Hostname: page-component-745bb68f8f-grxwn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-02-11T15:01:27.938Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Osbornellus auronitens (Hemiptera: Cicadellidae: Deltocephalinae), an introduced species new for the Palaearctic region

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  20 March 2017

Valeria Trivellone*
Affiliation:
Swiss Federal Institute for Forest, Snow, and Landscape Research (WSL), Biodiversity and Conservation Biology, Zürchertrasse 111, Birmensdorf 8903, Switzerland Agroscope Swiss Federal Research Station, A Ramél 18, Cadenazzo 6594, Switzerland
Milana Mitrović
Affiliation:
Department of Plant Pests, Institute for Plant Protection and Environment, Banatska 33, Zemun 11080, Serbia
Christopher H. Dietrich
Affiliation:
Illinois Natural History Survey, Prairie Research Institute, University of Illinois, Champaign, Illinois, 61820, United States of America
Ivo Toševski
Affiliation:
Department of Plant Pests, Institute for Plant Protection and Environment, Banatska 33, Zemun 11080, Serbia CABI, 1 Rue des Grillons, Delémont 2800, Switzerland
*
1Corresponding author (e-mail: valeria.trivellone@gmail.com).

Abstract

The introduction of invasive species may result in important ecological, environmental, and economic impacts. Extensive study of Auchenorrhyncha (Hemiptera) fauna in a wine-growing region in southern Switzerland revealed, for the first time, presence of the Nearctic leafhopper Osbornellus auronitens (Provancher) (Hemiptera: Cicadellidae) in the vicinity of Stabio (Canton of Ticino). The species identity of the collected specimens was confirmed using morphological and molecular characters. All specimens of O. auronitens were collected in a forest of Castanea sativa Miller (Fagaceae), Corylus avellana Linnaeus (Betulaceae), and Alnus glutinosa (Linnaeus) Gaertner (Betulaceae) intermixed with Cornus sanguinea Linnaeus (Cornaceae), Salix Linnaeus (Salicaceae), and Rubus Linnaeus (Rosaceae). In its native range this leafhopper is polyphagous and a relatively common visitor in vineyards. Based on analysis of the barcoding region of the mitochondrial cytochrome oxidase subunit I gene of the collected O. auronitens, 100% identity with specimens of the same species originating from Canada was determined. Osbornellus auronitens is morphologically similar to Scaphoideus titanus Ball (Hemiptera: Cicadellidae), another introduced Nearctic leafhopper, which was involved in severe outbreaks of disease caused by the Grapevine flavescence dorée phytoplasma (Bacteria: Acholeplasmataceae) in European viticultural regions since the 1960s. In this paper, we report the morphological features to distinguish O. auronitens from S. titanus, and discuss the possible implications of its expected spread across the Old World.

Type
Systematics & Morphology
Copyright
© Entomological Society of Canada 2017 

Introduction

According to the results of the Delivering Alien Invasive Species Inventory for Europe project (Roques et al. Reference Roques, Rabitsch, Rasplus, Lopez-Vaamonde, Nentwig and Kenis2009), alien insects and other terrestrial arthropods are the most numerous invaders in Europe, manifesting various effects, particularly in agricultural and forest ecosystems. Impacts range from the negative environmental effects commonly combined with economic losses, to negative social impacts when they affect a human well being (Binimelis et al. Reference Binimelis, Born, Monterroso and Rodríguez-Labajos2007). Once established into a new environment, alien terrestrial arthropods, especially insects, may undergo rapid dispersal followed by exponential population growth due to a lack of natural enemies that regulate their populations in their native areas, also referred to as enemy release hypothesis (Keane and Crawley Reference Keane and Crawley2002).

According to Roques et al. (Reference Roques, Rabitsch, Rasplus, Lopez-Vaamonde, Nentwig and Kenis2009), a total of 1296 alien terrestrial invertebrates originating from other continents are documented to have established in Europe; of which arthropods, mostly insects, represent 94% of the introduced species. The number of introduced species is probably even higher, taking into account the fact that identification and recognition of newly introduced alien species is often delayed until populations of introduced insects become well established and begin producing distinct environmental or economic impacts. Lack of taxonomic expertise in determination of the alien species may cause delays in recognition of the taxa, especially with regards to native and/or previously introduced congeneric species with high morphological similarity.

Over the past 50 years, several alien species in the suborder Auchenorrhyncha (Hemiptera) originating from the Nearctic Region caused various negative impacts in Europe by inducing substantial economic losses and environmental disturbance (Arzone et al. Reference Arzone, Vidano and Alma1987; Foissac and Wilson Reference Foissac and Wilson2009). The most striking example is a North American leafhopper Scaphoideus titanus Ball (Hemiptera: Cicadellidae), which was first reported in 1958 in the vineyards of southwestern France (Bonfils and Schvester Reference Bonfils and Schvester1960). The species quickly spread to southeastern France (Schvester et al. Reference Schvester, Carle and Moutous1963), northwestern Italy (Vidano Reference Vidano1964), and southern Switzerland (Baggiolini et al. Reference Baggiolini, Canevascini, Caccia, Tencalla and Sobrio1968). Presently, S. titanus colonises vineyards in all Mediterranean countries including the temperate regions of Austria and southeastern Europe. Introduced from eastern parts of North America to Europe (Papura et al. Reference Papura, Burban, Van Helden, Giresse, Nusillard and Guillemaud2012), this leafhopper became a causal vector in transmission of a quarantine disease, Grapevine flavescence dorée (Bacteria: Acholeplasmataceae) (Caudwell et al. Reference Caudwell, Kuszala, Bachelier and Larrue1970), caused by a phytoplasma belonging to the 16SrV taxonomic group (Angelini et al. Reference Angelini, Squizzato, Lucchetta and Borgo2004; Arnaud et al. Reference Arnaud, Malembic-Maher, Salar, Bonnet, Maixner and Marcone2007). It is worth noting that species of the genus Scaphoideus Uhler are also considered as potential vectors in transmitting diverse phytoplasma diseases in North America (Hill and Sinclair Reference Hill and Sinclair2000; Beanland et al. Reference Beanland, Noble and Wolf2006). In several large and small outbreaks from 1970 to 2006, Grapevine flavescence dorée severely affected vineyards in France, Spain, Portugal, Italy, and Serbia causing major economic losses due to deleterious effects on grapevine and the costs of control measures against the vector and disease spread.

Another well-known exotic species is the planthopper Metcalfa pruinosa (Say) (Hemiptera: Flatidae), also introduced from North America into the Mediterranean and temperate regions of Europe (Zangheri and Donadini Reference Zangheri and Donadini1980). Besides the great invasiveness of this planthopper in Europe, its presence is associated with serious damage to various field crops, gardens, and ornamental plants. The gregarious feeding behaviour of its nymphs and the massive secretion of epicuticular wax and honeydew favour the development of fungal diseases in the affected plants (Byrne and Bellows Reference Byrne and Bellows1991).

In the present paper, we document for the first time a species of the genus Osbornellus Ball (Hemiptera: Cicadellidae) identified as Osbornellus auronitens (Provancher) introduced to the Palaearctic from the Nearctic region based on morphological and molecular evidence. We report morphological features to distinguish it from the most closely related species in Europe, S. titanus. Finally, we discuss the possible implications of its expected spread across the Old World and possible interactions with native plants in its new environment.

Materials and methods

Insect sampling

During extensive study of Auchenorhyncha fauna in a wine-growing region in Canton Ticino (Southern Switzerland), a total of three males of a leafhopper species resembling Scaphoideus were collected on 11 August 2016 in a woody patch scattered within a wine-growing area (Stabio, 45°51'17.2'N, 8°55'38.1'E). At the collection site, Castanea sativa Miller (Fagaceae), Corylus avelana Linnaeus (Betulaceae), and Alnus glutinosa (Linnaeus) Gaertner (Betulaceae) are the dominant trees intermixed with scarce Cornus sanguinea Linnaeus (Cornaceae), Salix Linnaeus (Salicaceae), and Rubus Linnaeus (Rosaceae). The site was revisited on 7 and 9 September, and three more specimens (two females and one male) belonging to the same species were collected. All specimens were collected using a sweep net and mouth aspirators.

Morphological study

The abdomen of a voucher specimen designated as Oa1 (male) was dissected to study the genitalia (Knight Reference Knight1965), thereafter identified by using published taxonomic keys and related literature (Beamer Reference Beamer1937; DeLong and Knull Reference DeLong and Knull1941; DeLong Reference DeLong1941a; DeLong and Martinson Reference DeLong and Martinson1976a, Reference DeLong and Martinson1976b; Dlabola Reference Dlabola1984, Reference Dlabola1987a, Reference Dlabola1987b). Photographs were taken with a Leica MC 170AD digital camera on the Leica M165C stereomicroscope (Wetzlar, Germany). Terminology follows Viraktamath and Mohan (Reference Viraktamath and Mohan2004). Voucher specimen Oa1 is deposited in the collection of the Natural History Museum in Lugano (Canton Ticino, Switzerland). The rest of the sampled material is deposited in the private collection of the first author.

Molecular analysis

For molecular analysis, DNA was extracted from a voucher specimen designated as Oa2. The barcoding region of mitochondrial cytochrome oxidase subunit I gene (mtCOI) was used to confirm the identity of the sampled leafhoppers. Genomic DNA was extracted using the DNeasy® Blood & Tissue Kit (Qiagen Inc., Valencia, California, United States of America) following the manufacturer’s instructions. The barcoding region of the mtCOI gene was amplified using the primer pair LCO1490/HCO2198 (Folmer et al. Reference Folmer, Black, Hoeh, Lutz and Vrijenhoek1994). Each polymerase chain reaction was carried out in a volume of 20 μL [1 μL of DNA, 11.8 μL of H2O, 2 μL of high yield reaction buffer A with 1x Mg, 1.8 μL of MgCl2 (2.25 mM), 1.2 μL of dNTP (0.6 mM), 1 μL of each primer of the pair LCO1490/HCO2198 (0.5 μM), and 0.2 μL of KAPATaq DNA polymerase (0.05 U/μL) (Kapa Biosystems, Wilmington, Massachusetts, United States of America)]. The polymerase chain reaction protocol consisted of an initial denaturation at 95 °C for five minutes, 35 cycles each consisting of three steps, i.e., one minute at 94 °C, one minute at 54 °C, and 1.5 minute at 72 °C, with a final extension step at 72 °C for seven minutes at the end of amplification protocol. Amplified products were run on 1% agarose gel, stained with ethidium bromide and visualised under an ultraviolet transiluminator. Polymerase chain reaction amplicons were sequenced by Macrogen (Seoul, Korea). To obtain 658 base pairs of the barcoding region sequencing was performed with both, forward and reverse primers. Sequence data are deposited in GenBank (www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov) under accession number KY006567.

Results

According to morphology and molecular analysis, the specimens collected in Stabio (Canton Ticino, Switzerland) were identified as O. auronitens. The barcoding sequence of mtCOI subjected to BLAST analysis (www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/BLAST) revealed 100% identity with a sequence of O. auronitens (accession number KR043272), originating from Churchill, Prince Edward Island, Canada (Gwiazdowski et al. Reference Gwiazdowski, Foottit, Maw and Hebert2015).

Osbornellus auronitens (Provancher)

Material examined

Four males (designated as voucher specimens Oa1–Oa4), Stabio, Ticino, Switzerland (45°51'17.2'N, 8°55'38.1'E), 11.viii.2016 and 9.ix.2016, V. Trivellone; two females (Oa5, Oa6) Stabio, Ticino, Switzerland, 7.ix.2016 and 9.ix.2016, V. Trivellone. Voucher specimens Oa1 is deposited in the Natural History Museum in Lugano, while voucher specimens Oa2–Oa6 are in the private collection of V.T.

Differential diagnosis

Osbornellus auronitens is morphologically similar to S. titanus, a well-known vector of phytoplasmas belonging to the elm yellows ribosomal group and introduced into the Palaearctic region in the 1960s. The overall size, shape, and colouration bear a striking resemblance between the two species, but they can be distinguished using distinctive external morphological characters.

In O. auronitens, the anterior margin of the head has two dark brown, transverse bands; an incomplete brown preapical band on the vertex; and an arcuate, red-orange fascia between the eyes more posterad (Fig. 1A–B). In S. titanus, the head has four transverse, brown bands – two on the upper part of the face below the ocelli and two on the vertex, and a transverse light-orange fascia between the eyes with a median angulate projection anteriorly (Fig. 1D–E). The forewings of the two species are similar in colouration and venation but O. auronitens has relatively few dark brown markings and vein R has only three branches (Fig. 1A–B) while S. titanus has the dark markings more extensive and vein R has five branches (Fig. 1D–E). As in other species of Osbornellus, the male subgenital plate of O. auronitens has an elongate, slender, filamentous distal portion (Fig. 1C). In contrast, the subgenital plate of S. titanus is broadly rounded distally and lacks an elongated distal portion (Fig. 1F). All of the above traits are visible without dissection.

Fig. 1 Habitus of Osbornellus auronitens (Provancher), voucher specimen Oa1, A–C and Scaphoideus titanus Ball from Serbia (Bela Crkva, Banat region), D–F in dorsal, lateral view and ventral view respectively.

In Fig. 2, dissected parts of the male genitalia of O. auronitens are shown. The aedeagus of O. auronitens in lateral view is slender and thin, slightly curved dorsally, with a pair of broad processes arising laterally near the base of the shaft, flaring slightly, extending just beyond the apex of the shaft to dorsally pointed apices (Fig. 2A–C). In S. titanus, the aedeagus in lateral aspect is generally triangular with the base generally pear shaped; the paired posterior processes arising from the connective stem are membranous, digitiform, and divergent in ventral view, usually not reaching the apex of the aedeagus (della Giustina Reference della Giustina1989). The style in O. auronitens has the distal section stout, parallel sided, and relatively long, and the apex rounded and slightly concave on laterally near the apex (Fig. 2G–I). In S. titanus, the distal portion of the style is distinctly tapered and curved laterally with two setae near the middle and the apex is sharply pointed (della Giustina Reference della Giustina1989). The shape of the male pygofers of O. auronitens and S. titanus are rather similar.

Fig. 2 Male genitalia of Osbornellus auronitens (Provancher) voucher specimen Oa1. A, Aedeagus, dorsal view; B, aedeagus, rotate 30°; C, aedeagus, lateral view; D, left subgential plate, dorsal view; E, left subgential plate, lateral view; F, valve and right subgential plate; G, left stylus, dorsal view; H, left stylus, ventral view; I, left stylus, lateral view; J, pygofer, dorsal view.

Discussion

Early detection of an alien organism is of crucial importance to allow observation of the vast array of possible interactions between the introduced organism and its new environment. Developing a monitoring strategy is also important for minimising possible consequences of such an introduction. Most leafhopper species are small, inconspicuous animals that when introduced into new areas, may remain unnoticed for some time. Early detection may also be hindered in cases, such as the one presented here, when a newly introduced species is morphologically similar to another species already present. Unfortunately, due to a lack of systematic survey and monitoring programmes designed to detect exotic species, the presence of such species is most often noticed as a result of their negative environmental or economic impacts after they have become well established.

Although O. auronitens is morphologically similar to S. titanus, as noted above, in Europe it is possible to distinguish these species reliably using external morphological traits. So far, only one other species of Osbornellus, O. horvathi (Matsumura) (Hemiptera: Cicadellidae), and one other species of Scaphoideus, S. dellagiustinai Webb and Viraktamath (Hemiptera: Cicadellidae), have been reported from western Europe. Osbornellus horvathi, which is reported from Algeria, Sicily, and Spain, is similar to S. titanus in external colour pattern but easily distinguishable by the structure of the male genitalia (Hermoso de Mendoza et al. Reference Hermoso de Mendoza, Del Estal, Alcázar, Pérez-Otero and Marsilla2012). This species has recently been shown to be capable of transmitting ‘Candidatus Phytoplasma asteris’ to broad bean (Vicia faba Linnaeus; Fabaceae) and periwinkle (Apocynaceae) in experimental trials (Rizza et al. Reference Rizza, Pesce, D’Urso, Raciti, Marzachì and Tessitori2016). Scaphoideus dellagiustinai, which is, so far, only recorded from the coast of southern France and Burkina Faso, is smaller and paler in colouration compared with both O. auronitens and S. titanus; has only two transverse, brown bands on the head, both on the face below the ocelli; the vertex is white with a single, bright red, transverse band; and the male genitalia are distinctive (see figures in Webb and Viraktamath Reference Webb and Viraktamath2007).

Within their native range of eastern North America, both O. auronitens and S. titanus species can be confused with congeneric species occurring in the same deciduous forest habitats that are similar in size, colour pattern, and wing venation. Thus, it is important to confirm the identities of these species by examining features of the male genitalia that are diagnostic at the species level. Osbornellus and Scaphoideus are large genera, each with over 100 documented species worldwide and it is quite possible that additional species of both genera could eventually become established in Europe.

The genus Osbornellus is presently included in the tribe Scaphoideini within the large cicadellid subfamily Deltocephalinae. The genus was originally established by Ball (Reference Ball1932) based on type species Scaphoideus auronitens Provancher. Ball’s (Reference Ball1932) decision to recognise additional genera in the group was based on observations of morphological differences and distinct feeding behaviour and ecological relationships. The genera were originally distinguished based on the size of the ocelli and characteristics of the veins and cells of the forewing. Beamer (Reference Beamer1937) revised Osbornellus in the United States of America, highlighting the difficulty of distinguishing species. Subsequent authors added nearly 100 species from the Nearctic and Neotropical regions (e.g., DeLong and Berry Reference DeLong and Berry1937; DeLong Reference DeLong1941a, Reference DeLong1941b, Reference DeLong1942, Reference DeLong1976; DeLong and Knull Reference DeLong and Knull1941; Metcalf Reference Metcalf1954; Linnavuori Reference Linnavuori1959; DeLong and Martinson Reference DeLong and Martinson1976a, Reference DeLong and Martinson1976b) mainly distinguished using features of the male genitalia. Martinson (Reference Martinson1977) completed a taxonomic revision of the genus as a doctoral dissertation, but this work was never published. Dominguez and Godoy (Reference Dominguez and Godoy2010) recently added 37 new Osbornellus species from Central America.

Nine species of Osbornellus have been recorded from the Palaearctic, four of which have been assigned to the endemic western Asian subgenus Mavromoustaca Dlabola and one to the nominotypical subgenus (Matsumura Reference Matsumura1908; Vilbaste Reference Vilbaste1976; Dlabola Reference Dlabola1984, Reference Dlabola1987a, Reference Dlabola1987b). However, the phylogenetic status of the genus, and relationships of subgenera and species presently included in the genus, has never been explored through phylogenetic analyses (Nielson and Knight Reference Nielson and Knight2000).

Within its native range, O. auronitens is widespread in the deciduous forests of eastern North America from Canada (southern Ontario and Québec) to the southeastern United States of America (Florida to Oklahoma) (Martinson Reference Martinson1977). Its introduction into the Palaearctic Region may have occurred through contamination of imported live plant material (Bertin et al. Reference Bertin, Guglielmino, Karam, Gomulski, Malacrida and Gasperi2007), especially because O. auronitens hibernates as eggs inserted into the bark of woody plants. This is also the case with mosaic leafhopper Orientus ishidae (Matsumura) (Hemiptera: Cicadellidae), a polyphagous species native to the eastern Palaearctic Region but also widespread and well established in eastern North America (Valley and Wheeler Reference Valley and Wheeler1985), and reported for the first time in Europe from Switzerland in 2002 (Günthart and Mühlethaler Reference Günthart and Mühlethaler2002). Over the subsequent 15 years, the mosaic leafhopper was recorded in Germany (Nickel and Remane Reference Nickel and Remane2003), Slovenia (Seljak Reference Seljak2004), Czech Republic (Malenovský and Lauterer Reference Malenovský and Lauterer2010), Austria (Nickel Reference Nickel2010), France (Mifsud et al. Reference Mifsud, Cocquempot, Mühlethaler, Wilson and Streito2010), Hungary (Koczor et al. Reference Koczor, Bagarus, Karap, Varga and Orosz2013), and Serbia (V.T., unpublished data). Several authors also suggested that O. ishidae had probably been introduced into Europe by trading of plants (Malenovský and Lauterer Reference Malenovský and Lauterer2010; Mifsud et al. Reference Mifsud, Cocquempot, Mühlethaler, Wilson and Streito2010). The situation with O. ishidae is a typical case of rapid range expansion of the introduced alien leafhopper with possible economic impacts, especially after Grapevine flavescence dorée was identified recently in mosaic leafhopper adults from Italy, Slovenia, and Switzerland (Mehle et al. Reference Mehle, Seljak, Rupar, Ravnikar and Dermastia2010; Gaffuri et al. Reference Gaffuri, Sacchi and Cavagna2011; Trivellone et al. Reference Trivellone, Filippin, Narduzzi-Wicht and Angelini2016).

Data regarding capability of the species from the tribe Scaphoideini to serve as vectors in transmission of phytoplasmas are scarce in literature (Weintraub and Beanland Reference Weintraub and Beanland2006). Besides S. titanus, which is a documented vector transmitting the phytoplasma-associated disease Grapevine flavescence dorée on grapevine in Europe, O. auronitens was noted as a possible vector involved in transmission of grapevine yellows diseases in vineyards of Virginia, United States of America (Beanland et al. Reference Beanland, Noble and Wolf2006).

Although it is not known whether O. auronitens will disperse into new areas in the Palaearctic, almost 60 years ago, S. titanus, a species with similar food preferences in its native range, was introduced in France and is now widespread from 35 to 48 degrees north latitude and from Portugal to Romania. Scaphoideus titanus adjusted well to its new European environment, and has colonised both wild and cultivated grapevine to become the major vector of phytoplasma causing the Flavescence dorée disease on grapevine. Osbornellus auronitens collected in Switzerland has colonised the ecotone strip between vineyards and forest. This suggests that it poses a potential risk, as already reported from Virginia, where S. titanus, O. auronitens, and Jikradia olitorius (Say) (Hemiptera: Cicadellidae) exhibit seasonal movement into vineyards from nearby forest vegetation, which could account for the high incidence of diseased vines observed near the vineyard edge (Beanland et al. Reference Beanland, Noble and Wolf2006). Thus, presence of O. auronitens and its potential spread across viticultural regions in Europe is of objective concern because polyphagous adults can acquire different phytoplasmas from adjacent plant vegetation and launch new epidemiological cycles inside vineyards. To prevent such risk, setting controlled conditions for import of all plant material from foreign countries is of utmost importance. Scientific and economic concern that the spread of this exotic leafhopper species could lead to tremendous economic losses is justifiable because a similar scenario has already occurred in Europe with introduction and establishment of the related species, S. titanus.

Acknowledgements

The authors thank the Swiss National Science Foundation for financial support of this study through the Scientific co-operation between Eastern Europe and Switzerland (SCOPES) programme (grant number IZ73Z0_152414).

Footnotes

Subject editor: Rob Johns

References

Angelini, E., Squizzato, F., Lucchetta, G., and Borgo, M. 2004. Detection of a phytoplasma associated with grapevine Flavescence dorée in Clematis vitalba . European Journal of Plant Pathology, 110: 193201.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Arnaud, G., Malembic-Maher, S., Salar, P., Bonnet, P., Maixner, M., Marcone, C., et al. 2007. Multilocus sequence typing confirms the close genetic interrelatedness of three distinct flavescence dorée phytoplasma strain clusters and group 16SrV phytoplasmas infecting grapevine and alder in Europe. Applied and Environmental Microbiology, 73: 40014010.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Arzone, A., Vidano, C., and Alma, A. 1987. Auchenorrhyncha introduced into Europe from the Nearctic region: taxonomic and phytopathological problems. In Proceedings of 2nd international workshop on leafhoppers and planthoppers of economic importance. Edited by M.R. Wilson and L.R. Nault. Centre for Agriculture and Biosciences, International Institute of Entomology, London, United Kingdom. Pp. 317.Google Scholar
Baggiolini, M., Canevascini, V., Caccia, R., Tencalla, Y., and Sobrio, G. 1968. Présence dans le vignoble du Tessin d’une cicadelle néarctique nouvelle pour la Suisse, Scaphoideus littoralis Ball (Homoptera: Jassidae), vecteur possible de la Flavescence dorée. Mitteilungen der Schweize rischen Entomologischen Gesellschaft, 40: 270275.Google Scholar
Ball, E.D. 1932. New genera and species of leafhoppers related to Scaphoideus . Journal of the Washington Academy of Sciences, 22: 919.Google Scholar
Beamer, R.H. 1937. A review of the genus Osbornellus in the United States and Canada (Homoptera-Cicadellidae). Journal of the Kansas Entomological Society, 10: 89112.Google Scholar
Beanland, L., Noble, R., and Wolf, T.K. 2006. Spatial and temporal distribution of North American grapevine yellows disease and of potential vectors of the causal phytoplasmas in Virginia. Environmental Entomology, 35: 332344.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bertin, S., Guglielmino, C.R., Karam, N., Gomulski, L.M., Malacrida, A.R., and Gasperi, G. 2007. Diffusion of the Nearctic leafhopper Scaphoideus titanus Ball in Europe: a consequence of human trading activity. Genetica, 131: 275285.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Binimelis, R., Born, W., Monterroso, I., and Rodríguez-Labajos, B. 2007. Socio-economic impact and assessment of biological invasions. In Biological invasions. Ecological Studies. Volume 193. Edited by W. Nentwig. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg, Germany. Pp. 331347.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bonfils, J. and Schvester, D. 1960. The leafhoppers (Homoptera: Auchenorrhyncha) and their relationship with vineyards in south-western France. Annales des Epiphyties, 11: 325336.Google Scholar
Byrne, D.N. and Bellows, T.S. 1991. Whitefly biology. Annual Review of Entomology, 36: 431457.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Caudwell, A., Kuszala, C., Bachelier, J.C., and Larrue, J. 1970. Transmission de la Flavescence dorée de la vigne aux plantes herbacées par l’allongement du temps d’utilisation de la cicadelle Scaphoideus littoralis Ball et l’étude de sa survie sur un grand nombre d’espéces végétales. Annales de Phytopathologie, 2: 415428.Google Scholar
della Giustina, W. 1989. Homoptères Cicadellidae. Faune de France, 73(3). Institut National de la Recherché Agronomique, Paris, France.Google Scholar
DeLong, D.M. 1941a. The red-banded Osbornellus species of the auronitens group occurring in the United States. Annals of the Entomological Society of America, 34: 179180.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
DeLong, D.M. 1941b. The new species of Mexican Osbornellus . Anales de la Escuela Nacional de Ciencias Biologicas, 2: 263270.Google Scholar
DeLong, D.M. 1942. Twelve new species of Osbornellus (Homoptera Cicadellidae) from Mexico, Guatamala and Panama. Bulletin of the Brooklyn Entomological Society, 37: 92101.Google Scholar
DeLong, D.M. 1976. New species of Osbornellus from Bolivia and Brazil. Journal of the Kansas Entomological Society, 49: 262265.Google Scholar
DeLong, D.M. and Berry, L. 1937. Two new species of Osbornellus . Ohio Journal of Science, 37: 266.Google Scholar
DeLong, D.M. and Knull, D.J. 1941. Two new species of Osbornellus from the southwestern United States. Annals of the Entomological Society of America, 34: 177178.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
DeLong, D.M. and Martinson, C. 1976a. Five new species of Bolivian Osbornellus . Journal of the Kansas Entomological Society, 49: 429432.Google Scholar
DeLong, D.M. and Martinson, C. 1976b. New species of Mexican Osbornellus (Homoptera: Cicadellidae). Journal of the Kansas Entomological Society, 49: 583588.Google Scholar
Dlabola, J. 1984. Neue zikadenarten aus Mediterraneum und dem Iran mit weiter beitragen zur Iranischen fauna (Homoptera-Auchenorrhyncha). Sbornik Narohino Musea V Praze (B), 40: 2164.Google Scholar
Dlabola, J. 1987a. Neue zikadenarten von Saudi Arabien (Homoptera: Auchenorrhyncha). 3. Teil. Annotationes Zoologicae et Botanicae (Slovenské Národné Múzeum v Bratislave.), 177: 111.Google Scholar
Dlabola, J. 1987b. Drei neue arten der gattungen Jassargus, Osbornellus und Praganus (Homoptera-Cicadellidae). Annotationes Zoologicae et Botanicae (Slovenské Národné Múzeum v Bratislave), 178: 16.Google Scholar
Dominguez, E. and Godoy, C. 2010. Taxonomic review of the genus Osbornellus Ball (Hemiptera: Cicadellidae) in Central America. Zootaxa, 2702: 1106.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Foissac, X. and Wilson, M.R. 2009. Current and possible future distributions of phytoplasma diseases and their vectors. In Phytoplasmas: genomes, plant hosts and vectors. Edited by P.G. Weintraub and P. Jones. Centre for Agriculture and Biosciences International, Wallingford, United Kingdom. Pp. 309324.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Folmer, O., Black, M., Hoeh, W., Lutz, R., and Vrijenhoek, R. 1994. DNA primers for amplification of mitochondrial cytochrome c oxidase subunit I from diverse metazoanin vertebrates. Molecular Marine Biology and Biotechnology, 3: 294299.Google Scholar
Gaffuri, F., Sacchi, S., and Cavagna, B. 2011. First detection of the mosaic leafhopper, Orientus ishidae, in northern Italian vineyards infected by the flavescence dorée phytoplasma. New Disease Reports, 24: 22.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Günthart, H. and Mühlethaler, R. 2002. Provisorische Checklist der Zikaden der Schweiz (Insecta: Hemiptera, Auchenorrhyncha). In Zikaden - Leafhoppers, Planthoppers and Cicadas (Insecta: Hemiptera: Auchenorrhyncha). Edited by W.E. Holzinger. Denisia 4. Biologiezentrum des Oberösterreichischen Landesmuseums, Linz, Austria. Pp. 329338.Google Scholar
Gwiazdowski, R.A., Foottit, R.G., Maw, H.E.L., and Hebert, P.D. 2015. The Hemiptera (Insecta) of Canada: constructing a reference library of DNA barcodes. Public Library of Science One, 10: e0125635.Google ScholarPubMed
Hermoso de Mendoza, A., Del Estal, P., Alcázar, M.D., Pérez-Otero, R., and Marsilla, P. 2012. Diferenciación entre Scaphoideus titanus Ball, vector de la Flavescencia Dorada de la vid, y una especie próxima, Osbornellus horvathi (Matsumura), recentemente en contrada en España (Hemiptera, Cicadellidae). Boletín de Sanidad Vegetal Plagas, 38: 349352.Google Scholar
Hill, G.T. and Sinclair, W.A. 2000. Taxa of leafhoppers carrying phytoplasmas at sites of ash yellows occurrence in New York State. Plant Disease, 84: 134138.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Keane, R.M. and Crawley, M.J. 2002. Exotic plant invasions and the enemy release hypothesis. Trends in Ecology & Evolution, 17: 164170.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Knight, W.J. 1965. Techniques for use in the identification of leafhoppers (Homoptera: Cicadellidae). Entomologist’s Gazette, 16: 129136.Google Scholar
Koczor, S., Bagarus, A.K., Karap, A.K., Varga, Á., and Orosz, A. 2013. A rapidly spreading potential pest, Orientus ishidae identified in Hungary. Bulletin of Insectology, 66: 221224.Google Scholar
Linnavuori, R. 1959. Revision of the Neotropical Deltocephalinae and some related subfamilies (Homoptera). Annales Zoologici Societatis Zoologicae Botanicae Fennicae ‘Vanamo’, 20: 1370.Google Scholar
Malenovský, I. and Lauterer, P. 2010. Additions to the fauna of planthoppers and leafhoppers (Hemiptera: Auchenorrhyncha) of the Czech Republic. Acta Musei Moraviae, Scientiae Biologicae (Brno), 95: 49122.Google Scholar
Martinson, C. 1977. Revision of the genus Osbornellus Ball (Homoptera: Cicadellidae). Ph.D. dissertation. Ohio State University, Columbus, Ohio, United States of America.Google Scholar
Matsumura, S. 1908. Neue Cicadinen aus Europa und Mittelmeergebiet. Journal of the College of Science, Imperial University of Tokyo, 23: 146.Google Scholar
Mehle, N., Seljak, G., Rupar, M., Ravnikar, M., and Dermastia, M. 2010. The first detection of a phytoplasma from the 16SrV (Elm yellows) group in the mosaic leafhopper Orientus ishidae . New Disease Reports, 22: 11.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Metcalf, Z.P. 1954. Homoptera from the Bahama Islands. American Museum Novitates, 1698: 146.Google Scholar
Mifsud, D., Cocquempot, C., Mühlethaler, R., Wilson, M., and Streito, J.C. 2010. Other Hemiptera Sternorrhyncha (Aleyrodidae, Phylloxeroidea, and Psylloidea) and Hemiptera Auchenorrhyncha. BioRisk, 4: 511552.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nickel, H. 2010. First addendum to the leafhoppers and planthoppers of Germany (Hemiptera: Auchenorrhyncha). Cicadina, 11: 107122.Google Scholar
Nickel, H. and Remane, R. 2003. Verzeichnis der Zikaden (Auchenorrhyncha) der Bundesländer Deutschlands. Entomofauna Germanica, 6: 130154.Google Scholar
Nielson, M.W. and Knight, W.J. 2000. Distributional patterns and possible origins of leafhoppers (Homoptera, Cicadellidae). Revista Brasileira de Zoologia, 17: 81156.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Papura, D., Burban, C., Van Helden, M., Giresse, X., Nusillard, B., Guillemaud, T., et al. 2012. Microsatellite and mitochondrial data provide evidence for a single major introduction for the Neartic leafhopper Scaphoideus titanus in Europe. Public Library of Science One, 7: e36882.Google ScholarPubMed
Rizza, S., Pesce, A., D’Urso, V., Raciti, E., Marzachì, C., and Tessitori, M. 2016. Transmission of ‘Candidatus Phytoplasma asteris’ (16SrI) by Osbornellus horvathi (Matsumura 1908) co-infected with ‘Ca. Phytoplasma phoenicium’ (16SrIX). Phytoparasitica, 44: 491500.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Roques, A., Rabitsch, W., Rasplus, J. Y., Lopez-Vaamonde, C., Nentwig, W., and Kenis, M. 2009. Alien terrestrial invertebrates of Europe. In Handbook of alien species in Europe. Edited by Delivering Alien Invasive Species Inventory for Europe (DAISIE) consortium. Springer, Dordrecht, The Netherlands. Pp. 63–79.Google Scholar
Schvester, D., Carle, P., and Moutous, G. 1963. Transmission de la flavescence dorée de la vigne par Scaphoideus littoralis Ball. Annales des Epiphyties, 14: 175198.Google Scholar
Seljak, G. 2004. Contribution to the knowledge of planthoppers and leafhoppers of Slovenia (Hemiptera: Auchenorrhyncha). Acta Entomologica Slovenica, 12: 189216.Google Scholar
Trivellone, V., Filippin, L., Narduzzi-Wicht, B., and Angelini, E. 2016. A regional-scale survey to define the known and potential vectors of grapevine yellow phytoplasmas in vineyards south of Swiss Alps. European Journal Plant Pathology, 145: 915927.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Valley, K.R. and Wheeler, A.G. 1985. Leafhoppers (Hemiptera: Cicadellidae) associated with ornamental honey locust: seasonal history, habits, and descriptions of eggs and fifth instars. Annals qof the Entomological Society of America, 78: 709716.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vidano, C. 1964. Scoperta in Italia dello Scaphoideus littoralis Ball cicalina americana collegata alla ‘Flavescence dorée’ della Vite. L’Italia agricola, 101: 10311049.Google Scholar
Vilbaste, J. 1976. A revision of Homoptera-Cicadinea described by S. Matsumura from Europe and the Mediterranean area. Eesti NSV Teaduste Akadeemia Toimetised, Tallinn, 25: 2536.Google Scholar
Viraktamath, C.A. and Mohan, G.S. 2004. A revision of the deltocephaline leafhopper genus Scaphoideus (Hemiptera: Cicadellidae) from the Indian subcontinent. Zootaxa, 578: 148.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Webb, M.D. and Viraktamath, C.A. 2007. Three new Old World species of the leafhopper genus Scaphoideus Uhler (Hemiptera: Auchenorrhyncha: Cicadellidae). Zootaxa, 1457: 4955.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Weintraub, P.G. and Beanland, L. 2006. Insect vectors of phytoplasmas. Annual Review of Entomology, 51: 91111.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Zangheri, S. and Donadini, P. 1980. Comparsa nel Veneto di un omottero neartico: Metcalfa pruinosa . Redia, 63: 301305.Google Scholar
Figure 0

Fig. 1 Habitus of Osbornellus auronitens (Provancher), voucher specimen Oa1, A–C and Scaphoideus titanus Ball from Serbia (Bela Crkva, Banat region), D–F in dorsal, lateral view and ventral view respectively.

Figure 1

Fig. 2 Male genitalia of Osbornellus auronitens (Provancher) voucher specimen Oa1. A, Aedeagus, dorsal view; B, aedeagus, rotate 30°; C, aedeagus, lateral view; D, left subgential plate, dorsal view; E, left subgential plate, lateral view; F, valve and right subgential plate; G, left stylus, dorsal view; H, left stylus, ventral view; I, left stylus, lateral view; J, pygofer, dorsal view.