Hostname: page-component-745bb68f8f-grxwn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-02-04T18:31:57.445Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Laboratory evaluation of insecticides for the control of Delia planipalpis (Diptera: Anthomyiidae), a nascent pest of broccoli (Brassicaceae) in Mexico

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  08 January 2025

Rodrigo Lasa*
Affiliation:
Instituto de Ecología AC, Xalapa, Veracruz, 91073, Mexico
Guadalupe Córdova-García
Affiliation:
Instituto de Investigaciones en Inteligencia Artificial (IIIA), Universidad Veracruzana, Xalapa, Veracruz, 91000, Mexico
Trevor Williams
Affiliation:
Instituto de Ecología AC, Xalapa, Veracruz, 91073, Mexico
*
Corresponding author: Rodrigo Lasa; Email: rodrilasa@gmail.com

Abstract

The radish fly, Delia planipalpis Linnaeus (Diptera: Anthomyiidae), is an emerging pest of broccoli and brassicaceous crops (Brassicaceae). The fly oviposits close to the stem of broccoli plants, and larvae feed within the stem and then pupate in the soil. Due to D. planipalpis’s recent appearance as a pest, no insecticides are registered for its management in Mexico. This study evaluated the efficacy of 13 synthetic and biological insecticides against different developmental stages through laboratory bioassays. Neonicotinoid-based products were highly toxic to the larvae, especially when applied via root irrigation, with thiamethoxam, clothianidin, and imidacloprid showing systemic activity. Thiamethoxam- and spinetoram-based products were also effective when applied to the stem oviposition site as a spray. A clothianidin-based product demonstrated moderate ovicidal activity, and bifenthrin had moderate residual activity against adult flies. A pyriproxyfen-based product effectively suppressed adult emergence. Products based on spirotetramat, neem (Meliaceae), and Tagetes (marigold) (Asteraceae) extracts and the microbial insecticide Bacillus thuringiensis var. israelensis (Bacillaceae) were ineffective against this pest. Spinosad and Sterneinema feltiae (Rhabditida: Steinernematidae) were not highly effective but could be used together with other control strategies in organic production. Neonicotinoids, spinetoram, and pyriproxyfen are promising options to validate in field trials for the management of D. planipalpis in broccoli.

Type
Research Paper
Copyright
© The Author(s), 2025. Published by Cambridge University Press on behalf of Entomological Society of Canada

Introduction

Mexico is the world’s fifth largest producer and the second largest exporter of broccoli (Brassicaceae), with a production of 686 000 tonnes of this crop and an estimated value exceeding US$200 million (ProducePay 2022). Broccoli is grown intensively throughout the year in Mexico, with up to three harvests across both the rainy and the dry seasons.

The radish fly, Delia planipalpis Linnaeus (Diptera: Anthomyiidae), is an emerging pest of broccoli and other brassicaceous crops in Mexico (Lasa et al. Reference Lasa, Córdova-García, Navarro-de-la-Fuente and Williams2024). The fly oviposits close to the stem of broccoli plants in the early stages of growth, shortly after the seedlings have been transplanted. The larvae feed on the tap root or penetrate the stem, reducing plant growth and causing yellowing, stunting, and plant death. Plants remain susceptible for 3–4 weeks until they reach approximately 30 cm in height.

Each D. planipalpis female lays 35–45 eggs in its lifetime. Eggs hatch 2–3 days later, and larvae feed on roots or the stem and pupate in the soil. Under laboratory conditions (∼25 °C), the complete lifecycle takes approximately 30 days (Córdova-García et al. Reference Córdova-García, Navarro-de-la-Fuente, Pérez-Staples, Williams and Lasa2023). In recent years, losses of broccoli seedlings have increased to over 30% in some broccoli-producing regions, such as Guanajuato State (Comité Estatal de Sanidad Vegetal del Estado de Guanajuato 2014; Meraz-Álvarez et al. Reference Meraz-Álvarez, Bautista-Martínez, Illescas-Riquelme, González-Hernández, Valdez-Carrasco and Savage2020).

Due to its recent appearance as a nascent pest, no insecticides currently are registered for the management of D. planipalpis in Mexico or elsewhere in the world as far as we are aware. When attacks are detected, control strategies mainly involve the application of products that are registered for other pests of broccoli. These include systemic insecticides applied by root irrigation or contact insecticides applied directly to the soil near the plant stem. However, these treatments lack any research-based information regarding their efficacy or the duration of their insecticidal activity. As D. planipalpis is not a common pest in other countries, no additional information on effective active ingredients is available.

A previous comparison of the efficacy of 29 insecticides performed under laboratory conditions focused on the susceptibility of the cabbage fly, Delia radicum Linnaeus, another pest of broccoli (Joseph and Zarate Reference Joseph and Zarate2015). Other researchers have evaluated the efficacy of a range of conventional and biological insecticides against D. radicum and other species of Delia pests (Chen et al. Reference Chen, Li, Han and Moens2003; Ester et al. Reference Ester, de Puttera and van Bilsen2003; Nielsen Reference Nielsen2003; Ellis and Scatcherd Reference Ellis and Scatcherd2007; Bažok et al. Reference Bažok, Cerani-Serti, Bari, Kozina, Kos, Lemi and Aija2012; Beck et al. Reference Beck, Spanoghe, Moens, Brusselman, Temmerman, Pollet and Nuyttens2014; Zhou et al. Reference Zhou, Zhu, Zhao, Wang, Xue and Li2016).

The initial screening of insecticides under laboratory conditions allows their selection for subsequent field experiments. Products can be tested against different developmental stages and applied using a range of techniques that consider the biology and behaviour of the pest, the efficacy of insecticides against related species, and the agronomic practices in each crop and region. Given this, the objective of the present study was to assess, under laboratory conditions, the relative efficacy of insecticidal products against different stages of D. planipalpis, including adults, eggs, neonate larvae, other larval instars, and pupae. The selection of insecticides was based on their mode of action, their registration for use in broccoli in Mexico, and their reported efficacy against other Delia spp. pests.

Material and methods

Insect colony, plants, and insecticides

Experiments were conducted using a laboratory colony of D. planipalpis previously established in the Instituto de Ecología AC (Xalapa, Veracruz, Mexico). The colony originated from pupae collected in Guanajuato State, Mexico, in 2020 and was subsequently maintained in ventilated acrylic cages (30 × 30 × 30 cm) containing radish plants (Raphanus sativus Linnaeus) (Brassicaceae). Radishes (var. Champion) were used because each radish plant supports the development of many D. planipalpis larvae, whereas broccoli seedlings become seriously damaged or die when infested by just three or four larvae. The colony was maintained under controlled laboratory conditions at 24 ± 1 °C and 65% relative humidity with a 12:12–hour (light:darkness) photoperiod. Each radish plant with eggs was placed in a plastic cup with a thin layer of vermiculite for larval development. Pupae were collected weekly and were held separately for adult emergence. Adults of both sexes were segregated into groups at intervals of 1–2 days to produce batches of uniform age for assays. Flies had continuous access to water and food (3:1 ratio of sucrose:hydrolysed protein) before the experiments. The D. planipalpis colony is likely to be highly susceptible to insecticides due to the limited application of insecticides against this pest in the field and the period of several generations (> 10 generations) for which it was cultivated under laboratory conditions.

The commercial products used in our experiments are classified as either conventional (synthetic) or organic-approved insecticides (Table 1) and were selected based on their registration in Mexico for use in controlling various species of insect pests of broccoli. The product concentrations tested correspond to the maximal doses recommended to control other pests of broccoli.

Table 1. Insecticides registered in Mexico for the control of different pests of broccoli and tested against Delia planipalpis

Product manufacturers: Seizer 10 EC, Aldama Ltd, Mexico City; Karate Zeon 5 SC, Syngenta de México, Mexico City; Actara 25 WG, Syngenta de México, Mexico City; Clutch SC, Valent de México, Zapopan, Mexico; Helmfidor SC, Helm de México, Naucalpan de Juárez, Mexico; Movento 150 OD, Bayer, Mexico City; Palgus SC, Corteva Agriscience, Guadalajara, Mexico; Kloster EC, Proveedor de Insumos Agropecuarios y Servicios, Cualiacán, Mexico; Retrix4 EC, Química Lucava, Celaya, Mexico; Spintor 12 SC, Corteva Agriscience, Guadalajara, Mexico; Gnatrol, Valent de México, Zapopan, Mexico; Entonem, Koppert México, Querétaro, Mexico.

* Clothianidin is currently pending final approval by the Mexican regulatory authorities for use on broccoli.

a.i., active ingredient.

Contact toxicity in adults

To assess the mortality of adult flies following contact with dry insecticide residues (World Health Organisation 2022), filter paper rectangles (8.5 × 10 cm) were immersed in insecticide solution at predetermined concentrations or a water control (Table 1). Treated papers were air-dried at room temperature for 24 hours in an extraction hood. Each dry paper was then placed inside a 50-mL centrifuge tube covering nearly the entire internal surface. The tube was sealed with a modified lid perforated with a 10-mm hole to release adults into the tube. A group of 10 adults (five females and five males) aged 1–3 days were introduced into the centrifuge tube, and the hole was sealed with a cotton plug. The flies were confined within the tube for 20 minutes at 24 ± 1 °C and 65% relative humidity. After this period, the adults were collected and transferred to a 475-cm3 plastic cup containing a piece of cotton moistened with 10% (wt/vol) sucrose solution. The number of knocked-down flies was recorded after 1 hour, and mortality was recorded after 23 hours. Flies that did not respond to the touch of a small paintbrush were considered to be dead. Six replicates were performed for each of the products selected. Given their unique modes of action, Bacillus thuringiensis (Bacillaceae) and Sterneinema feltiae (Rhabditida: Steinernematidae) were not included in this experiment.

Ovicidal effects and neonate mortality

To assess the ovicidal effects of products, batches of eggs were collected from radish plants in cages with mated D. planipalpis females. Eggs were collected from leaf axils at intervals of 48 hours using a fine soft paintbrush. Two rows of five eggs (10 eggs in total) were placed on a dark piece of cotton fabric (20 × 40 mm). Each piece of fabric had previously been immersed in water (control) or insecticide solution (Table 1), allowed to dry for 2 hours at room temperature, and placed in the centre of a 9-cm plastic Petri dish containing a piece of cotton wool moistened with distilled water. The moist cotton prevented the desiccation of eggs during the experiment. The Petri dish was then sealed with adhesive paper tape around its border to prevent the escape of neonate larvae. Dishes were incubated at 24 ± 1 °C and 65% relative humidity in the laboratory for 5 days. After this period, the number of hatched eggs was counted by observation under a stereomicroscope, recognising that the majority of eggs hatch at 72–96 hours after oviposition. Recently hatched larvae were provided with access to food by placing two pieces of Drosophila artificial diet (4 × 4 × 20 mm) at opposite edges of the fabric. The diet consisted of sugar, corn flour, yeast, and agar (Dalton et al. Reference Dalton, Walton, Shearer, Walsh, Caprile and Isaacs2011) and was known to be palatable to neonate D. planipalpis (R. Lasa, unpublished data). The mortality of neonate larvae was registered after 5 days by counting living and dead neonates. Larvae that did not respond to a gentle touch were considered to be dead. Eight replicates were conducted for each insecticide using different batches of eggs.

Mortality of second- and third-instar larvae

Larval mortality on radishes was evaluated using two different methodologies: (1) a conventional foliar spray applied directly to the neck of the plant and (2) root irrigation. Radishes that were 2.5–4 cm in diameter were prepared by trimming almost all the leaves except for one or two small leaves in the centre of the neck. Radishes were disinfected by immersion in a 0.08% (wt/vol) sodium hypochlorite solution for 10 minutes, rinsed in tap water, and allowed to dry for 2 hours at 24 °C. Radishes then were transplanted into 280-mL cardboard cups (Uline, Monterrey, Mexico) filled with a commercial compost (Happy Flower, Chedraui, Mexico) and were irrigated with tap water. Cups were placed in laboratory cages (30 cups/cage) and illuminated with LED light strips (3500–4000 lux) for 3 days for acclimatisation. On the third day after transplanting, a moist piece of fabric (10 × 10 mm) carrying 10 eggs of D. planipalpis (1–2 days old) was placed around the neck of each plant. Radishes remained in the laboratory cages for 6 more days for eggs to hatch and initial larval development to occur within the plant tissue. After this period, larvae had reached the second- and third-instar stages, and radishes were treated either by spraying or root irrigation.

In the spray treatment, each radish was sprayed with 5 mL of water (control) or insecticide solution (Table 1) using a hand sprayer (Glendy Industrial, Jalisco, Mexico) targeted at the neck of the radish plant. In the root irrigation treatment, each radish was irrigated with 30 mL of water (control) or insecticide solution prepared at 50% of the concentration indicated in Table 1. The volumes of spray and irrigation applications were based on conventional practices in broccoli production (typically 250 L/ha for spray applications and 1500 L/ha for irrigation considering a density of 50 000 plants/ha).

Insecticides selected for foliar spray and root irrigation were based on previously reported systemic or translaminar activity (Thompson et al. Reference Thompson, Dutton and Sparks2000; Shimokawatoko et al. Reference Shimokawatoko, Sato, Yamaguchi and Tanaka2012; Zhang et al. Reference Zhang, Wang, Kaur and Gan2023). In this case, the biological insecticides – spinosad, S. feltiae, and B. thuringiensis – were included in some of the experiments at the request of organic broccoli growers who needed additional biological tools for the control of D. planipalpis. Insecticides were applied outdoors to prevent cross-contamination. Radishes were placed into laboratory cages at 1 hour after application and incubated for 5 days under laboratory conditions. Radishes were then carefully dissected, and the number of living and dead larvae recovered from plants was counted to calculate the percentage of mortality. The percentage of radishes that hosted at least one living larva was also recorded. Between 10 and 13 replicates (one radish per replicate) were conducted for each product and its respective control.

Mortality of pupae and adults

Groups of 10 pupae, aged 1–4 days, were collected from rearing containers and placed in small cups of aluminium foil (10 mm diameter × 5 mm depth) that were crafted in the laboratory. To evaluate the influence of insecticides on adult emergence, a 30-µL volume of water (control) or insecticide solution was applied by micropipette to each small foil cup. Pupae remained in contact with the water or insecticide solution for 20 minutes before being transferred to 475-cm3 plastic cups containing a 2-mm layer of vermiculite. To promote aeration and prevent fungal growth, the plastic cups were covered with a fine nylon gauze (0.1-mm mesh) and moistened at two-day intervals with 0.3% sodium benzoate solution. Twelve replicates (10 pupae each) were performed for each of the products, except for spirotetramat (10 replicates). Cups were checked daily over a 12-day period to record the number of adults that emerged from pupae. The experiment was performed under controlled laboratory conditions at 24 ± 1 °C and 65% relative humidity with a 12:12–hour (light:darkness) photoperiod. At emergence, adults were transferred to clean 475-cm3 plastic cups containing water and food (3:1 sugar:hydrolysed protein) and monitored for mortality over a 12-day period. Flies that exhibited no movement upon contact with a small paintbrush were considered to be dead.

Because no adults emerged from pupae treated with Kloster EC (pyriproxyfen) at 0.5 mL/L, a second experiment was performed with an identical methodology except that Kloster EC was applied to pupae at concentrations of 0.1, 0.05, and 0.005 mL/L or a water control. The experiment was replicated using 12 batches of pupae on separate days. The percentage of adult emergence from pupae and adult mortality over 12 days after emergence was evaluated.

Statistical analysis

The percentages of mortality of adults, larvae, and neonates, the percentage of egg hatch, and adult emergence were compared using a nonparametric Kruskal–Wallis test, followed by Dwass–Steel–Critchlow–Fligner pairwise comparisons. The results are reported as medians and interquartile ranges. A Chi-squared test was used to compare the frequencies of radishes hosting at least one living larva across insecticide treatments. All analyses were performed using the R-based package Jamovi, version 2.5 (The Jamovi Project 2024).

Results

Contact toxicity in adults

The two pyrethroid insecticides were the only products that caused knockdown of adult flies 1 hour after treatment. The median (interquartile range; IQR) percentage of knocked-down flies was similar for bifenthrin 100% (100–100%) and lambda-cyhalothrin 80% (73–88%). However, a large fraction of these flies subsequently recovered and were counted as alive in the 23-hour evaluation. The percentage of mortality of flies at 23 hours post-treatment differed markedly among the different products (Kruskal–Wallis: H = 46.2, df = 11, P < 0.001). Flies exposed to bifenthrin residues had the highest mortality, whereas all the other products resulted in mortalities of less than approximately 15%, similar to that of the control (Fig. 1).

Figure 1. Box plot of the percentage mortality of Delia planipalpis flies after contact with the dry residues of different insecticides. The median (horizontal bar), interquartile range (box), range (vertical whisker), and outliers (dots) are shown. Treatments labelled with different letters differ significantly (DSCF, P < 0.05).

Ovicidal effects and neonate mortality

The percentage of egg hatch differed significantly among insecticides (Kruskal–Wallis: H = 46.0, df = 13, P < 0.001). The only insecticide with significant ovicidal activity was the clothianidin-based product (Fig. 2), whereas egg hatch in all the other treatments was similar to that of the control.

Figure 2. Box plot of the percentage of egg hatch in Delia planipalpis after contact with the residues of different insecticides. The median (horizontal bar), interquartile range (box), range (vertical whisker), and outliers (dots) are shown. Treatments labelled with different letters differ significantly (DSCF, P < 0.05).

The percentage of mortality observed in neonate larvae also differed significantly among the insecticides (Kruskal–Wallis: H = 117.0, df = 13, P < 0.001). Products based on bifenthrin, lambda-cyhalothrin, clothianidin, imidacloprid, thiamethoxam, spinetoram, and spinosad all resulted in neonate mortalities of 80–100%, which were significantly higher than that observed in the control (∼15%; Fig. 3). Neonate mortalities in the organic-approved insecticides (Tagetes (Asteraceae) extract, S. feltiae, and B. thuringiensis) and the systemic spirotetramat-based product were similar to that of the control, whereas the neem (Meliaceae) oil- and pyriproxyfen-based products resulted in intermediate percentages of neonates mortality.

Figure 3. Box plot of the percentage mortality of neonate larvae of Delia planipalpis after contact with the residues of different insecticides. The median (horizontal bar), interquartile range (box), range (vertical whisker), and outliers (dots) are shown. Bars labelled with different letters differ significantly (DSCF, P < 0.05).

Mortality in larvae of the second- and third-instar stages

The percentage of larval mortality at the second- and third-instar stages varied significantly following spray application of products (Kruskal–Wallis: H = 65.0, df = 8, P < 0.001; Fig. 4A). The thiamethoxam- and spinetoram-based products resulted in the highest levels of larval mortality, followed by the clothianidin- and spinosad-based products (Fig. 4A). The imidacloprid-based product and the nematode S. feltiae generated intermediate levels of mortality that were similar to those observed in insects treated with the spirotetramat- and B. thuringiensis–based products and the control (Fig. 4A).

Figure 4. Box plot of the percentage of larval mortality in Delia planipalpis after the treatment of radish plants with different insecticides by A, spray application, and B, root irrigation. The median (horizontal bar), interquartile range (box), range (vertical whisker), and outliers (dots) are shown. Values in the box above each figure indicate the percentage of radishes that contained at least one living larva. Treatments or percentage values labelled with different letters differ significantly (DSCF, P < 0.05).

When insecticides were applied through root irrigation, the percentage of larval mortality also differed significantly among products (Kruskal–Wallis: H = 65.0, df = 8, P < 0.001), and only the systemic neonicotinoid-based products (thiamethoxam, clothianidin, and imidacloprid) resulted in high levels of mortality (75–100%) of second- and third-instar larvae (Fig. 4B).

Radishes were infested with a mean (± standard error) number of larvae that varied between 1.9 ± 0.3 and 3.9 ± 0.5 larvae per radish in the spray application experiment and between 1.3 ± 0.4 and 4.3 ± 1.0 larvae per radish in the root irrigation experiment. Upon inspection at the end of the experiments, 100% of the control radishes contained at least one living larva of D. planipalpis. However, the percentage of radishes that contained at least one living larva differed significantly among insecticides following a spray application (χ2 = 55.8, df = 8, P < 0.001; percentage values in the box at the top of Fig. 4A) or root irrigation (χ2 = 47.8, df = 6, P < 0.001; percentage values in the box at the top of Fig. 4B). The thiamethoxam-based product was the most effective in controlling larvae, with less than 10% of radishes containing a living larva irrespective of the application method.

Adult emergence of treated pupae and subsequent adult mortality

No adults emerged from pupae treated with 0.5 mL/L of the pyriproxyfen-based product, whereas all the other products resulted in adult emergence of 50–70%, similar to that of the control (Kruskal–Wallis: H = 41.1, df = 11, P < 0.001; Fig. 5).

Figure 5. Box plot of the percentage of adult emergence in Delia planipalpis after the treatment of pupae with different insecticides. The median (horizontal bar), interquartile range (box), range (vertical whisker), and outliers (dots) are shown. Treatments labelled with different letters differ significantly (DSCF, P < 0.05).

In treatments in which adult flies emerged, a similar but low fly mortality (5–14%) was observed among products during the 12-day period after emergence, compared to 10% (10–10%; median, IQR) in the control (Kruskal–Wallis: H = 15.5, df = 11, P = 0.161; data not shown).

The percentage of adults that emerged from pupae treated with the pyriproxyfen-based product at different concentrations (0.1, 0.05, and 0.005 mL/L) was significantly lower than that observed for the control pupae (Kruskal–Wallis: H = 35.3, df = 3, P < 0.01; Fig. 6). Even at the lowest product concentration (0.005 mL/L), adult emergence was half that observed for the control.

Figure 6. Box plot of the percentage of adult emergence in Delia planipalpis after the treatment of pupae with different concentrations of a pyriproxyfen-based product. The median (horizontal bar), interquartile range (box), range (vertical whisker), and outliers (dots) are shown. Treatments labelled with different letters differ significantly (DSCF, P < 0.05).

The median (IQR) mortality of flies at 12 days after emergence also differed markedly between the control 10% (10–10%) and pyriproxyfen-treated insects, which varied from 100% (100–100%) mortality for 0.1 mL/L (n = 3) and 100% (88–100%) for 0.05 mL/L (n = 14), compared to 50% (46–100%) mortality for 0.005 mL/L (n = 22) treated insects (Kruskal–Wallis: H = 21.3, df = 3, P < 0.01).

Discussion

This study evaluated the efficacy of various insecticidal products against each of the developmental stages of D. planipalpis through laboratory bioassays. Both females and males of this pest achieve rapid sexual maturation, with females commencing oviposition just 3 days after emergence (Córdova-García et al. Reference Córdova-García, Navarro-de-la-Fuente, Pérez-Staples, Williams and Lasa2023). This reduces the window for effective fly control and necessitates the use of products that act swiftly against adults. Only the pyrethroid bifenthrin dry residues resulted in moderate adult mortality (median 61%) at 23 hours after exposure. Although the lambda-cyhalothrin residues induced a substantial knockdown effect (median > 80% mortality) on adult flies within 1 hour of exposure to residues, most of these flies recovered, with less than 20% median mortality observed after 23 hours. Under field conditions, knocked-down flies are likely to be susceptible to predation by birds or invertebrate predators while lying on the soil surface during the recovery period, although the magnitude of such predation is difficult to quantify. None of the other insecticidal products tested in the present study produced mortalities significantly higher than that observed for the control.

The clothianidin-based product was the only insecticide that exhibited moderate ovicidal activity. The ovicidal effect of clothianidin, but not of thiamethoxam, has also been documented for the weevil, Conotrachelus nenuphar (Coleoptera: Curculionidae) (Hoffmann et al. Reference Hoffmann, Middleton and Wise2008), despite thiamethoxam being a precursor of clothianidin (Nauen et al. Reference Nauen, Ebbinghaus-Kintscher, Salgado and Kaussmann2003). These differences in ovicidal activity appear to correlate with the octanol–water partition coefficient of these compounds. The lipid layers of the egg chorion generally serve as a barrier to hydrophilic substances that are characterised by a low octanol–water partition coefficient (Smith and Salkeld Reference Smith and Salkeld1966). Clothianidin, with a higher partition coefficient, permeates the chorion, whereas thiamethoxam is less likely to reach target sites within the embryo (Hoffmann et al. Reference Hoffmann, Middleton and Wise2008). Kirkpatrick et al. (Reference Kirkpatrick, Hargerty, Turnipseed, Sullivan and Bridges2005) reported similar findings for lepidopteran eggs exposed to acetamiprid (with a higher octanol–water partition coefficient) that demonstrated higher ovicidal activity than the more hydrophilic compounds thiamethoxam and imidacloprid.

Despite the absence of ovicidal activity, products based on bifenthrin, lambda-cyhalothrin, clothianidin, imidacloprid, thiamethoxam, spinetoram, and spinosad were all found to be highly toxic to neonate D. planipalpis larvae. Notably, the pyrethroid- and neonicotinoid-based products killed many neonates immediately following eclosion, as dead larvae were observed to have died while trying to cross the treated fabric, whereas larvae in the spinosad and spinetoram treatments were mostly observed to have died after reaching the pieces of diet.

A high prevalence of second- and third-instar larvae developing inside radish plants was killed by the neonicotinoid-based products (thiamethoxam, clothianidin, and imidacloprid) applied through root irrigation. None of the other products showed systemic activity. Neonicotinoids are primarily absorbed by roots and translocated via the xylem, providing protection against various pests (Zhang et al. Reference Zhang, Wang, Kaur and Gan2023). Although some systemic activity of spinosad was previously reported in tomato (Solanaceae) plants when administered at the base of the stem (Van Leeuwen et al. Reference Van Leeuwen, Van de Veire, Dermauw and Tirry2006), the low mortality of larvae observed in our experiment after root irrigation suggests that spinosad was not effectively taken up or transported in radish plants.

In contrast to root irrigation, spray application to the neck of the radish plants resulted in larval mortality following treatment with products based on thiamethoxam, clothianidin, spinosad, and spinetoram. However, the imidacloprid-based product was not effective when applied as a spray. Neonicotinoids are absorbed by leaves to a lesser extent than they are through the roots (Zhang et al. Reference Zhang, Wang, Kaur and Gan2023). Thiamethoxam and clothianidin are considered to be phloem-transported insecticides, whereas imidacloprid is primarily translocated via the xylem (Nauen et al. Reference Nauen, Ebbinghaus-Kintscher, Salgado and Kaussmann2003; Weichel and Nauen Reference Weichel and Nauen2004), which could explain the variations in larval mortality observed among these products when applied as a spray. Indeed, the uptake and translocation of neonicotinoids can vary with plant species, environmental conditions, and application method (Zhang et al. Reference Zhang, Wang, Kaur and Gan2023), which must be considered when extrapolating our results for the control of D. planipalpis in broccoli.

Spinosad and spinetoram have low mobility in the soil and do not move within the plant’s vascular system. However, both products exhibit translaminar activity and can penetrate leaf tissue (Thompson et al. Reference Thompson, Dutton and Sparks2000; Shimokawatoko et al. Reference Shimokawatoko, Sato, Yamaguchi and Tanaka2012), thereby improving pest control when applied as foliar sprays. The structure of the neck of radish plants, with a crown of leaves that retains some of the spray liquid, may have contributed to the absorption of these active ingredients and their effectiveness against D. planipalpis larvae that primarily feed on the radish neck before burrowing into the root. These plant structures and the larval feeding behaviour are quite different on broccoli seedlings, where foliar sprays may not be as effective as suggested by our results. In this case, root irrigation remains a potentially viable control option.

We observed intermediate mortality of larvae following application of the nematode S. feltiae by root irrigation and foliar sprays that was similar to that of the control. Previous studies on S. feltiae for the control of Delia antiqua and D. platura in onions (Allioideae) reported that this pathogen needs to be improved or complemented with other control tactics (Chen et al. Reference Chen, Li, Han and Moens2003; Ellis and Scatcherd Reference Ellis and Scatcherd2007; Beck et al. Reference Beck, Spanoghe, Moens, Brusselman, Temmerman, Pollet and Nuyttens2014). Our other assays involving neonates or pupae were probably not well suited to the mode of action of this nematode and resulted in consistently low pest mortality.

The emergence of adults from insecticide-treated pupae was similar among all products tested and the control (60–65%), with the exception of the pyriproxyfen-based product that resulted in a reduction in adult emergence that varied with product concentration (Figs. 5 and 6). According to Zhou et al. (Reference Zhou, Zhu, Zhao, Wang, Xue and Li2016), application of pyriproxyfen (50 mg/kg) to onions infested with D. antiqua did not affect larval survival and pupation, but resulted in adult emergence that was approximately 30% lower than the control. Treatment of pupae with pyriproxyfen can also greatly reduce adult emergence in other dipteran pests of agricultural (Casaña-Giner et al. Reference Casaña-Giner, Gandía-Balaguer, Mengod-Puerta, Primo-Millo and Primo-Yúfera1999; Sánchez-Ramos et al. Reference Sánchez-Ramos, Fernández and González-Núñez2024) and veterinary importance (Langley et al. Reference Langley, Felton, Stafford and Oouchp1990; Bull and Meola Reference Bull and Meola1993). The marked reduction in adult emergence and reduced adult longevity make pyriproxyfen-based products a strong candidate for field testing using a root irrigation approach because D. planipalpis pupates in the soil close to the root and the pupal stage lasts approximately two weeks at 24 °C (Córdova-García et al. Reference Córdova-García, Navarro-de-la-Fuente, Pérez-Staples, Williams and Lasa2023). However, exposure to nonlethal concentrations of this compound has been reported to lead to increased egg production in D. antiqua (Zhou et al. Reference Zhou, Zhu, Zhao, Wang, Xue and Li2016) and the tephritid Rhagoletis pomonella (Diptera: Tephritidae) (Duan et al. Reference Duan, Prokopy, Yin, Bergweiler and Oouchi1995), which would likely have an adverse effect on crop protection and requires consideration in future studies.

Despite its systemic properties, the spirotetramat-based product was ineffective in controlling any stage of D. planipalpis. The primary targets of spirotetramat are insects that feed on plant sap, rather than larvae that feed on roots (Fischer and Weiss Reference Fischer and Weiss2008). The bacterial insecticide Gnatrol®, which is based on B. thuringiensis var. israelensis, and the botanical products based on Tagetes extract or neem oil failed to kill significant numbers of larvae, pupae, or adults of D. planipalpis in the present study. Insecticides based on B. thuringiensis are activated in the gut of phytophagous insects (Pinos et al. Reference Pinos, Andrés-Garrido, Ferré and Hernández-Martínez2021). Insecticide compounds, including photoactive thiophenes, have been isolated from Tagetes spp. and have been found to be biologically active against some dipteran species (Perich et al. Reference Perich, Wells, Bertsch and Tredway1995; Ravikumar Reference Ravikumar2010) but of limited practical use because of their volatility and poor persistence (Isman Reference Isman2006). Neem oil exerts its effects through repellency, antifeedant properties, and disruption of the ecdysone hormone that regulates insect moulting (Benelli et al. Reference Benelli, Canale, Toniolo, Higuchi, Murugan, Pavela and Nicoletti2017).

Conclusion

We conclude that neonicotinoids, particularly thiamethoxam applied via spray or root irrigation, are likely to be the most effective products for controlling D. planipalpis in broccoli, whereas clothianidin showed slightly less satisfactory results in the laboratory setting. The imidacloprid-based product was the least effective of the neonicotinoids but remains a potential option via root irrigation. The spinetoram-based product was highly effective when applied to the stem oviposition site as a spray. Pyriproxyfen was highly effective in preventing adult emergence and appears promising for root irrigation application. The pyrethroid-based products were not highly active for control of adult flies. Of the other insecticides tested, spinosad and the nematode, S. feltiae, had intermediate efficacy as standalone treatments but could complement other control strategies in organic production. Field testing in commercial broccoli production is essential to confirm the efficacy of these insecticides and to provide growers with the most effective tools for D. planipalpis management.

Acknowledgements

We thank Fernando Tamayo and María de los Ángeles Flores of the Secretaría de Desarrollo Agroalimentario y Rural (SDAyR) of Guanajuato State, Mexico, and René J. Chaurand, Transito Sánchez Galván from the Comité Estatal de Sanidad Vegetal del Estado de Guanajuato (CESAVEG). We also thank Kassandra Salcedo, M. Laura Navarro de la Fuente, Ricardo Macías, and Juan Sebastián Gómez Díaz (INECOL) for technical support in the laboratory.

Author contributions

GC, TW, and RL conceived research. GC and RL conducted experiments. RL contributed material. TW and RL analysed data and conducted statistical analyses. GC, TW, and RL wrote the manuscript. RL secured funding. All authors have read and approved the manuscript.

Funding statement

This study was financed by the Secretaría de Desarrollo Agroalimentario y Rural (SDAyR) of Guanajuato State, Mexico, project number DS/SDCA/DGA/DSV/01/2023.

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Footnotes

Subject editor: Leah Flaherty

References

Bažok, R., Cerani-Serti, M., Bari, J.I., Kozina, A., Kos, T., Lemi, D., and Aija, M. 2012. Seasonal flight, optimal timing and efficacy of selected insecticides for cabbage maggot (Delia radicum L., Diptera: Anthomyiidae) control. Insects, 3: 10011027. https://doi.org/10.3390/insects3041001.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Beck, B., Spanoghe, P., Moens, M., Brusselman, E., Temmerman, F., Pollet, S., and Nuyttens, D. 2014. Improving the biocontrol potential of Steinernema feltiae against Delia radicum through dosage, application technique and timing. Pest Management Science, 70: 841851. https://doi.org/10.1002/ps.3628.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Benelli, G., Canale, A., Toniolo, C., Higuchi, A., Murugan, K., Pavela, R., and Nicoletti, M. 2017. Neem (Azadirachta indica): towards the ideal insecticide? Natural Product Research, 31: 369386. https://doi.org/10.1080/14786419.2016.1214834.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bull, D.L. and Meola, R.W. 1993. Effect and fate of the insect growth regulator pyriproxyfen after application to the horn fly (Diptera: Muscidae). Journal of Economic Entomology, 86: 17541760. https://doi.org/10.1093/jee/86.6.1754.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Casaña-Giner, V., Gandía-Balaguer, A., Mengod-Puerta, C., Primo-Millo, J., and Primo-Yúfera, E. 1999. Insect growth regulators as chemosterilants for Ceratitis capitata (Diptera: Tephritidae). Journal of Economic Entomology, 92: 303308. https://doi.org/10.1093/jee/92.2.303.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Comité Estatal de Sanidad Vegetal del Estado de Guanajuato (CESAVEG). 2014. Manejo fitosanitario de hortalizas. Programa de trabajo 1–16 [Phytosanitary management of vegetables. Work program 1–16]. Available from https://www.gob.mx/cms/uploads/attachment/file/156498/Manejo_fitosanitario_de_hortalizas.pdf [accessed 13 September 2024].Google Scholar
Chen, S., Li, J., Han, X., and Moens, M. 2003. Effect of temperature on the pathogenicity of entomopathogenic nematodes (Steinernema and Heterorhabditis spp.) to Delia radicum. BioControl, 48: 713724. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1026341325264.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Córdova-García, G., Navarro-de-la-Fuente, L., Pérez-Staples, D., Williams, T., and Lasa, R. 2023. Biology and ecology of Delia planipalpis (Stein; Diptera: Anthomyiidae), an emerging pest of broccoli in Mexico. Insects, 14: 659. https://doi.org/10.3390/insects14070659.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Dalton, D.T., Walton, V.M., Shearer, P.W., Walsh, D.B., Caprile, J., and Isaacs, R. 2011. Laboratory survival of Drosophila suzukii under simulated winter conditions of the Pacific Northwest and seasonal field trapping in five primary regions of small and stone fruit production in the United States. Pest Management Science, 67: 13681374. https://doi.org/10.1002/ps.2280.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Duan, J.J., Prokopy, R.J., Yin, C.M., Bergweiler, C., and Oouchi, H. 1995. Effects of pyriproxyfen on ovarian development and fecundity of Rhagoletis pomonella flies. Entomologia Experimentalis et Applicata, 77: 1721. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1570-7458.1995.tb01980.x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ellis, S.A. and Scatcherd, J.E. 2007. Bean seed fly (Delia platura, Delia florilega) and onion fly (Delia antiqua) incidence in England and an evaluation of chemical and biological control options. Annals of Applied Biology, 151: 259267. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1744-7348.2007.00170.x CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ester, A., de Puttera, H., and van Bilsen, J.G.P.M. 2003. Filmcoating the seed of cabbage (Brassica oleracea L. convar. Capitata L.) and cauliflower (Brassica oleracea L. var. Botrytis L.) with imidacloprid and spinosad to control insect pests. Crop Protection, 22: 761e768. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0261-2194(03)00042-5.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fischer, R. and Weiss, H. 2008. Spirotetramat (Movento®): discovery, synthesis and physico-chemical properties. Bayer Crop Science Journal, 61: 127140.Google Scholar
Hoffmann, E.J., Middleton, S.M., and Wise, J.C. 2008. Ovicidal activity of organophosphate, oxadiazine, neonicotinoid, and insect growth regulator chemistries on Northern strain plum curculio, Conotrachelus nenuphar . Journal of Insect Science, 9: 29. https://doi.org/10.1673/031.008.2901.Google Scholar
Isman, M.B. 2006. Botanical insecticides, deterrents, and repellents in modern agriculture and an increasingly regulated world. Annual Review of Entomology, 51: 4566. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.ento.51.110104.151146.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Joseph, S.V. and Zarate, J. 2015. Comparing efficacy of insecticides against cabbage maggot (Diptera: Anthomyiidae) in the laboratory. Crop Protection, 77: 148156. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cropro.2015.07.022.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kirkpatrick, A.L., Hargerty, A.M., Turnipseed, S.G., Sullivan, M.J., and Bridges, W.C. 2005. Activity of selected neonicotinoids and dicrotophos on nontarget arthropods in cotton: implications in insect management. Journal of Economic Entomology, 98: 814820. https://doi.org/10.1603/0022-0493-98.3.814.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Langley, P.A., Felton, T., Stafford, K., and Oouchp, H. 1990. Formulation of pyriproxyfen, a juvenile hormone mimic, for tsetse control. Medical and Veterinary Entomology, 4: 127133. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2915.1990.tb00269.x.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Lasa, R., Córdova-García, G., Navarro-de-la-Fuente, L., and Williams, T. 2024. Sticky traps and water pan traps to monitor Delia planipalpis (Diptera: Anthomyiidae), an emerging pest of broccoli in Mexico. Crop Protection, 176: 106495. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cropro.2023.106495.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Meraz-Álvarez, R., Bautista-Martínez, N., Illescas-Riquelme, C.P., González-Hernández, H., Valdez-Carrasco, J.M., and Savage, J. 2020. Identification of Delia spp. (Robineau-Desvoidy; Diptera, Anthomyiidae) and its cruciferous hosts in Mexico. ZooKeys, 964: 127141. https://doi.org/10.3897/zookeys.964.53947.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Nauen, R., Ebbinghaus-Kintscher, U., Salgado, V.L., and Kaussmann, M. 2003. Thiamethoxam is a neonicotinoid precursor converted to clothianidin in insects and plants. Pesticide Biochemistry and Physiology, 76: 5556. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0048-3575(03)00065-8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nielsen, O. 2003. Susceptibility of Delia radicum to steinernematid nematodes. BioControl, 48: 431446. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1024759229315.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
ProducePay. 2022. Producción y exportación de brócoli en México [Broccoli production and export in Mexico]. Available from https://es.producepay.com/produccion-y-exportacion-de-brocoli-en-mexico/ [accessed 5 June 2024].Google Scholar
Perich, M.J., Wells, C., Bertsch, W., and Tredway, K.E. 1995. Isolation of the insecticidal components of Tagetes minuta (Compositae) against mosquito larvae and adults. Journal of the American Mosquito Control Association, 11: 307310.Google ScholarPubMed
Pinos, D., Andrés-Garrido, A., Ferré, J., and Hernández-Martínez, P. 2021. Response mechanisms of invertebrates to Bacillus thuringiensis and its pesticidal proteins. Microbiology and Molecular Biology Reviews, 85: e00007–20. https://doi.org/10.1128/MMBR.00007-20.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Ravikumar, P. 2010. Chemical examination and insecticidal properties of Tagetes erecta and Tagetes patula. Asian Journal of Bio Science, 5: 2931.Google Scholar
Sánchez-Ramos, I., Fernández, C.E., and González-Núñez, M. 2024. Laboratory evaluation of insect growth regulators against the spotted-wing drosophila, Drosophila suzukii . Journal of Pest Science, 97: 885895. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10340-023-01648-y.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shimokawatoko, Y., Sato, N., Yamaguchi, Y., and Tanaka, H. 2012. Development of the Novel Insecticide Spinetoram (Diana®). Sumitomo Chemical Co., Ltd., Tokyo, Japan.Google Scholar
Smith, E.H. and Salkeld, E.H. 1966. The use and action of ovicides. Annual Review of Entomology, 11: 331368. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.en.11.010166.001555.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
The Jamovi Project. 2024. Jamovi. Version 2.5 [computer software]. Available from https://www.jamovi.org [accessed 22 June 2024].Google Scholar
Thompson, G.D., Dutton, R., and Sparks, T.C. 2000. Spinosad – a case study: an example from a natural products discovery programme. Pest Management Science, 56: 696702. https://doi.org/10.1002/1526-4998(200008)56:8<696::AID-PS182>3.0.CO;2-5.3.0.CO;2-5>CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Van Leeuwen, T., Van de Veire, M., Dermauw, W., and Tirry, L. 2006. Systemic toxicity of spinosad to the greenhouse whitefly Trialeurodes vaporariorum and to the cotton leaf worm Spodoptera littoralis. Phytoparasitica, 34: 102108. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02981345.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Weichel, L. and Nauen, R. 2004. Uptake, translocation and bioavailability of imidacloprid in several hop varieties. Pest Management Science, 60: 440446.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
World Health Organisation. 2022. Standard operating procedure for impregnation of filter papers for testing insecticide susceptibility of adult mosquitoes in WHO tube tests. SOP version. 17 pp. https://www.who.int/publications/i/item/9789240043817 [Accessed 11 September 2024].Google Scholar
Zhang, C., Wang, X., Kaur, P., and Gan, J. 2023. A critical review on the accumulation of neonicotinoid insecticides in pollen and nectar: influencing factors and implications for pollinator exposure. Science of The Total Environment, 899: 165670. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2023.165670.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Zhou, F., Zhu, G., Zhao, H., Wang, Z., Xue, M., Li, X., et al. 2016. Sterilization effects of adult-targeted baits containing insect growth regulators on Delia antiqua. Scientific Reports, 6: 32855. https://doi.org/10.1038/srep32855.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Figure 0

Table 1. Insecticides registered in Mexico for the control of different pests of broccoli and tested against Delia planipalpis

Figure 1

Figure 1. Box plot of the percentage mortality of Delia planipalpis flies after contact with the dry residues of different insecticides. The median (horizontal bar), interquartile range (box), range (vertical whisker), and outliers (dots) are shown. Treatments labelled with different letters differ significantly (DSCF, P < 0.05).

Figure 2

Figure 2. Box plot of the percentage of egg hatch in Delia planipalpis after contact with the residues of different insecticides. The median (horizontal bar), interquartile range (box), range (vertical whisker), and outliers (dots) are shown. Treatments labelled with different letters differ significantly (DSCF, P < 0.05).

Figure 3

Figure 3. Box plot of the percentage mortality of neonate larvae of Delia planipalpis after contact with the residues of different insecticides. The median (horizontal bar), interquartile range (box), range (vertical whisker), and outliers (dots) are shown. Bars labelled with different letters differ significantly (DSCF, P < 0.05).

Figure 4

Figure 4. Box plot of the percentage of larval mortality in Delia planipalpis after the treatment of radish plants with different insecticides by A, spray application, and B, root irrigation. The median (horizontal bar), interquartile range (box), range (vertical whisker), and outliers (dots) are shown. Values in the box above each figure indicate the percentage of radishes that contained at least one living larva. Treatments or percentage values labelled with different letters differ significantly (DSCF, P < 0.05).

Figure 5

Figure 5. Box plot of the percentage of adult emergence in Delia planipalpis after the treatment of pupae with different insecticides. The median (horizontal bar), interquartile range (box), range (vertical whisker), and outliers (dots) are shown. Treatments labelled with different letters differ significantly (DSCF, P < 0.05).

Figure 6

Figure 6. Box plot of the percentage of adult emergence in Delia planipalpis after the treatment of pupae with different concentrations of a pyriproxyfen-based product. The median (horizontal bar), interquartile range (box), range (vertical whisker), and outliers (dots) are shown. Treatments labelled with different letters differ significantly (DSCF, P < 0.05).