Introduction
Arctia olschwangi Dubatolov was described from northwestern Asia, the Polar Ural Mountains, and the southern part of the Yamal Peninsula. Later, based on a single-damaged specimen, it was recorded from the Lena River delta (Dubatolov Reference Dubatolov1996, Reference Dubatolov2003, Reference Dubatolov2010); these localities were the only ones known until now.
In April 2004, K.W.P. sent to V.V.D. a set of tiger-moth photographs from the collection of the Alaska Lepidoptera Survey, and in 2007 the first author noticed that a set of specimens from the North Slope of Alaska, United States of America differed from Arctia opulenta (Edwards) specimens from the more southern parts of Alaska. Specimens of this series have more elongate forewings and a flatter position of the brown subbasal band on the forewings, characters of the sibling species from Arctic Siberia, Russia, A. olschwangi. The latter species was described as a sibling species to Arctia caja (Linnaeus), differing mainly by strongly reduced eyes (adaptation to continuous daylight during the polar summer), absence of the blue tint in hindwing spots, and minute characters in male genitalia. Later comparisons of eye structure and male and female genitalia based on photographs kindly prepared by Clifford Ferris (University of Wyoming, United States of America) showed that there are no noticeable differences between the specimens from the Polar Urals and Yamal Peninsula, Russia and their relatives from Alaska. So, it should be stated that A. olschwangi is actually a Holarctic species; in North America it is known only from the northernmost part of Alaska (Dubatolov Reference Dubatolov2010; Lafontaine and Schmidt Reference Lafontaine and Schmidt2010). Nevertheless, there is one more very similar species in the North American fauna, Arctia brachyptera Troubridge and Lafontaine, which was described based on three females from St. Elias Range, southern Yukon Territory, Canada. This species is the most similar to A. olschwangi, based on very small eyes (smaller than in A. opulenta and much smaller than in A. caja). Unfortunately, it is difficult to say anything about elements of the forewing pattern, because it is greatly widened, and the position of the dark subbasal band on the forewings is not outlined. The female genitalia did have very small differences, which may be no more than subspecific differences.
A diagnosis for the northern Holarctic A. caja complex is given below; species are cited in a systematic order.
Specimens were examined from the following collections:
ALS – Alaska Lepidoptera Survey, Fairbanks, Alaska, United States of America
BPI – Institute of Biology and Soil Science, Far Eastern Branch of the Russian Academy of Sciences, Vladivostok, Russia
ISEA – Institute of Systematics and Ecology of Animals, Siberian Branch of the Russian Academy of Sciences, Novosibirsk, Russia
YIB – Yakutsk Institute of Biology, Siberian Branch of the Russian Academy of Sciences, Yakutsk, Russia
ZIN – Zoological Institute, Russian Academy of Sciences, St.-Petersburg, Russia
ZMHU – Zoological Museum, Helsinki, Finland
Arctia caja (Linnaeus)
Phalaena (Bombyx) caja Linnaeus, Reference Linnaeus1758: 500–501. Type locality not stated, probably Europe (Watson et al. Reference Watson, Fletcher and Nye1980).
Material. FINLAND: 2 ♀♀, Om, Haapavesi, A.G. Helenius leg. (ZMHU); 1 ♂, Ok, Kn, Puolanka, 15.vii.1956, O. Peltonen leg. (ZMHU); 1 ♀ Ok, Kuhmon, No. 616, K. Walle leg. (ZMHU); 1 ♂, Ob, Pello, No. 2273, Nordmann leg. (ZMHU). RUSSIA: Murmansk Province: 1 ♀, Munozero (ZIN); Sakha-Yakutia: 1 ♀, Janathal bei Sfici-bap, 6-7.vii.1901, O. Herz leg. (ZIN); 1 ♂, 1 ♀, in der tundra am Dogdo, 16.VI-18.vii.1901, O. Herz leg. (ZIN); 4 ♂, 1 ♀, Verkhoyansk, vii.1903, Rozhkovskii leg. (ZIN); 2 specimens, Verkhoyanskii Range, river Bytantai, left tributary of river Yana, village Kustur, 80 km NE from village Batagai-Alyta, vii.2002 (YIB); 1 ♂, Cherskogo Mts., Ulakhan-Chistai Range, river Ikar middle flow, right tributary of river Turakh, right tributary of river Dyapkachan, river Artyr basin, right tributary of river Nera, h = 1220 m, bush tundra, 2.viii.2003 (Nogov, ISEA); Magadan Province: 2 ♂♂, 1 ♀, 1 specimen, river Kolyma upper flow, near Sibit-Tyellakh village, Aborigen Station, 17.vii.1983, vii.1986, 11-12.viii.1986, D. Berman, V. Dubatolov, V. Zintshenko leg. (ISEA, ZMHU); 1 ♂, Omsukchan, 16.vii.1990, V. Tuzov leg. (ISEA); 1 ♂, Magadan, 4.viii.1963 (BPI).
Distribution. The temperate belt of Eurasia, the mountains of Central Asia and Himalayas, the boreal belt of North America, and the cordilleras of western North America. The species is also known from the polar territories of Finland, the Murmansk Province of Russia, and the mountains of northeast Yakutia and the Magadan Province, Russia (Dubatolov Reference Dubatolov2010). In North America, its northernmost localities are Saskatchewan at 55°N and Quebec at 48°N (Handfield Reference Handfield2011), although it also occurs in temperate latitudes.
Remarks. All specimens from the northernmost A. caja populations are of smaller size, but have very large hemispheric eyes. The distance between the subbasal and antemedial brown bands is equal to the distance between the antemedial and postmedial bands. The subbasal brown band of the forewings is steep, and the dark spots of hindwings have a blue tint. The brown medial band on hindwings is wide and located between the discal vein and the wing base. In the male genitalia, there is a separate bulbous lobe on the vesica (Figs. 12–13). In the female genitalia, the sclerotised part of the ductus bursae is wide and long, the signae on bursae are large, the corpus bursae narrows towards the ductus bursae (Fig. 17).
Arctia opulenta (Edwards)
(Fig. 3)
Euprepia opulenta Edwards, Reference Edwards1881: 38. Type locality: “Yukon River, Alaska, 700 miles from the mouth”.
Arctia caja parva Rothschild, Reference Rothschild1910: 181. Type locality: “Labrador”.
Arctia caja virginivir Dyar, Reference Dyar1923: 12–13. Type locality: “Alaska …, probably from one of the coastal islands”.
Material. 1 ♂, Canada, British Columbia, Pink Mountain, summit, emerged 5.VII.1990, Lynda Troubridge leg. (ISEA).
Distribution. North America: United States of America: Alaska, CANADA: east to Manitoba (arctic, alpine, and subarctic habitats) and across northern Québec to Labrador. There is a photograph of a female specimen from Kamchatka, Russia in a small book “Babochki Kamchatki” [Lepidoptera of Kamchatka] by Zykov and Lobkova (Reference Zykov and Lobkova2004) that looks like a more-or-less melanistic specimen of A. opulenta or A. olschwangi with narrow forewings and without any blue tint on the dark hindwing spots, but it is impossible to say anything more without studying the specimen. In any case, all localities in Kamchatka are too southerly for A. olschwangi; it is better to consider that it might be a specimen of A. opulenta. It should be stated that A. caja is not a very rare species in Kamchatka, represented by a different subspecies, A. c. kamtschadalis Draudt, of which more than 10 specimens are known.
Remarks. This species is transitional between A. caja and A. olschwangi. It has noticeably reduced eyes (Fig. 9), but not so strongly as in the latter species; length to width ratio 1:1.2–1.3. The distance between the subbasal and antemedial brown bands is equal to the distance between the antemedial and postmedial bands; the subbasal brown band of forewings is steep, the dark spots of hindwings have a blue tint; these characters are common with A. caja. The brown medial band on hindwings, as in the previous species, is wide and located between the discal vein and the wing base. Taking into account the significant individual and geographic variability of genitalia structure, it should be noted we could not find any noticeable specific character except for the structure of the vesica, which lacks a separate bulbous lobe (Fig. 14), but this character is shared with A. olschwangi. In the female genitalia, Lafontaine and Troubridge (Reference Lafontaine and Troubridge1999) stated that “posterior corpus bursae of A. opulenta is swollen to about the same size as the anterior corpus bursae and separated from it by a slight constriction”.
Arctia olschwangi Dubatolov
Arctia olschwangi Dubatolov, Reference Dubatolov1990: 89–93, figs. 1a, 2l. Type locality: “South Yamal, r.[iver] Khadyta”.
Material. RUSSIA: Yamal-Nenets Autonomous Region: 2 ♀♀ (paratypes), Polar Ural, Kharp Station, 30.vii.1970, V. Olschwang leg. (ISEA); 2 ♂♂ (holotype and paratype), 1 ♀, South Yamal, river Khadyta, 31.vii.1979, 16.vii.1982, 5.viii.1985, V. Olschwang leg. (ISEA); Sakha-Yakutia: 1 ♂ (without abdomen), Lena river delta, Ust’-Lenskii Nature Reserve, Is. Dunai, 27.vii.1988, D. Ivanova, (ZMMU). United States of America: Alaska: 1 ♂, North Slope, Umiat on bank of Colville River, 25.vii.1979, A.M. Springer leg. (ALS); 1 ♀ ex larva, North Slope, VABM Aruk, larva 24.vii.1976, imago late viii.1976, K. W. Philip leg. (ALS); 1 ♀, North Slope, Itkillik River, 21 mi. E Outpost Mtn., 69°10′N, 150°24′W, 8.vii.1971, J.L. Harry leg. (ALS); 1 ♀, North Slope, Itkillik River camp, 46 mi. ESE Umiat, 22 mi. E Outpost Mtn., 17.vii.1971, J.L. Harry leg. (ALS).
Distribution. Russia: the Polar Ural Mountains, west Siberia: the plains of south part of the Yamal Peninsula; east Siberia: the Lena river delta in Yakutia; United States of America: north Alaska.
Remarks. The species is distinctly separated from A. caja by very small reduced eyes (Figs. 10, 11), length to width ratio 1:1.5–1.6 (an adaptation for constant sunshine during the polar summer), small size (forewing length 20 mm in males and 22 mm in females), absence of a blue tint in hindwing spots, and the position of the subbasal brown band on the forewing upperside. This band is narrow and noticeably more oblique than in A. caja and A. opulenta. Moreover, the distance between the subbasal and antemedial brown bands is noticeably wider than that between antemedial and postmedial bands. In addition, rudiments of a narrow brown medial band on the hindwings are located close to the discal vein. In the male genitalia, a separate bulbous lobe on the vesica is reduced to a small inflation (Figs. 15–17). In the female genitalia, the sclerotised part of the ductus bursae is wide but short, the signae on the bursae are small like dots, the corpus bursae does not noticeably narrow towards the ductus bursae.
Arctia brachyptera Troubridge and Lafontaine
(Fig. 8)
Arctia brachyptera Troubridge and Lafontaine in Lafontaine and Troubridge Reference Lafontaine and Troubridge1999: 90–92, figs. 1a, 1b, 2b. Type locality: “Canada, Yukon, Nickel Creek, 4500’, St. Elias Range”.
Distribution. CANADA: southern Yukon Territory and Mackenzie Mountains, Northwest Territories.
Remarks. We suspect that A. brachyptera is a subspecies of A. olschwangi that penetrated into the subarctic mountains of North America. Both species have similarly reduced eyes. There is the single noticeable character in wing pattern: all the white bands of the forewings are very narrow in A. brachyptera, or wholly disappear. In all A. olschwangi specimens both from Siberia and north Alaska, the white antemedial band sensu Ferguson (Reference Ferguson1985) between the brown subbasal and antemedial bands is not narrow, being wider than or equal to the medial white band sensu Ferguson between the brown antemedial and postmedial bands. However, the female forewings are not brachypterous as might be assumed from the specific name A. brachyptera. In all northern populations of A. brachyptera, A. caja, A. olschwangi, and A. opulenta, the ratio of thorax width to forewing length is about 1:3.5–4.0. Nevertheless, all characters cited in the original description for A. brachyptera (entirely brown abdomen, small size of bursa) are found in A. olschwangi. But the unclear shape of the appendix bursae in A. brachyptera might be caused by its position in the genitalia slide. The more sinuous postmedian forewing band of A. brachyptera is poorly visible and might indicate no more than a subspecific difference. Unfortunately, the authors of A. brachyptera did not compare their species from Yukon with its relative from Polar Siberia, and did not discuss their affinities and similarities. So, the most noticeable differences between these two taxa are seen in the forewing pattern, and appear to be no more than subspecific. For a conclusive decision on the taxonomic status of A. brachyptera, a serious comparison of individual variation in Siberian and North American populations of A. olschwangi and A. brachyptera is necessary; the material we examined is not enough for such a determination.
Acknowledgements
Authors are very thankful to Dr. C. Ferris from the University of Wyoming, United States of America for his photographs of the genitalia of A. olschwangi from Alaska; to Dr. K. Mikkola (Helsinki, Finland) for the opportunity to work with the Arctiinae collections in the Zoological Museum of the University of Helsinki, Finland; to Prof. S. Yu. Sinev and Dr. A.L. Lvovsky (St.-Petersburg, Russia) for their help during work with the Arctiinae collection in the Zoological Institute, St.-Petersburg, Russia; to Dr. N.N. Vinokurov (Yakutsk, Russia) for information and photographs of A. caja specimens from northeast Yakutia; to Dr. D.I. Berman (Magadan, Russia) for his help during work at the Aborigen Station (Magadan Province, Russia); to Dr. V.N. Olschwang (Ekaterinburg, Russia) for presenting a series of A. olschwangi specimens for the description; to Dr. D. Lafontaine (Canada) for his permission to use two figures from the original description of A. brachyptera; to Dr. J. Troubridge (Canada) for a specimen of A. opulenta for investigation; and to Mr. E.V. Novomodnyi (Khabarovsk, Russia) for information on the book “Lepidoptera of Kamchatka”.