Hostname: page-component-745bb68f8f-kw2vx Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-02-06T01:06:28.599Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Antonio Fábregas and Sergio Scalise. 2012. Morphology: From data to theories. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press. Pp. xii + 209. £19.90 (softcover).

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  06 January 2016

Francesco-Alessio Ursini*
Affiliation:
Stockholms Universitet
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Reviews/Comptes Rendus
Copyright
Copyright © Canadian Linguistic Association. 2015

References

Anderson, Stephen R. 1992. A-morphous morphology. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Aronoff, Mark. 1994. Morphology by itself. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Booij, Gert. 2010. Construction Morphology. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Booij, Gert and Lieber, Rochelle. 2004. On the paradigmatic nature of affixal semantics in English and Dutch. Linguistics 42:327357.Google Scholar
DiSciullo, Anne Marie and Williams, Edwin. 1987. On the definition of word. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Hale, Ken and Keyser, Samuel J.. 2002. Prolegomenona to a theory of argument structure. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Harbour, Daniel. 2007. Morphosemantic number. Dordrecht: Springer.Google Scholar
Harley, Heidi. 2012. Semantics in Distributed Morphology. In Semantics: An international handbook of natural language meaning, ed. Maienborn, Claudia, von Heusinger, Klaus, and Portner, Paul, 688709. Amsterdam: De Gruyter.Google Scholar
Kiparsky, Paul. 1982. Lexical phonology and morphology. Linguistics in the morning calm: Selected papers from SICOL-1981, ed. Yang, In-Shu, 391. Seoul: Hanshin.Google Scholar