Hostname: page-component-745bb68f8f-d8cs5 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-02-11T15:51:34.779Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Assessment and management of the failing heart in children

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 December 2008

Beth D. Kaufman*
Affiliation:
Children’s Hospital of Philadelphia, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, United States of America
Robert E. Shaddy
Affiliation:
Children’s Hospital of Philadelphia, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, United States of America
Girish S. Shirali
Affiliation:
Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, South Carolina, United States of America
Ronn Tanel
Affiliation:
Children’s Hospital of Philadelphia, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, United States of America
Jeffrey A. Towbin
Affiliation:
Baylor College of Medicine, Texas Children’s Hospital, Houston, Texas, United States of America
*
Correspondence to: Beth D. Kaufman, MD, Pediatric Cardiology, Cardiomyopathy and Heart Transplant Program, Children’s Hospital of Philadelphia, 3400 Civic Center Blvd, Room 8NW81, Philadelphia, PA 19104-4399, United States of America. Tel: 267-426-5700; Fax: 215-590-1340; E-mail: kaufmanb@email.chop.edu
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Type
Original Article
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2008

Over the last 25 years, the diagnosis, assessment, and management of cardiac failure has changed dramatically. Diagnosis now depends on use of new modalities for imaging, and more recently, on the use of molecular techniques and biomarkers. The latter approaches help in prognosticating, and following the progression of, the failing heart. While the majority of new breakthroughs in the field have been in adults, with the data then extrapolated to the child with cardiac failure, therapies for the child with end-stage heart failure, such as mechanical circulatory support and cardiac transplantation, have also significantly advanced. The purpose of this review is to focus on these new modalities for diagnosis and treatment of cardiac failure as seen in children. It is beyond its scope to present a comprehensive description of the current state of the art in adults. The interested reader is referred to recent reviews and consensus statements on this topicReference Hunt, Abraham and Chin1Reference Shaddy and Tani3.

What’s new in diagnosis and treatment of myocarditis?

Myocarditis is an inflammatory process affecting the heart and causing ventricular dysfunction. The inflammation may involve the myocytes, the supporting fibrous matrix, the vascular elements and neural elements, and/or pericardium. It may be an acute or chronic process.Reference Towbin4 In childhood, the most common cause of myocarditis is viral infection of the heart, which is predominantly an acute disorder.Reference Bowles, Bowles and Towbin5 These children typically present with cardiac failure of acute onset, cardiovascular collapse, or sudden death. A viral etiology, consistent with chronic myocarditis, can be identified in about one-fifth of cases of chronic dilated cardiomyopathy.

What’s new in the diagnosis?

The classic diagnostic criterions for myocarditis rely on the ability to analyze myocardial specimens, such as endomyocardial biopsies, explanted hearts or autopsied hearts, by histopathologic methods. The criterions known as the “Dallas Criteria” require inflammatory infiltrates with or without cellular necrosis, fibrosis and tissue oedema. Staining with haematoxylin-eosin, or Masson’s trichrome stains, are standard in their evaluation.Reference Aretz6 In some centres, lymphocyte sub-typing is also used. None of these studies identify the underlying cause of disease, and other major issues with the basic concept are also in question. For instance, it is believed that viral infection is the major cause of myocarditis in children yet, when myocardium is obtained and cultured, it is extremely rare to identify an infectious agent. Hence, peripheral cultures are used as surrogates. These samples, including urine, stool, sputum, blood, and others, are taken to indicate cause-and-effect when culture-positive, although no correlation has ever been demonstrated. Another issue is the relationship of the histopathologic findings with the disease. Do all patients in whom inflammatory infiltrates are identified in myocardial specimens have myocarditis? Clearly not. Patients with genetic-based dilated cardiomyopathies commonly have inflammatory infiltrates focally in myocardial specimens. Indeed, many families in which cardiomyopathies occur are diagnosed with familial or inherited myocarditis. There is essentially no data supporting these views. And what about patients in whom a myocardial sample, particularly a biopsy, does not satisfy the Dallas criterions for myocarditis? Have they been excluded from this as a potential disease causing the clinical disorder? It is well appreciated that inflammatory infiltrates are patchy, and that myocarditis may be missed because of issues with sampling.Reference Aretz6 Another key issue, nonetheless, must also be kept in mind, namely the definition of myocarditis itself. The use of inflammatory infiltrates as the diagnostic sign of myocarditis is based on the belief that the disorder is primarily inflammatory, and that inflammatory disease must lead to infiltrates. Both of these assumptions have limited scientific basis. It is certainly possible, and in fact likely, that the infiltrates are nothing more than late responders to a primary insult, such as a viral infection of the myocardium. The central role that this finding has in the diagnosis, therefore, is problematic. There are other important issues. How do we know that inflammation in any way is a primary part of the disease? The use of cellular markers, such as cytokines, lymphocytic markers, and the like, are not definitive.Reference Hauck, Kearney and Edwards7 Many key inflammatory markers are down-regulated and are dependent on which virus is causative. Hence, the identification of the inciting virus or other factor becomes critical. Recently, criterions were published for performing endomyocardial biopsies.Reference Cooper, Baughman and Feldman8 In the case of suspected myocarditis, these criterions strongly suggested biopsy and the performance of polymerase chain reaction for known causes of myocarditis. These viruses, which include adenovirus, parvovirus B19, enteroviruses including coxsackievirus, cytomegalovirus, and Epstein-Barr virus, amongst others, can all be analyzed by the use of the polymerase chain reaction to identify the viral genome within the heart.Reference Bowles, Bowles and Towbin5, Reference Bowles, Ni and Kearney9 This reaction is a process of molecular amplification that enables the specific amplification of genomic nucleic acid. When added to a procedure for identification, this allows for identification in the reference specimen. In the current era, this method should be standard.

What’s new in treatment?

Very little has changed over the years in terms of treatment. Therapy to date focuses on the clinical signs and symptoms of cardiac failure, cardiovascular collapse, and arrhythmias. Supportive care is provided with inotropic agents and anti-arrhythmics, and, when necessary, devices such as those providing ventricular assistance and extracorporeal mechanical oxygenation. Targeted therapy with anti-viral agents or vaccines has not become common place. Some centers continue to use steroids despite the lack of supportive data.Reference Mason, O’Connell and Herskowitz10 The use of intravenous gamma globulin is not universally agreed upon, as limited supportive data currently exists. More recently, particularly in Europe, the use of interferon therapy has been studied. While this option is supported by the enthusiasts, it has yet to become commonplace. Hence, a trial is needed to test these various agents in children.

Thus, while the diagnosis of myocarditis in childhood has moved into the molecular era, therapy has remained stagnant. The outcomes of treatment in children rely, to some extent, on early diagnosis and therapeutic intervention. When necessary, devices should be considered for use prior to the occurrence of life-threatening events. Novel diagnostic and therapeutic options require the community of paediatric cardiologists to work to develop trials in order to make progress with this important problem.

Tachycardia-mediated and pacemaker-mediated cardiomyopathies

There are two important causes of dilated cardiomyopathy induced by an abnormal cardiac rhythm, namely tachycardia-mediated cardiomyopathy and pacemaker-mediated cardiomyopathy.

Tachycardia-mediated cardiomyopathy

The concept of a cardiomyopathy resulting from a tachyarrhythmia was recognized several decades ago through observations that induced tachycardias, as well as chronic clinical tachycardias, could result in ventricular dysfunction which could be reversed when the arrhythmia was controlled.Reference Coleman, Taylor and Pool11Reference Gillette, Smith and Garson13 Although the mechanism of tachycardia-mediated cardiomyopathy is not completely understood, experimental studies have demonstrated disturbed cellular anatomy and physiology.Reference Spinale, Fulbright and Mukherjee14 Clinically, the absolute heart rate and duration of tachycardia are thought to be important determinants of the development of signs and symptoms of congestive cardiac failure. An arrhythmia with an average rate greater than 140 beats per minute is thought to have an increased association with the development of cardiomyopathy. Automatic ectopic atrial tachycardia, and orthodromic reciprocating tachycardia due to a slowly conducting accessory pathway, are the most common causes of tachycardia-mediated cardiomyopathy in children. Chronic atrial fibrillation and ventricular tachycardia are less common causes in this age group.

In the experience at The Children’s Hospital of Philadelphia, we identified 23 children who presented with congestive cardiac failure, left ventricular dysfunction, or fetal hydrops due to supraventricular tachycardia over the period 1989 through 2004. Almost four-fifths of these children presented at less than 6 months of age, including 5 who presented prenatally. In two-thirds, there was a delay in diagnosis. Most of the young patients had orthodromic reciprocating tachycardia in association with Wolff-Parkinson-White syndrome, while the most common arrhythmic mechanism for the older children was an automatic ectopic atrial tachycardia. All but one patient had complete resolution of ventricular dysfunction.

Overall, full recovery of ventricular function is the rule with good control of the abnormal rhythm. This may be accomplished with medications or catheter ablation therapy. The time course to full resolution is variable, with more severe and long-standing cases needing longer. If complete resolution of the cardiomyopathy does not occur, a secondary arrhythmia related to an end-stage cardiomyopathy should be considered.

Pacemaker-mediated cardiomyopathy

This cardiomyopathy can be defined as left ventricular or systemic ventricular dysfunction secondary to nonphysiologic ventricular activation and contraction due to repetitive, artificial pacing stimulation. Due to accessibility, for decades the heart has been paced from the right ventricular apex as the standard technique. The studies proposing potential mechanisms for pacemaker-mediated cardiomyopathy are summarized in Figure 1.

Figure 1 The proposed mechanisms for pacemaker-induced cardiomyopathy.

Abnormalities of echocardiographic indexes of cardiac function and performance have been found in studies of children. In one study measuring echocardiographic parameters of function in children with structurally normal hearts who had been paced for an average of 9.5 years, and comparing them to age-matched controls,Reference Tantengco, Thomas and Karpawich15 a significant decrease was noted in left ventricular fractional area of change, as well as an abnormal left ventricular index of myocardial performance. Another study compared patients with congenital complete heart block with chronic right ventricular pacing to age-matched controls.Reference Thambo, Bordachar and Garrigue16 Based upon echocardiographic and exercise data, patients who were paced had increased measures of dyssynchrony, abnormal morphologic changes, increased left ventricular end diastolic diameter, and lower exercise capacity.

Affects of right ventricular pacing on clinical outcome have been studied in large, prospective trials in adults.Reference Sweeney, Hellkamp and Ellenbogen17, Reference Wilkoff, Cook and Epstein18 As the frequency of right ventricular pacing increased, endpoints of death or congestive heart failure increased. Relevant studies in children have looked at the incidence of late onset dilated cardiomyopathy in patients with congenital complete heart block.19Reference Eronen22 In these patients, cardiac structure and function are generally normal, with long term pacing required. Dilated cardiomyopathy was noted in about five percent of the children over the first two decades. Potential risk factors for the development of late onset cardiomyopathy, however, were not evaluated.

At The Children’s Hospital of Philadelphia, we are following 70 patients undergoing pacing for congenitally complete heart block. After a mean pacing duration of 6.5 years, one-tenths have developed a dilated cardiomyopathy, with one going on to cardiac transplantation, and two receiving upgrades to biventricular devices. The remaining patients are treated medically. Only pre-existing cardiac failure was a risk factor for late onset of dilated cardiomyopathy. The incidence of a dilated cardiomyopathy developing in patients without pre-existing heart failure was approximately 5%. Thus, the incidence of clinically relevant pacemaker-induced cardiomyopathy is relatively low in the first and second decades of pacing. In addition, the interaction of pacing with pre-existing myocardial dysfunction may accelerate the potential development of an induced cardiomyopathy.

Imaging in children with cardiac failure

Echocardiography is a tool widely used to quantify ventricular function. Systolic dysfunction is a powerful predictor of cardiac symptoms and outcomes in both adults and children with congestive cardiac failure and dilated cardiomyopathy. Important considerations for the systematic evaluation of the many tools available for measuring ventricular function are:

  • Accuracy, in that the measurement should be validated in comparison to a gold standard

  • Reproducibility, in that the measurement should have acceptable reproducibility between studies, different observers, and the same observer

  • Load independence, in that changes in the measurement should reflect changes in contractility rather than changes in loading conditions

  • Geometry independence, in that the measurement should be valid regardless of ventricular morphology, size or shape and

  • Prognostic capability, in that the measurement should be predictive of outcomes.

Measurements may be grouped into two broad categories. The first depends on indexes for the phase of ejection. These measurements are dependent on assumptions regarding ventricular geometry, and are inherently load-dependent.

M-mode: fractional shortening

Accuracy: While M-mode fractional shortening is performed almost universally as a measurement of left ventricular function, its accuracy cannot be validated because there is no gold standard which would permit calculation of this value, which is fundamentally a derived number.

Reproducibility: In a large study, the agreement found between local and core laboratories was marginal.Reference Lipshultz, Easley and Orav23 For example, a measurement of 32% measured by the core laboratory could be reported as low as 22% and as high as 40% in the local laboratory. This reflects a high degree of inter-observer variability.

Prognostic capability: The technique passes this test in that a recent large study of children with dilated cardiomyopathy demonstrated it to be an independent predictor of subsequent death or the need for transplantion.Reference Towbin, Lowe and Colan24

Ejection fraction measured by cross-sectional echocardiography

Accuracy: This technique is fair at best in adults, and has not been validated in children.Reference Jenkins, Bricknell, Chan, Hanekom and Marwick25, Reference Eidem, O’Leary, Tei and Seward26

Reproducibility: No data is available for use in children

Prognostic capability: In keeping with data from adult studies, the technique has been shown to be an independent predictor of hospitalization, death or transplantation for children with dilated cardiomyopathy.Reference McMahon and Eapen27

The other broad category is made up of the Doppler indexes. These measurements examine time intervals and velocities of the flow of blood and movement of myocardium as a means of evaluating ventricular performance. These methods are inherently independent of ventricular geometry.

The myocardial performance, or Tei index

Ventricles perform two types of work, namely the work involved in isovolumic contraction and relaxation, and the work needed for ejection. A healthy ventricle expends proportionately less time doing isovolumic work, and more time doing ejection work. As the ventricle begins to fail, it expends increasingly more time doing isovolumic work and less time doing ejection work. The Tei index is the ratio of isovolumic to ejection times, which increases as the ventricle fails.

Validation, accuracy and reliability: No data is yet available for children.

Load-independence: It has been shownReference Eidem, O’Leary, Tei and Seward26 that the index does not change following relief of right ventricular pressure or volume overload, thus suggesting that it is load-independent.

Prognostic capability: In a controlled study of children with dilated cardiomyopathy,Reference McMahon and Eapen27 it was found that the Tei index for neither the right or left ventricle was predictive of the need for hospitalization or transplantation, or a predictor of death.

The mitral valvar dP/dT

This is a measurement made using continuous wave Doppler of the maximum rate of increase in left ventricular pressure during ventricular systole. It is an attractive measurement because most patients with congestive cardiac failure have quantifiable mitral regurgitation. As the ventricle fails, this number should decrease.

Validation: The index has been validated in adults by comparison to measurements obtained during cardiac catheterization.Reference Chung, Nishimura, Holmes and Tajik28

Reproducibility: No data is available for children.

Prognostic capability: While dP/dT has been shown to be predictive of hospitalizations and mortality in adults with dilated cardiomyopathy and congestive cardiac failure,Reference Tournoux, Alabiad and Fan29, Reference Kolias, Aaronson and Armstrong30 there is no data available concerning its prognostic capability in children.

Myocardial velocities

The concept underlying the measurement of tissue Doppler velocities is that the movement of the atrioventricular junction reflects global ventricular function. Validation of these measurements would be difficult. These measurements have been shown to be reproducible.Reference Eidem, O’Leary, Tei and Seward26 There is conflicting data on the load-dependence of tissue Doppler parameters in adults, and little to no data in children.Reference Eidem, O’Leary, Tei and Seward26, Reference Borlaug, Melenovsky and Redfield31Reference Jacques, Pinsky, Severyn and Gorcsan34 The technique is inherently independent of ventricular geometry, and has been shown to have prognostic capability in children not only with dilated and hypertrophic cardiomyopathy,Reference McMahon and Eapen27, Reference McMahon, Nagueh and Pignatelli35 but also for left ventricular non-compaction.Reference McMahon, Pignatelli and Nagueh36

Recent advances

Over the past three years, three dimensional echocardiography has evolved into a practical bedside tool for quantifying left ventricular volume and ejection fractions. Early data on the validation of this method, in children as well as adults, and in functionally univentricular as well as biventricular hearts, is encouraging.Reference Corsi, Lang and Veronesi37Reference Bu, Munns and Zhang39 The technique has also been proven to be feasible in a clinical environment, and shown to have excellent reproducibility.Reference Baker, Hlavacek, Chessa, Fleming and Shirali40 The application of quantitative three-dimensional echocardiographic techniques has revealed a strong association between left ventricular dysfunction and intra-left ventricular dyssynchrony.Reference Baker, Flack and Hlavacek41 It is conceivable that the application of this technique could improve our ability to customize pacing strategies for children who have dysfunction and dyssynchrony.

What’s new in diagnosis and treatment of the failing heart in children?

The search for biomarkers that correlate with imaging assessments of ventricular function and clinical outcomes of heart failure is a recent focus of the field. Natriuretic peptides have become standard-of-care for the diagnosis and prognostication of heart failure in adults and in children. Both b-type natriuretic peptide and N terminal pro-brain natriueretic protein have been extensively studied, with the most recent work being done to determine their predictive value. A recent study randomized adults who presented to an emergency room with dyspnoea to have the levels of the N terminal protein measured in the serum in addition to routine diagnosis and treatment.Reference Moe, Howlett, Januzzi and Zowall42 The addition of this biomarker resulted in a significant reduction in duration and cost of the visits to the emergency department, and the number of recurrent hospitalizations. When reviewing the experience in a single centre with measuring levels of brain natriuretic peptide in children with cardiac failure due to left ventricular dysfunction seen as outpatients, the levels of the protein were shown to be predictive of adverse events.Reference Price, Thomas and Grenier43

Treatment of cardiac failure in adults and children can be divided into pharmacologic as opposed to electrophysiologic therapies. The current class I recommendations for the pharmacologic treatment of cardiac failure in adults include diuretics for fluid overload, inhibitors of angiotensin converting enzyme, blockers of beta-adrenergic receptors, antagonists of aldosterone, and blockers of the angiotensin receptors for those intolerant to the inhibitors themselves.Reference Hunt, Abraham and Chin1 Almost all guidelines are based on the results of large clinical trials of adults. Such a recent study in adults demonstrated that inhibitors of angiotensin converting enzyme cause a significant reduction in cardiac events, including arrhythmias, cardiac failure and death, in those who developed cardiotoxicity after administration of anthracyclines.Reference Cardinale, Colombo and Sandri44 Spironolactone, and more recently eplerenone, have been shown to improve survival in adults with moderate-to-severe cardiac failure.Reference Pitt, Zannad and Remme45, Reference Pitt, Remme and Zannad46 Another recent study suggested that the addition of spironolactone to candesartan improves left ventricular remodeling in adults with mild-to-moderate failure.Reference Chan, Sanderson and Wang47 In contrast, a recent update on a clinical trial of eplerenone showed no effect on left ventricular remodeling.Reference Pitt, Remme and Zannad46 Nesiritide, a recombinant form of human brain natriuretic peptide, promotes natriuresis and diuresis, acts as a vasodilator, and antagonizes the renin-angiotensin-aldosterone system. Initial studies with this agent showed that it reduced cardiac preload and dyspnoea in adults.Reference Chan, Sanderson and Wang47 Subsequent metanalysis raised concern of increased renal dysfunction and mortality in adults who received nesiritide.Reference Cleland, Coletta and Clark48 A more recent trial reported no benefit of nesiritide compared to placebo on a composite of all-cause mortality and cardio-renal hospitalization in adults.Reference Young, Abraham, Stevenson, Horton, Elkayam and Bourge49 When used in children, however, there was no evidence of increased renal dysfunction or mortality, but a marked improvement in the acute clinical condition of those in cardiac failure when receiving the drug.Reference Jefferies, Price and Denfield50 More recently, results were published of the prospective, randomized trial of carvedilol in children with cardiac failure. Although the study showed no benefit of carvedilol compared with placebo on a composite endpoint of clinical outcomes, analysis of subgroups suggested a possible differential effect on those with a systemic left ventricle compared with those whose systemic ventricle was not morphologically left.Reference Shaddy, Boucek and Hsu51

Electrophysiologic therapy with cardiac resynchronization and implantation of cardioverter-defibrillators have both gained widespread popularity in adults, and are both now class I recommendations for the treatment of selected patients with symptomatic cardiac failure.1 A new area of intense investigation is the definition of dyssynchrony, in order to be able to identify those that could benefit from resynchronization. Dyssynchrony has become an increasingly complex concept, requiring definition of electrical as opposed to mechanical dyssynchrony, and systolic versus diastolic dyssynchrony.Reference Kass52 A recent study showed that adults without electrical dyssynchrony, having narrow QRS complexes on their electrocardiographic traces, but with echocardiographic evidence of mechanical dyssynchrony, failed to benefit from resynchronization.Reference Beshai, Grimm and Nagueh53 Although resynchronization is currently a class I recommendation for selected adults with mild-to-moderate heart failure, adults with severe failure have also been shown to benefit both from resynchronization and implantation of cardioverter defibrillators.Reference Lindenfeld, Feldman and Saxon54 The indications for both of these therapies in children, however, remain speculative.

What’s new in cardiac transplantation

The year 2007 marked the 25th anniversary of transplantation of the heart for children. The era began in 1982, with the discovery of cyclosporine as an effective immunosuppressive agent. Survival of children subsequent to transplantation has been steadily improving by era during this period of 25 years, most significantly in the early postoperative period (Fig. 2).Reference Feingold, Bowman and Zeevi55 Survival at 6 months after transplantation has improved from 74% to 90% from the earliest era, 1982 to 1989, to the most recently reported era, 2000 to 2005. Experience with selection of patients and postoperative management in the intensive care unit are likely the major contributors to this decrease in early mortality.Reference Holt, Lublin and Phelan56, Reference Pollock-BarZiv, den Hollander, Ngan, Kantor, McCrindle and Dipchand57

Figure 2 Kaplan-Meier Survival by Era for cardiac transplantation in children as revealed by the data from the pediatric heart transplantation registry of the International Society for Heart and Lung Transplantation (J Heart Lung Transplant 2007; 26: 796–798).

This year also marked the publication of the tenth annual report of the Registry of the International Society of Heart and Lung Transplant for cardiac transplant in children, which includes data on almost 5,000 recipients worldwide from 1982 to the present.Reference Boucek, Aurora and Edwards58 Access to the full report is publically available at www.ishlt.org. New in the analysis this year is the report of complications observed in paediatric recipients with 10 or more years of follow-up. Hypertension is common, reported in almost three-quarters of those surviving 10 years, with hyperlipidemia also having a significant prevalence of almost two-fifths. While renal dysfunction is certainly a concern in long-term survivors, the prevalence of severe renal dysfunction in long-term follow-up was less than 2%. The risk of coronary vasculopathy, which is the most common reason for retransplantation and the cause of many deaths, was 16.7% at 10 years, significantly less than that observed in adults.

Significant differences in terms of survival have been observed based on age at time of transplantation.Reference Morrow and Kirklin59, Reference Canter, Shaddy and Bernstein60 The median survival of the graft, or the so-called half-life, was 15.8 years for those transplanted during infancy, 14.2 years for children, and 11.4 years for adolescents across all eras. Those transplanted during infancy showed a bimodal curve for survival, with higher early mortality but seemingly lower late mortality than the older cohorts. The increased early mortality may be related to the increased incidence of congenital cardiac disease, which is an independent risk factor for death at 1 and 5 years. Whether the differential long term survival represents a true form of tolerance of the graft for infants versus the insurmountable problem of nonadherance in the teens, or some combination of these effects, is unknown.

The identification of populations shown to be at high risk for potentially modifiable risk factors that affect long-term survival is now the focus of many recent investigations. Examples of this are an increased focus on the presensitized recipient, and immune-mediated effects on the graft. Exposure to nonself human lymphocytic antigens occurs via homograft materials used during surgical procedures for congenitally malformed hearts, multiple exposures to blood products, ventricular assist devices, and previous transplantations, all of which are increasing in frequency among children being referred for transplantation. At the time of transplantation, a mismatch between donor and recipient for human lymphocytic antigens can result in a reaction between pre formed antibodies and the donor graft, resulting in a positive donor specific cross-match. A positive cross-match has been associated with damage to the transplanted heart via a cascade mediated by complement, the effects of which are not limited to the early postoperative period. Increased risks of rejection, graft vasculopathy, graft dysfunction, and mortality have been associated with presence of alloantibodies and positive cross-match in large studies of adults. In the past year, there has been at least 6 reports from single centres concerning outcomes of the sensitized child undergoing cardiac transplantation.Reference Feingold, Bowman and Zeevi55Reference Pollock-BarZiv, den Hollander, Ngan, Kantor, McCrindle and Dipchand57, Reference Casarez, Perens and Williams61 Decreased survival of sensitized as opposed to nonsensitized candidates was reported by 4 of the 6 centres. Increased rejection was observed in half the studies. In one centre, an increased incidence of graft vasculopathy was noted in the presensitized population. A multicentric clinical trial sponsored by the National Institutes of Health to study further the influence of immunologic factors on outcomes in children subsequent to cardiac transplantation is currently being formulated.

A noteworthy event on the theme of sponsored clinical trials in children is the trial of the Berlin Heart EXCOR® Pediatric Ventricular Assist Device. This device is a miniaturized pneumatic paracorporeal implant now available in sizes suitable for infants and small children. There have been 96 devices implanted in the United States of America between July 2000 and May of 2007 under regulations for emergency compassionate use. The multicentric prospective single arm trial is to determine the risk-benefit profile of the device as a potential alternative to extracorporeal oxygenation for infants and small children requiring long-term mechanical circulatory support.Reference Blume, Naftel, Bastardi, Duncan, Kirklin and Webber62 Comparison is to a historical control group of children bridged to transplant with extracorporeal oxygenation. Included in the approval granted by the Food and Drug Administration for this trial is the provision of a relatively streamlined procedure for providing the device under the regulations for compassionate use in centres not actively participating in the trial.

Another exciting advancement is being made worldwide with increasing experience of transplantation of incompatible hearts in terms of ABO blood groups. The strategy depends on transplantation of hearts from incompatible donors successfully into infants who have yet to develop isohaemagglutinins, which typically occurs at about 1 year of age.Reference West, Pollock-Barziv and Dipchand63 The pioneers of this approach recently reported follow up data from their initial cohort of infants, who underwent transplantation from 1995 through 2006,Reference West, Karamlou, Dipchand, Pollock-BarZiv, Coles and McCrindle64 showing a reduced mortality whilst awaiting transplantation, with comparable outcomes up to 4 years subsequent to transplantation. Similar findings have been reported in the experience of such transplantation in the United Kingdom.Reference Roche, Burch and O’Sullivan65 Again there was reduced mortality whilst awaiting transplantation, without any adverse events noted for transplantation across blood groups. This ongoing work of transplantation between apparently incompatible donors and recipients, in the realms of both clinical practice and research, is not only providing insight into the unique nature of the infant immune system, but also into the mechanisms of graft tolerance, which represents the leading edge of transplantation medicine.

References

1.Hunt, SA, Abraham, WT, Chin, MH, ACC/AHA. 2005 Guideline Update for the Diagnosis and Management of Chronic Heart Failure in the Adult-Summary Article A Report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines (Writing Committee to Update the 2001 Guidelines for the Evaluation and Management of Heart Failure). J Am Coll Cardiol 2005; 46: 11161143.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
2.Rosenthal, D, Chrisant, MR, Edens, E, et al. International Society for Heart and Lung Transplantation: Practice guidelines for management of heart failure in children. J Heart Lung Transplant 2004; 23: 13131333.Google Scholar
3.Shaddy, RE, Tani, LY. Chronic congestive heart failure. In: Allen HD, Driscoll DJ, Shaddy RE, Feltes T, (eds). Moss and Adams’ Heart Disease in Infants, Children, and Adolescents, Including the Fetus and Young Adult, 7th Edition. Lippincott, Williams and Wilkins, Philadelphia, 2007, pp 14951504.Google Scholar
4.Towbin, JA. Inflammatory cardiomyopathy: there is a specific matrix destruction in the course of the disease. Ernst Schering Res Found Workshop 2006; 55: 219250.Google Scholar
5.Bowles, NE, Bowles, KR, Towbin, JA. Viral genomic detection and outcome in myocarditis. Heart Failure Clin 2005; 1: 407417.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
6.Aretz, HT. Myocarditis: the Dallas criteria. Hum Pathol 1987; 18: 619624.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
7.Hauck, AJ, Kearney, DL, Edwards, WD. Evaluation of postmortem endomyocardial biopsy specimens from 38 patients with lymphocytic myocarditis: Implications for role of sampling error. Mayo Clin Proc 1989; 64: 12351245.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
8.Cooper, LT, Baughman, K, Feldman, AM, et al. The role of endomayocardial biopsy in the management of cardiovascular disease. A scientific statement from the American Heart Association, American College of Cardiology, and European Society of Cardiology, Endorsed by the Japanese Circulation Society and the Heart Failure Society of America. Circulation 2007; 116: 22162233.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
9.Bowles, NE, Ni, J, Kearney, DL, et al. Detection of viruses in myocardial tissues by polymerase chain reaction: evidence of adenovirus as a common cause of myocarditis in children and adults. J Am Coll Cardiol 2003; 42: 466472.Google Scholar
10.Mason, JW, O’Connell, JB, Herskowitz, A, et al. . and the Myocarditis Treatment Trial Investigators. A clinical trial of immunosuppressive therapy for myocarditis. N Engl J Med 1995; 333: 269275.Google Scholar
11.Coleman, HN III, Taylor, RR, Pool, PE, et al. Congestive heart failure following chronic tachycardia. Am Heart J 1971; 81: 790798.Google Scholar
12.Kugler, JD, Baisch, SD, Cheatham, JP, et al. Improvement of left ventricular dysfunction after control of persistent tachycardia. J Pediatrics 1984; 105: 543548.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
13.Gillette, PC, Smith, RT, Garson, A Jr, et al. Chronic supraventricular tachycardia: a curable cause of congestive cardiomyopathy. JAMA 1985; 253: 391392.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
14.Spinale, FG, Fulbright, BM, Mukherjee, R, et al. Relation between ventricular and myocyte function with tachycardia-induced cardiomyopathy. Circ Res 1992; 71: 174187.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
15.Tantengco, MV, Thomas, RL, Karpawich, PP. Left ventricular dysfunction after long-term right ventricular apical pacing in the young. J Am Coll Cardiol 2001; 37: 20932100.Google Scholar
16.Thambo, JB, Bordachar, P, Garrigue, S, et al. Detrimental ventricular remodeling in patients with congenital complete heart block and chronic right ventricular apical pacing. Circulation 2004; 110: 37663772.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
17.Sweeney, MO, Hellkamp, AS, Ellenbogen, KA, et al. Mode Selection Trial Investigators. Adverse effect of ventricular pacing on heart failure and atrial fibrillation among patients with normal baseline QRS duration in a clinical trial of pacemaker therapy for sinus node dysfunction. Circulation 2003; 107: 29322937.Google Scholar
18.Wilkoff, BL, Cook, JR, Epstein, AE, et al. Dual Chamber and VVI Implantable Defibrillator Trial Investigators. Dual-chamber pacing or ventricular backup pacing in patients with an implantable defibrillator: the Dual Chamber and VVI Implantable Defibrillator (DAVID) Trial. JAMA 2002; 288: 31153123.Google ScholarPubMed
19.The DAVID Trial Investigators. Dual-chamber pacing or ventricular backup pacing in patients with an implantable defibrillator. JAMA 2002; 288: 31153123.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
20.Moak, JP, Barron, KS, Hougen, TJ, et al. Congenital heart block: development of late-onset cardiomyopathy, a previously underappreciated sequela. J Am Coll Cardiol 2001; 37: 238242.Google Scholar
21.Udink ten Cate, FE, Breur, JM, Cohen, MI, et al. Dilated cardiomyopathy in isolated congenital complete atrioventricular block: early and long-term risk in children. J Am Coll Cardiol 2001; 37: 11291134.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
22.Eronen, M. Long-term outcome of children with complete heart block diagnosed after the newborn period. Pediatr Cardiol 2001; 22: 133137.Google Scholar
23.Lipshultz, SE, Easley, KA, Orav, EJ, et al. Reliability of multicenter pediatric echocardiographic measurements of left ventricular structure and function: the prospective P(2)C(2) HIV study. Circulation 2001; 104: 310316.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
24.Towbin, JA, Lowe, AM, Colan, SD, et al. Incidence, causes, and outcomes of dilated cardiomyopathy in children. JAMA 2006; 296: 18671876.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
25.Jenkins, C, Bricknell, K, Chan, J, Hanekom, L, Marwick, TH. Comparison of two- and three-dimensional echocardiography with sequential magnetic resonance imaging for evaluating left ventricular volume and ejection fraction over time in patients with healed myocardial infarction. Am J Cardiol 2007; 99: 300306.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
26.Eidem, BW, O’Leary, PW, Tei, C, Seward, JB. Usefulness of the myocardial performance index for assessing right ventricular function in congenital heart disease. Am J Cardiol 2000; 86: 654658.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
27.McMahon, CJ NSEapen, RS, et al. Echoacardiographic predictors of adverse clinical events in children with dilated cardiomyopathy: a prospective clinical study. Heart 2004; 90: 908915.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
28.Chung, N, Nishimura, RA, Holmes, DR Jr, Tajik, AJ. Measurement of left ventricular dp/dt by simultaneous Doppler echocardiography and cardiac catheterization. J Am Soc Echocardiogr 1992; 5: 147152.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
29.Tournoux, FB, Alabiad, C, Fan, D, et al. Echocardiographic measures of acute haemodynamic response after cardiac resynchronization therapy predict long-term clinical outcome. Eur Heart J 2007; 28: 11431148.Google Scholar
30.Kolias, TJ, Aaronson, KD, Armstrong, WF. Doppler-derived dP/dt and -dP/dt predict survival in congestive heart failure. J Am Coll Cardiol 2000; 36: 15941599.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
31.Borlaug, BA, Melenovsky, V, Redfield, MM, et al. Impact of arterial load and loading sequence on left ventricular tissue velocities in humans. J Am Coll Cardiol 2007; 50: 15701577.Google Scholar
32.Dincer, I, Kumbasar, D, Nergisoglu, G, et al. Assessment of left ventricular diastolic function with Doppler tissue imaging: effects of preload and place of measurements. Int J Cardiovasc Imaging 2002; 18: 155160.Google Scholar
33.Duan, YY, Harada, K, Toyono, M, Ishii, H, Tamura, M, Takada, G. Effects of acute preload reduction on myocardial velocity during isovolumic contraction and myocardial acceleration in pediatric patients. Pediatr Cardiol 2006; 27: 3236.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
34.Jacques, DC, Pinsky, MR, Severyn, D, Gorcsan, J 3rd. Influence of alterations in loading on mitral annular velocity by tissue Doppler echocardiography and its associated ability to predict filling pressures. Chest 2004; 126: 19101918.Google Scholar
35.McMahon, CJ, Nagueh, SF, Pignatelli, RH, et al. Characterization of left ventricular diastolic function by tissue Doppler imaging and clinical status in children with hypertrophic cardiomyopathy. Circulation 2004; 109: 17561762.Google Scholar
36.McMahon, CJ, Pignatelli, RH, Nagueh, SF, et al. Left ventricular non-compaction cardiomyopathy in children: characterisation of clinical status using tissue Doppler-derived indices of left ventricular diastolic relaxation. Heart 2007; 93: 676681.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
37.Corsi, C, Lang, RM, Veronesi, F, et al. Volumetric quantification of global and regional left ventricular function from real-time three-dimensional echocardiographic images. Circulation 2005; 112: 11611170.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
38.Soriano, BD, Hoch, M, Ithuralde, A, et al. Matrix-array 3-dimensional echocardiographic assessment of volumes, mass, and ejection fraction in young pediatric patients with a functional single ventricle: a comparison study with cardiac magnetic resonance. Circulation 2008; 117: 18421848.Google Scholar
39.Bu, L, Munns, S, Zhang, H, et al. Rapid full volume data acquisition by real-time 3-dimensional echocardiography for assessment of left ventricular indexes in children: a validation study compared with magnetic resonance imaging. J Am Soc Echocardiogr 2005; 18: 299305.Google Scholar
40.Baker, GH, Hlavacek, AM, Chessa, KS, Fleming, DM, Shirali, GS. Left ventricular dysfunction is associated with intraventricular dyssynchrony by 3-dimensional echocardiography in children. J Am Soc Echocardiogr 2008; 21: 230233.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
41.Baker, GH, Flack, EC, Hlavacek, AM, et al. Variability and resource utilization of bedside three-dimensional echocardiographic quantitative measurements of left ventricular volume in congenital heart disease. Congenital Heart Dis 2006; 1: 318323.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
42.Moe, GW, Howlett, J, Januzzi, JL, Zowall, H. N-terminal pro-B-type natriuretic peptide testing improves the management of patients with suspected acute heart failure: primary results of the Canadian prospective randomized multicenter IMPROVE-CHF study. Circulation 2007; 115: 31033110.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
43.Price, JF, Thomas, AK, Grenier, M, et al. B-type natriuretic peptide predicts adverse cardiovascular events in pediatric outpatients with chronic left ventricular systolic dysfunction. Circulation 2006; 114: 10631069.Google Scholar
44.Cardinale, D, Colombo, A, Sandri, MT, et al. Prevention of high-dose chemotherapy-induced cardiotoxicity in high-risk patients by angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibition. Circulation 2006; 114: 24742481.Google Scholar
45.Pitt, B, Zannad, F, Remme, WJ, et al. The effect of spironolactone on morbidity and mortality in patients with severe heart failure. Randomized Aldactone Evaluation Study Investigators. N Engl J Med 1999; 341: 709717.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
46.Pitt, B, Remme, W, Zannad, F, et al. Eplerenone, a selective aldosterone blocker, in patients with left ventricular dysfunction after myocardial infarction. N Engl J Med 2003; 348: 13091321.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
47.Chan, AK, Sanderson, JE, Wang, T, et al. Aldosterone receptor antagonism induces reverse remodeling when added to angiotensin receptor blockade in chronic heart failure. J Am Coll Cardiol 2007; 50: 591596.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
48.Cleland, JG, Coletta, AP, Clark, AL. Clinical trials update from the American College of Cardiology 2007: ALPHA, EVEREST, FUSION II, VALIDD, PARR-2, REMODEL, SPICE, COURAGE, COACH, REMADHE, pro-BNP for the evaluation of dyspnoea and THIS-diet. Eur J Heart Fail 2007; 9: 740745.Google Scholar
49.Young, JB, Abraham, WT, Stevenson, LW, Horton, DP, Elkayam, U, Bourge, RC. Intravenous nesiritide vs nitroglycerin for treatment of decompensated congestive heart failure: a randomized controlled trial. JAMA 2002; 287: 15311540.Google Scholar
50.Jefferies, JL, Price, JF, Denfield, SW, et al. Safety and efficacy of nesiritide in pediatric heart failure. J Card Fail 2007; 13: 541548.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
51.Shaddy, RE, Boucek, MM, Hsu, DT, et al. Carvedilol for children and adolescents with heart failure: a randomized controlled trial. JAMA 2007; 298: 11711179.Google Scholar
52.Kass, DA. An epidemic of dyssynchrony: but what does it mean? J Am Coll Cardiol 2008; 51: 1217.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
53.Beshai, JF, Grimm, RA, Nagueh, SF, et al. Cardiac-resynchronization therapy in heart failure with narrow QRS complexes. N Engl J Med 2007; 357: 24612471.Google Scholar
54.Lindenfeld, J, Feldman, AM, Saxon, L, et al. Effects of cardiac resynchronization therapy with or without a defibrillator on survival and hospitalizations in patients with New York Heart Association class IV heart failure. Circulation 2007; 115: 204212.Google Scholar
55.Feingold, B, Bowman, P, Zeevi, A, et al. Survival in allosensitized children after listing for cardiac transplantation. J Heart Lung Transplant 2007; 26: 565571.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
56.Holt, DB, Lublin, DM, Phelan, DL, et al. Mortality and morbidity in pre-sensitized pediatric heart transplant recipients with a positive donor crossmatch utilizing peri-operative plasmapheresis and cytolytic therapy. J Heart Lung Transplant 2007; 26: 876882.Google Scholar
57.Pollock-BarZiv, SM, den Hollander, N, Ngan, BY, Kantor, P, McCrindle, B, Dipchand, AI. Pediatric heart transplantation in human leukocyte antigen sensitized patients: evolving management and assessment of intermediate-term outcomes in a high-risk population. Circulation 2007; 116 (11 Suppl): I172178.Google Scholar
58.Boucek, MM, Aurora, P, Edwards, LB, et al. Registry of the International Society for Heart and Lung Transplantation: tenth official pediatric heart transplantation report--2007. J Heart Lung Transplant 2007; 26: 796807.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
59.Morrow, R, Kirklin, JK. Survival after pediatric heart transplantation. In: Canter CE, Kirklin, JK (eds). ISHLT Monograph Series: Pediatric Heart Transplantation, Vol. 2. Elsevier, Philadelphia, 2007, pp 123137.Google Scholar
60.Canter, CE, Shaddy, RE, Bernstein, D, et al. Indications for heart transplantation in pediatric heart disease: a scientific statement from the American Heart Association Council on Cardiovascular Disease in the Young; the Councils on Clinical Cardiology, Cardiovascular Nursing, and Cardiovascular Surgery and Anesthesia; and the Quality of Care and Outcomes Research Interdisciplinary Working Group. Circulation 2007; 115: 658676.Google Scholar
61.Casarez, TW, Perens, G, Williams, RJ, et al. Humoral rejection in pediatric orthotopic heart transplantation. J Heart Lung Transplant 2007; 26: 114119.Google Scholar
62.Blume, E, Naftel, D, Bastardi, H, Duncan, B, Kirklin, J, Webber, S. Outcome of children bridged to transplant with ventricular assist devices: A multi-institutional study. J Heart Lung Transplant 2005; 24: S75S75.Google Scholar
63.West, LJ, Pollock-Barziv, SM, Dipchand, AI, et al. ABO-incompatible heart transplantation in infants. N Engl J Med 2001; 344: 793800.Google Scholar
64.West, LJ, Karamlou, T, Dipchand, AI, Pollock-BarZiv, SM, Coles, JG, McCrindle, BW. Impact on outcomes after listing and transplantation, of a strategy to accept ABO blood group-incompatible donor hearts for neonates and infants. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2006; 131: 455461.Google Scholar
65.Roche, SL, Burch, M, O’Sullivan, J, et al. Multicenter experience of ABO-incompatible pediatric cardiac transplantation. Am J Transplant 2008; 8: 208215.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Figure 0

Figure 1 The proposed mechanisms for pacemaker-induced cardiomyopathy.

Figure 1

Figure 2 Kaplan-Meier Survival by Era for cardiac transplantation in children as revealed by the data from the pediatric heart transplantation registry of the International Society for Heart and Lung Transplantation (J Heart Lung Transplant 2007; 26: 796–798).