Hostname: page-component-745bb68f8f-f46jp Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-02-06T08:54:34.370Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Rigidity Properties for Hyperbolic Generalizations

Part of: Special aspects of infinite or finite groups

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  18 November 2019

Brendan Burns Healy
Brendan Burns Healy*
Affiliation:
Department of Mathematical Sciences, University of Wisconsin-Milwaukee, 3200 N Cramer St, Milwaukee, WI 53211, USA Email: healyb@uwm.edu
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

We make a few observations on the absence of geometric and topological rigidity for acylindrically hyperbolic and relatively hyperbolic groups. In particular, we demonstrate the lack of a well-defined limit set for acylindrical actions on hyperbolic spaces, even under the assumption of universality. We also prove a statement about relatively hyperbolic groups inspired by a remark by Groves, Manning, and Sisto about the quasi-isometry type of combinatorial cusps. Finally, we summarize these results in a table in order to assert a meta-statement about the decay of metric rigidity as the conditions on actions on hyperbolic spaces are loosened.

Keywords

acylindricalrelativehyperbolicityrigidityquasi-isometrygeneralized loxodromic

MSC classification

Primary: 20F65: Geometric group theory
Type
Article
Information
Canadian Mathematical Bulletin , Volume 63 , Issue 1 , March 2020 , pp. 66 - 76
Copyright
© Canadian Mathematical Society 2019

References

Abbott, C. R., Not all finitely generated groups have universal acylindrical actions. Proc. Amer. Math. Soc. 144(2016), 4151–4155. https://doi.org/10.1090/proc/13101CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Abbott, C., Balasubramanya, S., and Osin, D., Hyperbolic structures on groups. Algebr. Geom. Topol. 19(2019), no. 4, 1747–1835. https://doi.org/10.2140/agt.2019.19.1747CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bridson, M. R. and Haefliger, A., Metric spaces of non-positive curvature. Grundlehren der Mathematischen Wissenschaften, 319, Springer-Verlag, Berlin, 1999. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-662-12494-9CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bowditch, B. H., Relatively hyperbolic groups. Internat. J. Algebra Comput. 22(2012), 1250016. https://doi.org/10.1142/S0218196712500166Google Scholar
Croke, C. B. and Kleiner, B., Spaces with nonpositive curvature and their ideal boundaries. Topology 39(2000), 549–556. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0040-9383(99)00016-6CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Caprace, P.-E. and Sageev, M., Rank rigidity for CAT(0) cube complexes. Geom. Funct. Anal. 21(2011), 851–891. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00039-011-0126-7CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Geoghegan, R., Topological methods in group theory. Graduate Texts in Mathematics, 243, Springer, New York, 2008. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-0-387-74614-2CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Groves, D. and Manning, J. F., Dehn filling in relatively hyperbolic groups. Israel J. Math. 168(2008), 317–429. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11856-008-1070-6CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Groves, D., Manning, J. F., and Sisto, A., Boundaries of dehn fillings. arxiv:1612.03497Google Scholar
Osin, D., Acylindrically hyperbolic groups. Trans. Amer. Math. Soc. 368(2016), 851–888. https://doi.org/10.1090/tran/6343CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sisto, A., Contracting elements and random walks. J. Reine Angew. Math. 742(2018), 79–114. https://doi.org/10.1515/crelle-2015-0093CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Thurston, W. P., Three-dimensional geometry and topology. Princeton Mathematical Series, 35, Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ, 1997.CrossRefGoogle Scholar