Hostname: page-component-745bb68f8f-cphqk Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-02-11T17:41:25.917Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Two Models of Ethical Consensus, Or What Good Is a Bunch of Bioethicists?

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  15 January 2002

MARK KUCZEWSKI
Affiliation:
Neiswanger Institute for Bioethics and Health Policy at the Stritch School of Medicine, Loyola University of Chicago
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

Contemporary bioethics is a peculiar creature. What was once a subdivision of moral theology and philosophy tended mainly within the confines of schools of arts and sciences or seminaries has now become a quasi-profession whose practitioners come from a wide variety of disciplines. Perhaps still more intriguing is that the “members” of this discipline routinely engage the public at the hospital bedside, in the institutional boardroom, and through public policy consultation. Bioethicists have actively embraced these roles as the natural outgrowth of their research and study. Contemporary bioethics is thus a “demi-discipline.” It is study and research but completes itself in public engagement.

Type
SPECIAL SECTION: CONSENSUS IN BIOETHICS: NEGOTIATING THE CHALLENGE OF MORAL PLURALISM
Copyright
© 2002 Cambridge University Press