Hostname: page-component-6bf8c574d5-2jptb Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-02-21T23:46:38.538Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Some Linear Operators in the Lp Spaces

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  20 November 2018

Lee Peng-Yee
Lee Peng-Yee*
Affiliation:
University of Auckland, Auckland, New Zealand
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

Let Lp,1 ≦ p< ∞, denote the space of all functions ƒ (real or complex) such that ƒ and |ƒ|pare variationally integrable (see 2, p. 40, for definition) with respect to a pair h of interval functions in an elementary set E. In what follows, we fix both h and E and assume that h = {hl ht}is variationally integrable and hs ≧ 0 (s = l, r)in E. Further, let L∞denote the space of all functions ƒ (real or complex) which are h-measurable (cf. 2, p. 95) and bounded almost everywhere, i.e. except in a set X satisfying (cf. 2, p. 47) V(h; E; X)= 0.

Type
Research Article
Information
Canadian Journal of Mathematics , Volume 21 , 1969 , pp. 648 - 654
Copyright
Copyright © Canadian Mathematical Society 1969

References

1. Banach, S., Théorie des opérations linéaires (Monogr. Mat., Vol. 1, 1932, Warsaw).Google Scholar
2. Henstock, R., Theory of integration (Butterworths, London, 1963).Google Scholar
3. Lee, Peng-Yee, A note on some generalizations of the Riemann-Lebesgue theorem, J. London Math. Soc. 41 (1966), 313–317.Google Scholar
4. Lorentz, G. G., Some new functional spaces, Ann. of Math. (2) 51 (1950), 37–55.Google Scholar
5. Sargent, W. L. C., Some sequence spaces related to the lp spaces, J. London Math. Soc. 85 (1960), 116–171.Google Scholar
6. Sunouchi, G. and Tsuchikura, T., Absolute regularity for convergent integrals, Tôhoku Math. J. (2) 4 (1952), 153–156.Google Scholar
7. Tatchell, J. B., On some integral transformations, Proc. London Math. Soc. (3) 3 (1953), 257–266.Google Scholar