Ponekkara PO, Amrita Institute of Medical Sciences, Kochi, Kerala, India
*
Corresponding author: Balu Vaidyanathan; Email: baluvaidyanathan@gmail.com
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Type
Brief Report
Copyright
© The Author(s), 2025. Published by Cambridge University Press

Introduction

Cardiac rhabdomyomas are the most common cardiac tumours in fetuses and children. Reference Kwiatkowska, Wałdoch, Meyer-Szary, Potaż and Grzybiak1 Tumors causing mechanical obstructions to blood flow in the fetal or neonatal period can compromise cardiac output and can benefit from therapies aimed at tumour regression. Everolimus is a serine–threonine kinase mammalian target of rapamycin inhibitor, which can inhibit growth-driven cell proliferation. Reference Franz and Capal2 We report a case of a prenatally diagnosed massive left ventricular rhabdomyoma with inflow and outflow obstruction where everolimus therapy was initiated immediately after birth with dramatic regression in the size of the tumour.

Case report

A 28-year-old primigravida was referred to our centre for fetal echocardiography in view of a cardiac mass detected on a routine antenatal scan. Fetal echocardiography evaluation (Voluson Expert 22, GE Healthcare, Zipf, Austria) at 27 weeks revealed a large hyperechoic intracardiac mass lesion occupying almost the entire cavity of the left ventricle. There was no LV inflow or outflow obstruction. On follow-up evaluations, at 35 weeks, there was an increase in the size of the tumour (25 × 20 mm) (Figure 1A) compromising the inflow (Figure 1B) with protrusion into the LV outflow (Figure 1C). The 3-vessel view and aortic arch views were normal with no evidence of reverse flow into the aortic arch. The fetal heart rate and rhythm were normal. The family refused trans-placental therapy with everolimus but was willing to deliver the baby at our centre for post-natal cardiac care.

Figure 1. Prenatal and neonatal imaging findings. (a) Four-chamber view showing a large homogenous hyperechoic mass lesion filling the entire left ventricular cavity encroaching on the inflow. (b) Colour flow mapping showing severe LV inflow obstruction with a minimal filling of the LV cavity alongside the edges of the tumour (arrows). (c) LV outflow tract view showing the protrusion of the tumour into the aortic outflow. (d) Neonatal echocardiography four-chamber view showing a large hyperechoic mass lesion in the left ventricle measuring 28 ×17 mm encroaching on the LV inflow. (e) Cardiac MRI axial non-gated steady-state free precision image showing a large (29 × 17 mm) T2 hypointense mass occupying LV cavity. ( f) Axial late gadolinium enhancementphase-sensitive inversion recovery image on MRI showing large hypointense mass in LV cavity without any enhancement. LV = left ventricle; RV = right ventricle; LA = left atrium; RA = right atrium; Ao= aorta.

At 38 weeks, a baby boy was delivered via caesarian section with a birthweight of 2.84 kg. There were no birth-related complications. Post-natal echocardiography on day 1 of life showed a massive hyperechoic mass lesion filling the LV cavity (28 × 17 mm) with encroachment into the left ventricular inflow and outflow tracts (Figure 1D). Cardiac MRI was done on day 4 of life for tissue characterisation and revealed a single large (29 × 17 × 18 mm) solid mass lesion arising from the anterior and antero-septal wall, proximally reaching till the mitral valve and distally till the LV apex (Figure 1E) with no evidence of late gadolinium enhancement (Figure 1F) suggesting the diagnosis of rhabdomyoma. There were no clinical stigmata or neurological symptoms suggestive of tuberous sclerosis, and genetic testing for the same was not done.

In view of the very large tumour size with likelihood of acute life-threatening events, it was decided to initiate everolimus therapy aimed at tumour regression. After baseline investigations including complete blood count, renal and liver parameters, and lipid profile, the baby was initiated on oral everolimus 0.1 mg/day, two times per day, twice a week. This dosage schedule was lower compared to previous published reports, but we were able to maintain the recommended drug levels (5–15 ng/ml) with this dosage regime. Reference Dahdah4,Reference Demir, Ekici, Yazal Erdem, Emir and Tunç5 Follow-up echocardiography showed a dramatic reduction in tumour size, largely confined to the LV apex, after 3 weeks of therapy (Figure 2D). After 6 weeks of treatment, the everolimus dose was decreased to 0.1 mg twice daily once a week. There were no major adverse effects in the baby, and there was steady weight gain. The blood parameters were monitored throughout the treatment and were in the normal range. The tumour remained confined to the LV apex with no compromise on blood flows on follow-up, and hence, everolimus was discontinued after 10 weeks of therapy.

Figure 2. Pictorial depiction of the clinical course of the patient from prenatal diagnosis and dramatic response to everolimus therapy. (a) Fetal echocardiography at 35 weeks showing a large homogenous hyperechoic mass lesion filling the entire left ventricular cavity encroaching on the inflow. (b ) Parasternal long axis view on neonatal echocardiography on day 1 showing a large homogenous mass lesion protruding into LV outflow tract. (c ) Echocardiography with parasternal long axis view taken 14 days after start of everolimus showing significant decrease in tumour size. (d) Echocardiography done 21 days after start of everolimus showing complete resolution of the tumour with no obstruction to LV inflow and outflow. LV = left ventricle; RV = right ventricle; LA = left atrium; RA = right atrium; Ao = aorta.

Figure 2 and Movie 1 depict the clinical course of the tumour from the prenatal stage and the dramatic resolution in size in response to everolimus.

Discussion

Rhabdomyoma is the most common cardiac tumour in paediatric age group. The reported prevalence of cardiac rhabdomyoma varies from 0.002 to 0.25% in necropsy series, 0.02 to 0.08% in live-born infants, and 0.12% in prenatal fetal studies. Reference Isaacs3 Most cases are asymptomatic and undergo spontaneous regression. Depending upon their location, rhabdomyomas may interfere with myocardial function by causing mechanical obstruction of the outflow tracts, valve regurgitations, and arrhythmias including pre-excitation.

The option of mTOR (mammalian target of rapamycin) inhibitors like everolimus in the management of cardiac rhabdomyomas is an evolving concept and is described as case reports or small case series in literature. Reference Dahdah4– Reference Breathnach, Pears, Franklin, Webb and McMahon11 Nespoli et al. described the use of everolimus in a neonate with multiple biventricular cardiac rhabdomyomas, causing subaortic obstruction. Everolimus therapy was given for 6 months and showed regression of the intracardiac masses and normalisation of trans-aortic gradients. Reference Nespoli, Albani and Corti7 Babaoğlu et al. reported the efficacy of everolimus therapy in seven neonates (median age 8 days) diagnosed with cardiac rhabdomyoma, who were treated with different dose regimens. The indication of everolimus therapy was inflow/outflow obstruction in six patients and supraventricular tachycardia resistant to antiarrhythmic drugs in one patient. Everolimus was administered in a dose of 0.25 mg two times a day for 2 days a week in four patients, 0.1 mg/day in two patients, and 0.4 mg/day in one patient. Significant regression of cardiac rhabdomyoma was observed in all patients, and the tachycardia was controlled in 2 weeks after everolimus initiation. Reference Babaoğlu, Başar, Usta, Yılmaz and Günlemez8 Breathnach et al. described a neonate with severe left ventricular outflow tract obstruction secondary to a large rhabdomyoma infiltrating the paraaortic area, extending around the origin of the right coronary artery making surgical resection difficult. Oral sirolimus therapy (0.5 mg once daily) resulted in a rapid regression of the tumour within 1 month of treatment. Reference Breathnach, Pears, Franklin, Webb and McMahon11 Ng et al. reported outcomes of the use of mTOR inhibitors in a group of six patients with cardiac rhabdomyomas Reference Ng, McGuinness and Prendiville12 . The starting dose for everolimus varied from 0.9 to 2.3 mg/m2 per day. In five patients, there was a significant reduction in the size of rhabdomyoma with therapy with everolimus. Cleary et al. summarised the current evidence about the use of everolimus in neonatal cardiac rhabdomyomas in a meta-analysis. There were significant differences in the dosage regimes and monitoring strategies. The most commonly used drug maintenance levels for everolimus was 5–15 ng/ml. The majority received treatment for 1–6 months. Dyslipidaemia was the most commonly reported side effect. Reference Cleary and McMahon13

Our case had a haemodynamically significant cardiac rhabdomyoma in the left ventricle, which was compromising both the inflow and outflow with a high potential for acute life-threatening events (Figures 1 and 2). Even though the diagnosis was made in the prenatal stage, everolimus was not initiated prenatally since the tumour was haemodynamically well tolerated and considering the fact that this is still experimental in the prenatal stage. Though the dosage regime we used was lower than most of the published reports, we could achieve the recommended drug levels and the desired clinical response. Everolimus therapy resulted in a dramatic reduction in the tumour size within 3 weeks of initiation without causing any adverse effects (Figure 2, Movie 1). Although the previous case reports have documented regression of tumour size with the use of everolimus, such a rapid and dramatic regression in a massive left ventricular rhabdomyoma is a strikingly noteworthy clinical response. Though the patient did not have any neurological symptoms or signs till now, an MRI of the brain is planned on follow-up in view of the strong association reported between cardiac rhabdomyomas and central nervous system involvement. Reference Northrup, Aronow and Bebin14

In conclusion, everolimus is an effective therapy for promoting tumour regression in haemodynamically significant cardiac rhabdomyomas in neonates and should be considered in large tumours causing blood flow obstructions or significant arrhythmias.

Supplementary material

The supplementary material for this article can be found at https://doi.org/10.1017/S1047951125000095.

References

Kwiatkowska, J, Wałdoch, A, Meyer-Szary, J, Potaż, P, Grzybiak, M. Cardiac tumors in children: a 20-year review of clinical presentation, diagnostics and treatment. Adv Clin Exp Med 2017; 26: 319326. DOI: 10.17219/acem/62121.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Franz, DN, Capal, JK. MTOR inhibitors in the pharmacologic management of tuberous sclerosis complex and their potential role in other rare neurodevelopmental disorders. Orphanet J Rare Dis 2017; 12: 51. DOI: 10.1186/s13023-017-0596-2.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Isaacs, H Jr. Fetal and neonatal cardiac tumors. PediatrCardiol 2004; 25: 252273. DOI: 10.1007/s00246-003-0590-4.Google ScholarPubMed
Dahdah, N. Everolimus for the treatment of tuberous sclerosis complex-related cardiac rhabdomyomas in pediatric patients. J Pediatr 2017; 190: 2126.e7. DOI: 10.1016/j.jpeds.2017.06.076.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Demir, HA, Ekici, F, Yazal Erdem, A, Emir, S, Tunç, B. Everolimus:a challenging drug in the treatment of multifocal inoperable cardiac rhabdomyoma. Pediatrics 2012; 130: e243e247. DOI: 10.1542/peds.2011-3476.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stelmaszewski, EV, Parente, DB, Farina, A et al. Everolimus for cardiac rhabdomyomas in children with tuberous sclerosis. In The ORACLE study protocol (everOlimus for caRdiac rhAbdomyomas in tuberous sCLErosis): a randomised, multicentre, placebo-controlled, double-blind phase II trial. Cardiology in the Young, 2020: pp. 19. DOI: 10.1017/S104795111900314.Google Scholar
Nespoli, LF, Albani, E, Corti, C, et al. Efficacy of everolimus low-dose treatment for cardiac rhabdomyomas in neonatal tuberous sclerosis: Case Report and Literature Review. Pediatr Rep 2021; 13: 104112. DOI: 10.3390/pediatric13010015.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Babaoğlu, K, Başar, EZ, Usta, E, Yılmaz, EH, Günlemez, A. Effect of different dose regimens of everolimus in a series of neonates with giant cardiac rhabdomyomas. Cardiol Young 2023; 33: 22912296. DOI: 10.1017/S1047951123000094.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sagiv, E, Chikkabyrappa, SM, Conwell, J, Lewin, M, Chun, TUH. Use of everolimus to treat cardiac rhabdomyomas and incessant arrhythmias in a newborn: benefits and complications. Ann Pediatr Cardiol 2022; 15: 5860. DOI: 10.4103/apc.apc_11_21.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bornaun, H, Öztarhan, K, Erener-Ercan, T, et al. Regression of cardiac rhabdomyomas in a neonate after everolimus treatment. Case Rep Pediatr 2016; 2016: 8712962. DOI: 10.1155/2016/8712962.Google Scholar
Breathnach, C, Pears, J, Franklin, O, Webb, D, McMahon, CJ. Rapid regression of left ventricular outflow tract rhabdomyoma after sirolimus therapy. Pediatrics 2014; 134: e1199e1202. DOI: 10.1542/peds.2013-3293.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Ng, LY, McGuinness, J, Prendiville, T, et al. Cardiac rhabdomyomas presenting with critical cardiac obstruction in neonates and infants: treatment strategies and outcome, a single-center experience. Pediatr Cardiol 2024; 45: 11321141. DOI: 10.1007/s00246-024-03420-0.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Cleary, A, McMahon, CJ. Literature review of international mammalian target of rapamycin inhibitor use in the non-surgical management of haemodynamically significant cardiac rhabdomyomas. Cardiol Young 2020; 30: 923933. DOI: 10.1017/S104795112000147X.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Northrup, H, Aronow, ME, Bebin, EM, et al. International Tuberous Sclerosis Complex Consensus Group. In Updated International Tuberous Sclerosis Complex Diagnostic Criteria and Surveillance and Management Recommendations. Pediatr Neurol. 2021; vol. 123: pp. 5066. DOI: 10.1016/j.pediatrneurol.2021.07.011.Google Scholar
Figure 0

Figure 1. Prenatal and neonatal imaging findings. (a) Four-chamber view showing a large homogenous hyperechoic mass lesion filling the entire left ventricular cavity encroaching on the inflow. (b) Colour flow mapping showing severe LV inflow obstruction with a minimal filling of the LV cavity alongside the edges of the tumour (arrows). (c) LV outflow tract view showing the protrusion of the tumour into the aortic outflow. (d) Neonatal echocardiography four-chamber view showing a large hyperechoic mass lesion in the left ventricle measuring 28 ×17 mm encroaching on the LV inflow. (e) Cardiac MRI axial non-gated steady-state free precision image showing a large (29 × 17 mm) T2 hypointense mass occupying LV cavity. (f) Axial late gadolinium enhancementphase-sensitive inversion recovery image on MRI showing large hypointense mass in LV cavity without any enhancement. LV = left ventricle; RV = right ventricle; LA = left atrium; RA = right atrium; Ao= aorta.

Figure 1

Figure 2. Pictorial depiction of the clinical course of the patient from prenatal diagnosis and dramatic response to everolimus therapy. (a) Fetal echocardiography at 35 weeks showing a large homogenous hyperechoic mass lesion filling the entire left ventricular cavity encroaching on the inflow. (b) Parasternal long axis view on neonatal echocardiography on day 1 showing a large homogenous mass lesion protruding into LV outflow tract. (c) Echocardiography with parasternal long axis view taken 14 days after start of everolimus showing significant decrease in tumour size. (d) Echocardiography done 21 days after start of everolimus showing complete resolution of the tumour with no obstruction to LV inflow and outflow. LV = left ventricle; RV = right ventricle; LA = left atrium; RA = right atrium; Ao = aorta.

Supplementary material: File

Verma et al. supplementary material

Verma et al. supplementary material
Download Verma et al. supplementary material(File)
File 13.6 MB