Hostname: page-component-745bb68f8f-s22k5 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-02-06T07:43:03.881Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Acquired systemic-to-pulmonary shunts in a 6-month-old child: case report and review of the literature

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  10 February 2020

Oscar Werner*
Affiliation:
Pediatric Cardiology & Pulmonology Department, M3C Regional Reference Center, Montpellier University Hospital, Montpellier, France Pediatric Imaging Department, Montpellier University Hospital, Montpellier, France
Caroline Ovaert
Affiliation:
Cardiology, M3C Regional Reference CHD Centre, La Timone University Hospital, Marseille, France Marseille Medical Genetics, INSERM UMR 1251, Aix Marseille University, Marseille, France
Pascal Amedro
Affiliation:
Pediatric Cardiology & Pulmonology Department, M3C Regional Reference Center, Montpellier University Hospital, Montpellier, France PhyMedExp, CNRS, INSERM, University of Montpellier, Montpellier, France
*
Author for correspondence: Dr O. Werner; Pediatric Cardiology & Pulmonology Department, CHU Arnaud De Villeneuve, 371 avenue du Doyen Gaston Giraud, 34295Montpellier Cedex 5, France. Tel: +33 4 67 33 66 39; Fax: +33 4 37 33 21 29; E-mail: o-werner@chu-montpellier.fr
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

The incidence of paediatric venous thromboembolism has steadily increased in the past decade, by nearly 10% per year. Deep venous thrombosis may remain completely asymptomatic during the acute phase and symptoms may occur later, due to complications. We related the case of a 9-month-old child with increasing cyanosis. A computed tomography (CT) angiography showed a thrombosis of the superior vena cava (SVC) with the development of collateral flow from the systemic to the pulmonary veins. Transcatheter shunt occlusion after SVC recanalization was successfully performed. We discussed the characteristics of these cases and the consequence on our practice in term of treatment (anticoagulation, transcatheter, intervention) and screening.

Type
Brief Report
Copyright
© Cambridge University Press 2020

The incidence of venous thromboembolism in children has steadily increased in the past decade, by nearly 10% per year, reaching currently 5 out of 100,000 hospitalised children.Reference Raffini, Huang, Witmer and Feudtner1,Reference Vidal, Sharathkumar, Glover and Faustino2 Improved survival of critically ill children associated with prolonged hospital stay is the main reason. Central venous lines represent the main risk factor for deep venous thrombosis in children, especially in the neonatal population (<1 month old). However, this risk depends on the type of catheter, with a high incidence of central catheter- related thrombosis in tunneled catheters and a rather low incidence of thromboembolic events in peripherally inserted central catheters.Reference Vidal, Sharathkumar, Glover and Faustino2 A significant number of catheter-related thromboembolic events may remain undiagnosed in children during the acute phase. According to Menéndez et al, nearly 20% of thrombosis related to peripherally inserted central catheters are asymptomatic in the paediatric population.Reference Menéndez, Verdú and Calderón3 However, complications related to thromboembolic events in peripherally inserted central catheters have been rarely reported in pediatrics.

We report a 6-month-old child with undiagnosed neonatal catheter-related venous thrombosis, resulting in a severe cyanosis.

Case report

A 6-month-old female patient known to have bronchopulmonary dysplasia was referred by the pulmonologist to the paediatric cardiology clinic because of a refractory and unusual cyanosis.

This patient was born at 25 weeks and 6 days of gestation; birth weight was 875 grams. The mother had received steroid treatment more than 48 hours before delivery. The newborn exhibited respiratory distress, requiring surfactant instillation and prolonged ventilation. Parenteral nutrition was administered during the 2 first weeks of life, using a peripheral inserted central catheter in the right brachial vein. The catheter was removed at day 18 without any complications. Non-invasive ventilation was continued until day 23 and the baby was discharged from hospital at day 86 with, according to the current definition, severe bronchopulmonary dysplasia treated with oxygen therapy and spironolactone.

During the following 6 months, cyanosis worsened but remained unresponsive to an increase of at-home oxygen treatment with a minimum oxygen saturation of 78%. Clinically, the child had no tachypnea, no retraction signs, and the capillary blood gas test remained normal (pH = 7.39; PCO2 = 40 mmHg). Chest computed tomography (CT) scan showed no pulmonary lesions. An echocardiography confirmed the absence of cyanotic CHD but showed unusual venous structures at the posterior side of the left atrium. Contrast echocardiography was not conclusive because of the presence of a patent foramen ovale. Blood clotting was normal. CT angiography with injection through a venous access on the left foot (Revolution GSI General Electric; intravenous injection of 20 ml Xenetic 350 ml/ml, no sedation required) revealed an obstruction of the superior vena cava and the left brachiocephalic (e.g. innominate) venous trunk with multiple collateral vessels between the venomous trunks and the right and left inferior pulmonary veins (Supplementary material: 3D reconstruction).

The patient underwent a first cardiac catheterization with double venous access (left jugular and right femoral). The existence of a narrow lumen within the thrombus allowed progressive balloon dilation and final deployment of two balloon-expandable stents (Valeo®, Bard Inc., New Providence, NJ, USA) dilated up to 8 mm (Figs 1 and 2). Oxygen saturation normalised immediately after the intervention. Oral anticoagulation (warfarin) was prescribed for a period of 6 months and anti-platelets for an undetermined period. An additional catheterisation was performed in March 2019 during which a dilatation of the stent of the superior vena cava was performed. Then an occlusion of the two major collaterals with two Amplatzer vascular plugs II of 10 and 12 mm (Fig 3).

Figure 1. Classic angiography of the left jugular vein show voluminous collaterals without perfusion of the superior vena cava.

Figure 2. Stented superior vena cava during classical angiography of the left jugular vein.

Figure 3. Second intervention. Obstruction of the collaterals with Amplatzer plug II.

Discussion

We report, for the first time in an infant, an uncommon venous systemic-to-pulmonary shunt resulting in a refractory cyanosis, due to multiple collateral vessels after an undiagnosed neonatal catheter-related venous thrombosis.

The asymptomatic character of the initial deep venous thrombosis in our patient is not uncommon, and in the general population, some studies showed that asymptomatic form could reach more than 1% of hospitalised patients.Reference Zubrow, Urie and Jurkovitz4

Acquired right-to-left shunts have been reported in the adult population with various clinical presentations and underlying conditions.Reference Gilkeson, Nyberg and Sachs5 After neoplasia, the second most frequent cause of acquired right to left shunt is related to deep venous thrombosis, with various origins, from fibrosis mediastinitis to clotting disorders. In these cases, a triggering factor for thrombosis such as repetitive surgeries, or a venous central catheter, was often reported. Only one case was described in a child secondary to a thoracic surgery.Reference Saliba, El-Rassi and Smayra6

These acquired right to left shunts are well known in the CHD population, in particular, in patients with Fontan circulation.Reference Gilkeson, Nyberg and Sachs5,Reference Kapur, Paik, Rezaei and Vu7 It can reach more than 50% of those patients with essential collaterals located above the diaphragm that are the result of recanalisation of embryological venous collaterals also known as bronchial venous plexuses. Recanalisation occurs as a result of increased venous pressures, well described in Fontan patients. The physiopathology is likely the same in our patient, with however a very different origin.

In neonates, the use of central catheters usually remains limited to the neonatal ICUs. The development of less invasive biomedical materials and the promotion of new vascular sites are intended to limit catheter-related complications. In the current era, peripheral inserted central catheter is the privileged access, to the detriment of femoral and subclavian central catheters.Reference Vidal, Sharathkumar, Glover and Faustino2 However, extremely premature infants remain at risk of catheter-related complications. Currently, there is a lack of evidence for prophylactic anticoagulation.Reference Vidal, Sharathkumar, Glover and Faustino2,Reference Monagle, Chan and Goldenberg8 Targeted echography screening should be considered in neonates with central venous line in the absence of acute clinical symptoms of deep venous thrombosis.

Management of catheter-related thrombosis in neonates is also a subject of controversy. Different therapeutic approaches have been considered: ‘wait and see’ strategy, standard anticoagulation, or thrombolysis. The result of the NEOCLOT study will hopefully clarify this situation.Reference Sol, van de Loo and Boerma9

In opposite to the adult population, in the paediatric population, benign superior vena cava thrombosis angioplasty has been rarely reported. Two case series study reported percutaneous angioplasty procedures without any acute adverse effect, in specific and severe populations: deep venous thrombosis after heart transplantation or extracorporeal membrane oxygenation. Reinterventions were more frequent than in the adult population (30–45%).Reference Salavitabar, Flyer and Torres10,Reference Kazanci, McElhinney and Thiagarajan11 The level of mortality in one of the two articles (8/19 patients in Kazanci et al) was very high during the follow-up but could be explained by the severity of the disease itself, as it was as high as in the control group. Finally, in this case, the medical treatment after recanalisation included anticoagulation, as recommended, for 6 months after a venous stenting.Reference Ignatyev12,Reference Milinis, Thapar, Shalhoub and Davies13 Concerning the antiplatelet treatment that was prescribed afterwards, there is no consensus regarding its long-term utility, and the decision to treat was justified by the existence of a venous stent along with vascular plugs in a patient with a much abnormal systemic venous system.

Conclusion

Acquired right-to-left shunt secondary to venous thrombosis is a rare complication, with an uncommon clinical presentation and potentially associated with a late diagnosis. In the absence of paediatric guidelines on thromboembolic prophylaxis, systemic screening for central catheter-related thrombosis must be considered, even with minimally invasive devices, such as peripheral inserted central catheter.

Supplementary Material

To view supplementary material for this article, please visit https://doi.org/10.1017/S1047951119003354

Financial Support

This research received no specific grant from any funding agency, commercial, or not-for-profit sectors

Conflict of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest

References

Raffini, L, Huang, Y-S, Witmer, C, Feudtner, C. Dramatic increase in venous thromboembolism in children’s hospitals in the United States from 2001 to 2007. Pediatrics 2009; 124: 10011008. https://doi.org/10.1542/peds.2009-0768CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Vidal, E, Sharathkumar, A, Glover, J, Faustino, EVS. Central venous catheter-related thrombosis and thromboprophylaxis in children: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Thromb Haemost 2014; 12: 10961109. https://doi.org/10.1111/jth.12598CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Menéndez, JJ, Verdú, C, Calderón, B, et al.Incidence and risk factors of superficial and deep vein thrombosis associated with peripherally inserted central catheters in children. J Thromb Haemost 2016; 14: 21582168. https://doi.org/10.1111/jth.13478CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Zubrow, MT, Urie, J, Jurkovitz, C, et al.Asymptomatic deep vein thrombosis in patients undergoing screening duplex ultrasonography. J Hosp Med 2014; 9: 1922. https://doi.org/10.1002/jhm.2112CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Gilkeson, RC, Nyberg, EM, Sachs, PB, et al.Systemic to pulmonary venous shunt: imaging findings and clinical presentations. J Thorac Imaging 2008; 23: 170177. https://doi.org/10.1097/RTI.0b013e318172d65bCrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Saliba, Z, El-Rassi, I, Smayra, T. Percutaneous closure of a large iatrogenic fistula between the inferior vena cava and the pulmonary vein in a child. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv 2011; 78: 694697. https://doi.org/10.1002/ccd.22949CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kapur, S, Paik, E, Rezaei, A, Vu, DN. Where there is blood, there is a way: unusual collateral vessels in superior and inferior vena cava obstruction. RadioGraphics 2010; 30: 6778. https://doi.org/10.1148/rg.301095724CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Monagle, P, Chan, AKC, Goldenberg, NA, et al.Antithrombotic therapy in neonates and children: Antithrombotic Therapy and Prevention of Thrombosis, 9th ed: American College of Chest Physicians Evidence-Based Clinical Practice Guidelines. Chest 2012; 141: e737S–e801S. https://doi.org/10.1378/chest.11-2308CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Sol, JJ, van de Loo, M, Boerma, M, et al.NEOnatal Central-venous Line Observational study on Thrombosis (NEOCLOT): evaluation of a national guideline on management of neonatal catheter-related thrombosis. BMC Pediatr 2018; 18: 84. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12887-018-1000-7CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Salavitabar, A, Flyer, JN, Torres, AJ, et al.Transcatheter stenting of superior vena cava obstruction after pediatric heart transplantation: a single-center experience assessing risk factors and outcomes. Pediatr Transplant 2018; 22: e13267. https://doi.org/10.1111/petr.13267CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kazanci, SY, McElhinney, DB, Thiagarajan, R, et al.Obstruction of the superior vena cava after neonatal extracorporeal membrane oxygenation: association with chylothorax and outcome of transcatheter treatment. Pediatr Crit Care Med 2013; 14: 3743. https://doi.org/10.1097/PCC.0b013e31825b5270CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Ignatyev, IM. Antithrombotic therapy after venous stenting. Angiol Sosud Khirurgiia Angiol Vasc Surg 2019; 25: 183187. https://doi.org/10.33529/ANGID2019302CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Milinis, K, Thapar, A, Shalhoub, J, Davies, AH. Antithrombotic therapy following venous stenting: international delphi consensus. Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg 2018; 55: 537544. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejvs.2018.01.007CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Figure 0

Figure 1. Classic angiography of the left jugular vein show voluminous collaterals without perfusion of the superior vena cava.

Figure 1

Figure 2. Stented superior vena cava during classical angiography of the left jugular vein.

Figure 2

Figure 3. Second intervention. Obstruction of the collaterals with Amplatzer plug II.

Supplementary material: Image

Werner et al. Supplementary Materials

Werner et al. Supplementary Materials

Download Werner et al. Supplementary Materials(Image)
Image 326.1 KB